Quantum

We have come a long way since the first enunciation of quantum theory. Some got used to it so much is like a second nature. But today many people discuss about on forums and they have opinions and sometimes find inconsistencies if not contradictions.

But what it is. In the subatomic world, all quantities are discrete values. It is, in a way, what digital is vs analog.

The reason for that is simple. The state of the Universe was 0 before the big bang and that was one single event.

However, properties of quantum world translates to the every day world and the enormous number of quantum properties put together to form everyday objects make them look continuous and analog. Like composing bits from an wav or mp3 file into an analog wave form which is audible and recognizable.

At the time, all these of course came from observations and not postulates. They determined the properties of quantum world through experiments of which first and most important is the photon-electron effect. One photon is needed to displace one electron from a metallic surface.

They concluded the entire quantum world is made of such discrete particles of which every single one of the same class has the same properties.

One electron has always the same mass and electric charge. One photon travels always with the speed of light and it can never be found resting, one proton has always the same mass and its electric charge will be always the opposite of that of an electron.

More than that, they interact with each other to form what we call matter. Protons and neutrons together form the nucleus of atoms which is orbited by a number of electrons. For each element and isotope of  the Mendeleev table we have the same number of protons and neutrons.

Because electrons cannot be split in smaller particles, they are called fundamental, together with several others while protons and neutrons are formed by smaller fundamental ones.

This discretization of matter goes all the way to molecules. Atoms combine to form molecules by sharing orbiting electrons. Molecules with the same formulas or structure have always the same properties.

However. It has been found that light which is made of photons has properties similar to those of waves in elastic media, like sounds or a wave created by a rock or in a lake, of which one is diffraction.

After much head scratching of the scientists, they came with a solution. Light is not photons or waves but a combination of those they call dualism wave particles of light. That, to satisfy all observations and experiments.

One discrete photon is always accompanied by an analogous wave front and they came with the idea of electro magnetic radiation or wave. And that's where the first confusion occurred.

EM waves let's say emitted by a radio station seem continuous and analog and have all properties of those.

However EM radiation coming from a single electron descending to a lower orbit, which is a short lived electric current, generates a magnetic field and it is said that magnetic field pulse in turn generates and electric one and so forth, hence the EM radiation seems discrete because the speed, the start end end position of the electron can be defined only in quantum world.

And first inconsistency. Since the current generated by that falling electron is a finite line, it generates a magnetic field like a rectangular permanent magnet would, in the shape of a pumpkin that would be near zero at poles or in the direction of the pole. However we expect something more like a cloud, the same way electrons orbit the atom.

Anyways it is not a circular or spherical wave like field we are used to from elastic media. Same goes for a dipole antenna for radio emissions.

Another one. Falling of an electron can create only one front wave. After that, the EM field is not sustained by anything from behind.

Again the velocity of the fallen electron is a quantum affair. Electrons reside in discrete cloud like positions on different levels of energy around the atom. Thus it cannot be established a speed in classical or non quantum terms for that falling electron from one cloud to another. Thus we can't know for how long the magnetic field lives.

Another one. Let's say the front of EM wave created by the pulse of falling of an electron spreads, though not like a sphere but like a pumpkin, continuously, in all directions (with the exception of poles). The photon can only go in one direction out of an infinity (or a few following the uncertainty principle).

After a while the intensity of the EM field decreases by a law similar to the square of distance, and will become insignificantly small while the photon can travel theoretically 11 billion years if it does not encounter any obstacles, (and depending on where it was emitted, can exceed the limits of the Universe and there will be no more dualism).

Another one. A number of photons emitted by a compact source are each created by its own electron so we cannot talk of a coherent analogous EM field but of a cloud of overlapping out of phase short lived fields.

From all the above observations one can realize the precarity of the whole EM theory as we know it today.

Without going into postulate mode yet, or without any changes to current theories, i want to make a first observation. The wave nature of light which is a bunch of photons coming from a single compact source like those used in experiments can be explained much easier if we could consider some sort of resonance between traveling photons emitted by falling electrons or a statistic grouping of in phase photons.

