Reconciliation of Quantum and Classic Physics

"Newtonian physics, also called classical mechanics, describes the motion of everyday objects at a macroscopic level, while quantum physics deals with the behavior of extremely small particles like atoms and subatomic particles, where the laws of Newtonian physics break down, exhibiting phenomena like wave-particle duality and uncertainty in measurements; essentially, Newtonian physics is applicable to large-scale objects moving at speeds much slower than light, while quantum physics is needed for the microscopic world at the atomic and subatomic level."

"Erwin Schrödinger and Werner Heisenberg were both prominent physicists who significantly contributed to the development of quantum mechanics, with Schrödinger known for his "wave equation" and Heisenberg for his "uncertainty principle" which describes the limitations in knowing both the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously."

"The "Heisenberg cloud model" refers to the concept of an "electron cloud" within an atom, which is directly tied to Werner Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, suggesting that the exact position of an electron cannot be known with certainty, only the probability of finding it in a given region around the nucleus, creating a "cloud-like" appearance; this model is often associated with Erwin Schrödinger's wave function calculations that describe the electron's behavior as a wave rather than a particle."

I explained before what quantum is. Everything that is molecules and smaller. What does that mean. Molecules and everything smaller are made of combinations of particles that are always of the same size and have the same properties.

Because at the base all particles are made of strings, that are stationary waves made of oscillating virtual particles created initially as a reaction of the void to abrupt motion of charged particles like electrons and are always the same because the electric charge of virtual particles is always the same. Quantum stands for same quantity.

The two scientists named above created the cloud or shell model, which says the electrons move around fixed charged particles in shells or clouds.

Heisenberg uncertainty principle solved one problem, or better said, one worry about why we can't know how the electrons move in a cloud by simply stating we can not know, and sealing that statement with an equation.

It is true for the most part. We can't know where they are except they do reside in clouds or shells and those clouds exist at quantified energy level or heights and speeds. Because electrons are quantum particles and they rotate around other quantum particles all with quantum masses and electric charges there are only a few orbits they can occupy and that is according to Newtonian laws.

However this model has some serious inconveniences. One of them is we cannot figure by it the true nature of spontaneous emissions of photons.

The other is purely psychological. Students who later become scientists are baffled by the... uncertainty.

However in that cloud the electrons are not vaporized of merged or anything as the model suggests.

Electrons are still there and moving and most importantly, from time to time, colliding with each other. It is not a magical or fuzzy "quantum cloud", but their trajectories are so complicated we do not have the capabilities of writing down equations to describe them though lately we could model their motion on supercomputers.

In a few words, it is a classic physics n body problem where n represents the number of particles of the whole assembly, however, non-symmetrical, with electrons repelling, not attracting each other, moving on an area close to the surface a sphere, attracted electrostatically and gravitationally by a central non-punctiform mass and thrown away by centripetal forces, with sometimes missing electrons on the last level and some receiving energy from photons.

Thus the speed of electrons on a level is not constant but constantly modified by all the above described forces and events and inevitably sometimes colliding with each other.

Indeed, the equations describing the motions of electrons are so complicated we may be tempted to call for an uncertainty umbrella equation.

However with the advent of supercomputers, i think they can be modeled, starting with assemblies with few particles at the center and in orbits.

The number of electrons on each energy level is also quantified, with the first levels being occupied first and each level having a certain tolerance of total energy of all moving electrons.

From time to time two electrons on the same level can collide near frontally so violently one of them can be knocked out of orbit and move to a higher quantum level, or outside the whole assembly if it happens on the last level (like in photelectric effect), creating a vacancy in the level where it started. This may create an imbalance in the whole assembly, with more electric charges near periphery or less.

Almost immediately a slow moving electron from the higher level that could be the same one that just jumped will fall back in the vacant space though with a much lower speed.

Any motion of an electric charge creates a tear in the space time continuum i shall call from now on void and the void reacts to it by creating a virtual particle that has the same charge instant speed and trajectory and moves perpendicular and at some distance to the first one. We may call this the universal law of action-reaction.

We are familiar with this phenomenon we called in the past electromagnetism though with more than one particle involved (an whole current of electrons) thus the created magnetic field will appear to have closed lines.

Now try to imagine in that conductor we have an electric current made of one single electron (practically not possible in conductors, only in vacuum) moving at non relativistic speeds.

Instead of magnetic lines we will have a point that moves on a trajectory perpendicular on the trajectory of the generating electron, we can call a virtual particle creating a spiral magnetic line, with the same charge as that of the electron though positive, which virtual particle is created by the void following the action-reaction universal law however massless and with no energy transfer from the creating photon since there is no reaction of the void to a non relativistic mass.

In other words, the whole up and down movement of an electron is creating an electric oscillation in the assembly similar to an electric current though made by only one electron that will create an (incomplete) spiral shaped magnetic field line in the surrounding void. If the speed of the electron is relativistic, a virtual particle with the opposite charge and negative relativistic mass of that electron will be created.

When an electron withing a shell or cloud or level is accelerated by a collision to relativistic speed, the virtual particle generated by it will also have a a relativistic mass however negative that is the difference between the the resting mass of that electron and its relativistic mass and the relativistic part of the energy of that electron will be transferred to the virtual particle until the electron is slowed down back to non-relativistic.

A photon's first virtual particle is a virtual particle with negative relativistic mass created by an electron that is accelerated to a relativistic speed and then decelerated to non-relativistic the relativistic part of its energy to the virtual particle mirroring self in that time frame of its relativistic speed with only difference it has no resting mass, its relativistic mass is negative moving perpendicular on electron's instant trajectory, with same relativistic instant speed and acceleration, at 1/4 distance of the photon's wavelength, with a time delay of 1/4 of its period.

The newly created virtual particle, having all the properties of the creating electron except for resting mass (which does not create a reaction of the void), and moving at relativistic speeds during all of its existence will do the same as the electron, mirroring self on a perpendicular direction, at a distance and with a time delay. By the time the creating virtual particle ceases to exist, the new one just appears because of that time delay. The only difference would be its relativistic mass will be positive.

This process may continue indefinitely creating a cross like pattern.

I believe this is how measurable time and space is being created.

In other words, the photon is made by 4 discrete self replicating in time and space electrically charged virtual particles appearing and moving sequentially in four different directions each perpendicular to the previous and to the axis and the fifth being identical with the first though at a one wave length distance on the axis and at one period time delay or completing a cycle.

