May 8

1:45 I hate to see every time i want to post something the date has changed. I mean, time is flying so fast.

Got to a conclusion with my study regarding the correlation of number of earthquakes and moon distance. Apparently the column i added manually for Moon distance 8 years ago was wrong. I can't remember where it took it from, a calculator from a site, it was showing a correlation but could not interpret the results.

Recently i looked at and realized that correlation is possible, however i only had distances added for 8 years out of 76.

After a few days of work and emotions i added in the table columns with the most updated formulas for calculating the Moon distance, those from Wikipedia. But this time i verified a few instances with Stellarium. Stellarium does not give center to center (Earth center and Moon center) distances but the distance from a point on Earth and the surface of the Moon.

Since Earth is rotating, the distance from a point varies according to the our of the day, by up to 2 times Earth diameter, or 12k kilometers but for the instances i verified, the distance calculated was within those limits.

As base for calculations i used the Julian date or day, used by NASA and Stellarium that starts on 1/1/4713 BC.

There is no doubt the chart is not random (if there are not other mistakes), but it shows a strong correlation, a bit different from the one with the wrong distances. As for why there are more earthquakes in certain distance ranges, i think it has something to do with the pull of Moon on Earth on different points of the ecliptic.

But the way the earthquakes happen both on small distances and long ones can only mean one thing. There are two different types, one that happen at high pressure when the phase change in the magma (under and @100 km depth) is in one direction and ones that happens at low pressure, when the phase change reverses. This way we can have earthquakes in the same magma pocket as long as the pressure and temperature conditions are near equilibrium in that pocket.

I will add here a link to the sheet, not the html but the sheet itself. I guess it can only be opened if you have a google account and you are signed in. So those interested can see how i implemented those formulas in the sheet.

There is one more thing i have to add. If you scroll down in the sheet will see on the left two diagrams showing location (longitude, latitude) and depth of the 431 events >4 between 1940 and 2016 in Romania.

It looks like they are distributed on a well or grape bunch like structure, and not on a line or "fault" as expected when talking about "fractures" of the "tectonic plates".

There could not have been mistakes, for those charts i used the data exactly as downloaded from USGS.

BTW Anybody who  knows a bit of Excel can try and do this for any seismic area. Go to USGS search catalog, choose magnitude, time range, etc., draw a rectangle on a map, and then chose CSV as download format. Then you upload the data in a sheet, draw charts in longitude-latitude-depth coordinates, anything you like.

There is a software called jmol used to represent interactively molecules in 3D big. I plan on finding something similar so i can represent in 3D + magnitude (tiny ball size) an entire seismic area. This way we can all see the distribution and basically the anatomy of the seismic area so we can study it cause it looks like our scientists don't care if it doesn't sell.

If you click on the link above, then click on the static representation and try to stop the rotation with your mouse.

I would think if you could do a time based slider controlled animation of the evolution of a bunch you could probably see how the earthquakes move from one place to another and figure what a seismic area actually is and maybe how it works.

Please note the software is free, done by volunteers. Think of what they have on supercomputers and AI and keep for themselves.

12:45 O aluzie abia mascată...

Change Is The Only Constant

I've just been reviewing - briefly - this article

And it seems they are many that bought Kuhn's ideas. And perfected them. And here's the exploit: Statistically, we all see only one slice of the social reality or the paradigm shift, as they call it at a certain time. For reasons that we are busy with our such perceived comfort. Or by reason of learned behavior. Or by reason of artificially created focus points. Or simply because we are not sociologists but only live in the society... Our bad luck is that many of us choose to look in the expected direction at the expected time and sometimes even applauding collectively and approving the whole shift without knowing it as a whole. Never-mind some are changing facts and rules on the fly or tearing holes in the fabric of reality or current paradigm shift in those unobserved gray areas and creating new shifts as long as we're not looking. To us the casual observers it remains the same shift as long as we didn't know it as a whole. And in the case somebody after a great deal of effort is pointing a few of us to look into those gray areas, they can adjust or insert other previously nonexistent gray areas and still make the shift appear whole. (Here, as an example and proof they are following this theory, the on demand fabricated news often with adjacent but not directly related events, for creating confusion). It is not the same shift anymore. But to us it seems as actually it is as long as we didn't know the whole from the beginning and accepting the new additions. As long as we are buying it.

Or simply eliminate or move the few or the some. For our comfort.

They can even create the appearance of two completely different shifts out of the same one to different individuals or groups of different cultures or embraces or simply of any difference including of space or time or if they look into different areas or if they think and act on cultural or biased assumptions instead of learning the rules and the facts of the paradigm shift.

We should never forget, for the shifters change is the only constant.

02/01/2013 1:56 PM PDT

It just occurred to me that in order to successfully deal with reality especially in unknown surroundings one should continuously build dynamic models, adding and subtracting information from the current model. Sometimes he/she even has to switch models in a blink of an eye due to sudden change of scenery, the entering of another entity, etc.

Obviously we have to forget classical sociology when we try do add the concept of scene in reality modeling. Physics, physiology, statistics, perhaps geometry and sociology together are at place here. Can we apply the idea of paradigm when we describe an instantaneous, ever-changing model of the surrounding reality? By definition, is the opposite. However, is the same concept, only applied dynamically. Or maybe it only looks dynamically as we slice reality, or the bigger picture, in order to deal with it one scene at the time?

The ideea that some people got into the habit of entering one's current paradigm through the back door, totally artificially, intentionally, usually pretending legitimacy but introducing some obvious, apparently benign, weird events in order to distract him/her and change his/her final decision on how to deal with it or if he/she is going to deal at all is intriguing to me right now and actually motivates me to write these. I'm convinced that some occult practitioners or even entire social groups have learned to do things by manipulating one's paradigm especially when the subject cannot react and creating all kind of effects, some possibly at distance.

