1:55 All by itself...
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
A Theory on Mole Gas
At midnight i went and plugged 3 holes next to foundation, the 4th was not through. They were not visible holes, like rat holes, but more like bulges, with porous loose soil, for air exchange, with tunnel endings inches under.
I wanted to postpone that but the apartment was filled with a weird smoke. I believe someone must have put (again) inside the galleries one of those mole chaser cartridges, that puts out smoke inside the galleries. Though moles probably leave, they come back soon. I know this from experience, this repeated almost daily, for years.
There has been a break for the last couple of years but this spring the moles came back.
Due to the way these buildings are made and the so called "stack effect" the smell comming out of mole galleries that end near foundation is being drawn into the walls and inside. If you follow the arrows you can realize there is a low pressure area right next to the building, due to Bernoulli's effect, that sucks ''air" right from those "shallow ridges" near foundation that are actually build only around the end of tunnels.
There has been a break for the last couple of years but this spring the moles came back.
Due to the way these buildings are made and the so called "stack effect" the smell comming out of mole galleries that end near foundation is being drawn into the walls and inside. If you follow the arrows you can realize there is a low pressure area right next to the building, due to Bernoulli's effect, that sucks ''air" right from those "shallow ridges" near foundation that are actually build only around the end of tunnels.
The smoke from cartridges gets inside through the same mechanism mole gas does. This always happens when i post something they don't like.
I have been reading again, the mole researchers did not change much their point of view, but they now agree moles stink and confirm they keep up to 1000 worms alive in special "larders". But i think they are not eaten by cats or dogs because their build in venom might be toxic to them.
Besides the well known mounds which are actually nests build on higher ground where they keep their young, moles have to have breathing openings and the ideal place is near a building where it does not rain due to extension of roof. While the oxygen gets inside, also their "pungent odor" comes out.
While normal people who live in their own houses will not allow that, there are little choices when you live in a rented apartment.
So far i have tried many tricks available to me, the only one that seemed to work, but after a while, is repeatedly pouring cement mixed with soil in their breathing galleries and galleries under the mounds.
But wait to read more. Moles' main food is earthworms.
Though "researchers have dug out moles galleries", i believe they did not have a real interest in figuring how these animals really live.
First of all, unlike gophers which are herbivore or rats that are omnivores, they feed almost exclusively on worms and have to eat up to 200 of them a day, and most "larders" store about double that amount. That would not suffice for more than two days, not all winter or drought. Earthworms are available most of the time, even in drought or winter, though in lower numbers.
I do not believe moles catch the worms, bite their heads and move them into larders, one by one.
This ensures a large number of worms in a lawn, up to hundreds or even thousands on a square meter.
And here comes my theory. After invading a lawn, moles dig a number of galleries to ensure they have access to earthworms on the whole surface. However, they do not actively chase them.
Once a worm wonders in one of those galleries, it is doomed. The so called pungent smell of moles contains an enzyme (venom) that is aerosolized and spread throughout the galleries. When earthworms come in contact with that enzymes, they get zombified and move by themselves throughout that galleries until they reach the larder, which is the lowest point of the network.
In there they await alive to be eaten by moles.
If the moles breathing galleries are near a house, especially the light construction type, with empty walls and siding, due to natural thermal flow, which goes upward, gets inside the walls and ultimately rooms of the house, and the people living in there are affected.
Symptoms from breathing "mole gas" include sleepiness, lethargy, slow thinking, feeling like you're not yourself, carelessness, etc.. And like from every toxin, a certain high.
I have been reading again, the mole researchers did not change much their point of view, but they now agree moles stink and confirm they keep up to 1000 worms alive in special "larders". But i think they are not eaten by cats or dogs because their build in venom might be toxic to them.Besides the well known mounds which are actually nests build on higher ground where they keep their young, moles have to have breathing openings and the ideal place is near a building where it does not rain due to extension of roof. While the oxygen gets inside, also their "pungent odor" comes out.
While normal people who live in their own houses will not allow that, there are little choices when you live in a rented apartment.
So far i have tried many tricks available to me, the only one that seemed to work, but after a while, is repeatedly pouring cement mixed with soil in their breathing galleries and galleries under the mounds.
But wait to read more. Moles' main food is earthworms.
Though "researchers have dug out moles galleries", i believe they did not have a real interest in figuring how these animals really live.First of all, unlike gophers which are herbivore or rats that are omnivores, they feed almost exclusively on worms and have to eat up to 200 of them a day, and most "larders" store about double that amount. That would not suffice for more than two days, not all winter or drought. Earthworms are available most of the time, even in drought or winter, though in lower numbers.
I do not believe moles catch the worms, bite their heads and move them into larders, one by one.
