Electro Dynamic Theory of Everything or Single Void Disturbance Theory

An "electron" moving to a lower orbit creates in time as per the universal law of action/reaction a pulse of electric field which in turn creates and transfers all its energy and propagates to another one with a time (phase) difference, and those constantly recreate selves following the same law thus transferring energy to the next while advancing in time and space and the lag to each other is 1/4 of the period of the whole cycle of disturbance, until they reach again after four transfers the post initial stage (first void reaction) or in one period and this continue indefinitely.

The perceived direction of the reaction to each pulse is at 90 degrees again in a plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation because the reaction can only appear in a direction perpendicular and at 1/4 wavelength distance without interfering with its cause. Time and space are illusions created by the reaction to the initial manifestation of void. A random lowering of the orbit of an electron and its reactions occur in the space created by the initial manifestation.

There is no photon but just a singled out, orphaned, autonomous, quantum pulsating electric disturbance that maintains self while advancing, a contained bubble of constant energy that propagates on a straight line in vacuum constantly changing direction of pulse with 90 degrees each time on a plane perpendicular on the direction of propagation.

Total electric charge gets balanced in the transversal plane after one period but there will be a charge in the direction of propagation. The void provides a reaction to light quanta similar to that of elastic media to a wave of sound which appears due to inertia to mechanic motion. Due to net longitudinal charge there is a longitudinal electric field carried by the light quanta that may combine with the others and be responsible for the results of experiments that show light behaves like a wave.

Light quanta will live and travel indefinitely until they interact and cede their energy to a slow moving "particle" or a solid object.

In a radio antenna the emission will occur when the alternating electric current applied to the dipole stops before starts changing direction. The growing reacting bubble exists as a whole for as long as it is a reaction to the flow of current. When the flow of current stops, it will burst into quanta of fields repelling each other.

When an electron moves to a lower orbit it also creates an electric current similar to that in a dipole.

Electric fields cannot exist without a charge. When the virtual charge behind the field bubble bursts it will channel in all directions because of repelling of similar charges until each generated smaller quanta will start getting its own reaction.

Charge of electric field or energy of each generated quanta is given by the necessary time to obtain a reaction of the same size. Period of a complete cycle of transformation until it reaches initial direction or 1/frequency depends on the length of dipole or electron's trip.

Number of quanta emitted by a dipole is calculated by dividing the total charge generated by the alternating electric current given by the number of electrons in half period to the value of each quanta charge which depends only on frequency.

Moving mass of a "photon". Eventually all "photons" travelling throughout Universe will end colliding with atoms, triggering a photoelectric effect. When the electron is ejected from the atom it generates a momentum.

Also. An "electron" gets knocked out of orbit by a "photon", reverting the effect of a photon being created by an electron moving to a lower orbit.

However. In photon generation the electron does not come from the outer space. It only moves to a lower orbit. Which suggests the energy needed to emit a photon is not equal to the energy to knock out an electron by a photon which is not true.

The energy generated from moving an electron to a lower orbit can be greater than the one needed to emit a photon. There are proven cases where at least two photons has been emitted in one single electron move to a lower orbit and not talking about the photons that may be emitter inwards or towards the object that get absorbed right away.

There are cases in which a photon moving to a lower orbit fails to generate a photon but instead generate an electron/positron pair. During photoelectric effect the electron is completely knocked free of the atom with some extra moving energy. It may be because different types of atoms are involved for emission or absorption of photons.

But it all leads to one conclusion. There must me some leftovers when creating quanta of light, both in the case of electrons lowering orbit or resonant circuit emissions because the generating energy does not divide exactly to the emitted energy.  Frozen or stationary quanta and their reaction that in the end could be other "particles" that may be charged.

There are no particles. Everything is made of quanta of different levels of energy.

The electrons are excited by heat before they move to lower orbits. Emission of a photon cools down the atom so it may be a "local" anti-entropic process. But when the emitted photon hits another atom it heats it up again and en electron is lost.

Inertia is a reaction of void to change of speed or acceleration of static non moving or frozen quanta.

Gravity is the attraction between the numerous reorienting dipoles inside objects. Freedom for reorienting is small and the force is small for everyday objects.

Speed of light. In an empty Universe like the one before the Big Bang or the original Single Void Disturbance we cannot measure space because there is nothing to measure with. Then the Universe started to get filled with light. However light quanta do not move. They jump from one point in space to another instantly, the only delay is given by the transfer of charge in time from one point to another or time of reaction of void. Any other object that actually moves through space cannot match that speed.

Since light quanta does not move when it propagates it may be stationary to the primordial disturbance. That's why some say the speed of light is perceived as the same by any observer.

There are people who say the electric field lines start from a charged object and end at infinity for a positive charge and from infinity to the object for a negative charge. This is a very interesting enunciation.

Let's say we turn a switch on and let a small sphere of metal be charged through a wire from another one already charged negatively and shielded. How long it takes for the field lines arising from infinity to reach the sphere? By the definition, it should be instantaneous. Also by experiments. However we know from other experiments that the speed of light is finite.

But there is another consequence of the fact the electric field extends instantaneously to infinity. It also should extinguish instantaneously if the sphere is connected to the ground and loses charge. Same with magnetic, we cut current through the coil, the magnetic field collapses (after a transient phenomenon called self induction).

But in now classic relativity the EM wave accompanying a photon do not extinguish after cutting off the source.

BTW since photons can travel for billions of billions of years, will they.... leave or some already left our Universe which is "only" 26.7 billion years old?

It is said expanding quasi spherical EM field has two transversal, electric and magnetic components, which means the electric field is not parallel to the direction of propagation but perpendicular.

I really don't understand how a transversal field can be spherical (or how an electric field that may extend to infinity can be transversal).

Quasi spherical or spherically deformed closed lines alternating lobes (loops) they say, and if they expand with the speed of light, the fields should also loose intensity with the square of distance as the same lobes that "somehow" maintain selves occupy more and more space. Speed of "closing lines" in the same direction with advancement shown in the animation above on top or bottom of some alternating lobes at speeds greater than light, consistent with... The formulas and the other animation here suggest the waves accompanying a photon do not loose energy while they advance.


There is only one type of (dynamic) manifestation of void (disturbance), we call electric, but actually the only thing that can exist in void is will. All "particles" and light in the Universe come from a reaction of void to a primordial manifestation of will.

In everyday objects, a magnetic field is a closed electric field, confined in space or shaped by the way it was generated, either by moving of particles like electrons in a wire in a closed trajectory or by coils. A closed electric field will not interact with one one with single pole (charge) with open lines but will deflect a charged moving particle.

No need for big "particles" accelerators to figure what happened in the first seconds after the creation of Universe (time did not have sense anyways until the creation of the the planes of resonance). Stop making experiments based on false theories (particles) that may one day hurt everybody or simply throw us all in a parallel Universe if they didn't already.