Let's take an example here. Crossing one's path when unexpected and usually the subject is overlapping current monotonous activities like walking or driving with other activity like distant thoughts. When done obviously intentionally and while the subject knowing that statistically that event shouldn't happen at that moment, it violates one's privacy and current reality model forcing him to try to resort at a larger model in which the described action would fit. And while he is trying to do this, the intruder can escalate it even more, by introducing more elements and information like an unexpected gesture, reveal more clothes' color, facial expressions usually justifiable later but never at the present to the subject's mind, or noises or language, escalation that would end in crushing one's ability to deal with in that moment and become totally distracted, disoriented and in a trance like state of mind. This collapse of one's ability to understand what's happening and puts his mind in a sort of slave-like status, in that moment accepting any input as suggestion (if not giving in to uncontrollable emotional bursts that can pull the subject out of this type of cognitive trap but usually risky as the intruder is ready to interpret it as aggression towards him.) Thus unprovable reprogramming of the mind can occur. However, i believe next to every model acquired in ones collection of models known as education this way there is a flag that says "learned on distress" and could be accessed in a process similar to psychoanalysis or clearing of engrams.

Such intrusions sometimes can be used during the waiting time before a meeting or a conversation, when the subject might even try to prepare him/she-self, with carefully arranged, avoidable in the last second accident-like situations usually in the last intersection before the meeting place, or simply two or three people acting weird together in front of the subject in the waiting lounge before the meeting, putting in him in a distracted state of mind and making him more suggestible, depending of what their intentions are.

It may very well that the person that intrudes this way in one's privacy apparently don't even needs to go much out of his/her way to do this, along or close with his normal routine, this way being almost impossible to prove anything. This of course if there is a distribution of such tasks within the members of a group. Or could this be an instance of actions of individuals guided by a "collective subconscious"?

Although this always seem to happen unexpectedly, when analyzed, even carefully, these events are always justifiable down to a certain level, giving for the distracted mind, in that moment even more frightening experiences, looking like a never ending string on coincidences that target him. Only when carefully, objectively analyzed, sometimes the trick can be revealed, but usually with addition of more information and time and effort, sometimes with the entering of more characters pretending helping analyzing and often being covered up with similar events, creating a similar type of effect, so the instance cannot be easily turned as a complaint to the outsiders. Usually one easily discredits him/her-self if he tries to do this in a hurry, because of confusion of elements from two different but very similar instances.

Other examples can go all the way to introduction in the ever changing, continuous local news show of shocking elements, carefully chosen from the otherwise statistically normally distributed local events, matching some groups or even individual's state of mind, although in a twisted and toxic way in order to change minds and creating some sort of virtual, parallel, mocked reality.

(One particularly other  good example of reality recognition manipulation is parallel talking. You can talk to a person who for some chosen reason prefer not to talk to you directly about a subject, but starts talking using phrases composed in such way that they contain for the much part the information they want you to catch, without even touching the subject. Usually in the last part of the phrase you realize they are talking about something else. It also gives them the advantage of seeing you reacting at those informations without much risk, other than an "unjustified emotional burst" that he/she might even be prepared to take advantage of by claiming agression. Parallel talking next to intentional mistakes that pretty much do the same job as describe above has become lately very widely used in media. However they cannot impact you on a subconscient level as privacy cognitive intrusion through unsuspected action as described before because they come pretty much when you are expecting some sort of input from that source, whatever it may be. Or even people talking in front of you on a phone, conversation that you don't usually pay attention to and then asking you a question that might be influenced but what you just heard)

(Sometimes the newcomers are "embraced" at first invoking some moral principle they presumably abide by and let him get used to. Then unconsciously, suddenly or constantly they introduce some unrecognizable elements into his/her already learned paradigm forcing him/her to get assimilated or enter in a state or permanent confusion, discomfort or even distress and desire to leave, for no definable reason. But this is the more common, happier case.)

Sometimes the subject him/her-self is active participant or made to look so, by synchronization of intruders with his/her activities, and creating a false sensation of causality, feeling of embarrassment or even guilt, which is furtherly exploited in creating distraction, disruption, trance and reprogramming, or psychosis and/or emotional bursts. Or even more troubling, something like erasing one's thoughts with overlapping, or entrainement with very similar ones, but belonging to others, making one forgetting or bowing his own self?

Could this influence others' mind at a distance through some unknown bio-transmission mechanism, like emitting a distress or even a surrender call? I don't know, but statistically, by the number of these practitioners and instances encountered, it is an indication that it is done so.

But if there are some religions that include these kind of practices in their un/declared rituals, could they still use them in the larger society on basis of the principle of the freedom of religion, since it is obvious that they could significantly interfere with the whole?

Could this kind of experiments prove indeed the existence of a collective mind or a social integration on an unconscious level? Maybe temporary. Maybe on subconscious level on lower educated individuals. Or maybe between close relatives or larger DNA alike ethnic groups. Or maybe the existence of an unknown or unrecognized bio-communication system that can work best when one is in a very acute state of mind or total relaxation.

Be-Belu or Be-Bela?

"There's a sucker born every minute"



It's been a long time since i saw the title of this publication that belongs to http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medien_Holding.

I wanted to signal the reality of the fact that in US a lot of people still strongly associate the name Bela with the name of the actor who first incarnated Dracula about a century ago then maintained in the public's conscience throughout decades through movies and media.

Even right now there is an ongoing commercial on networks about a ... lip-o-suction local company named... Sono Bello!

For Romanians, there are no such associations as the movies about Dracula entered in their conscience only recently and they do not realize the consequences of these associations and the fact they are actually in the middle of it all.

I suspected for a longtime now that there is quite a long list of words in modern Romanian that have been introduced, tolerated by bribed scholars, used by some as little trendy "language endearments - alintări" (actually more in sarcastic phrases which denotes the non-fully acceptance of the terms) and slowly promoted in the mainstream of our culture mostly within advertisement without the majority realizing how damaging this may be.

The word bébé is borrowed from French alright. But why add a diminutive suffix to it then contract it under the pretext of familiar use to get it to this final shape and add it to the title of a well financed and advertised magazine for babies' stuff?

Is it again a coincidence that the name of the most important cemetery in Bucharest is again, Bellu?