If a photon hits the outer shell of the assembly it depends on the moment that photon transfers its energy to an electron or by the direction of the last virtual particle vs the movement of the electron in the moment of transfer of energy.

Jumping to a higher level of energy after an electron gets directly hit by a photon or what they call excitement happens rarely. Most likely, the virtual particle will interact with several electrons at a time meaning its energy will be transmitted to the whole shell and then one electron will be knocked out of orbit by a collision.

Electro Dynamic Theory of Everything or Single Void Disturbance Theory

An "electron" moving to a lower orbit creates in time as per the universal law of action/reaction a pulse of electric field which in turn creates and transfers all its energy and propagates to another one with a time (phase) difference, and those constantly recreate selves following the same law thus transferring energy to the next while advancing in time and space and the lag to each other is 1/4 of the period of the whole cycle of disturbance, until they reach again after four transfers the post initial stage (first void reaction) or in one period and this continue indefinitely.

The perceived direction of the reaction to each pulse is at 90 degrees again in a plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation because the reaction can only appear in a direction perpendicular and at 1/4 wavelength distance without interfering with its cause. Time and space are illusions created by the reaction to the initial manifestation of void. A random lowering of the orbit of an electron and its reactions occur in the space created by the initial manifestation.

There is no photon but just a singled out, orphaned, autonomous, quantum pulsating electric disturbance that maintains self while advancing, a contained bubble of constant energy that propagates on a straight line in vacuum constantly changing direction of pulse with 90 degrees each time on a plane perpendicular on the direction of propagation.

Total electric charge gets balanced in the transversal plane after one period but there will be a charge in the direction of propagation. The void provides a reaction to light quanta similar to that of elastic media to a wave of sound which appears due to inertia to mechanic motion. Due to net longitudinal charge there is a longitudinal electric field carried by the light quanta that may combine with the others and be responsible for the results of experiments that show light behaves like a wave.

Light quanta will live and travel indefinitely until they interact and cede their energy to a slow moving "particle" or a solid object.

In a radio antenna the emission will occur when the alternating electric current applied to the dipole stops before starts changing direction. The growing reacting bubble exists as a whole for as long as it is a reaction to the flow of current. When the flow of current stops, it will burst into quanta of fields repelling each other.

When an electron moves to a lower orbit it also creates an electric current similar to that in a dipole.

Electric fields cannot exist without a charge. When the virtual charge behind the field bubble bursts it will channel in all directions because of repelling of similar charges until each generated smaller quanta will start getting its own reaction.

Charge of electric field or energy of each generated quanta is given by the necessary time to obtain a reaction of the same size. Period of a complete cycle of transformation until it reaches initial direction or 1/frequency depends on the length of dipole or electron's trip.

Number of quanta emitted by a dipole is calculated by dividing the total charge generated by the alternating electric current given by the number of electrons in half period to the value of each quanta charge which depends only on frequency.

Moving mass of a "photon". Eventually all "photons" travelling throughout Universe will end colliding with atoms, triggering a photoelectric effect. When the electron is ejected from the atom it generates a momentum.

Also. An "electron" gets knocked out of orbit by a "photon", reverting the effect of a photon being created by an electron moving to a lower orbit.

However. In photon generation the electron does not come from the outer space. It only moves to a lower orbit. Which suggests the energy needed to emit a photon is not equal to the energy to knock out an electron by a photon which is not true.

The energy generated from moving an electron to a lower orbit can be greater than the one needed to emit a photon. There are proven cases where at least two photons has been emitted in one single electron move to a lower orbit and not talking about the photons that may be emitter inwards or towards the object that get absorbed right away.

There are cases in which a photon moving to a lower orbit fails to generate a photon but instead generate an electron/positron pair. During photoelectric effect the electron is completely knocked free of the atom with some extra moving energy. It may be because different types of atoms are involved for emission or absorption of photons.

But it all leads to one conclusion. There must me some leftovers when creating quanta of light, both in the case of electrons lowering orbit or resonant circuit emissions because the generating energy does not divide exactly to the emitted energy.  Frozen or stationary quanta and their reaction that in the end could be other "particles" that may be charged.

There are no particles. Everything is made of quanta of different levels of energy.

The electrons are excited by heat before they move to lower orbits. Emission of a photon cools down the atom so it may be a "local" anti-entropic process. But when the emitted photon hits another atom it heats it up again and en electron is lost.

Inertia is a reaction of void to change of speed or acceleration of static non moving or frozen quanta.

Gravity is the attraction between the numerous reorienting dipoles inside objects. Freedom for reorienting is small and the force is small for everyday objects.

Speed of light. In an empty Universe like the one before the Big Bang or the original Single Void Disturbance we cannot measure space because there is nothing to measure with. Then the Universe started to get filled with light. However light quanta do not move. They jump from one point in space to another instantly, the only delay is given by the transfer of charge in time from one point to another or time of reaction of void. Any other object that actually moves through space cannot match that speed.

Since light quanta does not move when it propagates it may be stationary to the primordial disturbance. That's why some say the speed of light is perceived as the same by any observer.

There are people who say the electric field lines start from a charged object and end at infinity for a positive charge and from infinity to the object for a negative charge. This is a very interesting enunciation.

Let's say we turn a switch on and let a small sphere of metal be charged through a wire from another one already charged negatively and shielded. How long it takes for the field lines arising from infinity to reach the sphere? By the definition, it should be instantaneous. Also by experiments. However we know from other experiments that the speed of light is finite.

But there is another consequence of the fact the electric field extends instantaneously to infinity. It also should extinguish instantaneously if the sphere is connected to the ground and loses charge. Same with magnetic, we cut current through the coil, the magnetic field collapses (after a transient phenomenon called self induction).

But in now classic relativity the EM wave accompanying a photon do not extinguish after cutting off the source.

BTW since photons can travel for billions of billions of years, will they.... leave or some already left our Universe which is "only" 26.7 billion years old?

It is said expanding quasi spherical EM field has two transversal, electric and magnetic components, which means the electric field is not parallel to the direction of propagation but perpendicular.

I really don't understand how a transversal field can be spherical (or how an electric field that may extend to infinity can be transversal).