Quantum

We have come a long way since the first enunciation of quantum theory. Some got used to it so much is like a second nature. But today many people discuss about on forums and they have opinions and sometimes find inconsistencies if not contradictions.

But what it is. In the subatomic world, all quantities are discrete values. It is, in a way, what digital is vs analog.

The reason for that is simple. The state of the Universe was 0 before the big bang and that was one single event.

However, properties of quantum world translates to the every day world and the enormous number of quantum properties put together to form everyday objects make them look continuous and analog. Like composing bits from an wav or mp3 file into an analog wave form which is audible and recognizable.

At the time, all these of course came from observations and not postulates. They determined the properties of quantum world through experiments of which first and most important is the photon-electron effect. One photon is needed to displace one electron from a metallic surface.

They concluded the entire quantum world is made of such discrete particles of which every single one of the same class has the same properties.

One electron has always the same mass and electric charge. One photon travels always with the speed of light and it can never be found resting, one proton has always the same mass and its electric charge will be always the opposite of that of an electron.

More than that, they interact with each other to form what we call matter. Protons and neutrons together form the nucleus of atoms which is orbited by a number of electrons. For each element and isotope of  the Mendeleev table we have the same number of protons and neutrons.

Because electrons cannot be split in smaller particles, they are called fundamental, together with several others while protons and neutrons are formed by smaller fundamental ones.

This discretization of matter goes all the way to molecules. Atoms combine to form molecules by sharing orbiting electrons. Molecules with the same formulas or structure have always the same properties.

However. It has been found that light which is made of photons has properties similar to those of waves in elastic media, like sounds or a wave created by a rock or in a lake, of which one is diffraction.

After much head scratching of the scientists, they came with a solution. Light is not photons or waves but a combination of those they call dualism wave particles of light. That, to satisfy all observations and experiments.

One discrete photon is always accompanied by an analogous wave front and they came with the idea of electro magnetic radiation or wave. And that's where the first confusion occurred.

EM waves let's say emitted by a radio station seem continuous and analog and have all properties of those.

However EM radiation coming from a single electron descending to a lower orbit, which is a short lived electric current, generates a magnetic field and it is said that magnetic field pulse in turn generates and electric one and so forth, hence the EM radiation seems discrete because the speed, the start end end position of the electron can be defined only in quantum world.

And first inconsistency. Since the current generated by that falling electron is a finite line, it generates a magnetic field like a rectangular permanent magnet would, in the shape of a pumpkin that would be near zero at poles or in the direction of the pole. However we expect something more like a cloud, the same way electrons orbit the atom.

Anyways it is not a circular or spherical wave like field we are used to from elastic media. Same goes for a dipole antenna for radio emissions.

Another one. Falling of an electron can create only one front wave. After that, the EM field is not sustained by anything from behind.

Again the velocity of the fallen electron is a quantum affair. Electrons reside in discrete cloud like positions on different levels of energy around the atom. Thus it cannot be established a speed in classical or non quantum terms for that falling electron from one cloud to another. Thus we can't know for how long the magnetic field lives.

Another one. Let's say the front of EM wave created by the pulse of falling of an electron spreads, though not like a sphere but like a pumpkin, continuously, in all directions (with the exception of poles). The photon can only go in one direction out of an infinity (or a few following the uncertainty principle).

After a while the intensity of the EM field decreases by a law similar to the square of distance, and will become insignificantly small while the photon can travel theoretically 11 billion years if it does not encounter any obstacles, (and depending on where it was emitted, can exceed the limits of the Universe and there will be no more dualism).

Another one. A number of photons emitted by a compact source are each created by its own electron so we cannot talk of a coherent analogous EM field but of a cloud of overlapping out of phase short lived fields.

From all the above observations one can realize the precarity of the whole EM theory as we know it today.

Without going into postulate mode yet, or without any changes to current theories, i want to make a first observation. The wave nature of light which is a bunch of photons coming from a single compact source like those used in experiments can be explained much easier if we could consider some sort of resonance between traveling photons emitted by falling electrons or a statistic grouping of in phase photons.

That is there will be always a number of photons in phase with each other, creating a virtual front wave.

But the front wave can only be electric, magnetic or both, and we'd have to accept the photons are carrying each its own pulsating field while the energy of the photon will always depend on its... (pulsating) frequency, field that of course is not spherical or pumpkin like and does not loose intensity and travels with the photon for 11 billion years.

Ok so here comes the postulate. In the same line of reasoning, we have to admit that the falling electron does not produce a quasi spherical magnetic field but transfer its energy to only one pulsating photon that is made of both magnetic and electric fields. Or better said, only electrical.

And that pulsating field can only be an infinite series of successive reactions of the void to the initial disturbance created by the falling electron, following the only universal law and that is action/reaction.

First reaction to the disturbance will occur in such a way it will not interfere with its source, and that is at 90 degrees in space and time to its cause. In turn, that first reaction will create the second, etc.. in an infinite cycle creating a cross traveling quantum we call photon.

However there is not a B wave but only E disturbances which pulses once transversal like in the animation below and then jumps 90 degrees ahead longitudinal and pulses again at 90 degrees transversal.

Though each transversal pulse is made at peak of two quarks that have mass, the total transversal (electric of course) momentum is zero while it's still photon, the pulse balances self after one cycle of four pulses as if those four pulses were emitted at once which makes us thinking if longitudinal time has any significance in its own reference frame.

I think the mass of the two quarks may come from the electron also falling into the gravitational field of the nucleus which is very weak when compared to the electric but it exists. (we cannot not dismiss any amount in quantum).

Even in this animation one starts to ask self if the fields are balanced. But we are talking here electric and magnetic line fields, not mechanical yoyos with inertia and stuff. Why should they be anchored at one end? And here another question for the EM theory. If one field causes the other, then why are they always in phase?

The representation does not apply to EM fields emitted by falling electrons because those can only exist for the time of the electron falling, that is one half period, and hence the first confusion. We don't have such things in nature (dipoles fed by oscillators).

The deducted appearance of the moving quanta would be a succession of lines at 90 degrees each in a succession of parallel planes that seen on the direction of propagation will look like a cross. The apparent rotation of the quantum is its spin.

Depending on the frequency, or the difference in levels of energy of the origin electron (or possible other sources) we will have light, microwaves, radio waves etc. or all the EM spectrum as we know it.

According to this theory, light can be bend when an electric field is applied in the direction of the quanta where is moving away with the help of a very high frequency high voltage stimulation (maybe not at every cycle) that may be created with the help of so called Helmholtz resonators or other type of very advanced "stone age" device inside pyramid or simply with the help of a very strong electrostatic field applied from very close when light generated at the top of they pyramidion moves down the gold faces.

Also light quanta could be accelerated or rushed from behind down the pyramidion by other in phase quanta.