As for the name Bela, it started with the ex and current trainers of our Olympics Gymnastics Team. Painstakingly, right under the ignorant nose of the ex-regime they probably made great efforts to get those two chosen, but through what lengths did they have to go to do it again with the new ones? Bitang, Bellu, Bitman. I remember the first time i said something about, within the next few days Octavian Bellu got a decoration from the President of Romania, Mr. Băsescu.

Don't get me wrong, they might be meritorious people, but this is how the bigger picture looks.

How many others words, names, people and instances of this sort, fruits of the decades of efforts to undermine our languages are they and will they ever be exposed and/or stopped?

Heart Muscle Regeneration

I have always been intrigued by the muscular breakdown process during exercise. When exercising beyond your capabilities the next day you have pain and your muscles ache. But it does not help with muscle growth. In fact athletes know this and try to avoid using different techniques. (Those who cheat know that using steroids actually helps with minimizing muscular damage so they can exercise more, stimulating muscle build-up.) Then if you go for a blood test you will have the CK enzyme elevated. So what exactly happens to your dead cells after muscular breakdown?

Then i said to myself. Your own dead cells contain DNA fragments (if DNA theory is true) that can be used in different areas of the body if needed, like in heart, better than from any other source. What if when exercising your body deliberately creates muscular breakdown in areas of your body and uses the cellular remains to rebuild your damaged heart or increase heart muscle?

If this is true, how many times this process can repeat itself until your heart is not fixable anymore?

Maybe even during CPR, where sometimes there is required energetic action from the part of the reviver, some breakdown occurs in the chest area where rhythmic pressure is applied.

Then thinking even further. Maybe heart muscle can be regenerated indefinetley. And it may be a quick process, a matter of hours or even dozens of minutes. Cause that'a how long a moderate muscular breakdown lasts.

How about the nerve circuits that synchronize heart? If you take a heart cell and put it in a Petri dish with nutrients it will continue to contract, rhythmically. All heart cells can do that including the new ones. The problem is how to synchronize them. And that can take a little longer until new nerve circuits build and train themselves. In this interval, fibrillation may occasionally occur. So now how do you fix that?

Defibrillator is one way this may be done. There are people with implanted defibrilators. I always wondered why they only work occasionally. Maybe just only when the heart is at the end of a decompensated regeneration cycle. When muscle buildup has been to great to be retrained by heart's own means.

But they might exist other more or less "natural" methods. I think of the entrained walking. When one person can walk in the same rhythm of the beating heart. Some nerve impulses from other parts of the body can overlap the heart electric currents and help with the retraining process. Other methods can be brain entraining through music or noise, breath entraining, etc. Even mantras, or poetry.

I was looking on the web for a memorable phrase the guy from Computer Age Auto Service once told me, citing the Bible. It was roughly the equivalent of "in the end times people will eat their own flesh" or something like that. But there is no such thing in the Bible. He might have said one of the verses from the Bible like from Ezekiel and i didn't get it right. I was pretty messed up that day as not sleeping for days and prepared for that conversation.

On another occasion one of the more senior programers at Quadramed told me something about one's body consuming itself when starving. He specified that we consume our own muscles for staying alive when fasting.

Yet on another occasion a therapist in a hospital told me that we can use our own body fat to convert it into sugar and keep going. However that is not true. Fat can only be used for keeping body temperature and for a few other "minor" things. To have your body and especially your brain functioning you need glucose or other sugars. I think protein can be broken down to either fat or sugar.

However in all tree instances above your body shuffles his own muscles or fat in order to survive.

χάρισμα

χάρισμα -  "favor freely given" or "gift of grace."

It is the unconscious power that one has over somebody else's will. There is submitting charisma and submissive charisma.

It comes from the facial features. Any facial feature that is slightly exaggerated or asymmetrical, thus being perceived by the observer as viewed from an angle, usually from below.

A big chin is one of the first qualities that gives the perception of viewing a face from below. A child being held is having a point of view that gives the impression of a bigger chin of a person that is otherwise "normal".

A mustache gives the impression of a bigger chin by fooling the perception into thinking the mouth is higher on the face. A beard actually enlarges the viewing perception of the chin. An asymmetrical eye or eyebrow and a big chin gives the impression of viewing the face from an angle below.

All of the above gives the charismatic person the power of the mother that holds her child from the mere fact that some facial features of the charismatic leader are perceived as seen from the position of the child being held.

It also comes from attitude. A calm and reassuring attitude is the second condition of the charismatic "leader". I put here the word leader between quotes because a charismatic person needs more qualities to be a leader.

There are many people whose charismattic qualities are nullified by the lack of reassuring attitude.

This is also obvious if we refer to the same proposed theory, of the submission of a person by seeing a face as a child being held by mother.

But most of the charismatic people realize sometimes in life that he/her posses this quality and fall into the temptation of using and end up depending on it.


When people with little education try and exercise their charismatic qualities over those with more education sometimes are being rejected by the failed subjects and often labeled as trying to patronize or having a patronizing attitude.

The opposite is also true, men looking for women prefer a smaller chin or elevated eyebrows as a person would appear to have if seen from above.

Usually what happens nowadays, innate charismatic persons are being hired by others, usually becoming "politicians" with the only purpose of projecting an image of a leader and news breaker to the submitted crowds. (There is an interesting discussion here, as real politicians could be in fact all hired charismatic persons, and in rarer instances they might have learned to use their charisma for themselves)

I put the picture below as an example as i wrote this with this face in my mind. I read so many negative articles about this gentleman that is impossible for me not believe that his sole quality for the proposed function is charisma.

http://www.academiacatavencu.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/interviu2-468x351.jpg

Maxwell's Demon Goes Electric?

Anybody who took some physics in HS and has a little imagination can understand how Maxwell's Demon thought experiment works.

So far it has been understood though the experiment is only evocative or allegorical as it can not work in reality.