On a healthy, green lawn, there are hundreds of earthworms underground per square meter. To understand moles, we first have to understand earthworms, their main food source.
Earthworms themselves do some agricultural work.
Earthworms themselves do some agricultural work.
This ensures a large number of worms in a lawn, up to hundreds or even thousands on a square meter.
And here comes my theory. After invading a lawn, moles dig a number of galleries to ensure they have access to earthworms on the whole surface. However, they do not actively chase them.
Once a worm wonders in one of those galleries, it is doomed. The so called pungent smell of moles contains an enzyme (venom) that is aerosolized and spread throughout the galleries. When earthworms come in contact with that enzymes, they get zombified and move by themselves throughout that galleries until they reach the larder, which is the lowest point of the network.
In there they await alive to be eaten by moles.
If the moles breathing galleries are near a house, especially the light construction type, with empty walls and siding, due to natural thermal flow, which goes upward, gets inside the walls and ultimately rooms of the house, and the people living in there are affected.
Symptoms from breathing "mole gas" include sleepiness, lethargy, slow thinking, feeling like you're not yourself, carelessness, etc.. And like from every toxin, a certain high.
This post might not be written in the best of styles and that is i am pretty dizzy because of the combined influence of what i believe is mole gas, smoke from a cartridge, etc.. This morning feeling indeed like a zombie.
Monday, June 15, 2026
June 15
10:15 AM
10:30
12:12 PM
11:00 PM Ron L Hubbard was the founder of the Church of Scientology.
During the WWII he was in command of a submarine chaser. Shortly after he took command of the ship that came out of the shipyards of Portland, they were sailing towards California when they picked up a sonar ping, that was recognized by the guy in charge as a submarine near Cape Lookout, an iconic landmark of Oregon coast.
They immediately started to release depth charges, using all of their ammo but apparently the sub evaded them. According to this largely undocumented article in the Oregonian, the story continues.
During the WWII he was in command of a submarine chaser. Shortly after he took command of the ship that came out of the shipyards of Portland, they were sailing towards California when they picked up a sonar ping, that was recognized by the guy in charge as a submarine near Cape Lookout, an iconic landmark of Oregon coast.
They immediately started to release depth charges, using all of their ammo but apparently the sub evaded them. According to this largely undocumented article in the Oregonian, the story continues.
They called help and 4 other ships and 2 blimps came. One of the men on the blimps reported the position of a sub that was then hit by one of the ships and then they men on the blimp said they saw oil and other debris consistent with the sinking of a sub.
Later, the "admiral Fletcher dismissed the whole story" and some speculated it was motivated politically, by not willing to "upset Oregon and Washington residents".
There are accounts of divers saying they found the ship. Some others, though underfunded, have tried.
Should Hubbard have been built upon this story and added some space lore to it, who knows.
We all know though he assumed the title of Commodore and organized the Church by navy rules, with degrees and hard working schedule, the Church having at core the so called SeaOrg, based on a small fleet of 4 vessels that in the end became a larger one, the Freewinds of the presents which according to location sites is spending a lot of times in the... Caribbean.
I would conclude that the Church of Scientology has by now enough material means (and had even when Hubbard was alive) to find the wreck if they wanted to, however have not heard of any trial.
Thing is Portland and Oregon coast is somehow tied to the story of the Church, because it is the place Hubbard became the Commodore (in his own navy).
I said repeatedly that i came to Oregon because here was living the friend of my ex class mate in HS, the guy who looked like Travolta who gave me his address (That guy, by the looks, could have been Miscavige himself which i also saw last time last night at Chinook Winds, dressed as a janitor).
There was another guy i worked with at IMU who was also living in Oregon and in the end i lived with him until i got my first job. At Sheridan Fruit Co, accros the street from the Portland branch of the Satanic Church of Anton LaVey.
So i might have figured why i had to leave everything in Romania (an apartment, small business and Angela's good job) and come here and become their slaves and mascot, not being able to get a real job etc., ending both mutilated and me in psychiatric hospitals etc..
But have you all my friends have figured what is happening in this country? How some "private" people can take charge of whole states, cities, hospitals, stores, casinos, etc..?
But have you all my friends have figured what is happening in this country? How some "private" people can take charge of whole states, cities, hospitals, stores, casinos, etc..?
I drive around and all i see is meaningful license plate numbers, brands and slogans on different vehicles. I go outside and people start coming "over me" from all direction, executing scenes and framings. All seeming coordinated by AI.
Have people of the US lost control of their country in favor of this entity that may be also controlled from outside, that seem much, much bigger than declared. 50k members could not possibly raise that amount of money (on top of everything they already have).