That is there will be always a number of photons in phase with each other, creating a virtual front wave.

But the front wave can only be electric, magnetic or both, and we'd have to accept the photons are carrying each its own pulsating field while the energy of the photon will always depend on its... (pulsating) frequency, field that of course is not spherical or pumpkin like and does not loose intensity and travels with the photon for 11 billion years.

Ok so here comes the postulate. In the same line of reasoning, we have to admit that the falling electron does not produce a quasi spherical magnetic field but transfer its energy to only one pulsating photon that is made of both magnetic and electric fields. Or better said, only electrical.

And that pulsating field can only be an infinite series of successive reactions of the void to the initial disturbance created by the falling electron, following the only universal law and that is action/reaction.

First reaction to the disturbance will occur in such a way it will not interfere with its source, and that is at 90 degrees in space and time to its cause. In turn, that first reaction will create the second, etc.. in an infinite cycle creating a cross traveling quantum we call photon.

However there is not a B wave but only E disturbances which pulses once transversal like in the animation below and then jumps 90 degrees ahead longitudinal and pulses again at 90 degrees transversal.

Though each transversal pulse is made at peak of two quarks that have mass, the total transversal (electric of course) momentum is zero while it's still photon, the pulse balances self after one cycle of four pulses as if those four pulses were emitted at once which makes us thinking if longitudinal time has any significance in its own reference frame.

I think the mass of the two quarks may come from the electron also falling into the gravitational field of the nucleus which is very weak when compared to the electric but it exists. (we cannot not dismiss any amount in quantum).

Even in this animation one starts to ask self if the fields are balanced. But we are talking here electric and magnetic line fields, not mechanical yoyos with inertia and stuff. Why should they be anchored at one end? And here another question for the EM theory. If one field causes the other, then why are they always in phase?

The representation does not apply to EM fields emitted by falling electrons because those can only exist for the time of the electron falling, that is one half period, and hence the first confusion. We don't have such things in nature (dipoles fed by oscillators).

The deducted appearance of the moving quanta would be a succession of lines at 90 degrees each in a succession of parallel planes that seen on the direction of propagation will look like a cross. The apparent rotation of the quantum is its spin.

Depending on the frequency, or the difference in levels of energy of the origin electron (or possible other sources) we will have light, microwaves, radio waves etc. or all the EM spectrum as we know it.

According to this theory, light can be bend when an electric field is applied in the direction of the quanta where is moving away with the help of a very high frequency high voltage stimulation (maybe not at every cycle) that may be created with the help of so called Helmholtz resonators or other type of very advanced "stone age" device inside pyramid or simply with the help of a very strong electrostatic field applied from very close when light generated at the top of they pyramidion moves down the gold faces.

Also light quanta could be accelerated or rushed from behind down the pyramidion by other in phase quanta.

Again using the hypothesis the pyramid is a indeed a photonic device capable of splitting light quanta created at the top in its four components. By doing this in a fast energetic successions it may bring anything contained inside or in a focused area to its frame reference and the time inside may slow, space dilate (According to Einstein time stops for anything that travels at the speed of light).

By bending light around pyramid light could be slowed down by the angle effect or accelerated by other quanta pushing from behind thus time can be reverted. But you need to revert time all the way to before that region of space was inside the expanding Universe to create a wormhole.

Or maybe they didn't want to. BTW, i was thinking yesterday, i don't see any restrictions to traveling into the future if you are about do die inside that pyramid anyway and never to come out. Or maybe if you abide a few simple rules. Or if you don't care about creating parallel universes and stuff.

We know this is possible in the microwave or even terahertz range with today's electronics. Did i mention vacuum creating mechanism for the Helmholtz resonator inside the pyramid?

All these and probably more were known of course to Ancient Egyptians, who build the pyramids to manipulate quanta, possibly others. By forcing the cross quanta down the slopes of a pyramid they split it into a square (in a way similar to opening a 4 blade iris) (final stabbing of Christ on the cross) using high voltage electricity and the shape of the gold pyramidion they could basically bend light, induce speeds much greater than light, stretch space, revert time, etc..

