Infinitesimal Whirls of Prodigious Velocity

Now imagine the space is filled with a superfluid known in the past as AEther, currently as dark matter, made not of Helium atoms like in the video above but of much smaller neutrinos which do not interact with anything except their intrinsic gravity and have a small but non zero mass.

The vortices created could be much smaller and rotate much faster, entering the area of relativity, when the mass increases exponentially with speed and we know in a ideal superfluid the vortices once started they rotate indefinitely.

Could those be what we know as elementary particles and the corresponding interacting forces the known fundamental forces except for gravity? All fundamental particles have quantized mass and spin.

From what we are seeing in sub lambda (superfluid) Helium, the whirls can travel, interact with each other, combine or destroy each other, attach to each other etc., just like particles but obeying the laws of fluid mechanics (applied to superfluids). By example two whirls rotating in the same direction repel each other etc.

Matter energy equivalence would be more obvious than within the known, given, non-intuitive abstract formula.

Also we can sea the reason for quantization. Stable whirls can form only in certain sizes (and speeds).

It is true. For more complicated atoms, it will look like an unmanageable and also possibly impossible to describe tangle. And there is a link with struggling string theory. The rotation of the string like whirls could count for the extra dimensions found necessary by its proponents.

The following image could represent what we currently know as electrons. Though Steven Rado was born and lived in Hungary, the name suggests Serbian or even Romanian origin, like for Nikola Tesla quoted in the title.

Magnetic field is nothing but the flow of AEther. The two electrons repel each other after they align because vortices of opposite direction repel each other and or the centripetal motion of AEther exchanged by the two. Electric field is the low pressure generated by the flow of AEther. When surrounding an electron it creates a pole of low (static) pressure.

Within this theory light would be a succession of unstable pairs of whirls passing energy from one pair to another (current to next) according to this model in an incredible fast succession. But they will not move at the speed of light, they will only jump at the speed of light.

One of the consequences of particles being made of whirls is if you try to accelerate them there will be an opposition because they are of course rotating (at very high speed), opposition we may call inertia.

But you will never be able to accelerate them at the speed of light of course because they are rotating and parts of them will have to move faster than light. Unless they align with the rotation axe parallel to the direction of motion but you can't do that with solid, macro objects.

Only a small fraction of Helium superfluid turns to whirls in a bowl or rotating sub lambda Helium. On a BIG scale like the Universe, only a small fraction of AEther had turned to vortices.

Some noticed there is very little antimatter in the Universe and i assume because the Universe is turning slowly of course in one direction only. We can also find it in unstable form in every photon. Dark energy of course is the rotating energy of the whole carousel.

Talking about matter anti-matter (symmetry). From the electron donut model proposed above we cannot see any possibility of a symmetrical counterpart because it is completely balanced.

So we need to add an extra movement (we are now in the world of dynamic particles where everything is made of motion) like the one seen in the static image (before clicking) in the first video. In there the spiral around the theroid is not actually part of it.

But a few days ago, just after i found Steven Rado's book linked twice above, i ran into something very interesting. A post doctoral researcher in a Greek University made some animations about 4 years ago, after much reasoning using terms of current accepted theories combined with his own intuition and pseudo science.

All i know it is just a different attempt to theorize dynamic particles and it fits what i have in mind right now. Here it is. He calls it electron geometric magnetic flux dynamic model. In the meantime his email address at the university is gone and he is not answering emails on the other address at gmail.

The whirls show intuitively a... shall i call it a spiral in a circumferential reference frame. It can be left and right.

But i was  thinking. If the magnetic field (flux whatever) is a flow of AEther this means it creates(wraps) a... should i call it, electric current on the circumference of torus, (if we only could speak of electric currents inside an electron) which in turn creates the NS axial magnetic field so in fact we can see now why the magnetic field and electric currents are inseparable. Also defines the spin up and down of an electron.