Again using the hypothesis the pyramid is a indeed a photonic device capable of splitting light quanta created at the top in its four components. By doing this in a fast energetic successions it may bring anything contained inside or in a focused area to its frame reference and the time inside may slow, space dilate (According to Einstein time stops for anything that travels at the speed of light).

By bending light around pyramid light could be slowed down by the angle effect or accelerated by other quanta pushing from behind thus time can be reverted. But you need to revert time all the way to before that region of space was inside the expanding Universe to create a wormhole.

Or maybe they didn't want to. BTW, i was thinking yesterday, i don't see any restrictions to traveling into the future if you are about do die inside that pyramid anyway and never to come out. Or maybe if you abide a few simple rules. Or if you don't care about creating parallel universes and stuff.

We know this is possible in the microwave or even terahertz range with today's electronics. Did i mention vacuum creating mechanism for the Helmholtz resonator inside the pyramid?

All these and probably more were known of course to Ancient Egyptians, who build the pyramids to manipulate quanta, possibly others. By forcing the cross quanta down the slopes of a pyramid they split it into a square (in a way similar to opening a 4 blade iris) (final stabbing of Christ on the cross) using high voltage electricity and the shape of the gold pyramidion they could basically bend light, induce speeds much greater than light, stretch space, revert time, etc..

I know where they got their ideas for the string theory. But do they know what the strings are made of?

Ok i think i got it. When an electrons falls to a lower orbit and creates a photon (void reaction) that is too energetic, it can break down in two other particles, which are open strings too small to create their own void reactions and in turn start vibrating. Because the reaction to void is dynamic, the split creates two charged particles.

Here are (named only) a few ancient and modern symbols reminding of this model of Universe and demonstrating knowledge of it. I won't add the graphic symbols because in some countries are banned.

Square and compass.

In Ancient Chinese mythology there is a story of two half snake half human brother and sister, Fuxi and Nüwa, who supposedly rebuilt the Universe with a square and a compass. In this representation they look surrounded by strings made of rings. Their modern continuation seem to be the freemasons.

Swastika

Toyota logo

Audi logo

Subaru logo

Also. The striking similarities of these fundamental scientific findings with major themes of the four main religions of the world, possible other religions, suggest these themes were popular in the past, possibly carrying symbolic informations about lost knowledge belonging to advanced ancient civilizations that ended in a global conflict conflict, possibly the one described in the oral epic story (that has been later written) Mahabharata.

Wild turkeys, split pyramid, pyramidion and a solar symbol (left) part of a museum across Indian Head Casino, last night, inside Warm Springs reservation, Oregon.

Dharma Wheel of Nikola Tesla

I think Tesla might have had a good intuition interpreting the dharma wheel of Buddhism or star of Ishtar or contemporary Scientology cross (yes i believe our future lays in the mnemonics of the past religions) but it is not quite the way he did it.

Disregarding those formulas, and seeing this representation as a photon in transversal plane it could all be the pulsating cross quanta may create besides time and space, also gravity.

The words tryadha vyavasthita sarva buddha in the mantra translate literally "three expected for each light (color?)" corresponding to the three components in some ancient representations in the center of the wheel that could mean each proton is made of three quarks.

Interpretation:

1:12 1/5/2024 version

It is not quite like that. I assumed the magnetic field line starts in the middle of nowhere and probably would have if the electron would have an initial vertical speed.

However its descending speed starts from zero and in the initial moment the single magnetic field line starts from near the electron and extends on a parable like curve in a plane perpendicular to the trajectory of the electron that contains the electron, if there are no other electrons to interfere with the electron's falling speed or trajectory. Then it's gonna be a more complicated curve.

During the constant speed phase it moves on a circle on a the same plane and the trajectory is helicoidal with a constant radius.

It seems the electron during acceleration phase is ceding its energy to the virtual field line. The only way this can happen is if the field line is the trajectory of a positive virtual charge that furthers from the electron by increasing the radius of that helix. During deceleration the electron looses speed and energy and the virtual charge gets back close to it. 

The trajectory as a whole seems like the shape of a 3D horse shoe  that is part of a helix with variable and constant radius or the edges of a propeller arm.

The virtual positive charge moving in a circuit that seems closed in a view in the direction of the fall, would create a negative virtual charge moving on a trajectory similar to that of the falling electron. For the accelerating and decelerating part of the cause the virtual charge would move at different angle both looking like an pharaoh's crook and flail with both constantly changing angles and propagating with each step?

Year is 2024 and i am shocked by the fact nobody looked into this until now. That is the shape of a single magnetic field line generated by a falling electron. They instead look in the cloud chamber of the LHC, the most complicated machine built on Earth. Unless if it's all a big coverup and they knew this from the beginning of quantum mechanics era.

Another ancient source that is less obvious. There are spirals in this Ancient Egypt amulet near other details (square, wings) that seem to represent right angles, half right angles in the context of an eye that might represent light and a bird that might represent gravity.

The tilak. Never knew it is called like that. And a 3D U shaped version on Amazon.

I think after a major world conflict people's knowledge broke into pieces. Like Sanskrit broke into many European and Indian languages, each keeping different words, the same happened with the advanced knowledge. People tried to pass it down to further generations that reverted to stone edge.

They knew they had to somehow preserve the important parts and painted those on the forehead of their children, or  built pharaoh's masks waiting for a revival which never took place. The pieces and symbols and stories became different religions as we know them and humans never reverted to the highly advanced civilization (Heaven for all) that was once here on Earth and it is possible the intruders who are probably the ones who built the pyramids survived as well without knowledge of their past.

But nowadays they are obviously way ahead of us.

DeCember 12 (12)

2:02 AM "My purpose for the day was to see if it's possible to design a practical device that could do what the warp engines were doing in Star Trek but the day has passed drowned in unnecessary noise a and stomps and s...t."

Let's see if i have anything to say about the link above. I don't believe in negative energy and mass an s...t.

I believe in traveling within a void bubble. What is a void bubble. It is a place... no place at all. It is what this Universe was before big-gang (or first true random void disturbance).

In that no place at all distances do not mater. So if you open one of those and then another one in a different place corner of the Universe whatever was in the first one would migrate in the second when first one fades away. No other opening (of bubbles) can intervene in those moments or loss of material and lives could occur. Or parallel Universes be created whatever.

That's why i was telling, it is a limited resource in this Universe.

This was done on Earth with a pyramid shaped device during Ancient Egypt and then nowadays using tokamaks (in a different purpose then declared). Synchronization is the key for the transfer.

Was thinking of a dynamic process. A traveling device could wrap itself in a bubble while opening a bubble ahead at some distance. While advancing from one bubble to the other, the ship does not exit in the normal space so i don't know if it could open a bubble in a continuous mode but who knows for sure if there is not some trick for it...

