January 9

12:57 AM I believe this is where we should look for particles. It is said all particles "have a spin", right?

It's not "they have a spin", they are swirls or they exist because they rotate. Right.

In a fluid, swirls rotating in the same direction repel each other and electrons of the same spin repel each other more strongly. In my theory the repelling electrostatic force is due to random disturbances of the same positive pressure rotating against neutral pressure of the AEther that repel each other.

String theory was born from the need to explain the "strong force".

8:00 What did i say about pink being the new white? What can it be a pink poney on a Japanese navy flag background?


11:28 Could she be the one upstairs? BTW she's shaking the building, "as we speak". (Didn't "go to work" today of course after i just posted).

11:50 Apropo credeam că simbolurile naziste sunt interzise în România... Sau în SUA...

3:20 Just figured a new valence for the song. Chrystal Nacht.

January 8

12:35 AM More of a nurse...

1:15 AM Sin atrociously...

6:50 All the current theories in physics start with observations of rather complex phenomena, trying to explain those with models we may call from top to bottom.

There are two different apparent currents in today's physics, like particles which gave us the standard model, with three called fundamentals, quarks, leptons and bosons with some confirmations through experiments and the strings theories which is tempting but still in the realm of hypothesis.

The other way would be to start with only one hypothesis trying to explain all observations, or from bottom up.

What i'm proposing is explaining them all with only one hypothesis. All matter is made of one single type of particle, called virtual particle or disturbance, that exists only dynamically.

The single particle, for the sake of familiarity we should call electric though it's basically nothing.

The disturbance always creates a reaction of space time continuum which can be confirmed by the so called electromagnetic induction experiment. It is at 90 degrees in space and it begins when the disturbance transfer its energy to it, diminishing.

We could attach a mental experiment to it. Imagine the magnetic field created by of the movement of one single electron (though in the end it proves that the electron is not punctiform). The deceleration 

of one single punctiform charged particle would create a movement of another single charged particle with an opposite sign and at 90 degrees direction.

But when the disturbance is not being accelerated, the reaction is closing upon self. Which is moving on a closed trajectory. Which in  our perception would be the equivalent with two particles, one charged positively and one negatively at different times.

The most simple case is that of a circular closed trajectory and this would be an electron. But depending on the speed and initial condition of creation, like being closed to other particles or coming of a cloud with n bodies, its trajectory could be more complicated, giving us all the known particles.

We can call these strings however only their trajectories resembles strings. If the trajectories are closed and stable no matter how complicated we have closed strings or particles and if they are open we have open strings though open strings can exist only temporarily or for the period of time the virtual particle moves on that trajectory, always creating and transferring its energy to another one like in the case of light.

So yeah, we may call a virtual positron the reaction in time of a virtual electron. So the energy released through annihilation of matter and antimatter is the initial energy of the disturbance that can never be "healed".

We shall conclude that there are two time frames in which matter and antimatter exist with two different charges and that generates gravity.

I believe we shall have any type of closed strings we can imagine by using this model starting with the most basic, a closed circle or an electron.

8:00 However at times i believe the whole space time continuum behaves like a fluid and one disturbance or a moving bubble of greater pressure is being attracted by its own trail like in Bernoulli's law... Than while moving together, they create a tiny depression in the Æther attracting everything in that is moving or all similar disturbances in that plane in the Universe.

Their mistake back then was Æther though a fluid, without mass cannot be an elastic medium for light.

A swirl in the dark Æther.

Copyright Notice. I shall call the above enunciations starting with 6:50 The Dynamic Swirls Theory or Æther Swirls Theory.
3:40 I din't know!

January 7

8:45 Ceaușescu începând cu discursul anti-sovietic din 68 a fost pro-europeanul din blocul socialist. Apoi, începând din 82 încercat să ne aducă ura față de sovietici, dându-le toată mâncarea pentru a plăti o balanță imaginară creată prin importul de tehnologie din vest pentru a contracara dependența de sovietici.

Omul devenise suveranist.

Acest suveranism a însemnat mai târziu blocarea importurilor și trasarea de sarcini pentru a face totul în țară (prin noi înșine?), care a însemnat distrugerea tehnologiei importate "cu mari sacrificii" prin lipsa update-rilor necesare (tehnologia merge mereu înainte) iar noi încă nu aveam suficiente cunoștințe sau specialiști (deși erau ca număr) sau disciplină pentru a face singur update-rile.

Astfel că la începutul anilor 90 lumea s-a trezit fără locuri de muncă, datorată lipsei competitivității industriei românești rămăsese fără îmbunătățirile necesare (updates) timp de cel puțin 10 ani.

În decembrie 89 Ceaușescu a fost înlocuit cu Iliescu, un "pro-sovietic". Chestia e că nu mult timp după, Uniunea Sovietică s-a topit ea însăși și a dat în beția lui Elțîn (ceea ce l-a chemat pe Putin salvatorul).

Care Iliescu în timp a fost înlocuit de pro-europeni (Constantinescu, Băsescu, Iohannis). S-a făcut integrarea în NATO, UE (fără aplicarea Schengen, partea cea mai importantă).

De aceea pare neverosimilă aderarea României la NATO, mai ales din partea NATO, spre sfârșitul celui de-al 3-lea mandat și ultimul al lui Iliescu, care în 89 și acum se declară pro-rus, cu prim ministru PSD (Năstase) .