So in the end this asymmetry does not lead to an anti-electron but just to the spin up spin down electrons. But it could help us to make the next step. That is understanding what is electric charge.

Maybe i should try and finish Rado's book. But from what i've seen so far, he thinks all particles are sinks. Which means we need an extra dimension where the AEther goes (and comes back in positively charged particles).

By looking at the (mind bending) animation below i have the following intuition. Whatever electric current that creates the axial magnetic field inside the torus might radiate in the outside world creating an electric field or maybe a very slow moving widely spread electric current in the opposite direction from the one that creates the magnetic field.

  

But if we go back to fluid mechanics, we may realize the electron is actually vacuuming AEther from surroundings an expels it through the axis and the pressure gradient created is the electric field.

When they attract to each other, the also align with the high speed flow of AEther, possibly relativistic and do not annihilate each other but create clusters like seen in the first static image above or the second video.

November 9

12:40 If this was true my closed circuit relativist drive should work too.

While searching for the origin of the Lorentz factor equation, i discovered other things though. It derived from the hypothetical exitance of AEther which was supposed to be a incompressible frictionless probably immaterial fluid filling all space, and an amazing forgotten theory about atoms being vortices of AEther in which great names of most physicists in that time are linked to, which strikingly resembles today's strings theory which is applied to elementary paticles though. 

That beautiful theory was killed by the discovery of electron as separate entity from the atom, other things. Many more elementary particles were discovered after.

In which case my proposed theory is deriving from that one i didn't know about or vortices made atoms only applied one level down to elementary particles (strings) which are not unidimensional but made of vortices of  frictionless AEther, which AEther could be made of the smallest (muon) neutrinos.

The propagation of light is not waves in AEther similar to those in elastic media but unstable AEther vortices moving ot transferring from one place to another like in this animation and all fundamental forces are given by variations of pressure in AEther near and far caused by vortices.

One first step in proving this theory is the existence of spins of particles like electrons which are half made of photons of which speed (at periphery?) is the speed of light. Other calculations show 292 times the speed of light.

In the hypothesis all particles are vortices are vortices with a (linear) rotation speed comparable to the speed of light, the mass of particles withing the vortex may come with applying the Lorentz factor or in other words relativistic. The reason of matter is energy is because matter is made of vortices (whirls) at relativist velocities.

Minimal energy for an electron to be produced in pair production is half of 1.022 or 0.511. MeV. If one photon has more energy, after splitting the rest is converted in kinetic energy. That is the only energy at which an electron can exist. According to my model that is the energy in which an electron can exist in both toroidal and rotational hyperboloid.

Within a photon the unstable double vortex, the electron and positron do not have their closed toroidal shape until they split, but rather open ended rotation hyperboloids.

8:45 One of the most common models for electron within today's struggling string theory was actually produced by Lord Kelvin himself, according to this paper.

My proposed model for the photon is an unstable (oscillating), always transitional rotation hyperboloid vortex.

During pair production the photon with enough energy (1021 MeV) splits into an electron and positron of which only difference is charge. We can conclude the two cups (branches) of the rotation hyperboloid turn in two different direction, and after split into two tori. However it is unclear how the torus rotates, like in the diagram above or like those torus vortices seen in nature or both.

Though moving in the air witch cause friction and ultimately breaking down because of it, the torus vortices are stable and in a frictionless environment they could last indefinetely.

Shiva's drum. It is not a secret i created my photon model following the shape of Shiva's little drum. which could symbolize pair production. When a photon with enough energy hits an obstacle, the hyperboloid splits and turn to two tori.

A combination of rotating hyperboloid transitioning continuously into a torus (and then continuously dissipating) is seen in this video, though is created by gravity and fed continuously by chemical combustion turned into heat. For illustration only.

 

And yes if particles are vortices in AEther they of course are not punctiform and their position cannot be localized as such, until they produce an effect and eventually dissipate.

9:45 Just realized spell checking was turned off for everything i wrote in the last few days or maybe weeks.

