Quantum

We have come a long way since the first enunciation of quantum theory. Some got used to it so much is like a second nature. But today many people discuss about on forums and they have opinions and sometimes find inconsistencies if not contradictions.

But what it is. In the subatomic world, all quantities are discrete values. It is, in a way, what digital is vs analog.

The reason for that is simple. The state of the Universe was 0 before the big bang and that was one single event.

However, properties of quantum world translates to the every day world and the enormous number of quantum properties put together to form everyday objects make them look continuous and analog. Like composing bits from an wav or mp3 file into an analog wave form which is audible and recognizable.

At the time, all these of course came from observations and not postulates. They determined the properties of quantum world through experiments of which first and most important is the photon-electron effect. One photon is needed to displace one electron from a metallic surface.

They concluded the entire quantum world is made of such discrete particles of which every single one of the same class has the same properties.

One electron has always the same mass and electric charge. One photon travels always with the speed of light and it can never be found resting, one proton has always the same mass and its electric charge will be always the opposite of that of an electron.

More than that, they interact with each other to form what we call matter. Protons and neutrons together form the nucleus of atoms which is orbited by a number of electrons. For each element and isotope of  the Mendeleev table we have the same number of protons and neutrons.

Because electrons cannot be split in smaller particles, they are called fundamental, together with several others while protons and neutrons are formed by smaller fundamental ones.

This discretization of matter goes all the way to molecules. Atoms combine to form molecules by sharing orbiting electrons. Molecules with the same formulas or structure have always the same properties.

However. It has been found that light which is made of photons has properties similar to those of waves in elastic media, like sounds or a wave created by a rock or in a lake, of which one is diffraction.

After much head scratching of the scientists, they came with a solution. Light is not photons or waves but a combination of those they call dualism wave particles of light. That, to satisfy all observations and experiments.

One discrete photon is always accompanied by an analogous wave front and they came with the idea of electro magnetic radiation or wave. And that's where the first confusion occurred.

EM waves let's say emitted by a radio station seem continuous and analog and have all properties of those.

However EM radiation coming from a single electron descending to a lower orbit, which is a short lived electric current, generates a magnetic field and it is said that magnetic field pulse in turn generates and electric one and so forth, hence the EM radiation seems discrete because the speed, the start end end position of the electron can be defined only in quantum world.

And first inconsistency. Since the current generated by that falling electron is a finite line, it generates a magnetic field like a rectangular permanent magnet would, in the shape of a pumpkin that would be near zero at poles or in the direction of the pole. However we expect something more like a cloud, the same way electrons orbit the atom.

Anyways it is not a circular or spherical wave like field we are used to from elastic media. Same goes for a dipole antenna for radio emissions.

Another one. Falling of an electron can create only one front wave. After that, the EM field is not sustained by anything from behind.

Again the velocity of the fallen electron is a quantum affair. Electrons reside in discrete cloud like positions on different levels of energy around the atom. Thus it cannot be established a speed in classical or non quantum terms for that falling electron from one cloud to another. Thus we can't know for how long the magnetic field lives.

Another one. Let's say the front of EM wave created by the pulse of falling of an electron spreads, though not like a sphere but like a pumpkin, continuously, in all directions (with the exception of poles). The photon can only go in one direction out of an infinity (or a few following the uncertainty principle).

After a while the intensity of the EM field decreases by a law similar to the square of distance, and will become insignificantly small while the photon can travel theoretically 11 billion years if it does not encounter any obstacles, (and depending on where it was emitted, can exceed the limits of the Universe and there will be no more dualism).

Another one. A number of photons emitted by a compact source are each created by its own electron so we cannot talk of a coherent analogous EM field but of a cloud of overlapping out of phase short lived fields.

From all the above observations one can realize the precarity of the whole EM theory as we know it today.

Without going into postulate mode yet, or without any changes to current theories, i want to make a first observation. The wave nature of light which is a bunch of photons coming from a single compact source like those used in experiments can be explained much easier if we could consider some sort of resonance between traveling photons emitted by falling electrons or a statistic grouping of in phase photons.

That is there will be always a number of photons in phase with each other, creating a virtual front wave.

But the front wave can only be electric, magnetic or both, and we'd have to accept the photons are carrying each its own pulsating field while the energy of the photon will always depend on its... (pulsating) frequency, field that of course is not spherical or pumpkin like and does not loose intensity and travels with the photon for 11 billion years.

