Now imagine the space is filled with a superfluid known in the past as AEther, currently as dark matter, made not of Helium atoms like in the video above but of much smaller neutrinos which do not interact with anything except their intrinsic gravity and have a small but non zero mass.
The vortices created in AEther as superfluid could be much smaller and rotate much faster, entering the area of relativity, when the mass increases exponentially with speed and we know in a ideal superfluid the vortices once started they rotate indefinitely.
Could those be what we know as elementary particles and the corresponding interacting forces the known fundamental forces except for gravity? All fundamental particles have quantized mass and spin.
From what we are seeing in sub lambda (superfluid) Helium, the whirls can travel, interact with each other, combine or destroy each other, attach to each other etc., just like particles but obeying the laws of fluid mechanics (applied to superfluids). By example two whirls rotating in the same direction repel each other etc.
Matter energy equivalence would be more obvious than within the known, given, non-intuitive abstract formula.
Also we can sea the reason for quantization. Stable whirls can form only in certain sizes (and speeds).
It is true. For more complicated atoms, it will look like an unmanageable and also possibly impossible to describe tangle. And there is a link with struggling string theory. The rotation of the string like whirls could count for the extra dimensions found necessary by its proponents.
The following image could represent what we currently know as electrons. Though Steven Rado was born and lived in Hungary, the name suggests Serbian or even Romanian origin, like for Nikola Tesla quoted in the title.
The following image could represent what we currently know as electrons. Though Steven Rado was born and lived in Hungary, the name suggests Serbian or even Romanian origin, like for Nikola Tesla quoted in the title.
Historically the AEther had different conceptualizations. But there is still one type of AEther that at least partly coincides with my theory. The magnetic flux is the literal flow of AEther (but with no vortices).
Within my theory, vortices are the particles and the only field is the AEther pressure gradient corresponding to electric field in mainstream science.
Magnetic field is nothing but the frictionless flow of AEther. Electric field is the gradient generated by the low pressure near the flow of AEther (Bernoulli). When surrounding an electron it creates a pole of low (static) pressure.
Within my theory light would be a succession of unstable pairs of whirls passing energy from one pair to another (current to next) according to this model in an incredible fast succession. But they will not move at the speed of light, they will only jump from one place to the next at the speed of light.
One of the consequences of particles being made of whirls is if you try to accelerate them there will be an opposition because they are of course rotating (at very high speed), opposition we may call inertia.
But you will never be able to accelerate them at the speed of light of course because they are rotating and parts of them will have to move faster than light. Unless they align with the rotation axe parallel to the direction of motion but you can't do that with solid, macro objects.
Within my theory, vortices are the particles and the only field is the AEther pressure gradient corresponding to electric field in mainstream science.
Magnetic field is nothing but the frictionless flow of AEther. Electric field is the gradient generated by the low pressure near the flow of AEther (Bernoulli). When surrounding an electron it creates a pole of low (static) pressure.
Within my theory light would be a succession of unstable pairs of whirls passing energy from one pair to another (current to next) according to this model in an incredible fast succession. But they will not move at the speed of light, they will only jump from one place to the next at the speed of light.
One of the consequences of particles being made of whirls is if you try to accelerate them there will be an opposition because they are of course rotating (at very high speed), opposition we may call inertia.
But you will never be able to accelerate them at the speed of light of course because they are rotating and parts of them will have to move faster than light. Unless they align with the rotation axe parallel to the direction of motion but you can't do that with solid, macro objects.
Only a small fraction of Helium superfluid turns to whirls in a bowl or rotating sub lambda Helium. On a BIG scale like the Universe, only a small fraction of AEther had turned to vortices.
Some noticed there is very little antimatter in the Universe and i assume because the Universe is turning slowly of course in one direction only. We can also find it in unstable form in every photon. Dark energy of course is the rotating energy of the whole carousel.
Some noticed there is very little antimatter in the Universe and i assume because the Universe is turning slowly of course in one direction only. We can also find it in unstable form in every photon. Dark energy of course is the rotating energy of the whole carousel.
Talking about matter anti-matter (symmetry). From the electron donut model proposed above we cannot see any possibility of a symmetrical counterpart because it is completely balanced.
So we need to add an extra movement (we are now in the world of dynamic particles where everything is made of motion) like the one seen in the static image (before clicking) in the first video. In there the spiral around the theroid is not actually part of it.
But a few days ago, just after i found Steven Rado's book linked twice above, i ran into something very interesting. A post doctoral researcher in a Greek University made some animations about 4 years ago, after much reasoning using terms of current accepted theories combined with his own intuition and pseudo science.
All i know it is just a different attempt to theorize dynamic particles and it fits what i have in mind right now. Here it is. He calls it electron geometric magnetic flux dynamic model. In the meantime his email address at the university is gone and he is not answering emails on the other address at gmail.
The whirls show intuitively a... shall i call it a spiral in a circumferential reference frame. It can be left and right.
But i was thinking. If the magnetic field (flux whatever) is a flow of AEther this means it creates(wraps) a... should i call it, electric current on the circumference of torus, (if we only could speak of electric currents inside an electron) which in turn creates the NS axial magnetic field so in fact we can see now why the magnetic field and electric currents are inseparable. Also defines the spin up and down of an electron.
So in the end this asymmetry does not lead to an anti-electron but just to the spin up spin down electrons. But it could help us to make the next step. That is understanding what is electric charge.
Maybe i should try and finish Rado's book. But from what i've seen so far, he thinks all particles are sinks. Which means we need an extra dimension where the AEther goes (and comes back in positively charged particles).
So we need to add an extra movement (we are now in the world of dynamic particles where everything is made of motion) like the one seen in the static image (before clicking) in the first video. In there the spiral around the theroid is not actually part of it.
But a few days ago, just after i found Steven Rado's book linked twice above, i ran into something very interesting. A post doctoral researcher in a Greek University made some animations about 4 years ago, after much reasoning using terms of current accepted theories combined with his own intuition and pseudo science.
All i know it is just a different attempt to theorize dynamic particles and it fits what i have in mind right now. Here it is. He calls it electron geometric magnetic flux dynamic model. In the meantime his email address at the university is gone and he is not answering emails on the other address at gmail.
The whirls show intuitively a... shall i call it a spiral in a circumferential reference frame. It can be left and right.
But i was thinking. If the magnetic field (flux whatever) is a flow of AEther this means it creates(wraps) a... should i call it, electric current on the circumference of torus, (if we only could speak of electric currents inside an electron) which in turn creates the NS axial magnetic field so in fact we can see now why the magnetic field and electric currents are inseparable. Also defines the spin up and down of an electron.
So in the end this asymmetry does not lead to an anti-electron but just to the spin up spin down electrons. But it could help us to make the next step. That is understanding what is electric charge.
Maybe i should try and finish Rado's book. But from what i've seen so far, he thinks all particles are sinks. Which means we need an extra dimension where the AEther goes (and comes back in positively charged particles).
By looking at the (mind bending) animation below i have the following intuition. Whatever electric current that creates the axial magnetic field inside the torus might radiate in the outside world creating an electric field or maybe a very slow moving widely spread electric current in the opposite direction from the one that creates the magnetic field.
But if we go back to fluid mechanics, we may think the electron is actually vacuuming AEther from surroundings an expels it through the axis and the pressure gradient created is the electric field.
When they attract each other, they also align like beads on a string on the high speed flow of AEther possibly relativistic in the center forming clusters, like seen in the first static image above or the second video.
When they attract each other, they also align like beads on a string on the high speed flow of AEther possibly relativistic in the center forming clusters, like seen in the first static image above or the second video.