I know where they got their ideas for the string theory. But do they know what the strings are made of?

Ok i think i got it. When an electrons falls to a lower orbit and creates a photon (void reaction) that is too energetic, it can break down in two other particles, which are open strings too small to create their own void reactions and in turn start vibrating. Because the reaction to void is dynamic, the split creates two charged particles.

Here are (named only) a few ancient and modern symbols reminding of this model of Universe and demonstrating knowledge of it. I won't add the graphic symbols because in some countries are banned.

Square and compass.

In Ancient Chinese mythology there is a story of two half snake half human brother and sister, Fuxi and Nüwa, who supposedly rebuilt the Universe with a square and a compass. In this representation they look surrounded by strings made of rings. Their modern continuation seem to be the freemasons.

Swastika

Toyota logo

Audi logo

Subaru logo

Also. The striking similarities of these fundamental scientific findings with major themes of the four main religions of the world, possible other religions, suggest these themes were popular in the past, possibly carrying symbolic informations about lost knowledge belonging to advanced ancient civilizations that ended in a global conflict conflict, possibly the one described in the oral epic story (that has been later written) Mahabharata.

Wild turkeys, split pyramid, pyramidion and a solar symbol (left) part of a museum across Indian Head Casino, last night, inside Warm Springs reservation, Oregon.

December 5

1:52 Is this torii gates tunnel reminiscing of a pyramid shaft?

11:17

1:40 I had no idea when i developed the autonomous light quanta theory what immediate purpose would serve and be confirmed by.

I think i wrote before why i can't believe the current EM theory. They say when an electron move to a lower orbit it creates a sudden discharge, basically an electric current that in turn generates a magnetic field that in turn... hence the EM traveling field.

It should be a one front only field since the source ceases to exist, being a magnetic field at inception it has the shape of a pumpkin etc. though it is not thin but has volume and will be next to zero on the direction of the discharge or the electric current that created it or at poles.

The original magnetic field is stationary for the time the electron falls but (they say) it creates an electric one that is ahead with half period of that wave length frequency of which shape is hard to imagine short of the animation in Wikipedia and which creates another magnetic one, basically moving in jumps.

These fields vectors are said to be perpendicular on each other and on the direction of propagation which seems impossible in polar regions of the pumpkin.

It also seems obvious that the intensity of those fields decreases, maybe not with the square of distance (because it is not a sphere) but following other similar equation and after a while it will be so weak it will be undistinguishable from the background noise.

According to the dualism of light theory accompanied by these jumping fields there is a photon that of course flies into one direction only (out of many possible by riding the quasi spherical field). Average life expectation for a photon is 11 billion years or something like that.

Which means that if the photon does not encounter any obstacle it will travel with the speed of light for 11 billion years, possibly escaping the edges of our Universe. And it is obvious that after a while, rather early in photon's life it will not be accompanied anymore by the original EM field.

This theory has so many flaws we need not to continue to discuss it.

What i proposed is there is no electric, magnetic or gravity field, but only electric which appears as pulses, basically arrows of energy. Those pulses (or disturbances) create reactions that have to be in a such direction and positions in space they will not interfere with its cause, basically re-creating self at a 90 degrees angle in space and one quart of the period in time.

They way those travel suggest a succession of squares which have one arrow on one side only. As soon as an arrow finish one side it is transfered on next square, not seen here.


The optical effects of light are easy to explain in this theory. Quanta (or pulses) whe nowadays call photons are never singular coming from a source but in large numbers flying in all direction. Some of them since inception are in phase (though not going in the same direction as in a laser), by resonance. So they will create the equivalent of wave fronts that may explain the classic optical experiments.

Now try to imagine four of those emitted simultaneously right on the tip of the pyramidion perpendicular on each side that in turn would create perpendicular ones moving on each side in squares pushed down (repelled) by new ones from the tip where a conductor is hooked fed by some induction coil fed by a batter or condenser inside the pyramid or a resonant circuit similar to a Tesla coil whatever.