Ok so here comes the postulate. In the same line of reasoning, we have to admit that the falling electron does not produce a quasi spherical magnetic field but transfer its energy to only one pulsating photon that is made of both magnetic and electric fields. Or better said, only electrical.

And that pulsating field can only be an infinite series of successive reactions of the void to the initial disturbance created by the falling electron, following the only universal law and that is action/reaction.

First reaction to the disturbance will occur in such a way it will not interfere with its source, and that is at 90 degrees in space and time to its cause. In turn, that first reaction will create the second, etc.. in an infinite cycle creating a cross traveling quantum we call photon.

However there is not a B wave but only E disturbances which pulses once transversal like in the animation below and then jumps 90 degrees ahead longitudinal and pulses again at 90 degrees transversal.

Though each transversal pulse is made at peak of two quarks that have mass, the total transversal (electric of course) momentum is zero while it's still photon, the pulse balances self after one cycle of four pulses as if those four pulses were emitted at once which makes us thinking if longitudinal time has any significance in its own reference frame.

I think the mass of the two quarks may come from the electron also falling into the gravitational field of the nucleus which is very weak when compared to the electric but it exists. (we cannot not dismiss any amount in quantum).

Even in this animation one starts to ask self if the fields are balanced. But we are talking here electric and magnetic line fields, not mechanical yoyos with inertia and stuff. Why should they be anchored at one end? And here another question for the EM theory. If one field causes the other, then why are they always in phase?

The representation does not apply to EM fields emitted by falling electrons because those can only exist for the time of the electron falling, that is one half period, and hence the first confusion. We don't have such things in nature (dipoles fed by oscillators).

The deducted appearance of the moving quanta would be a succession of lines at 90 degrees each in a succession of parallel planes that seen on the direction of propagation will look like a cross. The apparent rotation of the quantum is its spin.

Depending on the frequency, or the difference in levels of energy of the origin electron (or possible other sources) we will have light, microwaves, radio waves etc. or all the EM spectrum as we know it.

According to this theory, light can be bend when an electric field is applied in the direction of the quanta where is moving away with the help of a very high frequency high voltage stimulation (maybe not at every cycle) that may be created with the help of so called Helmholtz resonators or other type of very advanced "stone age" device inside pyramid or simply with the help of a very strong electrostatic field applied from very close when light generated at the top of they pyramidion moves down the gold faces.

Also light quanta could be accelerated or rushed from behind down the pyramidion by other in phase quanta.

Again using the hypothesis the pyramid is a indeed a photonic device capable of splitting light quanta created at the top in its four components. By doing this in a fast energetic successions it may bring anything contained inside or in a focused area to its frame reference and the time inside may slow, space dilate (According to Einstein time stops for anything that travels at the speed of light).

By bending light around pyramid light could be slowed down by the angle effect or accelerated by other quanta pushing from behind thus time can be reverted. But you need to revert time all the way to before that region of space was inside the expanding Universe to create a wormhole.

Or maybe they didn't want to. BTW, i was thinking yesterday, i don't see any restrictions to traveling into the future if you are about do die inside that pyramid anyway and never to come out. Or maybe if you abide a few simple rules. Or if you don't care about creating parallel universes and stuff.

We know this is possible in the microwave or even terahertz range with today's electronics. Did i mention vacuum creating mechanism for the Helmholtz resonator inside the pyramid?

All these and probably more were known of course to Ancient Egyptians, who build the pyramids to manipulate quanta, possibly others. By forcing the cross quanta down the slopes of a pyramid they split it into a square (in a way similar to opening a 4 blade iris) (final stabbing of Christ on the cross) using high voltage electricity and the shape of the gold pyramidion they could basically bend light, induce speeds much greater than light, stretch space, revert time, etc..

I know where they got their ideas for the string theory. But do they know what the strings are made of?

Ok i think i got it. When an electrons falls to a lower orbit and creates a photon (void reaction) that is too energetic, it can break down in two other particles, which are open strings too small to create their own void reactions and in turn start vibrating. Because the reaction to void is dynamic, the split creates two charged particles.

Here are (named only) a few ancient and modern symbols reminding of this model of Universe and demonstrating knowledge of it. I won't add the graphic symbols because in some countries are banned.

Square and compass.

In Ancient Chinese mythology there is a story of two half snake half human brother and sister, Fuxi and Nüwa, who supposedly rebuilt the Universe with a square and a compass. In this representation they look surrounded by strings made of rings. Their modern continuation seem to be the freemasons.

