January 3rd

10:40 AM I believe the key to a better health is the study of normal physiology or the parameters of a healthy body. Catching the moment when a person's physiological parameters are starting to go off and figuring the cause.

Our body is designed to take some blows or overcome temporary pushing of the physiology out of limits and then safely revert to normal but when these situations become more permanent, this could push it in the realm of irreversible chronic conditions.

Imagine if i could know when exactly my diabetes or my heart disease started and what was the reason.

But there might be conditioning factors that are under our control and we prefer to stay under those influences per reasons of... feeling well.

I will not talk about alcohol, tobacco and other drugs as this subject is completely exhausted and everybody agrees those will sooner or letter get to you.

There are other more subtle vices we agree to practice that do not involve nothing except our own body and mind.

Everybody of course remembers short scenes from martial arts movies where the "masters" emphasize the importance of breath. Not talking about the sarcasm of the scene breath in breath out in the Karate Kid movie where the masters seem to teach the kid to breath in dust.

Trouble is our bodies have two major different ways of functioning, depending on the way we breath, both called metabolism. Which comes of course from Ancient Greek. One, the more common involves burning fat and glucose in our cells using oxygen.

It's of course a slow burn, does not usually destroy the cells in the process, except of course if it's so intense the heat does not have time to be evacuated from tissues, causing the so called muscular breakdown.

There are two types of metabolisms, and we are talking here mostly about muscles but the other major energy user of our body, the brain, also have the two types of metabolism. Aerobic and anaerobic.

Ok so let's end the confusion and name a number of exercises that promote both types of metabolisms. Basically all the exercises that are slow and constant are aerobic and those who are short and intense are anaerobic, but they can also coexist.

Have yo ever seen a lion chasing and antelope and then giving up? The reason is the lion can do short bursts of high intensity effort that can last a bit over one minute but then it crashes. It has to stop following. So with other predators.

In other words, aerobic type of metabolism is more sustainable and anaerobic is something extra we need on short time basis when necessary.

And now let's get down to the reason i am writing all these. Anybody remembers David Carradine? I was still in Romania when i saw the series and was impressed as with many other new things that came in our TV after the "revolution" of 1989.

Today i googled more about him and i saw he actually started to study those during the third series of the movie, mostly per reasons to do some of the stunts as it was probably too complicated and inefficient to use doubles.

There is even a video of  him and Chuck Norris fighting in a movie, where Carradine of course gets humiliated. But that proves Chuck who was a real karate fighter some time in his early life thought he was a "worthy (movie scene) opponent".

Then the news about his death shocked me (i was a bit of a fan). Autoerotic suffocation they said. A risky practice of self strangulating to enhance sexual arousal and final pleasure.

Yeah i saw that during some videos on certain sites. Women change dramatically breath rate when approaching climax, with some holding, some accelerating, or combinations (sequences) and changes in metabolism made obvious by blushes.

So i would assume some during sex in anticipation change from one type of metabolism to other or combinations etc. mostly meant for enhancing pleasure in experienced practitioners.

So i tried to of course due some searches about.

Why is this important? Cause i believe some people, as they get older and have less sex, they start to mimic pleasure causing habits during non sexual activities and that of course is subconsciously changing breath rhythms in order to get... satisfaction.

(Have you ever wrote a paragraph in less than a minute typing 60 wpm in one breath and then took a moment to relax and enjoy the result?)

I was talking the other day about the cycle of motivation/satisfaction as being the carrying vehicle of our thoughts processes. Both can be purely mental like getting mad seeing a stupid manipulative news and getting a feeling of accomplishment after "nailing" or "debunking" it in a few short paragraphs.

Everybody heard about the expression "holding one's breath" while expecting some result either by our actions or other's. I believe is a method of kicking your extra anaerobic reserve for the moment the result is being releases, which can be either ways, to better deal with it.

Truth is we can, using the control over this semi-conscient part of physiology that is breathing, alter our own physiology, consciously or not, with some control over releasing some of the neurotransmitters that come with both types of metabolism.

However this is just the beginning of what i'm about to write. The intro part.