You have two rooms full of gas molecules with a door in the middle, small enough for only one molecule to pass at the time. If you possess a demon (a small enough intelligent being) that has the capacity to open the small door and the energy used to open and close that door would be negligible and the demon would be smart enough to open the door each time when a fast molecule comes from right and close it when a fast one comes from left, after a while you would have all the slow molecules in the right room and all the fast ones in the left. And of course that difference of temperature could create energy if using something like a Stirling motor. But you could also commandeer the demon to open the door for all molecules coming from right or left and after a while you would have vacuum in one room and pressure in the other which again you could use to power something.

I think i've identified a couple of instances when this is happening in nature or within existing technology. Let's say you have a similar room filled with a gas with a layer of liquid of the same substance at the bottom (separated by gravity), at a pressure both phases can coexist. Due to thermal agitation there will be a continuous exchange of molecules between gas and liquid phases. However, molecules move much faster in gas phase than liquid. Because of that the molecules escape the liquid at a slower speed than some (of the fastest) gas molecules enter back the same liquid. Also, as soon as the slower raising (evaporating) molecules get hit by faster ones in the gas phase, they should enter back the liquid again at lower speeds than fastest moving in upper layer of gas and so on. So you would have a small strata at the surface of the liquid where gas will have a lower temperature that the rest.

No matter how much i've searched, i could not find anything clear and simple about such a commonly seen phenomena, the speed of electrons moving in a metal. Main reason is, you guessed, nobody ever saw them moving. Everybody agrees the electrons inside a metal are in a cloud like state, with electrons moving freely around. But as for the speed, there are many differences of opinions, because of the different models they use. In classical physics, that can explain some of the phenomena, they are moving at speeds comparable to speed of light. In quantum, you guessed, they are waveforms and the speeds can't be known exactly. However they all agree about the drift speed, the speed at which the electric charges of electrons move together when an external electric field is applied, creating what they call an "electric current" but that speed is excruciatingly slow, for practical currents, (where conductors will be stable or won't heat up and vaporise) the speeds are in the order of mm/sec. From that and from calculations it results that only a very small fraction of moving electrons or better said only a small fraction or the axial component of the speed of electrons makes our practical current.

However much more is known about the flow of currents in pure (intrinsic) semiconductors. When an electric field is applied, electrons jump from one atom to another, leaving behind "holes" that in turn are creating again electric fields (on top of the externally applied field) that are attracting other electrons in a cascading effect. This way, the average speed of electrons jumping around is always limited, if not constant at a few discrete values (have to consider acceleration and deceleration between two jumps or the paths of electrons). I found a GIF that illustrates this phenomenon.

The more interesting part happens however whey you put two of these together, on the left a pure metal and at right next to it a pure semiconductor like in series and attach a battery on the sides (your electric field) in such a way (polarity) that electrons will flow from the metal into the semiconductor. Electrons cannot enter the semiconductor at the speeds they float around in metal but only at drifting speed.

Though some models say electrons move around at speeds comparable to speed of light, in all directions, if a bunch of those would hit the semiconductor they will vaporise it, hower that is not happening. What is happening though and we can measure it, is an electric current (same) is flowing through both and the speed of that current is "regulated" by the jump speed of electrons in semiconductor.

We all know that any current generated by an external field that translates into drifting (axial motion) of the electrons through a metal generates heat. Some models predict drifting current represent a very small fraction of the motion of electrons. However if the electrons were moving in the metal at high speed, they will be slowed down by collisions with the lattice and all their energy will be turned into heat.

Though, ultimately heat itself keep the electrons moving. Compared to materials that don't have free electrons, at the same temperature the lattice itself will agitate less because some of the heat will be carried by (free moving) electrons. As i just read on a site, metal is part solid with a gas or liquid (of electrons) flowing through it, which explains thermal conductivity and other phenomena.

(By this simple idea i think we can actually calculate the non-drifting average speed of the electrons at different temperatures, by rule of three or something close including the lattice vibration, starting with the temperature difference and drift speed generated by a current that we can calculate. Which shouldn't be that high. Actually comparable with the drift speed).

By continuing this line of reasoning. At a metal/semiconductor junction with flowing of current from metal to semiconductor, electrons from the metal will be caught in newly created "holes" within the semiconductor due to external field but also due to field created by the hole itself. But within certain limits, of various speeds and directions, since the speed and generally motion of electrons in metal is random due to collisions with its own lattice. Some of them will have axial speeds exceeding the capacity of the semiconductor lattice to retain them (both external and hole field) and will be rejected back in the metal though at a lower speeds (some momentum of the electron will be transferred throughout the lattice, creating agitation or heat), where they will collide again with metal's lattice again and eventually some will come back at lower speed and be retained after a number of cycles and finally start jumping, in the direction of the field, maybe a bit more at first, but not enough to overheat the lattice (we know how keep the current below that limit, from previous trials), with again some momentum (heat) transferred between them and semiconductor lattice, until all they all reach "regular" jumping speed. So here again we come to the conclusion that electrons are being selected by the junction in a way similar to molecules in Maxwell's experiment, though in both "rooms" particles (electrons) are constantly moving (flowing) to the right though in metal they are moving more, because they are moving in all directions and carry some of the total thermal energy of the metal. So from a cloud of electrons moving randomly through the metal lattice at thermal agitation speed and drifting speed in the electrical field we extract in the semiconductor only those moving at drifting speed and we can all agree that the drifting speed is lower than the average speed of electrons moving in the metal lattice.

Some would call these phenomena that occur all around us "rectifying" the brownian motion (of molecules or electrons) and it has been admitted by mainstream that if this would be possible, it would be a source of unlimited energy. That's where our intelligence must intervene and  harvest the free energy that exist all around us. (If only we wouldn't be so busy with plotting and be slaves to fake theories).

Would the universe collapse or fragment or shatter into multiverses if we start doing that? I don't think so cause heat pumps do this for decades and nothing happened so far (that we know about, or maybe the Universe is not expanding so much anymore).

Got you thinking, maybe a little?