Swastika

Toyota logo

Audi logo

Subaru logo

Also. The striking similarities of these fundamental scientific findings with major themes of the four main religions of the world, possible other religions, suggest these themes were popular in the past, possibly carrying symbolic informations about lost knowledge belonging to advanced ancient civilizations that ended in a global conflict conflict, possibly the one described in the oral epic story (that has been later written) Mahabharata.

Wild turkeys, split pyramid, pyramidion and a solar symbol (left) part of a museum across Indian Head Casino, last night, inside Warm Springs reservation, Oregon.

Debunking Terror

This could be one reason Americans should not be afraid of "nuclear explosions". It is said temperature inside a nuclear explosion is higher than inside the Sun, or around 100 million Celsius. It is said temperature at the surface right under the explosion in Hiroshima (explosion occurred at 1800 ft above) was about 7700 K or 7500 C or around 16000 F or hotter than Sun's surface. Steel melts at around 1400-1500 C (depending of type) and vaporizes at 2800 C.

In this diagram it can be seen that temperature at Hiroshima at the so called Atomic Dome which was right under explosion (ground zero) was much above iron melting point for several seconds. But it could have been higher because heat could not evacuate like in areas further from ground zero.

I know it is not temperature but heat that melts metal, which means a heat transfer need to occur from environment to metal and that needs time. However, at 7500 Celsius, or 5 times iron melting point or three times iron vaporizing temperature, much higher pressure and hot fluid surrounding metal structure moving at high speed, like in a blow torch but much faster, heat transfer may occur much faster than near melting in a stationary pool. It also depends how big the piece of iron is. It is true that the roof which might have been ceramic could have shielded that temperature, but blast waves near epicenter traveling much faster than speed of sound would have blown the roof almost instantly. Also blast shock-wave traveling at several times the speed of sound should have blown the metal structure probably before having time to melt.

Here is the image with the dome. One can see there is no signs of melting the iron works on top or signs of melting (vitrifying) of concrete and/or bricks like some say found on the ground after explosion. Event smaller (thinner) pieces survived.

Could had been hundreds or thousands of tones of conventional explosives brought in in a number of wooden Spruce Goose type of planes in close formation and detonated simultaneously producing a much lower temperature and smaller shock wave. 
Critical mass (in nuclear physics) is when there is enough mass or density of naturally radioactive materials caused by the natural constant spontaneous random neutron emissions by random atom split (radioactive decay) while each neutron emitted hits and splits another atom, emitting more neutrons, to exceed a certain number of emissions (or atom splits) and initiate a cascade known as chain reaction. Each atom split releases energy. If not controlled, like by cooling down inside a reactor, chain reaction may lead to an explosion. In some uranium devices critical mass or higher is achieved "simply" by putting together two smaller pieces. Hiroshima bomb had 3.5 critical masses.

HEU or Highly Enriched Uranium, or weapon grade uranium contains typically 80% uranium 235, or fissile (fissionable) isotope of uranium (I remember the address in Cumpulung, were i lived after birth, was Nr.235 on 7 November or 25 October old style, St, and now that address changed to 235 Transylvania St.) but there are some reactors that use up to 90%.

Amounts smaller than critical mass can be encountered in small reactors, like those used to power Voyager space probe.

We now see that it takes some time since chain reaction is initiated until it goes out of control, since in reactors temperature inside rods is hotter than the coolant, and there is a temperature gradient inside rods.

Increased thermal agitation should also oppose to an accelerated chain reaction because it may stop neutrons from spreading fast inside the material, pretty much like the case of moving electrons. When temperature increases, electric resistance of most material increases because of thermal agitation (or agitation of atoms). Faster moving atoms could be more difficult targets for neutrons (i assume a neutron has to hit a fissile atom at a certain angle and speed and/or atom also has to be quite stationary to take the hit and get split).

The devices may heat up the material to the point it boils and vaporizes before chain reaction can consume most of the fuel and heat up to 100 million degrees. Or it can only melt and gather as a pool (of many critical masses) at the bottom of a reactor, phenomena known to us as a meltdown.

Pretty much like an ordinary explosive which will not do much damage if not encased in a suited shell, having time to build pressure you will have to encase the material in a steel shell in order to reach more efficiency and for such big yields that could be so heavy it would be hard to transport and use as weapon.