It is well known the cascading effect of yawning. Again semi-conscious synchronizing of human activities. I believe it was acquired during evolution when cave men/women needed to synch some of the activities, like sleeping.

But breathing or simultaneously entering aerobic anaerobic states of a group of people? What cold that help with? I don't know, maybe when synching efforts do cooperate on something. Chasing an animal doing hunt? Pushing a rock uphill by a group of people?

And being a synched social behavior, it must be based on triggers. Some conscious, some not. Vibrational communications based, maybe. And if it's based on signals, it can be hacked.

How many times it happened to me like when holding breath to faster write a paragraph the human upstairs made of noise to either interrupt that thought or to get me out of it, before reaching the satisfaction linked to finishing that paragraph that was actually based on a host of mental processes, all interrupted, generating a feeling of total dissatisfaction with first consequences, the impulse to drop everything and getting mad and remaining in anaerobic for minutes or hours after.

But this case is very singular or can be understood by a tiny minority only. Those who do what i do.

There are other things being directed to masses and that is modern music. Have you seen how much they repeat some of the newest released junk on the airways? Yeah i know they would say i should shut the damn radio and not listen to.

But what to do when you have to drive like one more hundred miles at night and feel like falling asleep and turn on the radio? Until not long ago i used to enjoy it but now that i start to see more and more into it i came to hate it but i can't without it either because i'm addicted or too lonely especially in these long morning winters when i'm stuck along in the apartment.

And talking about apartment. How many times am i supposed to hear this song over and over? After i deciphered some of the symbolism in it, i discovered in the last few days there's so much more to it. APT which seems to be the abbreviated name of a popular Korean drinking game, suggests ATP as most people heard about this chemical crucial in cellular metabolism both aerobic and anaerobic.

The woman sin_ger at times seems to announce. I'm on my way! Is this song among others an invitation to enter anaerobic for your own pleasure? Make it an addiction?

Then this morning i heard another one, right next to this. (BTW, we have here in Portland this radio station like no other that pumps continuously the hottest hits on Billboard hip hop chart like no other i saw in other states).

Equally annoying one ore two notes most of time time, it seems to... "So hot it hurts!"

12:53 PM This morning i did my insulin on my inner thigh as it seemed i have more fat in there. They were big thundering noises coming from the garbage truck moving the bins and was not very careful when i chose the place and a drop of blood came after i pulled the tiny needle. Then i realized i did it next to a big dilated varicose vein and started to panic. I even googled. What happens when you do an insulin shot into a vein?

I started to heat up really fast (my feet were kinda cold before). About 15 minutes later i took again my blood sugar and saw it was dropping fast (not like i'm used to when doing insulin with a pen). So it dropped from 340 before the injection to 260 in about half hour and i was feeling kinda light headed.

I said to myself if it drops at the same rate, within an hour i would probably go under 200 and more. So i grabbed my clothes, dressed up just in case and took it one more time. It turns that the panic and moving around made my blood sugar to raise again to 290 and the light headedness disappeared.

So i would assume i entered anaerobic because of panic and my cells stopped using glucose so much.

During my searches today i saw there are devices that can actually tell what kinda metabolism you're in. I think it is very important to me to buy one those and watch the link with blood sugar level.

1:04 PM Market, first winning day of the year. Based on  Tesla, Nvidia, oil (energy).

BTW yesterday i went to buy cigarettes and tried again Albertson's on Boone Ferry. No Nat's there. No you can't get cigarettes on Amazon. The giant doesn't want to save climate change fuel burning trips for smokers.

When i came back i found myself driving behind a Tesla Cybertruck (why they call it cyber). I knew some sort of trouble was going to follow but was too lazy to do something (like breaking up). Or maybe i was in some sort of trance it happens when i meet weird people doing (non)random things in stores.

It was going ahead of me and when i stopped at the lights on the ramp there was a woman driving a van or something who "missed" her green lights holding the wheel nervously on the top, bent over, in order to make me appear like i'm following the damn thing as a cop car was stopped on the freeway flashing red and blue lights and probably filming.