But on the other hand. Look at what Trump is doing at the White House.
Did not know that Clear in Scientology is the same as Enlightenment (Nirvana) in Buddhism.
Have people of the US lost control of their country in favor of this entity that may be also controlled from outside, that seem much, much bigger than declared. 50k members could not possibly raise that amount of money (on top of everything they already have).
But on the other hand. Look at what Trump is doing at the White House.
Did not know that Clear in Scientology is the same as Enlightenment (Nirvana) in Buddhism.
Sunday, June 14, 2026
Datoria externă a României
Ok în mai multe postări precedente am făcut niște greșeli din grabă și alergatul după senzații tari. Nu e chiar așa cum spuneam.
Hai să plecăm de la aceste căutări google. Eu am confundat serviciul datorie externe cu dobânda.
Iată un decupaj din pagina BNR cu datoria și serviciul datoriei. La datoria pe termen lung, avem un serviciu financiar de 23 miliarde, ce înseamnă ratele și dobânzile.
Datoria pe termen scurt este în sumă absolută de aproape 3 ori mai mică decât cea pe termen lung (47/179) dar cere un serviciu în sumă absolută tot de aproape 3 ori mai mare (62/23).
Ce nu înțeleg în primul rând este de ce ratele pentru împrumuturile pe termen scurt sunt mult mai mari decât cele pe termen lung. Un motiv ar fi că ele se reînnoiesc mult mai repede sub un an, dar în final și unele și altele sunt datorii care trebuie plătite.
La datoria pe termen scurt avem de plătit principalul în mai puțin de un an. Să spunem că toată datoria pe termen scurt se reînnoiește într-un an și facem alte împrumuturi pentru a acoperi scadența întregii sume. Dacă suma de 62.6 miliarde este ratele plus dobânda, atunci ratele ar fi diferența, adică 62.6 - 47.5(o medie) și ar rămâne o dobândă de 15 miliarde de euro. Asta împărțită la 47.5 ar însemna 31%.
Conform google AI, termenul mediu pentru rambursările datorie pe termen scurt este de 3-9 luni, adică toată suma se reînnoiește de aproximativ două ori într-un an, dar asta ar depăși, împreună cu dobânda, cu mult cele 62 de miliarde.
La datoria pe termen scurt avem de plătit principalul în mai puțin de un an. Să spunem că toată datoria pe termen scurt se reînnoiește într-un an și facem alte împrumuturi pentru a acoperi scadența întregii sume. Dacă suma de 62.6 miliarde este ratele plus dobânda, atunci ratele ar fi diferența, adică 62.6 - 47.5(o medie) și ar rămâne o dobândă de 15 miliarde de euro. Asta împărțită la 47.5 ar însemna 31%.
Conform google AI, termenul mediu pentru rambursările datorie pe termen scurt este de 3-9 luni, adică toată suma se reînnoiește de aproximativ două ori într-un an, dar asta ar depăși, împreună cu dobânda, cu mult cele 62 de miliarde.
Dacă mergem pe ipoteza că dobânda (pentru împrumuturile) pe termen scurt este 6% și aplicăm acest procent pe media de 47.5, rezultă 2.85 miliarde, diferența fiind scadențele, ceea ce contrazice informația de mai jos.
Să spunem că datoria pe termen lung are o dobândă medie de 7% (pentru anul 2025). În același an, datoria pe termen lung a crescut de la 156 la 179, având o medie de 165 (miliarde euro). Asta ar însemna o dobândă în sumă absolută de 11.5 miliarde de euro, restul până la 23 miliarde reprezentând scadențele (ratele),
Datoria pe termen scurt s-a menținut constantă, dar fără date exacte (de câte ori s-a reînnoit în 2025) este aproape imposibil să spunem dacă și ea a fost finanțată în mod ascuns de la buget.
S-ar părea că exact creșterea datoriei pe termen lung în 2025 a fost folosită pentru plata dobânzilor și scadențelor plus o sumă de 23 miliarde furată de la buget față de cele 40 estimate de mine.
Dacă datoria pe termen scurt s-a reînnoit doar o dată în 2025, mai vedem și aici o gaură de aproximativ 20 miliarde. Nu se putea reînnoi de două ori, suma ar depăși serviciul declarat de BNR. O dată și jumătate, cine poate ști, fără datele concrete, ascunse în contabilitatea și site-ul BNR.
Datoria pe termen scurt s-a menținut constantă, dar fără date exacte (de câte ori s-a reînnoit în 2025) este aproape imposibil să spunem dacă și ea a fost finanțată în mod ascuns de la buget.