Quasi spherical or spherically deformed closed lines alternating lobes (loops) they say, and if they expand with the speed of light, the fields should also loose intensity with the square of distance as the same lobes that "somehow" maintain selves occupy more and more space. Speed of "closing lines" in the same direction with advancement shown in the animation above on top or bottom of some alternating lobes at speeds greater than light, consistent with... The formulas and the other animation here suggest the waves accompanying a photon do not loose energy while they advance.


There is only one type of (dynamic) manifestation of void (disturbance), we call electric, but actually the only thing that can exist in void is will. All "particles" and light in the Universe come from a reaction of void to a primordial manifestation of will.

In everyday objects, a magnetic field is a closed electric field, confined in space or shaped by the way it was generated, either by moving of particles like electrons in a wire in a closed trajectory or by coils. A closed electric field will not interact with one one with single pole (charge) with open lines but will deflect a charged moving particle.

No need for big "particles" accelerators to figure what happened in the first seconds after the creation of Universe (time did not have sense anyways until the creation of the the planes of resonance). Stop making experiments based on false theories (particles) that may one day hurt everybody or simply throw us all in a parallel Universe if they didn't already.

Quantum

We have come a long way since the first enunciation of quantum theory. Some got used to it so much is like a second nature. But today many people discuss about on forums and they have opinions and sometimes find inconsistencies if not contradictions.

But what it is. In the subatomic world, all quantities are discrete values. It is, in a way, what digital is vs analog.

The reason for that is simple. The state of the Universe was 0 before the big bang and that was one single event.

However, properties of quantum world translates to the every day world and the enormous number of quantum properties put together to form everyday objects make them look continuous and analog. Like composing bits from an wav or mp3 file into an analog wave form which is audible and recognizable.

At the time, all these of course came from observations and not postulates. They determined the properties of quantum world through experiments of which first and most important is the photon-electron effect. One photon is needed to displace one electron from a metallic surface.

They concluded the entire quantum world is made of such discrete particles of which every single one of the same class has the same properties.

One electron has always the same mass and electric charge. One photon travels always with the speed of light and it can never be found resting, one proton has always the same mass and its electric charge will be always the opposite of that of an electron.

More than that, they interact with each other to form what we call matter. Protons and neutrons together form the nucleus of atoms which is orbited by a number of electrons. For each element and isotope of  the Mendeleev table we have the same number of protons and neutrons.

Because electrons cannot be split in smaller particles, they are called fundamental, together with several others while protons and neutrons are formed by smaller fundamental ones.

This discretization of matter goes all the way to molecules. Atoms combine to form molecules by sharing orbiting electrons. Molecules with the same formulas or structure have always the same properties.

However. It has been found that light which is made of photons has properties similar to those of waves in elastic media, like sounds or a wave created by a rock or in a lake, of which one is diffraction.

After much head scratching of the scientists, they came with a solution. Light is not photons or waves but a combination of those they call dualism wave particles of light. That, to satisfy all observations and experiments.

One discrete photon is always accompanied by an analogous wave front and they came with the idea of electro magnetic radiation or wave. And that's where the first confusion occurred.

EM waves let's say emitted by a radio station seem continuous and analog and have all properties of those.

However EM radiation coming from a single electron descending to a lower orbit, which is a short lived electric current, generates a magnetic field and it is said that magnetic field pulse in turn generates and electric one and so forth, hence the EM radiation seems discrete because the speed, the start end end position of the electron can be defined only in quantum world.

And first inconsistency. Since the current generated by that falling electron is a finite line, it generates a magnetic field like a rectangular permanent magnet would, in the shape of a pumpkin that would be near zero at poles or in the direction of the pole. However we expect something more like a cloud, the same way electrons orbit the atom.

Anyways it is not a circular or spherical wave like field we are used to from elastic media. Same goes for a dipole antenna for radio emissions.

Another one. Falling of an electron can create only one front wave. After that, the EM field is not sustained by anything from behind.

Again the velocity of the fallen electron is a quantum affair. Electrons reside in discrete cloud like positions on different levels of energy around the atom. Thus it cannot be established a speed in classical or non quantum terms for that falling electron from one cloud to another. Thus we can't know for how long the magnetic field lives.

Another one. Let's say the front of EM wave created by the pulse of falling of an electron spreads, though not like a sphere but like a pumpkin, continuously, in all directions (with the exception of poles). The photon can only go in one direction out of an infinity (or a few following the uncertainty principle).

After a while the intensity of the EM field decreases by a law similar to the square of distance, and will become insignificantly small while the photon can travel theoretically 11 billion years if it does not encounter any obstacles, (and depending on where it was emitted, can exceed the limits of the Universe and there will be no more dualism).

Another one. A number of photons emitted by a compact source are each created by its own electron so we cannot talk of a coherent analogous EM field but of a cloud of overlapping out of phase short lived fields.

From all the above observations one can realize the precarity of the whole EM theory as we know it today.

Without going into postulate mode yet, or without any changes to current theories, i want to make a first observation. The wave nature of light which is a bunch of photons coming from a single compact source like those used in experiments can be explained much easier if we could consider some sort of resonance between traveling photons emitted by falling electrons or a statistic grouping of in phase photons.

That is there will be always a number of photons in phase with each other, creating a virtual front wave.

But the front wave can only be electric, magnetic or both, and we'd have to accept the photons are carrying each its own pulsating field while the energy of the photon will always depend on its... (pulsating) frequency, field that of course is not spherical or pumpkin like and does not loose intensity and travels with the photon for 11 billion years.

Ok so here comes the postulate. In the same line of reasoning, we have to admit that the falling electron does not produce a quasi spherical magnetic field but transfer its energy to only one pulsating photon that is made of both magnetic and electric fields. Or better said, only electrical.

And that pulsating field can only be an infinite series of successive reactions of the void to the initial disturbance created by the falling electron, following the only universal law and that is action/reaction.

First reaction to the disturbance will occur in such a way it will not interfere with its source, and that is at 90 degrees in space and time to its cause. In turn, that first reaction will create the second, etc.. in an infinite cycle creating a cross traveling quantum we call photon.

However there is not a B wave but only E disturbances which pulses once transversal like in the animation below and then jumps 90 degrees ahead longitudinal and pulses again at 90 degrees transversal.

Though each transversal pulse is made at peak of two quarks that have mass, the total transversal (electric of course) momentum is zero while it's still photon, the pulse balances self after one cycle of four pulses as if those four pulses were emitted at once which makes us thinking if longitudinal time has any significance in its own reference frame.