Though i'm pretty sure it can be done because we need it and this Universe, or the first disturbance, arose to fulfill any rational need or anything mind can think of.

But will a ship traveling using successive or continuous jumps, obviously slower than bubble to bubble disrupt the busy schedule of site to site traveling?

Only salvation would come with size. If a bubble will resonate only with one of the same size, or only with one created at a certain precise time after the first one, then yes, simultaneous multiple site to site pairs of bubbles could exist, including ships.

2:50 Yeah i know, it sounds a bit like Scientology. But then let us not forget that...

2:52 And now that we have all the philosophical premises in place, let's think of a practical device. However, it may require brainstorming, or who knows, all the thetans have again to agree...

But i think all a ship has to do is to create ahead a tunnel of void long enough for the end of it to be in phase with the beginning... But that would require a lot of energy and probably should think first of how to extract the energy from the void. Or maybe the bubble can travel as a wave or something, conserving the bubble... As a worm maybe?

3:12 Visionary Jules Verne writes in his book about Paris in 1960 (or after 100 years he wrote it), reality that seems to be postponed to our days (his mind was a bit fast), among others, that journalism would not exist anymore, as they were no news and i think he was right about that one too.

Superweapons used in the first decades of twentieth century (Tunguska event) and reactions that followed (WWI, WWII, totalitarism) wiped the need for war thus the one for news. However they keep waging wars as a mean to control population that was getting smarter in the west and writing something that replaces the news, i call it the continuous show, which is a very sophisticated and complex live show, using the addiction for news of the population as a mean to keep them dumb.

1:00 This suggests a couple of large superconductive coils similar to those of tokamaks that could wrap the ship in a void bubble. However, the coils themselves that are attached to the ship are out of that bubble.

3:43 Spin and orbit the nucleus? Ok let' say for the purpose of this discussion they spin in a circle. Thus the magnetic field is nothing but again a reaction of the void, creating again closed loops perpendicular to its motion in a way similar to electron rotates in a closed loop. 

No further reaction to the reaction cause this one is closed and not moving. Since the electron rotates it probably rotates with it and there is a continuous "field" of rotating magnetic lines around the rotation axis.

This type of reaction is again an electric field but since it has no polarity (no beginning or end) as it is closed it does not interact with other electric nearby fields. But if we were to consider the fact the electron is rotating like in a cloud of uncertainty around the nucleus, the multitude of lines of field at some time parallel to the axis of rotation in a plane containing the electron rotation radius is generated by the uncertainty (cloud like) position of the electron around the rotating axis.

So in the end there is only one "force" and that is electric and when dynamic (single, open or moving) it causes two different types of reaction to the void. Light quanta, for single open linear disturbances like in case of an electron falling to a lower orbit which propagates in squares, the so called magnetic field described above, gravity being just an attraction between orienting dipoles from two different objects.

In case of the "magnetic" field above,  things are clear. The reaction to the disturbance created  by the rotation of electron has a direction following the direction of the rotation of the electron and the poles attract each other in order to sum the reaction.

Why is an electron charged and why it repels other electrons. This is not an easy one. Electrons spin and they probably have asymmetric charges made of smaller particles like polar molecules and thus they create a "magnetic" field. But electron is spinning and changing direction of the spin too fast fast to allow its void reaction to close through it, hence the field lines appear open. Uncertainty of the direction of the spin and spin speed of electron create unipolar fields. Probably same with protons.

And from here on i think i got a direction into explaining what particles are. I think they are light quanta with such a high frequency or small wave length or side length of their square they can't move the way light quanta does and small ones combine into large ones to satisfy the weird properties of very small ones. Or they probably move into a different time frame and/or space than light does, whatever you may like. Anyways  they are trapped into combinations within larger "molecular" particles.

Ok i got the whole of it. It's all in my mind. Shall i put it here for free?

January 10

11:25 "Eu centrez, eu dau cu capul" (I center, i score). Here it goes :

I think i found a way to visualize the falling of an electron on a lower orbit, after i figure the equations. Probably the most overlooked phenomenon in history of science. For the accelerated phase, it should be a parabolic spiral. No need for supercomputers or anything. Except maybe if there was some AI software which you could verbally ask it to do so and spare all the work.

Why is it important? Well, a falling electron is (the smallest) electric current, right, which generates a magnetic field, right, which accompanies the emitted photon (or is the emitted photon).

Nevermind that. They just sent in a team (made of little "Mexicans") who started hammering to finish the walls of the fallen stairwell (about a month ago, remember). There will be between 1000 and 10000 hammerings today. Like in the days when the emperor was here, and did the windows. Or a few years earlier when they did the roofing for the whole complex, with an average of one nail a second for 6 months.

11:30 Was thinking earlier. If the religious thugs of Japan force their own people to work to death to partly finance their covert ninja type operations abroad, what will they do to others. Like what they are doing nowadays with Americans and they don't even know it.

4:00 Thoughts from my walk. If we were to calculate the trajectory of a falling electron we need to know first position and speed of the electron, which according to German physicist Werner von Braun Heisenberg it is not possible. I bet this is  the main reason they never adventured to do it.

So we must to get rid of this theory first, also with the help of deeper quantum mechanics, and that is the quarks i bet Heisenberg didn't know about.

Ok, Heisenberg published his uncertainty theory in 1927 and quarks were discovered in 1964 and he died in 1976 and he never corrected his theory. Why would had he, since he already won a Nobel prize in 1932 and was already the father of quantum mechanics?

For the most simple atom, hydrogen, with one single proton which is made of quarks we can see the proton has a spatial asymmetric dipole charge. More than that, to form the nucleus, the proton is paired with a neutron which has no electric charge at all, only mass which adds to the off center asymmetry.

Since both nuclei and electrons have mass, there is a tiny gravitational force between them though the electric force is prevalent.

So the normal circular trajectory of an electron around a nucleus, better said around the center of its electric charge is perturbed by the electric asymmetry of the proton and the position relative to its mass center.

There is also the issue with the mass of the electron. The electron has enough mass to move the atom around a bit, like Moon vs Earth. At those speeds, this thing will also contribute to instability of many possible orbits or "energy levels" and in the end their are only a few permitted or "quantified".

Since we now know quarks are made of strings that vibrate, i bet this model is too complicated for any mathematician and they came up with this uncertainty theory instead.

Though they have so many "idle" (they do not apply to anything) theorems in math no one single person on Earth can review them all in a single lifetime.

But nowadays we have giant supercomputers, let's feed them this model. However i bet they already did and only a few know the results.

I remember i once applied for a grant to pay to use a supercomputer to come up with a method of predicting earthquakes. Based of course on a different theory than tectonics plates theory. But applying for a grant is a complicated job in itself which i screwed and i bet they have one guy in every grants hogging team that to do just that.

BTW do they ever give Nobel prizes to guys who dismantle old theories that have been given Nobel prizes for? I believe they do, Bohr made substantial changes to the previous two models, Thompson and Rutherford who also received Nobel Prizes.

