January 11

2:20 AM Was wondering then i googled.

10:38 Greenland population.

4:45 PM They said using sea water is bad for environment. Could they borrow some of these suckers from different states (or countries)? Unless if they want to help to fulfill some apocalyptic prophecies.

FYI There are currently 64 in Canada and 10 in the US  but yet only 2 are deployed in LA of which one is down. It does not matter if sea water contaminates them after 100 scoops, they can be flushed. BTW, they could alter design to make them sea water resistant for future orders.

How ironic to have your house destroyed by fire hundreds of feet away from the largest body of water on the planet.

5:00 How much of an idiot one should be to fly a drone into one of those? Maye it's time FAA should consider not to allow to use drones capable of flying into planes without a pilot's license. I believe it's better not to have images of the disaster and save a house or ten with one scoop of those.

9:07 Again anybody had a chance to check polarity and voltage on the last section of the intertie? Hint: could use an electric field meter right under but have to identify it first (it's got two parallel wires per each way of (DC) current, not one.

10:00 No it does not contradicts my latest version of my theory of everything. Electrostatic charge is nothing but pressure gradient, positive or negative of the AEther. By Bernoulli's law, the very fast moving whirls create negative or positive pressure, depending on direction of rotation. It builds up because it does not have where to go. Or maybe it passes through a (micro worm) hole in space time continuum only to come back back through another.

10:10 Could not remember where i saw this, i first thought it was maybe Trump, but it's on the Air Force site. (BTW is that a water tanker in the picture? Nevermind that). They can literally blow a fire, like one would blow a candle. I once saw a documentary when i was a kid that impressed me, they used the technique to put out a fire on an oil or gas well, however it was isolated.

Don't know if they can use it on a number of fires or if the area is declared an unrecoverable total loss and of course would create much distress in population in nearby unevacuated areas.

But a better idea would be to temporarily disconnect first those DC lines around LA out of curiosity to see what happens.

10:37 Talking about Santa Ana winds.

Which again reminds me of this.


11:45 Turk Aegean, Atena, AEther.

January 10

4:40 PM No doubt, the biggest progress in quantum physics since the enunciation of theory, performed with much effort and insight by Polish scientists. By repeating the collision of two photons with one of them changing phase for each collision, they extracted the information pertaining to the "unknown" (constant phase) photon but the rest is misinterpretations and false beliefs (Schrodinger).

I believe what we are seeing here on the left are four whirls, rotating perpendicular to the propagation axis each ceding its energy to opposite while fading, similar to an hourglass. Two opposite ones turning in different directions create the next ones.

Closest analogy i can think of is a differential with 4 conic wheels, left side of this image. However, the wheels have no teeth and the two axis are not intersecting, all moving forward due to an axial momentum from creation time (burping).

This idea is too new to me, have to think more if there are two or four axis, one for each swirl but strictly by the hologram, there should be two.

Any of the two own an old red Subaru with a backward curbed antenna ;)?

Don't want to state the obvious, but just for courtesy, i could have never had the motivation and made the interpretation without the "hologram" above.

Now that i think, Subaru are the first production cars with four wheel drive having that type of differential. No, i think i'm wrong, it's the Audi Quatro with the 4 circles like an Ezekiel wheel. Nevermind that too, Audi is on the 7s position on this list.

6:50 Yeah i don't have any vocal interface supercomputer to simulate the above. Until then, i found something. I wish this one was 3D and animated though. 

10:15 BTW EAther - Eaton. Incredibly fast rotating whirls. That butterfly in Tokyo which again flapped its wings in Alaska and Oregon.

11:05

January 9

12:57 AM I believe this is where we should look for particles. It is said all particles "have a spin", right?

It's not "they have a spin", they are swirls or they exist because they rotate. Right.

In a fluid, swirls rotating in the same direction repel each other and electrons of the same spin repel each other more strongly. In my theory the repelling electrostatic force is due to random disturbances of the same positive pressure rotating against neutral pressure of the AEther that repel each other.

String theory was born from the need to explain the "strong force".

8:00 What did i say about pink being the new white? What can it be a pink poney on a Japanese navy flag background?


11:28 Could she be the one upstairs? BTW she's shaking the building, "as we speak". (Didn't "go to work" today of course after i just posted).

11:50 Apropo credeam că simbolurile naziste sunt interzise în România... Sau în SUA...

3:20 Just figured a new valence for the song. Chrystal Nacht.

January 8

12:35 AM More of a nurse...

1:15 AM Sin atrociously...

6:50 All the current theories in physics start with observations of rather complex phenomena, trying to explain those with models we may call from top to bottom.

There are two different apparent currents in today's physics, like particles which gave us the standard model, with three called fundamentals, quarks, leptons and bosons with some confirmations through experiments and the strings theories which is tempting but still in the realm of hypothesis.

The other way would be to start with only one hypothesis trying to explain all observations, or from bottom up.

What i'm proposing is explaining them all with only one hypothesis. All matter is made of one single type of particle, called virtual particle or disturbance, that exists only dynamically.

The single particle, for the sake of familiarity we should call electric though it's basically nothing.

The disturbance always creates a reaction of space time continuum which can be confirmed by the so called electromagnetic induction experiment. It is at 90 degrees in space and it begins when the disturbance transfer its energy to it, diminishing.

We could attach a mental experiment to it. Imagine the magnetic field created by of the movement of one single electron (though in the end it proves that the electron is not punctiform). The deceleration 

of one single punctiform charged particle would create a movement of another single charged particle with an opposite sign and at 90 degrees direction.

But when the disturbance is not being accelerated, the reaction is closing upon self. Which is moving on a closed trajectory. Which in  our perception would be the equivalent with two particles, one charged positively and one negatively at different times.

The most simple case is that of a circular closed trajectory and this would be an electron. But depending on the speed and initial condition of creation, like being closed to other particles or coming of a cloud with n bodies, its trajectory could be more complicated, giving us all the known particles.

We can call these strings however only their trajectories resembles strings. If the trajectories are closed and stable no matter how complicated we have closed strings or particles and if they are open we have open strings though open strings can exist only temporarily or for the period of time the virtual particle moves on that trajectory, always creating and transferring its energy to another one like in the case of light.

So yeah, we may call a virtual positron the reaction in time of a virtual electron. So the energy released through annihilation of matter and antimatter is the initial energy of the disturbance that can never be "healed".

We shall conclude that there are two time frames in which matter and antimatter exist with two different charges and that generates gravity.

I believe we shall have any type of closed strings we can imagine by using this model starting with the most basic, a closed circle or an electron.

8:00 However at times i believe the whole space time continuum behaves like a fluid and one disturbance or a moving bubble of greater pressure is being attracted by its own trail like in Bernoulli's law... Than while moving together, they create a tiny depression in the Æther attracting everything in that is moving or all similar disturbances in that plane in the Universe.

Their mistake back then was Æther though a fluid, without mass cannot be an elastic medium for light.

A swirl in the dark Æther.

Copyright Notice. I shall call the above enunciations starting with 6:50 The Dynamic Swirls Theory or Æther Swirls Theory.
3:40 I din't know!