I think the mass of the two quarks may come from the electron also falling into the gravitational field of the nucleus which is very weak when compared to the electric but it exists. (we cannot not dismiss any amount in quantum).

Even in this animation one starts to ask self if the fields are balanced. But we are talking here electric and magnetic line fields, not mechanical yoyos with inertia and stuff. Why should they be anchored at one end? And here another question for the EM theory. If one field causes the other, then why are they always in phase?

The representation does not apply to EM fields emitted by falling electrons because those can only exist for the time of the electron falling, that is one half period, and hence the first confusion. We don't have such things in nature (dipoles fed by oscillators).

The deducted appearance of the moving quanta would be a succession of lines at 90 degrees each in a succession of parallel planes that seen on the direction of propagation will look like a cross. The apparent rotation of the quantum is its spin.

Depending on the frequency, or the difference in levels of energy of the origin electron (or possible other sources) we will have light, microwaves, radio waves etc. or all the EM spectrum as we know it.

According to this theory, light can be bend when an electric field is applied in the direction of the quanta where is moving away with the help of a very high frequency high voltage stimulation (maybe not at every cycle) that may be created with the help of so called Helmholtz resonators or other type of very advanced "stone age" device inside pyramid or simply with the help of a very strong electrostatic field applied from very close when light generated at the top of they pyramidion moves down the gold faces.

Also light quanta could be accelerated or rushed from behind down the pyramidion by other in phase quanta.

Again using the hypothesis the pyramid is a indeed a photonic device capable of splitting light quanta created at the top in its four components. By doing this in a fast energetic successions it may bring anything contained inside or in a focused area to its frame reference and the time inside may slow, space dilate (According to Einstein time stops for anything that travels at the speed of light).

By bending light around pyramid light could be slowed down by the angle effect or accelerated by other quanta pushing from behind thus time can be reverted. But you need to revert time all the way to before that region of space was inside the expanding Universe to create a wormhole.

Or maybe they didn't want to. BTW, i was thinking yesterday, i don't see any restrictions to traveling into the future if you are about do die inside that pyramid anyway and never to come out. Or maybe if you abide a few simple rules. Or if you don't care about creating parallel universes and stuff.

We know this is possible in the microwave or even terahertz range with today's electronics. Did i mention vacuum creating mechanism for the Helmholtz resonator inside the pyramid?

All these and probably more were known of course to Ancient Egyptians, who build the pyramids to manipulate quanta, possibly others. By forcing the cross quanta down the slopes of a pyramid they split it into a square (in a way similar to opening a 4 blade iris) (final stabbing of Christ on the cross) using high voltage electricity and the shape of the gold pyramidion they could basically bend light, induce speeds much greater than light, stretch space, revert time, etc..

I know where they got their ideas for the string theory. But do they know what the strings are made of?

Ok i think i got it. When an electrons falls to a lower orbit and creates a photon (void reaction) that is too energetic, it can break down in two other particles, which are open strings too small to create their own void reactions and in turn start vibrating. Because the reaction to void is dynamic, the split creates two charged particles.

Here are (named only) a few ancient and modern symbols reminding of this model of Universe and demonstrating knowledge of it. I won't add the graphic symbols because in some countries are banned.

Square and compass.

In Ancient Chinese mythology there is a story of two half snake half human brother and sister, Fuxi and Nüwa, who supposedly rebuilt the Universe with a square and a compass. In this representation they look surrounded by strings made of rings. Their modern continuation seem to be the freemasons.

Swastika

Toyota logo

Audi logo

Subaru logo

Also. The striking similarities of these fundamental scientific findings with major themes of the four main religions of the world, possible other religions, suggest these themes were popular in the past, possibly carrying symbolic informations about lost knowledge belonging to advanced ancient civilizations that ended in a global conflict conflict, possibly the one described in the oral epic story (that has been later written) Mahabharata.

Wild turkeys, split pyramid, pyramidion and a solar symbol (left) part of a museum across Indian Head Casino, last night, inside Warm Springs reservation, Oregon.

Dharma Wheel of Nikola Tesla

I think Tesla might have had a good intuition interpreting the dharma wheel of Buddhism or star of Ishtar or contemporary Scientology cross (yes i believe our future lays in the mnemonics of the past religions) but it is not quite the way he did it.

Disregarding those formulas, and seeing this representation as a photon in transversal plane it could all be the pulsating cross quanta may create besides time and space, also gravity.

The words tryadha vyavasthita sarva buddha in the mantra translate literally "three expected for each light (color?)" corresponding to the three components in some ancient representations in the center of the wheel that could mean each proton is made of three quarks.

Interpretation:

1:12 1/5/2024 version

It is not quite like that. I assumed the magnetic field line starts in the middle of nowhere and probably would have if the electron would have an initial vertical speed.

However its descending speed starts from zero and in the initial moment the single magnetic field line starts from near the electron and extends on a parable like curve in a plane perpendicular to the trajectory of the electron that contains the electron, if there are no other electrons to interfere with the electron's falling speed or trajectory. Then it's gonna be a more complicated curve.

During the constant speed phase it moves on a circle on a the same plane and the trajectory is helicoidal with a constant radius.

It seems the electron during acceleration phase is ceding its energy to the virtual field line. The only way this can happen is if the field line is the trajectory of a positive virtual charge that furthers from the electron by increasing the radius of that helix. During deceleration the electron looses speed and energy and the virtual charge gets back close to it. 

The trajectory as a whole seems like the shape of a 3D horse shoe  that is part of a helix with variable and constant radius or the edges of a propeller arm.

The virtual positive charge moving in a circuit that seems closed in a view in the direction of the fall, would create a negative virtual charge moving on a trajectory similar to that of the falling electron. For the accelerating and decelerating part of the cause the virtual charge would move at different angle both looking like an pharaoh's crook and flail with both constantly changing angles and propagating with each step?

Year is 2024 and i am shocked by the fact nobody looked into this until now. That is the shape of a single magnetic field line generated by a falling electron. They instead look in the cloud chamber of the LHC, the most complicated machine built on Earth. Unless if it's all a big coverup and they knew this from the beginning of quantum mechanics era.

Another ancient source that is less obvious. There are spirals in this Ancient Egypt amulet near other details (square, wings) that seem to represent right angles, half right angles in the context of an eye that might represent light and a bird that might represent gravity.