However big money don't need Nobel prizes (which come with one million each), all they need is a good working theory that will allow them to peek into tomorrow's market. One thousand times per second.

BTW is head scratching stimulating blood circulation inside brain?

530 Like i remember during that time when i opened an Ameritrade account and put in 2000 dollars from a credit card. At first it was working but after a few days it was like some big entity with big money was intervening and screwing the prices of my picks so i gave up. But i was there long enough to see they were every day 2 o 3 startups dying there.

They all seemed the same. Gathering a hundred or two hundred million capital, real or not, around a chemical formula for a new Alzheimer drug that never made it past a couple years of studies. But guess what. How many grants where they sucking besides the initial investment?

Big money, big schemes nobody looks at. Nobody cares cause it's government's money.

Commentaries to Einstein's Explanation of Photoelectric Effect

(Yeah i know it should have been called photon-electron effect, this way it wouldn't have been confounded by so many with some photography related thing).

Photoelectric effect is one of the basis of Einstein's theory (of relativity of course). The experiments done before him showed that an electron is knocked out of bondage if hit with radiation above certain frequency, no matter the intensity of the beam, a more intense (classic, continuous) beam meaning higher energy making no difference.

Though this does not necessarily leads to it he came with the idea that radiation is made of discrete packets of (transversal, vibrating) energy he then considered as particles, later called photons. He even threw a formula including frequency and Plank's constant (don't know how to type scientific formulas with Greek letters right now, was not prepared for all these that for me would have been forgotten forever if not for this).

Einstein's photons do not have a resting mass since the emitters in a vacuum tube do not loose mass by emitting photons, which also means they only exist when in motion but they break the conservation of mass principle.

If they have a mass when in motion they should also have a longitudinal momentum and a kinetic energy, other than the transversal vibration energy that depends on the frequency (wavelength) as shown in the experiments.

Photons' longitudinal kinetic momenta is real by some and included in the design of hypothetical devices such as solar sails. Some say lasers create a weak but measurable momentum, being pushed in the other direction of emitting light. However the different opinions i collect are contradictory as this phrase is.

When a hypothetical photon hits an atom and adds enough energy to an electron and the electron breaks free and some, it then disappears (he said is absorbed). The theory does not explain what happens to its longitudinal, non vibrating kinetic mass momentum.

Also the vibrating energy of a photon would not have any sense without a mass. However it is not explained in the theory how the photon vibrates to carry that energy. Since it has no electric charge, it cannot vibrate in an accompanying variable transversal electric field. It could only be gravitational, maybe against self in time. Asymmetric and spinning?

Even though we cannot calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by Einstein's relativistic formula of kinetic energy, where the resting mass or non relativistic mass of a particle is used since photons do not have a resting mass, we could at least calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by the classic formula E=mv2/2 with v the the speed of light. Researchers at Stanford in order to calculate the mass of a photon equated the kinetic energy as calculated above with the relativistic energy of a photon E=hf, where h is Plank's constant and f frequency.

I believe i see where it's going... The (in)famous equation E=mc2 may derive from here, if you arbitrarily equate the two types of energy and then add them. It looks like the most famous equation in the whole theory of relativity that stipulates energy is mass comes from a non relativistic calculation that factors in the square of the speed of light of a photon with no resting mass and photon's relativistic mass.

As stated above longitudinal kinetic and transversal vibration energy are equal. Which probably makes for the dualism particle-wave and tries to keep them both equitably satisfied.

However there are some bad news. The spherical waves (pumpkin whatever) as we know them loose energy with the square of distance and "EM" waves as we know them are no exception. And still... A single photon emitted by a decaying electron will never extinguish if it doesn't hit anything in its travel (with the speed of light across the Universe)...

Even in the relativist world there are other ways to better explain the mass defect and one of them is same electrons moving at different relativist speeds before and after...

January 24

6:22 I have been working a few hours at this project. It is a representation of what it might be the real propagation of light. When an electron moves to a lower orbit, like in the case of hydrogen, where we have a single electron, its trajectory is similar to this one.

Its movement represent a tiny electric current initially created of a single falling electron that in turn may cause a magnetic field made of a single line, at 90 degrees. However the magnetic field cannot close cause it is following the movement of the only electron that ends in a different position.

This proves this magnetic field is nothing but a reaction of the void to the electric one in fact is just another electric current, made of only one virtual negatively charged particle, and the cycle repeats, propagating in space.

Travelling EM oscillations

All science describing light is weird. Never knew photons' mass which do not have a resting mass (do they ever rest?) depends on their frequency. According to the formula, when their frequency is zero, their energy is zero and mass is zero.

The EM radiation from a source propagates in all directions and they say is made of two fields, electric and magnetic that constantly recreate each other with each front wave, when any moving electric field creates a magnetic field etc. which fields are said to be perpendicular on each other and on the direction of propagation like in this image.

But the symmetry of propagation is broken as soon as we're away from the equator and at poles we don't have any fields at all. According to this demonstration EM field cannot propagate spherically. Or at least not symmetrically spherically.

The reason we see a light bulb similarly bright when observed from all directions is because we don't see only one front wave, but many, that each has its own (random) direction.

Can't find right now with google a satisfactory answer to the question. Does each photon has its own unique front wave or more than one photon can travel on the same wave front.

The reason we can not have spherical EM fields is EM field is not continuous but quantic in nature. Quantum means is made of discrete values or packets of energy called photons.

In lasers we can have photons traveling in synchronized front waves but they are still discrete. It is only a coincidence of our choice.

I came to believe that light is a collection of photons each with its own front wave that does only exist  around the photons.

I always believed polarization is rather an alignment of the electric and magnetic vectors of many photons rather than an intrinsic property of one photon. However, things have changed and now they are talking about the spin of a photon, that can be left, right, aligned with the direction of propagation and even transverse and the polarization is related to that spin and the spin can carry energy.

Maybe we shall soon come to believe that photon is a magnetically polar particle and its rotation generate the electric and magnetic field associated with it. My head is spinning.

Saleh Theory adds an extra motion to the photon besides linear and spin we know of already again carying extra energy but where is the balance to the centripetal force. Could it be the interaction of a magnetically or electrically polarized photon with its own front wave? If photon had a electric charge, the helical motion would create of course a variable electric field also calling for a magnetic one etc..

Or maybe there's no photon at all but just a (singled out, orphaned) EM disturbance that maintains self, a bubble that propagates on a straight line in vacuum in the same way disturbances propagate in elastic media though like spheres of pressure waves, that have a life of their own after the source ceases to exist.

One single front wave made of an one alternating electric and one alternating magnetic field in motion that recreate each other in time while advancing in space in steps, one after another, with nothing behind and nothing ahead. There is a phase difference between the electric and magnetic field that propel each other through space as both lag to each other at the speed of light and the lag time is the wavelength of the disturbance divided by the speed of light.