February 10

2:25 AM Sounds like my theory, with different words. The large-scale coherent effects of the spin of the particles in the virtual sea versus whirls in the frictionless AEther (probably made of electron neutrinos).
As for the two halves of the fast rotating hyperboloids. Don't know yet how they're created but i know it's got to be more than the fall of an electron to a different energy level. One idea would be one electrons pairs with a positron that comes from nucleus after an excitation. Another could be one electron exists as bigger whirl and splits in half, leaving the rest ionized.

But i know how it moves (jumps) forward and it moves fast. There are only two narrow streams of AEther at the joint, one for each half (electron/positron) that transfer fast moving AEther to the next perpendicular unrolling/rolling like reels (2x2).

As soon as one pair of whirls disappears the static pressure of the AEther takes place creating a shock wave, pushing the new one forward in the joint area creating two other whirls on a perpendicular direction, which takes angular momentum from touching the first.

12:46 PM M-am gândit pentru o secundă două, m-am luat cu alte chestii și am uitat să postez. Se putea afla ieri cât de mulți clienți au fost la supermarket-uri printr-o simplă căutare google. Acum google afișează (în dreapta, mai jos) gradul de ocupare a unui loc comercial, folosind datele GPS din telefoane.

12:55 PM Oamenii ar trebui să nu se mai chinuie să inventeze roata de atâtea ori la rând. Există anumite simboluri, obiecte de cult care poartă informații despre știința și tehnologia unor vremuri apuse. Unul dintre acestea este caduceul, un simbol asociat cu zeul Mercur care a devenit simbolul farmaciștilor dar și al comercianților. Însă dacă ne uităm atent, vedem două aripi și doi șerpi.

Șarpele prin felul în care înaintează pare să sfideze legile fizicii. Mercurul este un fluid greu. Aripile simbolizează zborul.

Eu am propus de mult un motor cu circuit închis, l-am numit relativistic. Un fluid, care ar putea fi vapori de mercur încărcați electrostatic este accelerat într-o direcție la viteze relativiste (bățul din mijloc), unde masa lor crește și returnat pe alt ciuruit la viteze axiale nerelativiste (șerpii), generând un moment net.

Asta ar elimina nevoia de a căra rezervoare de combustibil pe care să-l arunci în spațiu.

Varianta electronică.

A Theory About Light and Photon

Years ago i became intrigued with the Sanskrit syntagm pancha skanda that appears in Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra (Harvard Kyoto transliteration). Not knowing Sanskrit i attempted to replace each word with the corresponding English word from a dictionary and this is the result, that sounded more like a Physics Theory than a prayer. The title of the sUtra itself can be translated as Science Plan.

I have always been discontent with the current EM theory, fields theory, the existence of 5 fundamental forces, Special Relativity, etc..

One of the reasons is i don't see how the so called EM field can travel alongside the photon since electric field is radial with open lines and magnetic field is toroidal with closed lines and the intensity of both electric and magnetic components decrease with the square root of the distance while the photon keeps its energy constant.

To fix this they came with a patch to the theory, stating the EM field is separated into a near and a far zone, with the far zone being planar, with no more decreasing of intensity with square root which is not possible, not even as an approximation, because it breaks the laws of physics, with a bizarre shape of EM field in the near zone, a combination of the magnetic toroidal field and the electric radial.

However the planar far zone theory implies the photon caries it's own energy and EM fields which i believe it is true.

You can find the animated version of this representation in Wikipedia.

After seeing it though i became interested in the shape of an EM field caused by the decay of one single electron as in photon emission, thinking of it more like a disturbance than a field. Mostly because the electron does not travel through a conductor and cannot create a closed magnetic field because it starts and ends in different points in space.

During the past summer a group of Polish scientists published a few images claiming to be holograms of single photons. Obtain through interference of two photons, one consequence is the photons could not be other than waves.

More recently i ran into an animation showing whirls in a superfluid.

