Sami, Sumerian and Semitic

Yet again starting to write something that i don't know where it's gonna take me to. I had a hunch about a possible similarity between Sami people and Sumerians but mostly from personal experiences. Sami people live in north and exhibit features of all Nordic people. Skin, hair and eye de-pigmentation due to lack of much UVB, an adaptation necessary for living at high latitudes.

I once found a whole Pinterest page showing blue eyes of... Egyptians, who were a civilization parallel if not related to Sumerian. But here is a page showing... Sumerians with blue eyes!

"Scientists at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark have tracked down a genetic mutation, which took place 6-10,000 years ago, and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." Exactly. One mutation can occur only once, on one location of planet Earth.

Other time i found an image of an ancient statue of Thor (as in Thursday, remember) exhibiting an ank-like object. Thor could also be at the origin of name Horus.

If there is a link it can only be of North-South direction. Sumerians (and Egyptians) came from north and not the other way around. Because they show these northern features.

After a few searches i found some very interesting facts. Sami people, formerly known as laplanders, are unique among northern people both from genetic and linguistics points of view.

"In Norway, however, Sámi were still called Finns at least until the modern era (reflected in toponyms like Finnmark, Finnsnes, Finnfjord and Finnøy), and some northern Norwegians will still occasionally use Finn to refer to Sámi people, although the Sámi themselves now consider this to be an inappropriate term."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1mi_people#Etymologies

"Though they speak a Finno-Ugric language, they are genetically distinct from other Finno-Ugric and Indo-European people."
https://www.laits.utexas.edu/sami/dieda/hist/genetic.htm

So were Sumerians in Near East. Genetically distinct, there is a great and yet unsettled debate about their origin.

"The Sumerians, and their neighbors the Elamites, as well as groups like the Hatti and Hurrians & Urartian, pose problems for this thesis. None of these groups seem to be Indo-European or Semitic, the two dominant language families of Near East by ~1,000 B.C. You have in the ancient Near East then a situation where the light of history reveals before us not the diversification of Indo-European and Semitic speaking farmers, but rather a host of unique and disparate peoples, all simultaneously lurching toward literate civilization, one after another."
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/10/ancient-dna-and-sumerians/

Then an idea came to me. The linguistics argument. And here what i found. A (non-linguist) historian researched for eleven years on this (as i said in the past, future of history and all sciences belongs to interdisciplinary studies) basically going against all academics, establishment, mainstream, name it.

"Juha Jantunen, professor of East Asian languages and cultures at the University of Helsinki, summarizes the linguists’ horror at Parpola’s findings: saying that Sumerian is a closer relative of Finnish than the Finno-Ugric Sami is like saying that humans are not, in fact, that closely related to apes but find themselves rather somewhere between the horse and the donkey." http://www.icge.co.uk/languagesciencesblog/?p=1336

"Donbaz said the most important dialects of the Akkadian language, which is a member of the Sami language family, were Assyrian and Babylonian"

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/veysel-donbaz-interpreter-of-dead-languages-139895

How about Semitic?
https://www.academia.edu/33654979/THE_UNITY_OF_HAMITO-SEMITIC_AND_SUMERIAN_LANGUAGE_FAMILIES_1

If we do a google search on phrase "origin of the Sumerians" we get an... Akkadian description. Anybody knows why? Because Akkadians where those who displaced Sumerian from the fertile lands between the two rivers and a delta (modern day Iraq). Akkadians are actually Africans. You can see from the picture of their bronze heads.

What i guess it happened was Sumerians were overcome by their own African slaves.

Survivors in the North of last Ice Age, mainly because they relied on fire and other technologies, but also the proximity of volcanoes in Iceland to survive (average temperatures during last ice age where about 12 degrees Fahrenheit lower), they were thousands of years technologically more advanced than the rest of the world. And they choose to colonize the naturally most fertile places on Earth like Egypt and Sumer (southern Mesopotamia, The Fertile Crescent).

As written in one of the first links in the post. Ice Age in Northern Europe ended about 8000 BC. Indo-Europeans, Cro-Magnon, whatever, started to advance north and Scandinavians could not have stopped them.  Europenization of Scandinavia (skanda nava, New Kingdom in Sanskrit) started. Few of the Sami survived to this day. Some of them, the elite, moved way south, in an area where less developed Africans and SW Asians would not pose much problems to them. Sumerian civilization started to peak about one or two thousand years later.

They brought in many peoples are slaves among them the Africans but they eventually got smarter and being numerous in the end took over. Or it might have also been a climate change that contribute it to their return... back North. But they could not find their way back all the way to Northern Scandinavia and started wondering and putting bases to new civilizations throughout Eurasia, from Ireland to Ural, Turkey, Mongolia and Japan, mainly creating the Aryan (master) race. But forever they will remember and hate the Semitic Akkadians who drew then out of the garden of Eden.

What. I was searching for pyramids in Scandinavia.

Climate change due to Earth precession drew the monkeys North?

Could this 13th century representation from an English manuscript of St Eustace 2nd century AD be an attempt to describe eccentricity of Earth's orbit around Sun.

There is a similar depiction of Christ in the page of "Saint Hubertus [who] was widely venerated during the Middle Ages. The iconography of his legend is entangled with the legend of Saint Eustace." Hibernus as adjective means winter in Latin. More answers to this mystery here.

Could this be an attempt to describe the eccentricity of Earth's orbit around Sun.