All the transfers between electric and magnetic fields within the bubbles that make the quanta of light of the same frequency and same direction in the whole Universe are in phase due to resonance and the space itself is divided in planes of resonance or slices where electric and magnetic field can turn into each other and those would be stationary and at equal distance and time of transfer between fields which is the same at each frequency and that makes for the speed of light being constant and generally greatest in Universe.

Quantum because there is only one value for the intensity of magnetic and one value for the intensity of electric field for the phenomenon to occur when in resonance with the others.

The energy carried by a quantum of light would be E = hc/λ, with h = 6.625 × 10–34 Js (Plank's constant) and c is the velocity of light and is dependent only by frequency. However there is not one single collection of parallel and equidistant planes but separate collections on all frequencies and all directions.

All disturbances on the same frequency (quanta of light) of the same direction resonate across the Universe however there can be as little as a few in one direction and that can be observed as what we call quantum entanglement.

It is not the space that is bent in the vicinity of big masses but the slices that channel light.

Polarization. Yes, a disturbance, depending on how it was created can have a spin without being a particle.

Interference. At short distances planar front waves of many disturbances combine through interference into quasi spherical hence all the classical experiments. Double slit experiment etc..

So far all my ideas are philosophical deductions, 3D geometric enunciations and verbal description. As There are no mathematical formulas, as Einstein used us to, nothing to illustrate those though there are conclusions that satisfy certain experimental knowledge, like the speed of light is constant and the limit to all speeds in Universe, quantum entanglement etc..

So i wanted to take a look at Maxwell's equations to see if i can grab something meaningful to my demonstration and all i could find was counter intuitive integrals, differentials and gradient symbols that tell me nothing. So i had to take a look again at things i haven't seen in more than 40 years and started with the basics of calculus from a video narrated in English,

Though i can cross now easily the language barrier, i ran into the same problem i did so many years ago.

Definitions of a differential starts with an equation using abstract terms, ds and dt, that can be as small as we can imagine. And all of a sudden in the in the comfort of my intuitive mind the left term of the equation flys to zero or infinity whatever comes first when those entities approach zero.

In reality, the term dt that disappears on the right since it can be as small as possible (approaches zero as the narrators states) in the left side becomes a convention within a notation system, it does not have the value of an equation or division term anymore. Too bad considering all the resources that video took to make and all the hopes of those who watch it and generally the head scratching of all students that ever had to go through this ordeal.

Nevermind i just ran into an animation with two simple equations i can understand hopefully deriving from that symbolism that show the two fields are in phase though the em field is continuously fed from behind which is not possible since the "photons" are emitted by single electrons while decaying orbit or changing energy level. But what happens to the traveling photons when we turn off the light, what pushes them from behind in a non elastic medium (air which for this purpose of this mental experiment can be considered vacuum).

Nevermind an idea just came to me. In the animation above the E field is at 180 degrees on the perpendicular B field and vice-versa. And if i think now, i realize this is how they create each other.

However i believe they propagate in a different way than shown in the animation since in the case of a single photon coming out of a single electron there is no spherical front wave to push it from behind since there cannot be spherical magnetic fields and that would be also an enormous waste of energy of a single electron changing level and would not explain the indefinite travel of a "photon" at the same speed of light through space to the infinity and that field would cease to exist anyways after the electron has changed level.

The whole energy is carried in one in a traveling complete oscillation of both fields instead or EM pulsating quantum instead of being potentially dissipated on a sphere with the radius of the distance the photon travels and i bet that is the mass of the moving photon per Einstein's fundamental equation.

I also believe the best way to describe those in words would be "traveling standing waves". One electric standing wave transfers all of its energy to a magnetic one and then disappears while the bubble or EM pulsating quantum travels 180 degrees on y as time axis while it turns 90 degrees on y as direction axis like a corkscrew for the sake of symmetry.

This is what the electric (or magnetic) component of the cycle should look like for one electric period only. The magnetic component would oscillate in similar ways but in horizontal plane (unseen in the video) and at 180 degrees in the direction of moving of the EM field. During the next period the first component will be moved in space a full 360 degrees etc..

Moving mass of a photon. It's simply the oscillating energy of a fast moving EM quantum transferred through a collision with a "solid" surface or particle. Same for photoelectric effect. An "electron" gets knocked out of orbit by a "photon" that was created by an electron decaying to a lower orbit.

Gravity. They have been talking so much of it, after Tesla, Einstein, others. Whole mathematics have been invented for trying to explain those (string theory in the 11th dimensions space) but so far no one has come (in public) with a verifiable solution.

I will try to make a few steps over the normal ones on such a complex theory and state that gravity may be simply a (dynamic) residual attraction between EM pulsating stationary quanta of energy, or disturbances that do not travel or resonate like light quanta, but instead are caught, due to interaction with others, figuring dynamic dipoles that happen to be in phase or close to, naturally reorienting for or close to attraction.

By not travelling, through analogy with light those could generate their own space and time.

Mass (inertial) in general would be the resistance of moving the stationary EM quanta through the resonance planes of light. In the case of fast constant speed moving quanta like "photons" if you add energy to the photon you change only frequency, in the case of slow moving or stationary disturbances (quanta), like "heavier particles", if you add energy to those you will change speed.

Once acquired a certain amount of energy (speed) they will simply jump through the planes at constant speed, the resistance will appear only when adding speed.

No electrons do not create EM dipoles by moving around. Smaller particles EM pulsating quanta have mass and interact with gravity.

It is said Einstein didn't like the name photon. I submit the whole class of particles we know today as bosons should be called gozons.

January 13

12:37 I think i came up with the first law of Universal reaction. The force of the reaction is proportional with the square of the size of the disturbance.

4:24 Novak și fermierii.

7:00 How an antiquated election system in place since before media and super fast communications era favors big money and  pathological criminals or their designated opponents in their race towards US Presidency. Why not direct elections period like in most European countries?

According to the states' legislations (and this is a type of discrimination between citizens of  the same country), people vote early in a so called open or closed so called primary elections during which a single candidate is pushed to the top for the "final" elections when every citizen gets to choose between... two candidates only of which most don't want, even with Taylor Swift push for young voters. What (or who) to vote?

It is clear to anybody the Republican party is ceding early by pushing totally ineligible candidates, of which Trump is the most.

7:50 László Tőkés.

11:38 At this hour of the night i can't even begin to understand the formulas behind that trajectory, but i like to believe that if they would calculate that trajectory taking in the consideration only the electric asymmetry of the proton they would come with something similar. Also i don't know why the nucleus itself would not rotate a bit, thus the cloud. And it all seems symmetrical.

Needless to say. The movement of the electron creates an electric current following that trajectory and the electric current creates a weird shape magnetic field etc. of which the variable part caused by the curves would be compensated by self induction.