Than hypothesize at that temperature, Helium starts to exhibit the same properties as AEther, mainly due to lack of friction, though at a much higher density, creating inside whirls due to Coriolis force that show properties like repelling each other, breaking, re-combining and most importantly, creating quasi particles as strings, though several orders of magnitude bigger in size than the ones from the Standard Model.

I also hypothesize AEther could be a frictionlress or a super fluid made of neutrinos, which are much smaller than any particle and all particles are more or less stable disturbances within it all obeying the known laws of fluid mechanics.

I then proposed the 5 fields are all created by the movement of whirls that create areas of low pressure around them, streams of AEther inside, etc..

Two whirls rotating in the same direction are repelling each other, rotation of whirls create a stream of superfluid in interior that enters at one end and exits the other, producing magnetic field, and pressure of superfluid creating gravity. Strong force could be actual entanglement of whirls organized as strings.

Combining with ancient symbols, N.Tesla's ideas about whirls and AEther, Ezekiel's wheel, etc..

I created this animated model of a photon made of two rotating double hyperboloid shaped AEther whirls. The symbol above indicate the rotation direction which is the same for each wheel though opposite for two opposite ones. If you click on the image you can see the 3D simulation on desmos. (To see the animation click on the image first and then the arrow button under the plus sign).

Which representation fits more ancient symbols (Vajra, Buddhist Adamantine - Symbol of power).

Since the image of the vajras from this symbol seems very similar to my model, i don't see why they whirls should not have an internal structure. Made of rotating AEther, a superfluid, they could have all kind of stationary waves inside as they absorb AEther at the surfaces and expel it through the middle, it looks like in two stages.

In most representations i have seen so far it appears there is some sort of outer shell made of probably again stationary waves suggesting a closed circuit of AEther within a bubble. However (within the ancient symbol) there are tiny small swirls between the small whirls that form between the 4 main ones, other asymmetries.

Could it be each of the four whirls pump AEther in a closed circuit around them.

I believe it can all be all seen on a simulation on a supercomputer.

Then i looked again at those images created by the Polish scientists. It appears they also caught those structures inside the photon as seen in the Buddhist ritual tools. The indestructible vajra.

 

We are familiar with standing waves inside fast moving fluids from "diamond shock waves" inside the exhaust of supersonic engines. Vajra in Sanskrit means diamond, among other things.

The vajra is represented always outside the hyperboloid bell (to be visible) but i think it's all happening inside. We can see at the end of the bell and area called emptiness which suggests the flow of AEther is on an open circuit.

If these ancient symbols represent light, as it is always suggested by their names, it could mean this ancient knowledge could not have been transmitted to us over millennia except through religion. By a better version of ourselves.


Tripundra represents the stream of AEther entering and exiting every shwirl, that closes (sort of) outside the swhirl of every open ended particle (string).

This version of Trishula reminds me of something i've seen in Egypt. Four disks representing the four swirls (two double drums in India) of the photon.

Einstein knew. His tongue in the shape of a whirl. Question is. Is he taunting us or giving a message to the future?

January 29

7:02 All the math i could remember flashed in front of my eyes last night, but i've done it (the basis for my final model). In the meantime, i realized the model could be something else i haven't thought of it yet.

Got a question. How people could understand math in the past without desmos (or something similar like Geogebra, etc..)

7:50 It moves on slider l on z axis for now but it works. It's slow and jittery even on my octo core mini PC because there are a lot of calculations to be done. I believe it could be optimized by reusing some of the calculations but that is not my purpose today.

12:10 PM But again this version does not allow any asymmetry for polarization.

Also the real hologram on the left suggests there is a phase difference between the whirls. Could be advancement with rotation? (Coming (maybe not so) soon, have to move it in cylindrical coordinates).

Electric fields of electron and positron whirls is given by the AEther pressure gradient caused by the enormous speed of the whirls and magnetic field would be a stream of AEther attracted at periphery and expelled through the middle. Being frictionless, there is no transfer of energy on a closed circuit AEther stream.