The tilak. Never knew it is called like that. And a 3D U shaped version on Amazon.

I think after a major world conflict people's knowledge broke into pieces. Like Sanskrit broke into many European and Indian languages, each keeping different words, the same happened with the advanced knowledge. People tried to pass it down to further generations that reverted to stone edge.

They knew they had to somehow preserve the important parts and painted those on the forehead of their children, or  built pharaoh's masks waiting for a revival which never took place. The pieces and symbols and stories became different religions as we know them and humans never reverted to the highly advanced civilization (Heaven for all) that was once here on Earth and it is possible the intruders who are probably the ones who built the pyramids survived as well without knowledge of their past.

But nowadays they are obviously way ahead of us.

DeCember 12 (12)

2:02 AM "My purpose for the day was to see if it's possible to design a practical device that could do what the warp engines were doing in Star Trek but the day has passed drowned in unnecessary noise a and stomps and s...t."

Let's see if i have anything to say about the link above. I don't believe in negative energy and mass an s...t.

I believe in traveling within a void bubble. What is a void bubble. It is a place... no place at all. It is what this Universe was before big-gang (or first true random void disturbance).

In that no place at all distances do not mater. So if you open one of those and then another one in a different place corner of the Universe whatever was in the first one would migrate in the second when first one fades away. No other opening (of bubbles) can intervene in those moments or loss of material and lives could occur. Or parallel Universes be created whatever.

That's why i was telling, it is a limited resource in this Universe.

This was done on Earth with a pyramid shaped device during Ancient Egypt and then nowadays using tokamaks (in a different purpose then declared). Synchronization is the key for the transfer.

Was thinking of a dynamic process. A traveling device could wrap itself in a bubble while opening a bubble ahead at some distance. While advancing from one bubble to the other, the ship does not exit in the normal space so i don't know if it could open a bubble in a continuous mode but who knows for sure if there is not some trick for it...

Though i'm pretty sure it can be done because we need it and this Universe, or the first disturbance, arose to fulfill any rational need or anything mind can think of.

But will a ship traveling using successive or continuous jumps, obviously slower than bubble to bubble disrupt the busy schedule of site to site traveling?

Only salvation would come with size. If a bubble will resonate only with one of the same size, or only with one created at a certain precise time after the first one, then yes, simultaneous multiple site to site pairs of bubbles could exist, including ships.

2:50 Yeah i know, it sounds a bit like Scientology. But then let us not forget that...

2:52 And now that we have all the philosophical premises in place, let's think of a practical device. However, it may require brainstorming, or who knows, all the thetans have again to agree...

But i think all a ship has to do is to create ahead a tunnel of void long enough for the end of it to be in phase with the beginning... But that would require a lot of energy and probably should think first of how to extract the energy from the void. Or maybe the bubble can travel as a wave or something, conserving the bubble... As a worm maybe?

3:12 Visionary Jules Verne writes in his book about Paris in 1960 (or after 100 years he wrote it), reality that seems to be postponed to our days (his mind was a bit fast), among others, that journalism would not exist anymore, as they were no news and i think he was right about that one too.

Superweapons used in the first decades of twentieth century (Tunguska event) and reactions that followed (WWI, WWII, totalitarism) wiped the need for war thus the one for news. However they keep waging wars as a mean to control population that was getting smarter in the west and writing something that replaces the news, i call it the continuous show, which is a very sophisticated and complex live show, using the addiction for news of the population as a mean to keep them dumb.

1:00 This suggests a couple of large superconductive coils similar to those of tokamaks that could wrap the ship in a void bubble. However, the coils themselves that are attached to the ship are out of that bubble.

3:43 Spin and orbit the nucleus? Ok let' say for the purpose of this discussion they spin in a circle. Thus the magnetic field is nothing but again a reaction of the void, creating again closed loops perpendicular to its motion in a way similar to electron rotates in a closed loop. 

No further reaction to the reaction cause this one is closed and not moving. Since the electron rotates it probably rotates with it and there is a continuous "field" of rotating magnetic lines around the rotation axis.

This type of reaction is again an electric field but since it has no polarity (no beginning or end) as it is closed it does not interact with other electric nearby fields. But if we were to consider the fact the electron is rotating like in a cloud of uncertainty around the nucleus, the multitude of lines of field at some time parallel to the axis of rotation in a plane containing the electron rotation radius is generated by the uncertainty (cloud like) position of the electron around the rotating axis.

So in the end there is only one "force" and that is electric and when dynamic (single, open or moving) it causes two different types of reaction to the void. Light quanta, for single open linear disturbances like in case of an electron falling to a lower orbit which propagates in squares, the so called magnetic field described above, gravity being just an attraction between orienting dipoles from two different objects.

In case of the "magnetic" field above,  things are clear. The reaction to the disturbance created  by the rotation of electron has a direction following the direction of the rotation of the electron and the poles attract each other in order to sum the reaction.

Why is an electron charged and why it repels other electrons. This is not an easy one. Electrons spin and they probably have asymmetric charges made of smaller particles like polar molecules and thus they create a "magnetic" field. But electron is spinning and changing direction of the spin too fast fast to allow its void reaction to close through it, hence the field lines appear open. Uncertainty of the direction of the spin and spin speed of electron create unipolar fields. Probably same with protons.

And from here on i think i got a direction into explaining what particles are. I think they are light quanta with such a high frequency or small wave length or side length of their square they can't move the way light quanta does and small ones combine into large ones to satisfy the weird properties of very small ones. Or they probably move into a different time frame and/or space than light does, whatever you may like. Anyways  they are trapped into combinations within larger "molecular" particles.

Ok i got the whole of it. It's all in my mind. Shall i put it here for free?

December 26

9:48 Talking about electron-positron pair production, just remembered something. Something i always was intrigued with in Lake Oswego. The logo of the Mountain Park area, in two different versions and i thought it could represent the volcano which is actually the Mountain of the Mountain Park, where yes, PCC Sylvania is located. Re-creation center?

3:55 PM Ok was in a hurry and made a mistake by misreading this statement.

Bur i am still following this idea. What happens when a particle gets very close to the speed of light and according to Einstein, threatens to fill the whole Universe with its mass? Do they have experiments to prove it?

BTW At what speed an electron and a positron come out of pair production? Very close to the speed of light they say. But if we apply trigonometry to this image, we get electrons moving much slower.