Like in a combination of this video (turquoise pyramids only) and the one above.

There will be four disturbances chasing each other in squares above the surface while the squares are getting bigger and bigger and pushed down given the shape of the pyramidion that will create sort of an electric prying effect on space, and possibly opening the original void.

By calculation or trial and error one could focus this electric vacuum somewhere in an empty space below inside the pyramid where the air has also been removed, thus creating a bubble of the original void, where distances have no meanings and which will be instantly connected to a similar or more bubbles across the perceived Universe.

Yes it is possible the Ancient Egyptians, others, could have figured this by themselves if they knew about electricity and geometry and nature of the Universe.

In a time when people lived by themselves and not drowned in symbolism and all kind of fake competitions generated of course by the need of a few to own this very limited resource that could open the possibility to travel across the Universe maybe to better worlds that we may call Heaven.

Commentaries to Einstein's Explanation of Photoelectric Effect

(Yeah i know it should have been called photon-electron effect, this way it wouldn't have been confounded by so many with some photography related thing).

Photoelectric effect is one of the basis of Einstein's theory (of relativity of course). The experiments done before him showed that an electron is knocked out of bondage if hit with radiation above certain frequency, no matter the intensity of the beam, a more intense (classic, continuous) beam meaning higher energy making no difference.

Though this does not necessarily leads to it he came with the idea that radiation is made of discrete packets of (transversal, vibrating) energy he then considered as particles, later called photons. He even threw a formula including frequency and Plank's constant (don't know how to type scientific formulas with Greek letters right now, was not prepared for all these that for me would have been forgotten forever if not for this).

Einstein's photons do not have a resting mass since the emitters in a vacuum tube do not loose mass by emitting photons, which also means they only exist when in motion but they break the conservation of mass principle.

If they have a mass when in motion they should also have a longitudinal momentum and a kinetic energy, other than the transversal vibration energy that depends on the frequency (wavelength) as shown in the experiments.

Photons' longitudinal kinetic momenta is real by some and included in the design of hypothetical devices such as solar sails. Some say lasers create a weak but measurable momentum, being pushed in the other direction of emitting light. However the different opinions i collect are contradictory as this phrase is.

When a hypothetical photon hits an atom and adds enough energy to an electron and the electron breaks free and some, it then disappears (he said is absorbed). The theory does not explain what happens to its longitudinal, non vibrating kinetic mass momentum.

Also the vibrating energy of a photon would not have any sense without a mass. However it is not explained in the theory how the photon vibrates to carry that energy. Since it has no electric charge, it cannot vibrate in an accompanying variable transversal electric field. It could only be gravitational, maybe against self in time. Asymmetric and spinning?

Even though we cannot calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by Einstein's relativistic formula of kinetic energy, where the resting mass or non relativistic mass of a particle is used since photons do not have a resting mass, we could at least calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by the classic formula E=mv2/2 with v the the speed of light. Researchers at Stanford in order to calculate the mass of a photon equated the kinetic energy as calculated above with the relativistic energy of a photon E=hf, where h is Plank's constant and f frequency.

I believe i see where it's going... The (in)famous equation E=mc2 may derive from here, if you arbitrarily equate the two types of energy and then add them. It looks like the most famous equation in the whole theory of relativity that stipulates energy is mass comes from a non relativistic calculation that factors in the square of the speed of light of a photon with no resting mass and photon's relativistic mass.

As stated above longitudinal kinetic and transversal vibration energy are equal. Which probably makes for the dualism particle-wave and tries to keep them both equitably satisfied.

However there are some bad news. The spherical waves (pumpkin whatever) as we know them loose energy with the square of distance and "EM" waves as we know them are no exception. And still... A single photon emitted by a decaying electron will never extinguish if it doesn't hit anything in its travel (with the speed of light across the Universe)...

Even in the relativist world there are other ways to better explain the mass defect and one of them is same electrons moving at different relativist speeds before and after...