The thicker the shell, the bigger the pressure and temperature that can be achieved. Without it, there will be no explosion but a meltdown. Because being so heavy they should be using giant planes, like Spruce Goose, An 224, etc. and mos likely destroy the plane too in the process. Because of this and radiation, the planes should be controlled remotely.

But they could also secretly install it and detonate a device in an already controlled and evacuated area, to scare everybody else on planet into thinking they have delivery capabilities of such devastating weapons.

Maybe this is what they've been doing for decades, with thousands of tests and supercomputer simulations, trying to invent conventional spatial charges or smaller devices that could maintain pressure long enough around the big one in the middle, without a heavy encasing.

Also, another inconvenience, it think nuclear devices do not last long enough to be stored, because of decay of materials, heating up, loosing structural integrity, etc.. At barely sub critical mass or density or even critical mass (3.5 critical masses were kept apart but in same enclosure like in case of Hiroshima) due to continuous decay, a device would lower its fissionable mass and/or density changing continuously the ratio enriched of isotopes inside; material it may also heat up, like the reactors on Voyager. The whole steel structure will get damaged soon because of neutron emissions.

This image show not all rods in a reactor are at the same temperature. Thinking how hot is actually inside the rods themselves and for how long those rods keep their structural integrity while transferring those tremendous amounts of energy, due to density changes through atom splitting (changing from uranium to thorium), radiation and thermal stress. If rods are made mostly of uranium 235 dioxide (like in naval reactors), will that turn into thorium dioxide after split? If one neutron is splitting an uranium atom, what happens to the oxygen atoms in the molecule?

Ok let's say that due to ratio of atom number of uranium, that is of course 235 to 16 for oxygen, you could have close to 90 percent ratio by using oxide. But what will hold the rod together especially at that temperature after let's say 10% of the uranium turned to thorium, of course, breaking the chemical bond with oxygen in the process, by reason that the uranium does not exist anymore?

Conclusion. I think, like in the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII when they only had two devices which could have been of a much bigger size and weight than shown because of heavy cases, or smaller in effective magnitude than told ever since, they might have some, just a few, not the numbers and readiness and deliverability they claim, by at least two orders of magnitude. Enough to keep the whole planet in check though, while they do their job (depopulation, dumbification, zombification) with their actors in all important positions in all countries, which must have a purpose, which could be sending the gold through a line of accelerated particles in Orion constellation. Trying to cover through specially fabricated or adjusted events, like now Musk's satellite train.

I also believe that if the temperature in the center of explosion at Hiroshima, at 1800 ft or 600 meters above ground was 100 million degrees, or ten times hotter than inside the Sun as claimed with a total energy release of 50 TJ, or maybe and average 10 TW per second (1J = 1W/S) for 5 seconds and temperature at the surface was 7700 Kelvin, again hotter than 5500 at the surface of the Sun, even for only a few seconds with air turned to plasma blowing at speeds much greater than speed of sound, causing tremendous heat exchange, that dome in the first picture and generally surface of the ground would have looked like flat a glazed ceramic crater.

December 7

2:15 I was thinking earlier today. If those never produced any results, or the promised results are decades away, they could be used for something else. Like the centrifugal force that act on the rotating plasma could again crack open the space to re-create the original void (before the big bang) inside  the middle tower...

This commentator does not agree with the fact plasma is rotating inside a tokamak. However, in plasma state of matter, electrons and nucleons separate in a magnetic field and i think we have two currents rotating in two different directions and the heavy nucleons will rotate on the outer diameter, driven by the centrifugal force.

BTW i don't agree with the fact that plasma can be "contained" with the help of a magnetic field at those temperatures. Though the gas like matter could be, the enormous temperature will radiate towards the materials of the toroidal chamber and melt it in no time.

2:43 I think here that shape is used to extract energy from Earth's potential gradient and as an antenna to catch clouds in the middle of Reno to slash the energy bill for AC in hotels and casinos and of course electricity transport networks.

Wondering if the pyramid in Vegas is of any use.

2:55

2:34 Asian Japanese.

6:11 Fusion reactors. A mirage or a pretext?

It is generally agreed there is no immediate future for those. They say decades away from having free and clean energy from fusion.

Fusion is when you put together two simple atoms, like deuterium, and tritium, two forms of hydrogen, and create helium.