What happens to the conservation of mass and momentum, since both electrons and positrons are much heavier then photons (it is said photons do not have mass but have momentum)? All of the photon's energy will turn to mass, but that mass is speeding (near the speed of light), a momentum will appear, out of nothing.

Can we count to a near punctiform electric field to instantly? accelerate those two masses, one charged positively and one negatively at near the speed of light? What happens to their trajectory when moving in that charge's electric field? We see the whole process occur in the cloud chamber. Where is that completely stripped of electrons ionized charge come from to conserve momentum?

Also. The electron trajectory in an electric field is circular only if the angle it comes at is perpendicular to the field. They probably got lucky taking the image above.

BTW Lorentz force breaks the action-reaction principle Centrifugal force is not represented in any of the representations.

Let's say we build an electrostatic sling shot with two objects, one much heavier, both charged electrically. Upon release, the lighter particle will accelerate but the large one will have a recoil, proportional to the weight ratio. (Nothing is negligible in quantum).

8:20 So it can. If everybody gets lucky enough to pass among orbiting electrons, the electric field gradient of of the central mass could separate the two virtual particles from the photon, change direction from transversal to longitudinal and the prodigious rotation with asymmetries at the surface can accelerate them to near the speed of light while the magnetic field in the cloud chamber does the rest.

Looks too complicated and the rotation speed of billions of billions rotations per second could know the photon away.

Maybe the magnetic field does it all and there is no need for nucleus as the two virtual particles already have a longitudinal component (not well represented here) close to the speed of light.
 

11:30 This image confirms what i just stated about the two components of light, a virtual electron and a virtual photon being flattened out which means two particle both move now longitudinal and with an added energy becoming stable electrons.

And my thought goes again to dharmachakra that has 8 spokes, of which four charged, with relativistic mass, moving in a cross pattern of which only two exist at a time and probably gravitons moving on the other cross pattern of the chakra not at 45 degrees but on the same direction, in opposition with the virtual charged particles, to balance them.

Maybe they are represented at 45 degrees because there was no other way to represent them in a symbol that was supposed to transcend millennia or until people will regain enough knowledge to understand them.

With three colors swirling in the middle, pretty much like in the icon of google chrome, with a color for each component, a virtual electron, positron and a graviton. However in string theories it is also stated that a graviton does not exist alone but is massless chargeless entity that exist within all closed loops strings of which the electron is one.

According to hRdaya sUtra, gravitons could be temporary holes in the space time left behind by the moving virtual particles at relativistic speeds.

Could it be both virtual particles in existence within the photon moving at relativistic speed are closed by the magnetic field in a circle pattern with the gravitons chasing the particles, this being the energy to matter transfer phase phase before they become independent of each other, moving ahead at near the speed of light, borrowing energy from the rotation of that nucleus (so they are seen in the cloud chamber, otherwise would just float around at non relativistic speed.

I believe in nature there are enough places with a magnetic field strong enough to separate the virtual particles of a photon into a pair of one electron and one positron.

At the scale of the size of an electron there are no fog or air particle to interfere with their speed or turning their trajectory into a decaying spiral.

The two particles created by the splitting of a photon are electrons if the light is polarized in the direction of the magnetic field. If not, other weirder particles may be created with shapes like spirals, fish like spirals, etc..

Quarks cannot exist individually and have fractional charges and the reason is they have virtual electrons and positrons in common as are said to be bound by the strong force to create protons similar to how in molecules electrons are used in common.

January 10

11:25 "Eu centrez, eu dau cu capul" (I center, i score). Here it goes :

I think i found a way to visualize the falling of an electron on a lower orbit, after i figure the equations. Probably the most overlooked phenomenon in history of science. For the accelerated phase, it should be a parabolic spiral. No need for supercomputers or anything. Except maybe if there was some AI software which you could verbally ask it to do so and spare all the work.

Why is it important? Well, a falling electron is (the smallest) electric current, right, which generates a magnetic field, right, which accompanies the emitted photon (or is the emitted photon).

Nevermind that. They just sent in a team (made of little "Mexicans") who started hammering to finish the walls of the fallen stairwell (about a month ago, remember). There will be between 1000 and 10000 hammerings today. Like in the days when the emperor was here, and did the windows. Or a few years earlier when they did the roofing for the whole complex, with an average of one nail a second for 6 months.

11:30 Was thinking earlier. If the religious thugs of Japan force their own people to work to death to partly finance their covert ninja type operations abroad, what will they do to others. Like what they are doing nowadays with Americans and they don't even know it.

4:00 Thoughts from my walk. If we were to calculate the trajectory of a falling electron we need to know first position and speed of the electron, which according to German physicist Werner von Braun Heisenberg it is not possible. I bet this is  the main reason they never adventured to do it.

So we must to get rid of this theory first, also with the help of deeper quantum mechanics, and that is the quarks i bet Heisenberg didn't know about.

Ok, Heisenberg published his uncertainty theory in 1927 and quarks were discovered in 1964 and he died in 1976 and he never corrected his theory. Why would had he, since he already won a Nobel prize in 1932 and was already the father of quantum mechanics?

For the most simple atom, hydrogen, with one single proton which is made of quarks we can see the proton has a spatial asymmetric dipole charge. More than that, to form the nucleus, the proton is paired with a neutron which has no electric charge at all, only mass which adds to the off center asymmetry.

Since both nuclei and electrons have mass, there is a tiny gravitational force between them though the electric force is prevalent.

So the normal circular trajectory of an electron around a nucleus, better said around the center of its electric charge is perturbed by the electric asymmetry of the proton and the position relative to its mass center.

There is also the issue with the mass of the electron. The electron has enough mass to move the atom around a bit, like Moon vs Earth. At those speeds, this thing will also contribute to instability of many possible orbits or "energy levels" and in the end their are only a few permitted or "quantified".

Since we now know quarks are made of strings that vibrate, i bet this model is too complicated for any mathematician and they came up with this uncertainty theory instead.

Though they have so many "idle" (they do not apply to anything) theorems in math no one single person on Earth can review them all in a single lifetime.

But nowadays we have giant supercomputers, let's feed them this model. However i bet they already did and only a few know the results.

I remember i once applied for a grant to pay to use a supercomputer to come up with a method of predicting earthquakes. Based of course on a different theory than tectonics plates theory. But applying for a grant is a complicated job in itself which i screwed and i bet they have one guy in every grants hogging team that to do just that.