S-ar părea că exact creșterea datoriei pe termen lung în 2025 a fost folosită pentru plata dobânzilor și scadențelor plus o sumă de 23 miliarde furată de la buget față de cele 40 estimate de mine.
Dacă datoria pe termen scurt s-a reînnoit doar o dată în 2025, mai vedem și aici o gaură de aproximativ 20 miliarde. Nu se putea reînnoi de două ori, suma ar depăși serviciul declarat de BNR. O dată și jumătate, cine poate ști, fără datele concrete, ascunse în contabilitatea și site-ul BNR.
Un lucru poate vedea însă oricine.
Statul Român, prin emisia acestor instrumente "de investiție" la purtător (obligațiuni, bonuri de tezaur, Fidelis) a devenit un fel de bancă ce se împrumută și fură bani de la buget pentru a plăti dobânzi deținătorilor, acest împrumut enorm, de 227 miliarde euro, care între timp a ajuns 241 la sfârșitul lui martie 2026 și probabil peste 250 în prezent, nu aduce absolut nici un beneficiu Statului Român.
Statul Român, prin emisia acestor instrumente "de investiție" la purtător (obligațiuni, bonuri de tezaur, Fidelis) a devenit un fel de bancă ce se împrumută și fură bani de la buget pentru a plăti dobânzi deținătorilor, acest împrumut enorm, de 227 miliarde euro, care între timp a ajuns 241 la sfârșitul lui martie 2026 și probabil peste 250 în prezent, nu aduce absolut nici un beneficiu Statului Român.
În schimb cere plata unor dobânzi de aproximativ 15 miliarde la o dobândă medie de 6.8 la sută și a unor scadențe de cel puțin 11 miliarde anual (numai pe termen lung).
Pentru comparație, Bugetul de Stat pe 2025 a fost 100 miliarde euro (la 5 lei euro, ceva ce nu mai este și fără credite de angajament (o formă de buget multi-anual, neconstituțional)) la cheltuieli iar la venituri 70 miliarde, cu un deficit de 30 miliarde care în lipsa altor finanțări, se auto-finanțează, adică este deturnat de la bugetele ministerelor (banii alocați doar de formă, ei nu ajung unde trebuie).
Deci ajungem la o gaură totală de 50 miliarde, care este comparabilă cu estimarea mea de 40, făcută din analiza cheltuielilor ministerelor.
Pentru comparație, Bugetul de Stat pe 2025 a fost 100 miliarde euro (la 5 lei euro, ceva ce nu mai este și fără credite de angajament (o formă de buget multi-anual, neconstituțional)) la cheltuieli iar la venituri 70 miliarde, cu un deficit de 30 miliarde care în lipsa altor finanțări, se auto-finanțează, adică este deturnat de la bugetele ministerelor (banii alocați doar de formă, ei nu ajung unde trebuie).
Deci ajungem la o gaură totală de 50 miliarde, care este comparabilă cu estimarea mea de 40, făcută din analiza cheltuielilor ministerelor.
De aceea absolut nu contează cine va fi Prim Ministru, ei sunt doar fețele schimbătoare ale aceluiași dezmăț financiar, singura persoană față care contează în România e Guvernatorul Băncii Naționale a României, Mugur Isărescu, iar el nu a fost schimbat de nu știu, 35 de ani, adică niciodată?
Conform modelului Montesquieu (o lege nespusă sau scrisă a democrației), (trebuie să) avem 3 puteri în stat, legislativă (Parlament), juridică (curțile de toate felurile cu parchetele lor) și executivă (Președintele cu Primul său Ministru), dar BNR se pare că nu se subordonează executivului, și nici măcar lui Zalmoxis, toți, președinții, primii miniștri vin și pleacă dar "guvernatorul" Țării Românești din partea bandiților universali și din afara doctrinei Montesquieu, care iată, ne face cu ochiul, de 1/3 de secol, rămâne.
Da mi se pare normal. Guvernatorul a fost numit de Guvern. Și uitat acolo. Încă un record cu care să ne mândrim.
Conform modelului Montesquieu (o lege nespusă sau scrisă a democrației), (trebuie să) avem 3 puteri în stat, legislativă (Parlament), juridică (curțile de toate felurile cu parchetele lor) și executivă (Președintele cu Primul său Ministru), dar BNR se pare că nu se subordonează executivului, și nici măcar lui Zalmoxis, toți, președinții, primii miniștri vin și pleacă dar "guvernatorul" Țării Românești din partea bandiților universali și din afara doctrinei Montesquieu, care iată, ne face cu ochiul, de 1/3 de secol, rămâne.
Da mi se pare normal. Guvernatorul a fost numit de Guvern. Și uitat acolo. Încă un record cu care să ne mândrim.