1:45 Lately every time i went to smoke a cigarette (usually in the back) some vehicle comes to pick or leave a kid at the daycare in an apartment across the alley, within my line of site. Right now there was no exception but i came bac in to write it down as it's still there.

2:10 Nu am încontro, trebuie să scriu despre "știrile" de azi care sunt împănate cu ceea ce scriu. Majoritatea sunt invenții media.

Tortul bugetar.

Trebuie să fim recunoscători, nu să căutăm noduri în papura bugetară sau pe site-ul Ministerului Finanțelor. Un deficit de 9% este un record, chiar pentru România, chiar raportat la PIB. ANAF să colecteze mai bine.

TVA este ușor de colectat. După cum arată tortul, impozitul pe profit și pe salarii este infim în comparație cu TVA sau contribuția pentru pensie. Dar impozitul pe salariu ar trebuie să fie doar de două ori și jumătate mai mic decât contribuția CAS (conform fluturașilor). Asta arată că firmele nu virează impozitul pe salariu sau profit iar ANAF se face că nu vede.

Să fim recunoscători și nu ne uităm la miliardele cheltuite aiurea prin ministere. Cam jumătate din buget dispare din contabilitatea ministerelor. O scurtă privire la bugetul Ministerului Educației, care plătește 33 miliarde salarii, fiind cel mai mare angajator din România, arată o sumă egală sau mai mare care nu se știe la ce a folosită. Și nu iese nici un politician la rampă să ne spună.

Debunking Terror

This could be one reason Americans should not be afraid of "nuclear explosions".

It is said temperature inside a nuclear explosion is higher than inside the Sun, or around 100 million Celsius. It is said temperature at the surface right under the explosion in Hiroshima (explosion occurred at 1800 ft above) was about 7700 K or 7500 C or around 16000 F or hotter than Sun's surface. Steel melts at around 1400-1500 C (depending of type) and vaporizes at 2800 C.

Here they say temperature reached 3000-4000 C for maybe 3 seconds. That would have melted anything iron, that melts ad 1538 C.

I know it is not temperature but heat that melts metal, which means a heat transfer need to occur from environment to metal and that needs time. However, at 7500 Celsius, or 5 times iron melting point or three times iron vaporizing temperature, at a much higher than atmospheric pressure and hot fluid surrounding metal structure moving at high speed, like in a blow torch but much faster, heat transfer may occur much faster than near melting in a stationary pool of liquid iron.

It also depends how big the piece of iron is but blast waves near epicenter traveling much faster than speed of sound would have blown the roof almost instantly probably before it had time to melt.

Here is the image with the dome. One can see there is no signs of melting the iron works on top or signs of melting (vitrifying) of concrete and/or bricks like some say found on the ground after explosion. Event smaller (thinner) pieces survived.

Could had been hundreds or thousands of tones of conventional explosives brought in in a number of wooden Spruce Goose type of planes in close formation and detonated simultaneously producing a much lower temperature and smaller shock wave. 
Critical mass (in nuclear physics) is when there is enough mass or density of naturally radioactive materials caused by the natural constant spontaneous random neutron emissions by random atom split (radioactive decay) while each neutron emitted hits and splits another atom, emitting more neutrons, to exceed a certain number of emissions (or atom splits) and initiate a cascade known as chain reaction.

Each atom split releases energy. If not controlled, like by cooling down inside a reactor, chain reaction may lead to an explosion. In some uranium devices critical mass is achieved "simply" by putting together two smaller pieces. Hiroshima bomb had 3.5 critical masses and was made of two pieces which means at least one of them was critical before that.

HEU or Highly Enriched Uranium, or weapon grade uranium contains typically 80% uranium 235, or fissile (fissionable) isotope of uranium (I remember the address in Cumpulung, were i lived after birth, was Nr.235 on 7 November or 25 October old style, St, and now that address changed to 235 Transylvania St.) but there are some reactors that use up to 90%.

Amounts smaller than critical mass can be encountered in small reactors, like those used to power Voyager space probe. It is understood the masses not much smaller than critical also harbor sub critical chain reactions or simply pu out heat. That energy needs to be evacuated to prevent the masses from melting down. Never heard of any cooling devices on nuclear weapons.