BTW do they ever give Nobel prizes to guys who dismantle old theories that have been given Nobel prizes for? I believe they do, Bohr made substantial changes to the previous two models, Thompson and Rutherford who also received Nobel Prizes.

However big money don't need Nobel prizes (which come with one million each), all they need is a good working theory that will allow them to peek into tomorrow's market. One thousand times per second.

BTW is head scratching stimulating blood circulation inside brain?

530 Like i remember during that time when i opened an Ameritrade account and put in 2000 dollars from a credit card. At first it was working but after a few days it was like some big entity with big money was intervening and screwing the prices of my picks so i gave up. But i was there long enough to see they were every day 2 o 3 startups dying there.

They all seemed the same. Gathering a hundred or two hundred million capital, real or not, around a chemical formula for a new Alzheimer drug that never made it past a couple years of studies. But guess what. How many grants where they sucking besides the initial investment?

Big money, big schemes nobody looks at. Nobody cares cause it's government's money.

January 26

4:35 AM According to standard model the smallest known particle is the muon neutrino, with a mass of 0.17 eV. All the other masses are measured in either MeV (mega electron volts) or GeV (giga electron volts) which is million or billion times bigger. At this point i propose AEther is made of neutrinos. They have a tiny mass, millions of times smaller than next bigger particle, no charge and a 1/2 spin. Ideal candidate.

A stream of neutrino could stand for a magnetic field where their spins could be aligned.

When a high energy photon enters a stream of neutrinos, it will get knocked out in its components, an electron and a positron which are whirls rotating in opposite directions and will start circling in opposite directions when in vacuum and spiraling in the cloud chamber.

From what i saw, the positron is bigger than the electron resulted in pair production and that cold as well be caused by the spin of neutrinos.

Don't know yet if the photon is made of one or two hourglass shaped pair of particles in a cross pattern and if they oscillate, transferring AEther from one another but is the only way it could happen if they move on a direction perpendicular on the hourglasses axis because otherwise the photon will start spiraling. As for what makes them oscillate, could be fluid mechanics laws applied for frictionless AEther and it could appear as they are dynamically attracted by their own past selves.

9:47 Yeah should have avoided any exotic ideas like past selves, creating time, things like this. As i went to bed last night i finally got the idea, however was too tired to come back at the computer and write it down.

I don't believe anymore they oscillate or pulsate or anything. The Polish hologram seem to be accurate.

What is holding those four funnels together preventing them from growing to infinity is the pressure of the AEther, made of neutrinos. Which then could mean the AEther fills uniformly the whole known space. Photons cannot exist without it. This goes against the Big Bang theory.

So in a way the were right talking about luminiferous AEther. However i feel a bit nervous about countless neutrinos and muouns passing through my body all the time. But i believe other cosmic rays are doing more damage then those, giving me this terrible headache this morning.

Let's read one more time what the Bible says about Ezekiel's wheel.

Perpendicular Scalar Compression? Photons do not travel? This comes close to my first representation however those vectors are pulsating funnels and the "hologram" caught an image covering a whole period with all 4 funnels at their peak.

Two funnels in existence at any moment. The photon could be split into an electron and a positron when the funnels are equal enters the magnetic field. The positron gets bigger by accumulating more neutrinos that turn in opposite direction as whirl of opposite spin attract?

I don't see any negative spin in the standard model table though.

BTW the table is big and the number of particles we figured so far is small (Art is long and time is short).

3:10 I thought i saw that before! (Too late in Paris)

4:55 A boundary condition may occur when AEther pressure meets whilrs, like in the case of photons. Here is a more complex or maybe hypothetic particle.

January 8

12:35 AM More of a nurse...

1:15 AM Sin atrociously...

6:50 All the current theories in physics start with observations of rather complex phenomena, trying to explain those with models we may call from top to bottom.

There are two different apparent currents in today's physics, like particles which gave us the standard model, with three called fundamentals, quarks, leptons and bosons with some confirmations through experiments and the strings theories which is tempting but still in the realm of hypothesis.

The other way would be to start with only one hypothesis trying to explain all observations, or from bottom up.

What i'm proposing is explaining them all with only one hypothesis. All matter is made of one single type of particle, called virtual particle or disturbance, that exists only dynamically.

The single particle, for the sake of familiarity we should call electric though it's basically nothing.

The disturbance always creates a reaction of space time continuum which can be confirmed by the so called electromagnetic induction experiment. It is at 90 degrees in space and it begins when the disturbance transfer its energy to it, diminishing.

We could attach a mental experiment to it. Imagine the magnetic field created by of the movement of one single electron (though in the end it proves that the electron is not punctiform). The deceleration 

of one single punctiform charged particle would create a movement of another single charged particle with an opposite sign and at 90 degrees direction.

But when the disturbance is not being accelerated, the reaction is closing upon self. Which is moving on a closed trajectory. Which in  our perception would be the equivalent with two particles, one charged positively and one negatively at different times.

The most simple case is that of a circular closed trajectory and this would be an electron. But depending on the speed and initial condition of creation, like being closed to other particles or coming of a cloud with n bodies, its trajectory could be more complicated, giving us all the known particles.

We can call these strings however only their trajectories resembles strings. If the trajectories are closed and stable no matter how complicated we have closed strings or particles and if they are open we have open strings though open strings can exist only temporarily or for the period of time the virtual particle moves on that trajectory, always creating and transferring its energy to another one like in the case of light.

So yeah, we may call a virtual positron the reaction in time of a virtual electron. So the energy released through annihilation of matter and antimatter is the initial energy of the disturbance that can never be "healed".

We shall conclude that there are two time frames in which matter and antimatter exist with two different charges and that generates gravity.

I believe we shall have any type of closed strings we can imagine by using this model starting with the most basic, a closed circle or an electron.

8:00 However at times i believe the whole space time continuum behaves like a fluid and one disturbance or a moving bubble of greater pressure is being attracted by its own trail like in Bernoulli's law... Than while moving together, they create a tiny depression in the Æther attracting everything in that is moving or all similar disturbances in that plane in the Universe.

Their mistake back then was Æther though a fluid, without mass cannot be an elastic medium for light.

A swirl in the dark Æther.

Copyright Notice. I shall call the above enunciations starting with 6:50 The Dynamic Swirls Theory or Æther Swirls Theory.
3:40 I din't know!

