Superfluid vortexes are a only a few orders of magnitude bigger than hypothesized particle AEther vortexes, possible at a different quantum level (quasi particles quantum level), mirroring the particle level. Or it could simply be superfluid frictionless helium behave exactly like AEther at a different scale due to different densities or atom "inclusions".
Or maybe at near zero K AEther combined with Helium behaves like a denser frictionless AEther.
Superfluid vortices also connect and reconnect and can form quasi-particles. This is similar with electrons connecting to form strings thus bigger particles like photons.
But there is something else interesting in this animation. Vortexes seem aligned in strings and all seem to move in one direction kinda perpendicular to the movement of the fluid, possibly by expelling superfluid pretty much like a jet engine does. It would not violate conservation of energy since they do that since the beginning of
They are kept apart and quite uniformly distributed due to repelling forces between vortexes of the same direction of rotation. But i believe at longer distance they attract each other due to lower pressure (Bernoulli). They seem to attract and sometimes repel each other at the extremities because of streams of superfluid getting in at one end and out at the other. More study needed here.
1:05 Maybe it was time i defined the five fields according to my theory of Eather Whirls.
First was created Eather, through a disturbance that may have come from one single conscience (will) that filled the whole Universe. Then a single point in the middle started to rotate and turn into a whirl that was created the rotating speed needed for all the others.
All particles are made of Eather whirls. The stable ones which can exist in certain sizes and rotation speeds (quantum) move by inertia in the frictionless AEther and can live indefinitely.
All particles are made of Eather whirls. The stable ones which can exist in certain sizes and rotation speeds (quantum) move by inertia in the frictionless AEther and can live indefinitely.
Electron is the smallest charged particle made of a single stable whirl. Due to its magnetic field it has a measurable spin. As a whirl its rotation speed is not constant though. It starts with 0 at periphery and it goes all the way to speed of light or beyond in the center where there is absolute vacuum, voided of EAther. A place where again space and time does not exist.
Its quantum size is dictated by the initial pressure of the AEther and the maximum speed reached before a quantum void is created in the middle.
Strong force could be explained by entangling of two whirls.
Its quantum size is dictated by the initial pressure of the AEther and the maximum speed reached before a quantum void is created in the middle.
Strong force could be explained by entangling of two whirls.
It is very similar to the eye of a hurricane. There is a cylindric wall where speed is highest and inside there is low pressure and low humidity and no winds with clear blue sky.
All around the cyclone type of hurricane there is an area of low pressure and all around an anticyclone there is an area of high pressure.
The most interesting part about cyclones-anticyclones is the anticyclones exhibit high pressure on the outside and absorb air in the middle and cyclones the other way around.
Since i suspect that inside a low pressure whirl the pressure inside can get so low it creates a void in the AEther, possibly tunneling it to a nearby high pressure which leaks AEther and increase pressure around it. But it could be they simply couple with each other due to the fact they cannot combine due to quantum size.
In weather, due to existence of a positive pressure atmosphere, the cyclones would be more frequent and anticyclone cannot exist without an anticyclone which feeds it.
Since i suspect that inside a low pressure whirl the pressure inside can get so low it creates a void in the AEther, possibly tunneling it to a nearby high pressure which leaks AEther and increase pressure around it. But it could be they simply couple with each other due to the fact they cannot combine due to quantum size.
In weather, due to existence of a positive pressure atmosphere, the cyclones would be more frequent and anticyclone cannot exist without an anticyclone which feeds it.
I believe one can already guess through analogy, static electric fields, positive and negative, attraction between those and magnetic field as the flow of Aether through the whirls and attraction due to lower pressure inside those due to Bernoulli's law.
Gravity should come from low pressure inside the streams that flow in each string.
4:10 First where created galaxies, as single whirl. As the pressure of the AEther started to get lower, all the other objects started to be created.
Could it be most matter like hydrogen is created by the whirls in AEther created by Coriolis effect and not the Big Bang (what a choice of words)? Like cyclones on Earth and they are mostly low pressure spinning little things so that would be the reason there is more matter than antimatter around us?
The creation process will continue until enough AEther is converted to matter and then its density will be too low and the process stops.
By this reasoning the (hypothetical) black hole at the center of the Galaxy could at lease initially be creating by thinning EAther, pulling the slower rotating matter in that void until it saturates?
Since this was my first draft on this idea and did not know where was going to take me while kept doing searches, i have to re-write for eliminating apparent contradictions, readability all after giving it so more thought.
11:13 However before i do that i have to add a few things here.
I looks like for all particle, big or small which have a charge which stand for negative pressure, that pressure is indeed a constant of several. We can have 1/3, -1, 1/2 or zero.
So yeah, if you stack a number of electrons to make a what, bigger particle, donut like closed string you will have the same charge, possibly making a muon. I don't know if the sum of masses is equal to its mass or there is a "defect" due to differences in relativistic speeds of AEther to which i stick for now cause i don't know if it's right or wrong because if divide the two masses, i get a fractional number.
11:51 I think i was wrong when i said this particle cannot have spin or charge. Though is made obviously of spinning electrons aligned with their spinning axis on a circle, there is a "captive" stream of AEther inside, which would actually have to spin in opposite direction. The spinning electrons that make the ring would also create a stream along the axis of the donut which may count for this.
4:10 First where created galaxies, as single whirl. As the pressure of the AEther started to get lower, all the other objects started to be created.
Could it be most matter like hydrogen is created by the whirls in AEther created by Coriolis effect and not the Big Bang (what a choice of words)? Like cyclones on Earth and they are mostly low pressure spinning little things so that would be the reason there is more matter than antimatter around us?
The creation process will continue until enough AEther is converted to matter and then its density will be too low and the process stops.
By this reasoning the (hypothetical) black hole at the center of the Galaxy could at lease initially be creating by thinning EAther, pulling the slower rotating matter in that void until it saturates?
Since this was my first draft on this idea and did not know where was going to take me while kept doing searches, i have to re-write for eliminating apparent contradictions, readability all after giving it so more thought.
11:13 However before i do that i have to add a few things here.
I looks like for all particle, big or small which have a charge which stand for negative pressure, that pressure is indeed a constant of several. We can have 1/3, -1, 1/2 or zero.
So yeah, if you stack a number of electrons to make a what, bigger particle, donut like closed string you will have the same charge, possibly making a muon. I don't know if the sum of masses is equal to its mass or there is a "defect" due to differences in relativistic speeds of AEther to which i stick for now cause i don't know if it's right or wrong because if divide the two masses, i get a fractional number.
11:51 I think i was wrong when i said this particle cannot have spin or charge. Though is made obviously of spinning electrons aligned with their spinning axis on a circle, there is a "captive" stream of AEther inside, which would actually have to spin in opposite direction. The spinning electrons that make the ring would also create a stream along the axis of the donut which may count for this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Friendly comments welcome
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.