AEther pressure holds the 4 components of the photon together.

Gravity would stand for lower pressure inside every whirls that make up the Universe.

Whirls rotating in opposite directions attract each other and those rotating in the same direction repel however, when they rotate at 90 degrees, it's either way.

If i the photon enters a magnetic field (a stream of neutrinos or AEther) it will start to rotate until it breaks in the components with them merging from 4 into 2 swirls that start rotating in opposite directions creating the so called pair production. AEther itself is polarized which means it has a pressure. Due to this, electron whirls pump less AEther than positron ones hence an asymmetry for explaining polarization.

So yeah, instead of having one million crazy theories, formulas and interpretations (and approximations) each to explain anomalies in the pervious as it is in quantum physics right now, you would have one crazy interpretation and the rest is our classic (super)fluid mechanics...

12:20 Whirls in the news.

5:45 when i added this to that entry a very loud exhaust started to rumble outside. As the engine heated a little, the rpm went lower and the sound diminished. However it's still there and i think is the black GMW. It left after i wrote.

Though there is no left hand rule for magnetic field, in this image Tesla seems to point the thumb to himself and wrap his fingers, with hairdo figuring the asymmetrical pair production which is proof of the existence of positive pressure (polarized) AEther.

January 26

4:35 AM According to standard model the smallest known particle is the muon neutrino, with a mass of 0.17 eV. All the other masses are measured in either MeV (mega electron volts) or GeV (giga electron volts) which is million or billion times bigger. At this point i propose AEther is made of neutrinos. They have a tiny mass, millions of times smaller than next bigger particle, no charge and a 1/2 spin. Ideal candidate.

A stream of neutrino could stand for a magnetic field where their spins could be aligned.

When a high energy photon enters a stream of neutrinos, it will get knocked out in its components, an electron and a positron which are whirls rotating in opposite directions and will start circling in opposite directions when in vacuum and spiraling in the cloud chamber.

From what i saw, the positron is bigger than the electron resulted in pair production and that cold as well be caused by the spin of neutrinos.

Don't know yet if the photon is made of one or two hourglass shaped pair of particles in a cross pattern and if they oscillate, transferring AEther from one another but is the only way it could happen if they move on a direction perpendicular on the hourglasses axis because otherwise the photon will start spiraling. As for what makes them oscillate, could be fluid mechanics laws applied for frictionless AEther and it could appear as they are dynamically attracted by their own past selves.

9:47 Yeah should have avoided any exotic ideas like past selves, creating time, things like this. As i went to bed last night i finally got the idea, however was too tired to come back at the computer and write it down.

I don't believe anymore they oscillate or pulsate or anything. The Polish hologram seem to be accurate.

What is holding those four funnels together preventing them from growing to infinity is the pressure of the AEther, made of neutrinos. Which then could mean the AEther fills uniformly the whole known space. Photons cannot exist without it. This goes against the Big Bang theory.

So in a way the were right talking about luminiferous AEther. However i feel a bit nervous about countless neutrinos and muouns passing through my body all the time. But i believe other cosmic rays are doing more damage then those, giving me this terrible headache this morning.

Let's read one more time what the Bible says about Ezekiel's wheel.

Perpendicular Scalar Compression? Photons do not travel? This comes close to my first representation however those vectors are pulsating funnels and the "hologram" caught an image covering a whole period with all 4 funnels at their peak.

Two funnels in existence at any moment. The photon could be split into an electron and a positron when the funnels are equal enters the magnetic field. The positron gets bigger by accumulating more neutrinos that turn in opposite direction as whirl of opposite spin attract?

I don't see any negative spin in the standard model table though.

BTW the table is big and the number of particles we figured so far is small (Art is long and time is short).

3:10 I thought i saw that before! (Too late in Paris)

4:55 A boundary condition may occur when AEther pressure meets whilrs, like in the case of photons. Here is a more complex or maybe hypothetic particle.