Though at the end of reaction we have the same number of protons and neutrons, there is a mass difference between the sum of masses of particles entering the reaction and of the resulting ones and that difference is turned into energy by the famous formula. E = mc2. C square being of course speed of light to the power of two which number is enormous, something with 16 o 17 zeroes. It is called mass deffect.

It is said mass itself contains a huge amount of energy which is true.

This so call mass defect is very hard to explain even with relativistic terms. I will leave it out of this discussion for now.

This is what happens deep inside our Sun and keeps it hot for billion of years (until all or enough hydrogen have been turn to helium etc.). No it does not explode, some say because of the enormous pressure due to gravity, some say there is not enough pressure to do just that.

Unlike fission reactors which split atoms, again aiming to turn the mass difference (defect) into energy, producing a myriad of daughters from fissionable material (fuel), extremely polluting and hard to get rid of, fusion do not produce any pollutants and deuterium is found naturally in water.

For a number of hydrogen oxygen molecules there will be one of deuterium oxygen molecule, which can be separated mechanically. Unlimited almost free clean energy. However.

And one more catch. You need a temperature of hundreds of millions of degrees Celsius to start and maintain the reaction. Deuterium and tritium atoms have to move fast enough to bump and stick together to create helium. Temperature is the measure of how fast molecules move or vibrate within a material, gas or liquid or solid.

Like anybody else. Too drown in daily mishaps to pay attention to those. Let the scientists do their job while i try to enjoy mine. Squeeze the old lemon as much as you can.

But for some reason my subconscious never, ever gave a green light to a hope in those.

However subconscious seldom gives any explanation. Possibly at some level deep buried inside our brain there is the algorithm and the myriad of information are gathered constantly and casually in a lifetime and put aside and processed to take that decision. Possibly the pessimistic and overused terms we hear about in articles.

Still they are building those in various sizes and shapes all around the world.

But time has come now to look a bit deeper, a bit beyond what surfaced in media. Cause the motivation has become obvious. There are reasonable suspicions now they are something else. In my mind suspicion arose first when looking at the temperatures. Hundreds of millions degrees.

7-10 times more than in the middle of the Sun (depending on sources). But between the core of the Sun where the reactions take place and its surface of 6000 degrees C whatever there is a 400.000 miles insulating layer of hydrogen.

Let's say you "confine" plasma with a well directed magnetic field in such ways it does not touch the walls of the structure. However, radiation from that plasma would suffice to melt those in a fraction of a second. I know, it is heat, not temperature that melts something but if there's more than an ounce of plasma in there at over 100 million degrees...

And BTW why do they need so much plasma, judging by the size of those i've seen in pictures, when they could use way less amounts at least until they're done with experimental stage?

One more thing. I know ways to produce energy for free that are already used on Earth. They are called heat pumps, which produce several times more energy than drawn from grid.

They are mainly with some rather subtle variations surprisingly simple empty toroidal volumes (empty donuts if you want) shielded with metal and/or ceramic and surrounded by a number of conductors sunk into liquid helium. The reason for that is because at ambiental pressure helium boils at only 4 degrees above zero absolute (-273.15 degrees on the Celsius scale, and -459.67 on the Fahrenheit scale).

And we all know, if something boils, like water, it will stay at boiling temperature no matter what. At ambiental pressure a liquid cannot exceed a temperature higher than its boiling point. All we need is enough helium to maintain the level (of course through boiling helium turns into gas and escapes, that is the price we pay for) to keep the conductor sank and become superconductor.

(Some would say with better results than filling balloons or inhaling to change your voice into a "heilish" one).

The conductors immersed in boiling helium loose any resistance to flow of electrons among their frozen atoms hence we can pass through enormous currents, to create enormous magnetic fields bla bla.

Something we all have seen or felt when we have done an MRI and had all protons flipped over. Think of a tokamak like an MRI on steroids.

So here we are, building the tokamak. Looking today into them, the construction seem, as i said, surprisingly simple. A toroidal coil and a couple more i forgot what for. Through in some metal to make for the immersion pool, ceramic for heat shielding, etc..

Fill it with a bunch of plasma made of deuterium and tritium, which is basically superheated gas, to the point electrons and nuclei separate and move freely. And due to their electric charge they of course... what? What happens to an electric charge within a magnetic field?

Next question. Getting more and more confused. Is plasma moving inside a tokamak?

What i'm searching for. If there is a current of plasma looping in the tokamak. There should be at least two. One on the outside of the plasma torus, consisting of charged nuclei (just protons and neutrons, missing electrons) and one on the inside, in the opposite direction, consisting of electrons.