Commentaries to Einstein's Explanation of Photoelectric Effect

(Yeah i know it should have been called photon-electron effect, this way it wouldn't have been confounded by so many with some photography related thing).

Photoelectric effect is one of the basis of Einstein's theory (of relativity of course). The experiments done before him showed that an electron is knocked out of bondage if hit with radiation above certain frequency, no matter the intensity of the beam, a more intense (classic, continuous) beam meaning higher energy making no difference.

Though this does not necessarily leads to it he came with the idea that radiation is made of discrete packets of (transversal, vibrating) energy he then considered as particles, later called photons. He even threw a formula including frequency and Plank's constant (don't know how to type scientific formulas with Greek letters right now, was not prepared for all these that for me would have been forgotten forever if not for this).

Einstein's photons do not have a resting mass since the emitters in a vacuum tube do not loose mass by emitting photons, which also means they only exist when in motion but they break the conservation of mass principle.

If they have a mass when in motion they should also have a longitudinal momentum and a kinetic energy, other than the transversal vibration energy that depends on the frequency (wavelength) as shown in the experiments.

Photons' longitudinal kinetic momenta is real by some and included in the design of hypothetical devices such as solar sails. Some say lasers create a weak but measurable momentum, being pushed in the other direction of emitting light. However the different opinions i collect are contradictory as this phrase is.

When a hypothetical photon hits an atom and adds enough energy to an electron and the electron breaks free and some, it then disappears (he said is absorbed). The theory does not explain what happens to its longitudinal, non vibrating kinetic mass momentum.

Also the vibrating energy of a photon would not have any sense without a mass. However it is not explained in the theory how the photon vibrates to carry that energy. Since it has no electric charge, it cannot vibrate in an accompanying variable transversal electric field. It could only be gravitational, maybe against self in time. Asymmetric and spinning?

Even though we cannot calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by Einstein's relativistic formula of kinetic energy, where the resting mass or non relativistic mass of a particle is used since photons do not have a resting mass, we could at least calculate its longitudinal kinetic energy by the classic formula E=mv2/2 with v the the speed of light. Researchers at Stanford in order to calculate the mass of a photon equated the kinetic energy as calculated above with the relativistic energy of a photon E=hf, where h is Plank's constant and f frequency.

I believe i see where it's going... The (in)famous equation E=mc2 may derive from here, if you arbitrarily equate the two types of energy and then add them. It looks like the most famous equation in the whole theory of relativity that stipulates energy is mass comes from a non relativistic calculation that factors in the square of the speed of light of a photon with no resting mass and photon's relativistic mass.

As stated above longitudinal kinetic and transversal vibration energy are equal. Which probably makes for the dualism particle-wave and tries to keep them both equitably satisfied.

However there are some bad news. The spherical waves (pumpkin whatever) as we know them loose energy with the square of distance and "EM" waves as we know them are no exception. And still... A single photon emitted by a decaying electron will never extinguish if it doesn't hit anything in its travel (with the speed of light across the Universe)...

Even in the relativist world there are other ways to better explain the mass defect and one of them is same electrons moving at different relativist speeds before and after...

January 6

12:45 AM According to the diagram and formula of relativistic speed, there is not a clear point of when a speed becomes relativistic or when a virtual particle comes into existence.

The relativistic mass of an electron "falling" to a lower energy level basically begins when the electron starts to be accelerated.

Thing is, due to rotation of an electron around a central charge, the initial and final fall speed are different than zero, on the direction of the fall and they continue to rotate around the charge before and after the fall, thus creating some infinitesimal initial or residual void reactions and those follow the photon in its path and could count for the losses as they may interfere with others, effectively tangling the void, creating the AEther.

Because of this, the process of transfer of energy from one virtual particle to another within the photon is not 100% efficient. This may count for loss of energy during this transfer and the red shifting of distant sources of light. Where does that energy go? possibly in the void?

In fact if i think i realize that even if a photon is not emitted, the orbiting electrons may create signatures in the void which may slow their rotation, possibly falling to a lower energy level from where some other electron is kicked back after acquiring some energy that in the end could come from thermal agitation.

This could be the reason of decaying of some particles or assembles of particles depending on configurations.

9:08 De ce instituțiile de sondaj nu i-au dat lui Georgescu nici o șansă în turul I? Cum a fost posibil ca un candidat de care nu a auzit nimeni, nici măcar eu care urmăresc politica din România mai tot timpul, fiind clasat de sondaje pe locul 6 să iasă pe primul loc?

9:35 According to my theory (Dynamic Strings), AEther is not a medium of propagation for light but a tangle of infinitesimal electrical and gravitational disturbances, filling the void, opposing the motion of anything, possibly causing the limitation to speed of light, red shift of distance sources and "spontaneous" "probabilistic" decaying of particles and elements. Could this be the hypothetical dark matter.

Yes according to this, the "ordinary matter" (or energy whatever) is constantly leaking into dark matter, which in turn it is leaking into something else, but at a much slower rate.

Also the void creates the AEther as a sort of memory for everything that has ever moved in this Universe.

But don't worry, everything, matter, dark matter is cleaned by the black holes, the vacuum cleaners of the Universe. However it will be a long time until all black holes will  merge into a single one, and all the disturbances will melt back into the void.

9:40 Within the post with my theory of everything there is a statement saying that strings may swell with motion, especially at relativistic speeds, by accumulating energy. Now imagine an electron, which we now know is a circular closed string made of a negative virtual particle and a graviton chasing each other being accelerated while "falling" to a lower energy level.

Its virtual particle trajectory (and that of the accompanying graviton0 will look pretty much like this, right? So the virtual particle of positive sign generated by the void that continues to replicate self into a negative one etc..

Which may finally explain the 4 laurel leaves of Grinell College Seal most likely symbolically representing a photon. So it's just a bit more complicated that my minimalist representation linked on the right but it may account for the pair production.

11:12 Which may also count for one of the symbols seen on masonic aprons called the behive (here, 42).

It stand for industry and it may also represent a silk cocoon or a lotus petal. However there are many symbols on this apron that may symbolically represent light, like the 4 pillars, the main masonic sign, square and compass, sprig leaves etc.. Too bad we cannot see in the image all the explanations.

2:40 A charged virtual particle on a circular (or helicoidal) trajectory will create a copy of itself, moving in a plane at 90 degrees, of an opposite charge. Pretty much like in this image. Question. How the illustrator knew?