Cred că ideea NATO a fost izolarea și antagonizarea Rusiei.

PSD care a avut întotdeauna o majoritate în parlament a început de atunci sabotarea sistematică a țării. În loc să implementeze o protecție socială reală (nu sutele de lei date pe carduri), așa cum ar fi fost normal dată fiind denumirea partidului, a promovat un capitalism artificial sălbatic, cu multe scandaluri și corupție pe față în colaborare cu toți președinții aparent pro-europeni.

Un motiv ar putea fi să îi sature pe români de capitalism.

Furtul masiv de la buget. La fel cum pe vremea lui Ceaușescu am suferit pentru o fantezie (plata unei datorii externe probabil inexistentă), pe vremea PSD, adică ultimii 35 de ani, s-a furat masiv de la buget. Stau și mă întreb care a fost destinația finală acestor fonduri, care după estimările mele pot merge până la jumătate din buget sau sute de miliarde de lei anual.

Există și posibilitatea să nu fi ajuns nicăieri fiind pur și simplu tăiați din condei. Sau taxele (mai ales impozitul pe profit) care ar fi trebuit să formeze veniturile bugetului nu au fost strânse niciodată (cel mai probabil).

Am impresia că acum când românii au început să se sature de acest tip de capitalism PSD vor să o cotească iar spre Rusia, așa cum a vrut Iliescu în 89, 90, când a avut doi contra candidați ineligibili, prin numărătoarea voturilor lui Georgescu, justificându-le cu TikTok (o tâmpenie pe care nu o crede nimeni) ceea ce ar fi trădare, încălcarea gravă a Constituției.

Iar Iohannis, ca de obicei, tace având probabil un rol de securist pro-rus, sabotor și trădător. Mai ales fiindcă se alege cu o prelungire pe termen nedefinit a mandatului său.

January 6

12:45 AM According to the diagram and formula of relativistic speed, there is not a clear point of when a speed becomes relativistic or when a virtual particle comes into existence.

The relativistic mass of an electron "falling" to a lower energy level basically begins when the electron starts to be accelerated.

Thing is, due to rotation of an electron around a central charge, the initial and final fall speed are different than zero, on the direction of the fall and they continue to rotate around the charge before and after the fall, thus creating some infinitesimal initial or residual void reactions and those follow the photon in its path and could count for the losses as they may interfere with others, effectively tangling the void, creating the AEther.

Because of this, the process of transfer of energy from one virtual particle to another within the photon is not 100% efficient. This may count for loss of energy during this transfer and the red shifting of distant sources of light. Where does that energy go? possibly in the void?

In fact if i think i realize that even if a photon is not emitted, the orbiting electrons may create signatures in the void which may slow their rotation, possibly falling to a lower energy level from where some other electron is kicked back after acquiring some energy that in the end could come from thermal agitation.

This could be the reason of decaying of some particles or assembles of particles depending on configurations.

9:08 De ce instituțiile de sondaj nu i-au dat lui Georgescu nici o șansă în turul I? Cum a fost posibil ca un candidat de care nu a auzit nimeni, nici măcar eu care urmăresc politica din România mai tot timpul, fiind clasat de sondaje pe locul 6 să iasă pe primul loc?

9:35 According to my theory (Dynamic Strings), AEther is not a medium of propagation for light but a tangle of infinitesimal electrical and gravitational disturbances, filling the void, opposing the motion of anything, possibly causing the limitation to speed of light, red shift of distance sources and "spontaneous" "probabilistic" decaying of particles and elements. Could this be the hypothetical dark matter.

Yes according to this, the "ordinary matter" (or energy whatever) is constantly leaking into dark matter, which in turn it is leaking into something else, but at a much slower rate.

Also the void creates the AEther as a sort of memory for everything that has ever moved in this Universe.

But don't worry, everything, matter, dark matter is cleaned by the black holes, the vacuum cleaners of the Universe. However it will be a long time until all black holes will  merge into a single one, and all the disturbances will melt back into the void.

9:40 Within the post with my theory of everything there is a statement saying that strings may swell with motion, especially at relativistic speeds, by accumulating energy. Now imagine an electron, which we now know is a circular closed string made of a negative virtual particle and a graviton chasing each other being accelerated while "falling" to a lower energy level.

Its virtual particle trajectory (and that of the accompanying graviton0 will look pretty much like this, right? So the virtual particle of positive sign generated by the void that continues to replicate self into a negative one etc..

Which may finally explain the 4 laurel leaves of Grinell College Seal most likely symbolically representing a photon. So it's just a bit more complicated that my minimalist representation linked on the right but it may account for the pair production.

11:12 Which may also count for one of the symbols seen on masonic aprons called the behive (here, 42).

It stand for industry and it may also represent a silk cocoon or a lotus petal. However there are many symbols on this apron that may symbolically represent light, like the 4 pillars, the main masonic sign, square and compass, sprig leaves etc.. Too bad we cannot see in the image all the explanations.

2:40 A charged virtual particle on a circular (or helicoidal) trajectory will create a copy of itself, moving in a plane at 90 degrees, of an opposite charge. Pretty much like in this image. Question. How the illustrator knew?