I would think that while the atom is not perturbed like by heat, it would stay like that forever. 

However if the whole thing starts to vibrate, like being heated, at some point the electron might first jump on a higher level and and then loose that orbit and i don't know what shape will have the lower orbit, but will still be symmetrical if stable and at least during the fall both stable shapes will be asymmetrical and the magnetic field created during the fall will be asymmetrical.

Or simply the orbit would be perturbed enough by vibration for that to happen, without the need of fall. Especially if the lower energy level is fully populated like they are, where would the poor electron go?

By law of conservation of energy, something has to compensate that asymmetry and that would be a virtual particle creating an orphan asymmetrical field away from its cause because the cause (the fall or vibration) ceases before of the accomplishing of self induction and that in turn would create another one and another one, figuring the wheel of Ezekiel and of course the motion of a virtual particle would create an unstable string each time.

So in the end it is an uncompensated asymmetrical jumping (with the speed of light) magnetic or electric field. Nothing travels at the speed of light, not even light.

January 11

12:48 Could it be the 4 disks on the djed represent the four energy levels of orbiting electrons, the oval "head" of the Ankh the semi-closed eccentric magnetic or electric field line following the fall of an electron from highest orbit level, the Sun above representing the light (photon), etc..

2:15 I think i might have found something to work with in GeoGebra. Pharaoh's crook and flail? Earlier the image was available as google search result, it is now gone however in the meantime i downloaded the file it came from so i can do a screenshot (have to download it to see it). There are some interesting enunciations in the article too. "For the principle of conservation of energy to be hold true, it is necessary to add an extra term to the equation of motion as the radiation reaction force."

8:24 As for self induction of a single electron, it is very simple. Similar with self induction of a current made of many electrons eventually moving inside a conductor (self induction, the magnetic field created by a current generates back a current that opposes its cause).

However the problem gets more complicated and also more captivating when we consider a single accelerated electron moving in vacuum also on a curved trajectory which still fits the definition of an electric current. Then, we might have eccentric self induction and an electric momentum away from its cause which i call a virtual particle.

9:47 E=mc2 also means mass is energy. The photons which move at the speed of light only have mass in the sense they carry energy. However. Speed of light in glass is about 2/3 than in vacuum (BTW, way or infinitely outside of the scariest part of the Lorentz curve, or almost non-relativistic).

I understand the photons might be (instantly) slowed down when they enter glass. However. When light escapes glass it accelerates back to full c (c is always the same bla bla). Where do the slowed down photons get the extra energy to accelerate instantly back to c? (head scratching emoticon here).

January 12

11:08 Have no idea what is the etymology of the word свобода, the same in Russian and Ukrainian, however i know they are both Indo-European languages and this word reminds me of the last two words of Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra written in Sanskrit which i believe it the mother of most European and Indian languages.

11:37 Ca să nu regret mai târziu, așa cum regret că nu am scris chestia de mai sus acum câteva zile când mi-am dat seama prima dată, să mai spun o scurtă poveste. Pe care am mai spus-o dar în altă formă.

În anul I și II am avut o colegă cu looks de super star, de fapt semăna foarte bine cu Sandra, cântăreața lui Michael Crețu, dar avea o arsură pe gât care o desfigura puțin.

Însă abia zilele astea după ce am scris niște observații și am rememorat ce știam despre emisia spontană fotonică mi-am dat seama de niște chestii.

Pe colegă o chema Camelia Chelman și era din Bacău. Dacă scrii numele Chelman cu K, Kelman (da, știu la fel ca și Kelemen), toate consoanele formează KLMN adică numerotarea straturilor de energie ale electronilor care orbitează în jurul unui nucleu. În continuare, Camelia sugerează cocoașă deci o greutate sau o sarcină electrică poate?

Ea a picat examenul de mecanică teoretică din anul II bis, ceea ce însemna pentru ea terminarea facultății ceea ce sugerează că și căderea unui electron nu trebuie interpretată cuantic ci clasic? Și a căzut din tren înainte de a ajunge în Bacău (eu nu locuiam în Bacău în timpul acela, asta a fost după repartiție) după ce a picat examenul și a murit.

La începutul lui 81 cred m-am întâlnit cu ea la examenul de Studiul Metalelor în toamnă (eram în grupe diferite). L-am luat amândoi cu 5 (de pomană, eu am greșit chiar diagrama fier-carbon), știam că profesorul Alexandru nu pică în toamnă pe nimeni, ca de obicei când sunt foarte stresat, am luat-o pe jos la o plimbare foarte lungă și nu știu cum ne-am nimerit împreună, am mers pe jos din Tudor până în Copou (cât e, 5 km?) după care ne-am întors spre seară în centru și ea m-a dus să văd Carul cu Boi "care se uită la tine indiferent din ce direcție te uiți la tablou" (roțile lui Ezekiel?).

Mda, și traseul seamănă cu traiectoria unui electron care pică.

Căderea ei din tren a fost în 83? (locomotivă electrică, chiar, cât e forța gravitațională la distanțe foarte mici ca nucleu-orbită), an în care s-au scumpit băuturile iar România a început declinul economic ce a dus la căderea regimului 6 ani mai târziu în 89. Crețu, Kreuz, base, dance, oscillating perpendicular strings, de-light, M energy level, Sandra (particule, nisip, trecerea timpului)?

Inversarea timpului. E posibil să fie și alte mesaje în acest video, poate chiar notele, poate și în celelalte ale Enigma. Unicorn, primordial disturbance and its reaction that created the Universe, Nirvana (stingerea), etc..

Mai vedeți și voi eu sunt saturat cu multitudinea de chestii la care mă gândesc zilele astea.

December 5

1:52 Is this torii gates tunnel reminiscing of a pyramid shaft?

11:17

1:40 I had no idea when i developed the autonomous light quanta theory what immediate purpose would serve and be confirmed by.

I think i wrote before why i can't believe the current EM theory. They say when an electron move to a lower orbit it creates a sudden discharge, basically an electric current that in turn generates a magnetic field that in turn... hence the EM traveling field.

It should be a one front only field since the source ceases to exist, being a magnetic field at inception it has the shape of a pumpkin etc. though it is not thin but has volume and will be next to zero on the direction of the discharge or the electric current that created it or at poles.

The original magnetic field is stationary for the time the electron falls but (they say) it creates an electric one that is ahead with half period of that wave length frequency of which shape is hard to imagine short of the animation in Wikipedia and which creates another magnetic one, basically moving in jumps.

These fields vectors are said to be perpendicular on each other and on the direction of propagation which seems impossible in polar regions of the pumpkin.

It also seems obvious that the intensity of those fields decreases, maybe not with the square of distance (because it is not a sphere) but following other similar equation and after a while it will be so weak it will be undistinguishable from the background noise.