May 23

12:30/2:30 Four instances where tanks were outperformed by tactics or other factors. German invasion of France in 1940, Kurks battle, a battle in the Israeli - Egypt war in 1973 and the current Russian - Ukrainian war. People always wondered if tanks are/were still good in modern warfare. The answer is not simple. Clumsy, expensive and fearsome in appearance, with the advent of intelligent anti-tank missiles, they just might have become obsolete.

6:05/4:05 Deși o cunosc de atâta timp, nu mă pot obișnui și mă enerveze de fiecare dată. Am încărcat ieri o poză cu canapeaua pe lângă care am put niște bucăți de spumă izolontă, la fel am pus și dedesubt, fiindcă podeaua e foarte rece fiindcă se udă lemnul dedesbut la subsol, unde izolația a căzut din cauza aburului de la țevi de evacuare de la mașini de uscat rufe ce au scurgeri la subsol. Pe canapea era laptopul cu care lucrez eu la bloguri și l-am lăsat, azi apare știrea asta care probabil e inventată la fel ca 90% din știrile lor.

5:04 Javelin vs Malyutka

10:17 About a week ago after Angela felt confident about training being almost done, she applied for the job (the day when i wrote about word/weirdpad dualism on Widows). Since we are so isolated we never had to deal with voice mail (since we had a landline i guess, and that was... 7 years ago). I kinda knew about status and notifications areas on the phone but never paid attention to those more than battery and signal strength. We both didn't know until today there was an (tiny) icon showing a new voicemail. Until we got these Moto e7 Power we also had pre-installed visual voicemail apps. Also the pre-installed phone app does not notify you of a new voicemail or write the number of voicemail next to icon. There is nothing except the tiny icon in the notification area.

In that evening when she finished the application, a confirmation email arrived and someone called from New York, by the caller ID, would have been around 10 PM at originating location, (the phone didn't ring due to intermittent poor signal from Hello Mobile, if that call was in the morning at work she would had have good signal) and left a message saying she wanted to set Angela for an interview this (past) week, with no calling back instructions (except for the caller ID) and she will send a text with instructions, which never came. Today, Monday, less than a week since, Angela found the voicemail message by chance, but in the same time she got an email from her supervisor saying somebody else have been considered for that position.

On the Eaton site, the position is shown available.

05/24 10:18 Angela's got an email address at work where she gets all kinda emails addressed to everybody that mostly never concern her or her directly. Never got an email addressed to her only at that address. However now she found an email from the same person who called her at 7 PM from New York (and the phone didn't ring).

March 3rd

10 AM March comes from Mars. 

10:20

Two years, but roughly, one week.

No way to stop them. Article 5. Macron. 

11:30 Knocked out for several months.

1:20 PM Maya, the world of illusions. I take it they didn't have a word for "false perception" and/or "false projection" back then.

2:39 Two instances of a Shiva lingam sitting on lotus motifs in the heart of Buda(pest). What?

5:35 Hormuz

October 10

8:25 Woke up in smoke. I'm not sure if i am myself. A simple test. It took me like 30 seconds to figure how much was 1949-4. And still not sure.

7:00 According to this text the territory of Oregon is disputed. Or better said it does not belong to the US. Which i perceive as such and i said so many times here on my blog though i did not know it for sure until now and nobody told me when i applied for the green card lottery and moved here.

If there is or are here governments different than the US or Oregon Government, they theoretically could ally with whoever they want until liberation. Hungary, Japan. etc. That is the reason all the people in charge here are either Hungarian disguised in white Americans or Japanese disguised in Latinos, Natives.

But there is another distinct possibility. In the name of a few dispersed, disorganized and partly Native people they could come here and act as their allies.

7:08 The moment i started to write the previous entry they came upstairs and started a big commotion. As a result i became so distracted i deleted everything i wrote and had to start over with stumps at every word and syllable.

I had a chance to look at the person from upstairs when "she" went down the stairs earlier today. Though looking like a woman, i think he/she was a man, muscular, heavy, which explains the sustained stumping today. Though it was not the same person i saw before. This is consistent with other instances. Some people rent the place but many others come under the same appearance and do their tricks and torture according to the theme of the day.

Besides the very disrupting noise, different types of smokes and mold filled the apartment all day, complemented with unusually loud vehicles.

Also they did not let Angela sleep last night or me this morning.

Now that i finished the noise stopped and i heard a car starting and leaving.

9:35 Judging by my reactions while driving i was really stoned when i left. From the smoke i guess.

I took lots of abuse today by staying here because i had to search for the real Netanyahu. I had it wrong since the time i was doing this more for fun than for need. It turned into need when i realized things are happening because of it and now i felt like i was in trouble, at risk of wiping out all my work over the years because of one single similarity wrong. Single yet important.

I almost started to believe they did it Israel and Gaza whatever where BTW there is nothing but slump to bring my mistake in the middle of attention.

So i took it all, stumps, smoke, ninja engineered mold, exhaust, gave up my walk and stood at the laptop for almost 12 hours.

Because of how things are organized here in Oregon, i had to go in three places with Angela to buy groceries and at WinCo where you have to buy with debit or cash only we went over the limit with 4 dollars and now we have to go to the bank tomorrow with a jar full of change.

Also because we had too many items we had to go to a regular stand and the only one with no line was were a woman with an Arab shawl was suggesting of course i am being paid by those to to that. Especially since i have to go to the bank tomorrow. Dejavu.

Case NR.12-664146 OCT 26 2012, Lake Oswego Police Department

From: George Ion <george.ion.email@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Subject: Ref.case NR.12-664146
To: sfilippelli@ci.oswego.or.us

The time i made the phone call at home was 6:10 PM OCT 26 2012 and that was minutes after accident. There are also time stamps on the pictures attached. There is a picture with the rear of my car and one with the front of his. There is a picture with the offer for the insurance that has a date of OCT 25. But the date on the envelope is 29 as seen in the picture. I spoke with my insurance agent every day for the last 3 days. Minutes after the accident happened another gentleman showed up at the scene of the accident. He seemed to live in the neighborhood of https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Boones+Ferry+Rd+%26+Kerr+Pkwy+Lake+Oswego,+OR+97035&hl=en&sll=45.424485,-122.707842&sspn=0.011928,0.026565&t=h&gl=us&hnear=Boones+Ferry+Rd+%26+Kerr+Pkwy,+Lake+Oswego,+Clackamas,+Oregon&z=16
The other gentleman, a younger blond tall slim person brought a pen probably from his home. The personal data of Michael Jivangi (a tall guy name is indian, muslim by appearance) was written by himself and i added the license plate, make and year of the car. There is also a picture with the brake reservoir with the broken lid from the vandalism case i reported separately. Actually there are several cases and instances. Please try and speak with Ben Schneider of the Lake Oswego Police to whom i reported another instance of vandalism on my car that happened several months ago.

