November 9

12:40 If this was true my closed circuit relativist drive should work too.

While searching for the origin of the Lorentz factor equation, i discovered other things though. It derived from the hypothetical exitance of AEther which was supposed to be a incompressible frictionless probably immaterial fluid filling all space, and an amazing forgotten theory about atoms being vortices of AEther in which great names of most physicists in that time are linked to, which strikingly resembles today's strings theory which is applied to elementary paticles though. 

That beautiful theory was killed by the discovery of electron as separate entity from the atom, other things. Many more elementary particles were discovered after.

In which case my proposed theory is deriving from that one i didn't know about or vortices made atoms only applied one level down to elementary particles (strings) which are not unidimensional but made of vortices of  frictionless AEther, which AEther could be made of the smallest (muon) neutrinos.

The propagation of light is not waves in AEther similar to those in elastic media but unstable AEther vortices moving ot transferring from one place to another like in this animation and all fundamental forces are given by variations of pressure in AEther near and far caused by vortices.

One first step in proving this theory is the existence of spins of particles like electrons which are half made of photons of which speed (at periphery?) is the speed of light. Other calculations show 292 times the speed of light.

In the hypothesis all particles are vortices are vortices with a (linear) rotation speed comparable to the speed of light, the mass of particles withing the vortex may come with applying the Lorentz factor or in other words relativistic. The reason of matter is energy is because matter is made of vortices (whirls) at relativist velocities.

Minimal energy for an electron to be produced in pair production is half of 1.022 or 0.511. MeV. If one photon has more energy, after splitting the rest is converted in kinetic energy. That is the only energy at which an electron can exist. According to my model that is the energy in which an electron can exist in both toroidal and rotational hyperboloid.

Within a photon the unstable double vortex, the electron and positron do not have their closed toroidal shape until they split, but rather open ended rotation hyperboloids.

8:45 One of the most common models for electron within today's struggling string theory was actually produced by Lord Kelvin himself, according to this paper.

My proposed model for the photon is an unstable (oscillating), always transitional rotation hyperboloid vortex.

During pair production the photon with enough energy (1021 MeV) splits into an electron and positron of which only difference is charge. We can conclude the two cups (branches) of the rotation hyperboloid turn in two different direction, and after split into two tori. However it is unclear how the torus rotates, like in the diagram above or like those torus vortices seen in nature or both.

Though moving in the air witch cause friction and ultimately breaking down because of it, the torus vortices are stable and in a frictionless environment they could last indefinetely.

Shiva's drum. It is not a secret i created my photon model following the shape of Shiva's little drum. which could symbolize pair production. When a photon with enough energy hits an obstacle, the hyperboloid splits and turn to two tori.

A combination of rotating hyperboloid transitioning continuously into a torus (and then continuously dissipating) is seen in this video, though is created by gravity and fed continuously by chemical combustion turned into heat. For illustration only.

 

And yes if particles are vortices in AEther they of course are not punctiform and their position cannot be localized as such, until they produce an effect and eventually dissipate.

9:45 Just realized spell checking was turned off for everything i wrote in the last few days or maybe weeks.