According to the dualism of light theory accompanied by these jumping fields there is a photon that of course flies into one direction only (out of many possible by riding the quasi spherical field). Average life expectation for a photon is 11 billion years or something like that.

Which means that if the photon does not encounter any obstacle it will travel with the speed of light for 11 billion years, possibly escaping the edges of our Universe. And it is obvious that after a while, rather early in photon's life it will not be accompanied anymore by the original EM field.

This theory has so many flaws we need not to continue to discuss it.

What i proposed is there is no electric, magnetic or gravity field, but only electric which appears as pulses, basically arrows of energy. Those pulses (or disturbances) create reactions that have to be in a such direction and positions in space they will not interfere with its cause, basically re-creating self at a 90 degrees angle in space and one quart of the period in time.

They way those travel suggest a succession of squares which have one arrow on one side only. As soon as an arrow finish one side it is transfered on next square, not seen here.


The optical effects of light are easy to explain in this theory. Quanta (or pulses) whe nowadays call photons are never singular coming from a source but in large numbers flying in all direction. Some of them since inception are in phase (though not going in the same direction as in a laser), by resonance. So they will create the equivalent of wave fronts that may explain the classic optical experiments.

Now try to imagine four of those emitted simultaneously right on the tip of the pyramidion perpendicular on each side that in turn would create perpendicular ones moving on each side in squares pushed down (repelled) by new ones from the tip where a conductor is hooked fed by some induction coil fed by a batter or condenser inside the pyramid or a resonant circuit similar to a Tesla coil whatever.

Like in a combination of this video (turquoise pyramids only) and the one above.

There will be four disturbances chasing each other in squares above the surface while the squares are getting bigger and bigger and pushed down given the shape of the pyramidion that will create sort of an electric prying effect on space, and possibly opening the original void.

By calculation or trial and error one could focus this electric vacuum somewhere in an empty space below inside the pyramid where the air has also been removed, thus creating a bubble of the original void, where distances have no meanings and which will be instantly connected to a similar or more bubbles across the perceived Universe.

Yes it is possible the Ancient Egyptians, others, could have figured this by themselves if they knew about electricity and geometry and nature of the Universe.

In a time when people lived by themselves and not drowned in symbolism and all kind of fake competitions generated of course by the need of a few to own this very limited resource that could open the possibility to travel across the Universe maybe to better worlds that we may call Heaven.

Extracellular Matrix and Cancer

All cells, bacteria and viruses have a wrapping membrane formed by lipid bilayers. I don't know exactly how it grows back after a cellular division, but i believe it is the fundamental "brick" of life. Everything that lives in the animal kingdom have to have one. It is very fragile, like a soap bubble. Can read for further details.

The thickness of this universal bio material is known, it is two molecules thick or about 4 nm (nano meter or 1/1000 microns or 10 to the power -9 meters). For comparison, the size of a diamond cubic crystal made of 8 atoms is about 0.35 nm.

One of the methods of visualizing a virus within a tissue is by freezing and cutting that piece containing viruses with a micro-tome equipped with a knife made of diamond. However you cannot sharpen diamond to obtain an edge one atom thick, and even if you could it would break before cutting anything. One of the smallest commercially available diamond knife is about 12 atoms or 2 nm radius or 4 nm thick.

Because of that a cross section through a cell's or virus's membrane would be more of a tear than a cut.

Most viruses have around 100 nm diameter. To see a cross section of a virus you have to cut slices of the tissue suspected to have viruses in it and then you look under electron microscope to see if you caught/cut a virus in two.

Eukariotic cells are those which made up multicellular organisms. Their two molecule thick lipid bylayer membrane is very fragile but they are encapsulated in collagen extracellular tissue (or cellulose in case of plants) that also holds an organ together and has some mechanical resistance.

Here are images of collagen extracellular matrices in cut cross sections in various stages of degradation because of induced illnesses in mice, last one being most porous, after they have been stripped of cells with some chemicals.

Usually represented through graphs, there are also images of cross sections of whole cells taken under electron microscope, though is hard to catch in a single image all types of organelles within one single cell in a cut sample. But i would assume if you have enough time and patience you would find a cell that has been cut in such a way it has all of those visible.

Coincidentally this cell is seen with two open vesicles in the lower right side which means the cell is dying because some of its organelles are already used to produce viruses. It can also be a cultured cell, that is not wrapped yet in a connective tissue matrix.

To me it is hard to believe a cell would produce something that would infect and kill other cell, that is viruses.

But how most viruses that are enveloped only in a fragile bylayer membrane can escape the hard collagen connective tissue enclosure of the cell. I believe the answer probably is viruses can only propagate within already damaged tissue or weakened or porous matrix which is not intact and can be an evolutionary mechanism through which cells that are not completely encapsulated are killed. (2 micrometers mean 2000 nanometers).

There is a type of cells that specialize in maintaining and regenerating the connective tissue. They are called fibroblasts. However sometimes tissues cannot be repaired and they are replaced with scar tissues which is mostly made of collagen like in the case of cirrhosis of the liver. But there are no fiberblasts in the extracellular matrix surrounding cells. That one is secreted by the cells themselves.

But it could happen some people are so depleted of collagen from previous repairs like in case in chronic ulcerations, or simply a poor diet, that their cellular matrix is so thin is permeable to things as fragile as viruses. One way to know is examining old scars that used to be firm and then turned into very soft tissue.

Once the matrix become permeable, not only viruses and bacteria but the cells themselves start to penetrate and divide outside, right the border of the matrix, especially in weakened or damaged areas and if they are too many close to each other they start building a different kind of matrix we all know as cancer. Unlike viruses and bacteria they are not recognized as harmful but your organism's immune system.

However it is unclear to me from all i could find how cells divide inside the extracellular matrix where every cell seems to have its own place made of collagen fiber. 

It is obvious there is not enough room for two daughter cells inside a single "room", one of them has to die. I would assume that after division there is a competition between the two daughters and only the most viable survives. But if cells start dividing outside the matrix, they will all probably live for ever inculcating the mutant ones and the ones closest to the old matrix will start building their own aberrant matrix.

Could it be peaks during chemo kill the cells that are dividing freely just outside the matrix more than the ones inside.

...

It is known that collagen fibers are too big to penetrate human intestine. All it can go in your blood stream within a healthy intestine is broken down through digestion small molecules of monosaccharides, amino-acids, fatty acids and minerals.

However, if you take collagen supplements or eat collagen rich foods like bone broth or hot dogs, those are broken down in your intestine during digestion to the exact type of amino-acids and minerals needed by the fibroblasts or cells to produce collagen.

I believe a healthy cellular matrix in all organs is key in cancer prevention and it can be maintained through a proper diet and also by treating all chronic inflammations and ulcerations in your body that are usually caused by an unavoidable toxic environment with dust, mold and bacteria.