There are 4 pictures attached. I forgot to tell you one more thing. The apartment nr 6 wich is right under nr.10 in the building where i live is vacated since September 2011. Before that there was an older, shorter gentleman with an old green van that was making strange noises at night like rebuilding something. He put blankets and blinds and then he left and i never seen anybody going in and out but many times there was strange smoke smells coming from the cracks in the wall that i finally fixed but even as i write this email there is a strange smoke here that i cannot explain that has a weird effect on me. Could you possibly check to see why there are blinds and blankets in this vacated apartment and nobody is there for more than a year and sometimes i still here noises?

At 7:30 Oct-26 an hour or so after the accident i went to the Doctors Express at 17437 SW Boones Ferry Rd Ste.100 for a checkup. There was a middle age Dr with a grey goatee and an younger Asian like assistant and another older gentleman in a blue suit with a gray mustache. The doctor first wanted to see the car, front and read. After the assistant took my blood pressure which was 160/90 with a pulse of 91. I gave them the Medicare card and my drivers license and they gave them back to me. The doctor asked me if i had any back pain and i said i only felt heat like after going to the chiropractor. After that i went a couple of times for different reasons this week and i got paperwork for both. Last night and today i asked them for the paperwork for Friday 26 but they are saying there is no record of me being in that day in there.

4 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images   Share all images  

DSC05554.JPG 2649K   View   Share   Download

DSC05561.JPG 2749K   View   Share   Download

DSCN0865.JPG 3853K   View   Share   Download

June 14

10:44 Last thing first. A lot of cars on the street trying to literally "gas me" with their exhaust all the way to here. I know the reason. 10 miles before Bend i was searching for a restroom and veered off and went to a daily queen and found a restroom outside unlocked which is rare. Angela went first, to women's while i was checking the oil. It was definitely darker after 1000 miles i made in my 3 days of "vacation" of a total of about 1200.

A minivan with two parents and three children came but they all stayed in the van. I was waiting for Angela to come out because i did not want to check the exhaust manifold one more time before i left (more explanations later). So when she came i ran inside but in noticed one of the kid came out of the van, trying to simulate racing me. So i went inside and i only peed. However it took a while, you know, like old men do.

The kid came at the door and tried to open it several times. I thought it was the wind which was blowing pretty strong. Angela told me he came with the father and i'm sure both saw me when i got inside. Then the kid stayed at the door simulating diarrhea symptoms. Angela told him to go to the women if he was in such a hurry (he was about 6 years old) but he didn't.

After that all hell broke loose, with two diesel vehicles in front of me during the peak traffic hour in Bend, at the stop lights bottleneck on the freeway. I drove behind those for almost an hour, more later. I don't know what the kid and father said and to whom but i know i didn't let much smell behind me.

I know why they did this. They are trying to cover what they did at Rolling Hills casino. On a Tuesday morning, the only people in the casino were them. Didn't stay long, just before i left i grabbed some free coffee. Who said there's no such thing as a free lunch. I tasted the coffee and it tasted again like it did at Red Winds the other week and after that i f...d for three days like crazy and the f...s were smelling like an animal f...s maybe dog. So strong i was opening the car's windows and the smell wouldn't go out for one whole minute.

What i believe is they added either dog urine or poo or anal sack oil in the coffee, in both instances. Though this time i took one sip only, i could not spit it on the carpet in the casino, the effects were almost similar with the first time when i took several before i threw it away.

One more thing. When i got in Reno later that day, the whole city was smelling like burning plastic. Angela said she saw smoke coming out of a wooded area outside city but she is not sure if it wasn't fog.

I recognized that smell like from the other apartment in Lake Oswego and always thought it was meth because i read online that it smells like burning plastic.

I know meth makes you very alert no matter how tired you are and won't let you sleep which happened to me when i got in the city though i was dead tired from sleeping 5 hours the night before and driving more than 300 miles.

When i entered the city the gps pulled me on exit 13 not like i was used at the other end of Virginia street (the main street of the "biggest small city in the world") and as a result i paraded through the whole down town and saw groups of young people like partying or celebrating something. But is it possible they would drug a whole town? I think it is because it happened before, can't remember though for sure cause i was too high.

As for why i left precipitously, later, i'm just too tired after driving 550 miles today and having 4 hours of sleep last night. BTW, i tried to fall asleep in a parking lot and was waking every time after a minute or so of nightmares involving accidents while driving. I tried to setup the tablet as a proxy for the laptop and by doing so i exposed myself to microwave radiation big time and got pains on my hands legs and belly (the tablet was on the bed and i was standing). In the end i couldn't because of a setting i didn't know. The reason i did not write anything.

Later i had an idea, could have written everything with at text editor on the laptop while off line, than start the wi-fi for a few seconds and paste it on the blog, would had been much less exposure than trying to setup the tablet for minutes but simply was too tired like now, "too tried to sleep".

Russia and History of Linguistics

My frustration only grew when i tried to search for more aggressive instances of looking into history from the point of view of linguistics. As with many possibly interconnected scientific fields, there are not even established definitions or work protocols and methodologies. Nothing strong i can refer to in what follows.

There are many scientists (in Romania we use the French term "savant" in a rather sarcastic sense) in all areas of study. In fact so many in each area no one could drop one needle in there (another Romanian expression trying to describe extreme occupancy of a narrow space). There are also suspicions (from my part) that they actually cover each other in stagnation and all kinda time wasting heresies. (We saw so many useless studies and claims like about healing cancer and AIDS in the last decades while nothing really happens in reality).