We now see that it takes some time since chain reaction is initiated until it goes out of control, since in reactors temperature inside rods is hotter than the coolant, and there is a temperature gradient inside rods.

Increased thermal agitation should also oppose to an accelerated chain reaction because it may stop neutrons from spreading fast inside the material, pretty much like the case of moving electrons. When temperature increases, electric resistance of most material increases because of thermal agitation (or agitation of atoms). Faster moving atoms could be more difficult targets for neutrons (i assume a neutron has to hit a fissile atom at a certain angle and speed and/or atom also has to be quite stationary to take the hit and get split).

The devices may heat up the material to the point it boils and vaporizes before chain reaction can consume most of the fuel and heat up to 100 million degrees. Or it can only melt and gather as a pool (of many critical masses) at the bottom of a reactor, phenomena known to us as a meltdown.

Pretty much like an ordinary explosive which will not do much damage if not encased in a suited shell, having time to build pressure you will have to encase the material in a steel shell in order to reach more efficiency and for such big yields that could be so heavy it would be hard to transport and use as weapon.

The thicker the shell, the bigger the pressure and temperature that can be achieved. Without it, there will be no explosion but a meltdown. Because being so heavy they should be using giant planes, like Spruce Goose, An 224, etc. and mos likely destroy the plane too in the process. Because of this and radiation, the planes should be controlled remotely.

But they could also secretly install it and detonate a device in an already controlled and evacuated area, to scare everybody else on planet into thinking they have delivery capabilities of such devastating weapons.

Maybe this is what they've been doing for decades, with thousands of tests and supercomputer simulations, trying to invent conventional spatial charges or smaller devices that could maintain pressure long enough around the big one in the middle, without a heavy encasing.

Also, another inconvenience, it think nuclear devices do not last long enough to be stored, because of decay of materials, heating up, loosing structural integrity, etc.. At barely sub critical mass or density or even critical mass (3.5 critical masses were kept apart but in same enclosure like in case of Hiroshima) due to continuous decay, a device would lower its fissionable mass and/or density changing continuously the ratio enriched of isotopes inside; material it may also heat up, like the reactors on Voyager. The whole steel structure will get damaged soon because of neutron emissions.

This image show not all rods in a reactor are at the same temperature. Thinking how hot is actually inside the rods themselves and for how long those rods keep their structural integrity while transferring those tremendous amounts of energy, due to density changes through atom splitting (changing from uranium to thorium), radiation and thermal stress. If rods are made mostly of uranium 235 dioxide (like in naval reactors), will that turn into thorium dioxide after split? If one neutron is splitting an uranium atom, what happens to the oxygen atoms in the molecule?

Ok let's say that due to ratio of atom number of uranium, that is of course 235 to 16 for oxygen, you could have close to 90 percent ratio by using oxide. But what will hold the rod together especially at that temperature after let's say 10% of the uranium turned to thorium, of course, breaking the chemical bond with oxygen in the process, by reason that the uranium does not exist anymore?

Conclusion. I think, like in the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII when they only had two devices which could have been of a much bigger size and weight than shown because of heavy cases, or smaller in effective magnitude than told ever since, they might have some, just a few, not the numbers and readiness and deliverability they claim, by at least two orders of magnitude. Enough to keep the whole planet in check though, while they do their job (depopulation, dumbification, zombification) with their actors in all important positions in all countries, which must have a purpose, which could be sending the gold through a line of accelerated particles in Orion constellation. Trying to cover through specially fabricated or adjusted events, like now Musk's satellite train.

I also believe that if the temperature in the center of explosion at Hiroshima, at 1800 ft or 600 meters above ground was 100 million degrees, or ten times hotter than inside the Sun as claimed with a total energy release of 50 TJ, or maybe and average 10 TW per second (1J = 1W/S) for 5 seconds and temperature at the surface was 7700 Kelvin, again hotter than 5500 at the surface of the Sun, even for only a few seconds with air turned to plasma blowing at speeds much greater than speed of sound, causing tremendous heat exchange, that dome in the first picture and generally surface of the ground would have looked like flat a glazed ceramic crater.