September 25

2:23 AM Ăla din stânga (dpdv al privitorului) ofițerului cu mâna la gură sugerează Nicu Ceaușescu, iar cel din dreapta cu cască de protecție Cristi Borcea? (n.1970) Un lucru e sigur. Doar unii erau mineri, ca de exemplu ăia doi dintre ofițer și Nicu. Cei doi din dreapta. Miron Cozma.

9:00 Al nostru, dintre noi, pentru noi. Sunt proprietar, deci exist. Băsescu a fost căpitan, deci a existat (însă poza pare făcută la mișto). Nu are nici o pensie după ce a jăcmănit și distrus, dar mai ales, a dat tonul la confuzie, scandaluri și corupție (a avut două referendumuri de demitere, care au rezultat în legea cea mai aiurea dată nouă vreodată de vreun Parlament, 341/2013).

10:05 Efortul național este bugetul Ministerului Afacerilor Interne, pe care cu onor îl conduce. 1,2 miliarde lei din care jumătate sunt salariile (cheltuieli de personal). 550 milioane împărțit la 12 (Numărul de luni din an) și la salariul mediu (8532) ne dă aproximativ numărul de angajați. Poliție, Jandarmi, mai știu eu ce. Par puțini, însă dacă ne gândim că nu fac nimic...

Da, pare mic, în comparație cu Ministerul Dezvoltării, care iar face chiar nimic, sau Transporturilor, care face foarte puțin. Pentru ce avem un Minister al Dezvoltării, fiindcă sună bine? Dar unde se duc banii alocați?

Bugetele pe ministere sunt alocate de Parlament, prin lege, la fiecare început de an. Dreapta sus, link-uri permanente. Dar este evident că toate aceste sume enorme nu sunt folosite în România, ele se duc undeva, cel mai probabil în Ungaria, având în vedere că toți politicienii, miniștrii, par să fie actori unguri.

10:52 Nici măcar nu se mai obosește să păstreze aparențele. Primul Ministru nu numește (pe) Președintele Camerei Deputaților. El este votat în plen. Sau doar o altă încercare de a "localiza" toate aceste aparențe.

"Dăncilă" a fost Prim Ministru în perioada când România a avut (prin rotație) timp de 6 luni Președenția Consiliului European (ăla mic, de prim miniștri, a nu se confunda cu Consiliul UE, ăla mare, de președinți, care contra-votează legislația UE, da știu e ca la nebuni), un rol simbolic, perioadă în care însă nu am auzit să facă vreun efort pentru România ca de exemplu clarificarea apartenenței la Schengen unde România este membru din 2007 (dreapta sus, link-uri).

3:08 Just finished binge watching Obliterated (2003). Man what a fat s...t movie. A special team getting high after missing their objective, finishing their mission against all odds and all Russians in Vegas.

Besides the plain old anti-Russian propaganda whith a long tradition starting with James Bond and the psychosis with the bomb (nothing new, except for cursing all the time and almost advertising the use of drugs), there are a very few things i'd like to ad.

The Gremlin who haunts the Chinese guy. It is part of the list of keywords embedded in the brains of English speaking people around the world. It stands for Kremlin and is at the very basis of subconsciously antagonizing the Russians against all (English speaking) world and the other way around.

It looks, my friends like your brains have been programmed.

Moss_cow. Rush_ya. Bella_Russia. Si bear_ya. War_saw. Prague. Book, arrest, Loon_done, Pare_is.

Gore_bashev. Krush_chev. GRUss.

UK_GB.

Ukraine (UK reign). Key_ev. , etc..

The Cyrillic alphabet.

Why antagonize the Russians in this centuries old world wide conspiracy? DIVIDE ET IMPERA. They needed an antagonist, like the clown for Batman, Lex Luther (law looter) for Superman, the liquid terminator for the mechanical one etc.. Otherwise it will be all boring and people will forget about and go about their business.

5:00 BTW do i detect a threat in this Hungarian super confident plain arrogant looking yelling singer's "hit" played endlessly at least on our local specialized station (Z100 Portland. Zenu. PDXenu).

9:09 PM Everybody who took college level physics knows about relativistic mass. According to Einstein, mass of a particle changes with its speed and changes dramatically when the speed goes "relativistic", which means is comparable to the speed of light. So we assume here Einstein was right.

At the speed of light the mass of any particle except for the photon which may not be a particle after all becomes infinite. You can see the formula in this article.

We all know electrons usually revolve around an atom. However, when there are more than one electron, their trajectories and speeds become so complicated, due to interactions and collisions between them it is impossible to describe them in mathematical terms. The so called n-body situation.

At this point it is easier to describe their behavior in terms like clouds, where we can no longer know the speed or position of a certain electron.

Some of the electrons around an atom move at relativistic speeds. We know that is happening for gold, probably other heavy elements.

Electrons do have (resting) mass and when they move at relativistic speeds they will add their relativistic mass to the mass of atom.

In the case of gold, some of the fastest moving electrons can have 1.2 times the resting mass.

Nobody has yet measured the number of neutrons in an atom. It is said, for heavier particles, the number of neutrons is higher than that of protons, needed to counteract the electrostatic repulsion with the strong force and that explains the difference in mass/proton (atomic number) ratio. We call isotopes the atoms with same number of protons and different number of neutrons.

So what will happen with the relativistic electrons when one atom decays into two others, assuming the atoms do not loose them (or capture others right away from the "environment"), when the temperature stabilizes? Will the sum of their relativistic mass be the same as of the initial atom?

I think not. Electric charges that mainly hold the electrons in orbit will be the same, but the orbitals will be lower.

So here could be the true cause of the so call mass defect, the basis for the (in)famous formula E=mc2.

There is no equivalence between energy and matter (whatever that is).

I believe it is from here we should start looking for the nature of mass. Unfortunately i cannot make the calculations to prove the mass defect is the difference between relativistic mass of all electrons before and after because of my very limited mathematical knowledge at this time. And it could be impossible because of how complicated would be the trajectories.

After gross estimates, this theory does not stand if the electrons of the 6 orbital (in gold) do not exceed 58% of the speed of light. But if that percentage comes from an average speed, and some could have 70% of the speed of light or more, due to collisions and accelerations in their complicated trajectory, even for limited amounts of times, things could change.

11:55 For the first time ever i did a google search (with a typo) and got an answer but i don't know where that answer came from. Clicked on the link next to it, nothing. When i corrected the typo, i did not get the same answer anymore and o believe this is due to AI, could not have happened before that. So yeah, google AI is (of) an amoeba too or worse.

12:15 Yeah but... The electrons, especially for heavier elements do not move around the atom in a circular orbit, or at a constant speed or even radius like in Bohr' model, they are like zig-zagging in a mess mainly due to electrostatic repulsion forces and yes collisions (like in no one's model)... Here is an idea how it would look with 5 electrons but try to imagine 79 like in gold.