Narrow specialization leads to some sort of monopoly of scientific branches over certain areas of study. The savants get so good in their field no one can even dare to say a word. They become supreme authorities and nothing can be done anymore without the approval of the leader of the clan towards whom all hosannas converge. But who knows what really happens under the curtain of specialized terms and works and barrage of biased media articles. That is how much work and progress is being made.

But how could we possibly have savants in two different areas in the same time if (artificial) competition and time needed to be each on top of his game in a certain area does not allow one to specialize in two areas which sometimes are not apparently related, like by example history and linguistics?

We have an "official science" called "History of linguistics" which as the title says, takes care of history of linguistics. Very few people would even thing about that. However much more useful would be one that would study History of Languages, not even dare to think of a branch of history named Linguistic History, or history studied from the point of view of evolution and transfer of words and languages.

Probably on the opposite side is the holistic approach. I say probably because i rarely see attempts to look at things from more than one narrow point of view so i can only imagine. With much less resources and bibliographies to read, sometimes simply putting together basic facts from two or more disciplines (which i have to admit, i've done a lot lately) reveal things that no one can even dream or maybe could have never been discovered.

We all at least in High School are though lots of basic facts from different disciplines. However there is a total lack of integration between them and forgetting all those, either after specialization in faculties or having a full life is the general idea).


So here comes the example. One simple etymology reveals and attempts to state tantalizing facts that are not (strongly) implemented in current history of countries. And confirm the whole story i wrote about so far. And reveal controversies arisen from contradictions between two sciences on the same subject. Or lack of harmonization. Or lack of integration.

"Etymology[edit]

Main article: Rus' (name)

Europe in the 9th century. Roslagen is located along the coast of the northern tip of the pink area marked "Swedes and Goths".

The etymology and semantic history of the word Rus' has been a highly contentious topic, on which debate is ongoing. This is partly because of a widespread assumption that by identifying the linguistic origin of the name Rus', scholars can identify the origins of the people whom it described. This assumption has, however, been criticized in twenty-first-century scholarship.^[2][3]

According to the prevalent theory, the name Rus', like the Finnish name for Sweden(Ruotsi), is derived from an Old Norse term for "the men who row" (rods-) as rowing was the main method of navigating the rivers of Eastern Europe, and that it could be linked to the Swedish coastal area of Roslagen (Rus-law) or Roden, as it was known in earlier times.^[4][5] The name Rus' would then have the same origin as the Finnish and Estonian names for Sweden: Ruotsi and Rootsi.^[6][7]

In absence of any other attempts Wikipedia has become the only scientific multidisciplinary integration tool we know of. Here because of the way it was designed, people of different backgrounds can write and edit articles. It is the only place where, in this case historians and linguists can come together and talk in the view of public. However there are others who are watching and interfering. Occasional politicians. Wannabe quick fixers of this upside down world.

The above section. Obviously lacking necessary level of English. This is a sign somebody with strong convictions but little refinement has written parts of it. Word scholarship is used nowadays in English mostly for financing of students and very little as describing the scientific establishment. Or maybe the statement is sarcastic.

The fact one theory has opponents however does not mean it is not true. Probably those who don't like very much the fact that Russians and Swedes have a partially common origin. And those would not be necessarily the swedes who probably don't care except if they are polarized by politicians and lunatics that can speak and write. Those who are part of the anti-Russia propaganda machine at work in western countries for at least one century. Enemies of both people or all European native people. As for Russians, they even didn't wake up yet from one century long imprisonment in their own country or space or whatever.

First. It is unclear to me what Finish are. There are claims they are related in the western hemisphere of our planet only to Hungarians. The so called ugric connection. However, since i've been studied lately extensively but on isolated issues (it's really hard to study as a whole something that doesn't seem even been put together, like histories of all countries) the history of Hungarians which by the way is again full of controversies arised by their own historian and others who looked into it, i fail to fully understand it. Could it be a pre-Magyar relationship from a simultaneous migration to the north, both coming from Mesopotamia. (Sumer).

One thing is clear so far. Finish in northern Europe are as aliens as Hungarian in central. Vaguely connected linguistically and culturally with each other, heavily influenced and influencing including genetically in the last thousand of years their reacting hosts, they lost, until recently, a strong connection with each other. (Finland influence in the whole world nowadays is enormous for such a small country, if it was to talk only about Helsinki Accords, Linus Torvalds or Nokia).

But what do you do when you have strong contradiction scientific statements made in view of public within the same field of science which is history?

https://www.google.com/search?q=finland+history

"A part of the Kingdom of Sweden from 13th century until 1809, it then became an autonomous duchy of the Russian Empire until 1917, when it declared independence." (New world order which started after WWI or earlier after Tunguska event).

First entry in this one phrase history of Finland from google is since 13th century when it is said it became part of kingdom of Sweden. Obviously, in the other page quoted above it is said that the name Rus, or Kievan Rus kingdom starting in 10th century was given possibly by the... Finish!

Not much better in Wikipedia. First written account, 12 century. Though, through linguistics, that is etymology of the word Rus, they existed and have been highly influential before 10th century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland

It came at no surprise to me when i read this.

http://www.mongolia-web.com/opinion/2084-are-the-finns-the-mongolians-of-europe/

"This would also imply that Finno-Ugric languages in Finland were preceded by a North-Western Indo-European language, at least to the extent the latter can be associated with the Cord Ceramic culture"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland#Chronology_of_languages_in_Finland

"From 3200 BC onwards, either immigrants or a strong cultural influence from south of the Gulf of Finland settled in southwestern Finland. This culture was a part of the European Battle Axe cultures, which have often been associated with the movement of the Indo-European speakers."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland#Merovingian_period:_575_AD_%E2%80%93_800_AD

Due to great stress from the controlled environment i live in i will cut this very short for now:

My hypothesis (ans is built mostly on linguistic but integrated with known historic, cultural and archaeologically confirmed facts and especially with modern history and events) is after the fall of Ur, first state city in the world and great Sumerian Civilization which began due to climate changes around year -2000, Sumerians started to migrate north and went all the way to Scandinavia, Mongolia and Japan but some remained as south as Turkey, Iran, Iraq. Etymologies like Ural Mountains, Ukraine - ugric, Sami people, Samurai, Sumo wrestling, Orkhon River, but also Europe, which is recent, countless others are there to prove it. In India they came from back south starting around Aral Sea and became known as Arians (Aryan Invasion Theory, around -1500). Culturally, linguistically and genetically opposed to Indo European as Scandinavia and obviously Europe and India originally were, they were/are persistent people, with much extraordinarily ancient knowledge, of which some was un-accessible even to them until they re-gained more tools to look into old Sumerian and possibly Egyptian or Indian writings they might had have access to which suddenly brought to us all the technologically advances of the last century that seem to converge all to a great deception. From a different moment or time or different world.

Are they about to restore their ancient possibly advanced civilization this time on planetary scale (and of course eliminate all non-Aryans).

For all these reason they don't need a branch of history called Lingustics (based) History. They don't need anything new in science cause they already got all they need.

I am not completely satisfied with this blog post but i think i touched the important points. Also have some surprised in searches which compensate for not being able to write it the way i wanted due to great interference from outside like synchronized noises (which may seem to an observer normal).

Under Jurisdiction Of

Magically something has turned into something else. Both fb and Google and that is not unexpected knowing who the owners are (not Zuckerberg, uh-ho, or Brin or whoever, the're just pretty faces, well, the prettiest still nerdy they could came up with) are plainly targeting me hijacking my searches and links to searches and make the results different. This is new never happened to me before.

I tried to put both on fb and g+ a link to a google search on therms "under jurisdiction of". The results today were varying.

Here on blogger (still Google) one can control the html part of the post so there is no way they can do it. This is what i was looking for:

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22under+jurisdiction+of%22

What fb and google were putting in my post after parsing my link. They lost the closing quote mark, so they created a pretext to bring up a different definition, that is usually on the second place in the dictionaries and very little used in practice.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22under+jurisdiction+of

Operating together, what they did was creating a new issue over the one i was writing about. It is a very common Asian ninja undercover guerrilla tactic. You complain, they give you some more so your first complaint will fade by comparison with the second. I believe this could only come after a long tradition of bureaucracy which indeed reigned in one of the most bureaucratic states since times and that was Chinese Empire and subsequent Japanese one.

The complaint i had in mind before those attempts was about this part of the definition in Wikipedia. "Operating under the jurisdiction of the US Department of Justice, the FBI is also a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community and reports to both the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence."

(But actually the initial complaint i was thinking to write about on both networks was about the jurisdiction of the FBI in investigating the President of the United States of America. It started with Nixon. Now again with Mueller and Trump. So we go back deeper on several layers of complaints.)

Keeping in mind Montesquieu's "Principle of separation of powers in state" let's look again at the phrase from Wikipedia's definition for the FBI.

I believe they use the second less common definition of jurisdiction here because the're trying to cover the inconceivable concealed in the same phrase. FBI actually has double subordination. One to the Department of Justice and one to the Director of National Intelligence (a person or an institution, not sure from what i see in Wikipedia).

There is a phrase on the page of Department of Justice that says. "The department is headed by the United States Attorney General, who is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate and is a member of the Cabinet."

But maybe we should start with the Cabinet. Cabinet of course is not the storage shelves with little doors everyone has in the kitchen. It is i think the most important part of the executive (branch of the government, according again to Montesquieu, but who is this French guy Montesquieu to tell us what and how a government should be).

It is if you prefer the ensemble of all Departments of the executive branch (of the 3 branches of the government) but actually it is what other countries call "government" that is again all the departments or ministries of the executive. In this wonderful diagram again put for public to use freely in Wikipedia we can follow the blue arrows. "Appoints and controls". In the United States, the Cabinet, that is Departments is controlled by the President. (BTW i didn't know the President controls the Supreme Court).


By 111Alleskönner - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, Link

As we can see in the list of Head of Deparments aka members of the Cabinet, the Justice Department does not have a secretary. It has an Attorney General. Whatever.

About Department of Justice. Department itself is not the whole of judicial power in this country. It is not even an umbrella for the whole of it. The real judicial power and embodiment of that part of Montesquieu type of  state lays to the courts which are not subordinated to the Department of Justice.

Department of Justice is actually an umbrella only for several state agencies "The Department of Justice administers several federal law enforcement agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The department is responsible for investigating instances of financial fraud, representing the United States government in legal matters (such as in cases before the Supreme Court), and running the federal prison system.[3][4] The department is also responsible for reviewing the conduct of local law enforcement as directed by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994." These agencies are all prosecuting bodies so we can see Justice Department more like a prosecuting body than a defense attorney or the whole branch of the power of Judicial.

However. The head of the Justice Department aka Attorney General, according to its definition in Wikipedia is "is the chief lawyer of the United States government."

Who is head of United States Government? And especially why every state institution is called differently in the US then in any other country?

Parliament in Europe is Congress in the US, Govern in Europe is Cabinet in the US, etc.

I believe part of it was to break free with the British system so Parliament from the beginning was called Congress and Government was called Cabinet which in Britain is only a number of select ministers. Ministers where called secretaries and ministries became departments. Historically states where British colonies, they probably could not agree in the beginning to simply unite them in a country so US became a federation. This way they didn't have to change anything in the state's governments. The function of governor was kept including the name. Since United states is made of ...states, they could not use the name state describing the federal state institutions state so they became US government. Which is really confusing for foreigners.

However. Compared to leaders of other countries the US President has enormous powers basically controlling all the three branches of US government by cumulating the function of a head of state with that of head or leader of the Cabinet. He can block any law by not signing it. Congress can overturn  his veto only with a 2/3 majority, however that is hard to achieve. He can dismiss any member of the Cabinet including the Attorney General. He nominates the judges for the Supreme Court.