If you want a net current, you can get easily rid of electrons by purging or catching them somehow, maybe just at the beginning when they are not fast enough but just separated. Ground them. Pretty much like you would in magnetohydrodynamic generator.

Then you can have positively charged rotating plasma of which you can increase rotation by adding more magnetic field and make the donut of plasma stretch though centripetal force, again similarly with stretching the electric quanta moving down in squares on the gold pyramidion in the ancient devices in Giza. More elegant devices for a more civilized age.

And now we can guess what happens when you stretch a closed loop of electric current. At the level of currents and magnetic fields inside the tokamak, you can probably again crack open space itself.

12:43 Here is one in building stage. There is only one fraction or section (like an orange slice) is ready. You can realize the size of it. For what, if it will not work for decades?

August 11

12:37 They say now a new experiment can only be explained by the existence of a 5th force of nature or better said Universe cause Universe is all the nature we know.

As foreseen or maybe memorized by the Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra which also says they (the five forces, paJka skandha) are different manifestation of the same universal force, the random will, and that is as far as i could go with my translation keeping a reasonable degree of probability because i don't master Sanskrit and also the dictionaries are far from being complete or completely accurate.

(Though they are far better than Latin dictionaries, the equivalent of Sanskrit as a virtually dead language in Europe).

I think until they will acknowledge this simple fact, they will keep discovering particles and after that they will just predict them.

I think particles are autonomous self maintained disturbances similar to light quanta, though they oscilate in a different time frame and are not perceived as moving in ours. There is actually only one type which might combine in forming the particles as we know them in a way similar to protons and neutrons form atoms and there is indeed a whole Mendeleev table for those.

Without the manifestation of will and the reaction to it, Universe would be a void (zunya) with no distances and no time.

12:32 Went to take the garbage, nobody in the alley but the child actors who came from around the corner passing in front of our car. When i came back from the garbage they got again in front of me.

January 15

5:30 I think i was right to believe the motion of an electron around a proton would look weird, because of the existence of 3 quarks forming the proton which obviously have a non-zero distance between them, of which 2 are positively charged. In mechanics there is a situation known as three body problem.

If they were only two positive quarks, the orbit would not be anything like a circle. In fact people have thought of that and there is a blog post that quotes another one and is showing the orbit of the Star Wars planet Tatooine that gravitates around 2 Suns. And no, it won't have anything like years, crop seasons, thinks like that.

And this is the case of an atom with only one proton. Think about bigger ones. How complicated would be to describe the orbit of 16 electrons (oxygen) by example that also repel each other when moving around 16 protons of which all are made of three quarks. A 64 body problem (not counting the neutrons)?

Ok so Bohr and even Heisenberg didn't know about quarks but they knew about protons. However in Bohr's atomic model the electrons all turn nicely around the nucleus like planets around a Sun of which masses are negligible (except for Jupiter) when compared to that of the Sun by means of gravity which is not polar like protons in an atom (and even those gravities influence heavily each other).

And one more thing. In heavier atoms electrons on lowest levels (of energy?) turn at speeds close to c and that according to Einstein can cause their mass (and energy) to increase dramatically. Could that stand for the (in)famous mass "defect" problem?

Thing is we are stuck in physics at a level not far from that of fuzzy math Heisenberg and confusing Einstein, at nearly 100 years since their theories and waste the time of the children in colleges with stupid inconsistent naïve theories.

And no, it is not a Jewish conspiracy. Einstein was not a Jew, or maybe he was, by the looks, but he was also made by an actor, like Tesla and all others. The conspiracy is much deeper than that and goes all the way to Ancient Egypt and their today continuators, the elite of Japan and the Sun God and their alliance with Hungarians who provide the European looking actors.

6:25 Statul abrupt. Una e să protestezi și să faci grevă ca profesorii care nu voiau să încheie mediile sau chiar ca cei din 10 august și alta e să blochezi capitala unei țări cu utilaje grele, ca într-un asediu. Se atentează la funcționarea ordinii de drept într-un stat iar eu nu cred că șoferii aceia sunt români.

7:10 PM Aplicați legile existente și nu lăsați o categorie dotată cu utilaje grele să terorizeze toată populația României acționnând ca și complicii lor. Câte încălcări de exemplu ale codului rutier au fost comise de așa zișii protestatari, prin blocarea șoselelor cu vehiculele lor private?