September 25

2:23 AM Ăla din stânga (dpdv al privitorului) ofițerului cu mâna la gură sugerează Nicu Ceaușescu, iar cel din dreapta cu cască de protecție Cristi Borcea? (n.1970) Un lucru e sigur. Doar unii erau mineri, ca de exemplu ăia doi dintre ofițer și Nicu. Cei doi din dreapta. Miron Cozma.

9:00 Al nostru, dintre noi, pentru noi. Sunt proprietar, deci exist. Băsescu a fost căpitan, deci a existat (însă poza pare făcută la mișto). Nu are nici o pensie după ce a jăcmănit și distrus, dar mai ales, a dat tonul la confuzie, scandaluri și corupție (a avut două referendumuri de demitere, care au rezultat în legea cea mai aiurea dată nouă vreodată de vreun Parlament, 341/2013).

10:05 Efortul național este bugetul Ministerului Afacerilor Interne, pe care cu onor îl conduce. 1,2 miliarde lei din care jumătate sunt salariile (cheltuieli de personal). 550 milioane împărțit la 12 (Numărul de luni din an) și la salariul mediu (8532) ne dă aproximativ numărul de angajați. Poliție, Jandarmi, mai știu eu ce. Par puțini, însă dacă ne gândim că nu fac nimic...

Da, pare mic, în comparație cu Ministerul Dezvoltării, care iar face chiar nimic, sau Transporturilor, care face foarte puțin. Pentru ce avem un Minister al Dezvoltării, fiindcă sună bine? Dar unde se duc banii alocați?

Bugetele pe ministere sunt alocate de Parlament, prin lege, la fiecare început de an. Dreapta sus, link-uri permanente. Dar este evident că toate aceste sume enorme nu sunt folosite în România, ele se duc undeva, cel mai probabil în Ungaria, având în vedere că toți politicienii, miniștrii, par să fie actori unguri.

10:52 Nici măcar nu se mai obosește să păstreze aparențele. Primul Ministru nu numește (pe) Președintele Camerei Deputaților. El este votat în plen. Sau doar o altă încercare de a "localiza" toate aceste aparențe.

"Dăncilă" a fost Prim Ministru în perioada când România a avut (prin rotație) timp de 6 luni Președenția Consiliului European (ăla mic, de prim miniștri, a nu se confunda cu Consiliul UE, ăla mare, de președinți, care contra-votează legislația UE, da știu e ca la nebuni), un rol simbolic, perioadă în care însă nu am auzit să facă vreun efort pentru România ca de exemplu clarificarea apartenenței la Schengen unde România este membru din 2007 (dreapta sus, link-uri).

3:08 Just finished binge watching Obliterated (2003). Man what a fat s...t movie. A special team getting high after missing their objective, finishing their mission against all odds and all Russians in Vegas.

Besides the plain old anti-Russian propaganda whith a long tradition starting with James Bond and the psychosis with the bomb (nothing new, except for cursing all the time and almost advertising the use of drugs), there are a very few things i'd like to ad.

The Gremlin who haunts the Chinese guy. It is part of the list of keywords embedded in the brains of English speaking people around the world. It stands for Kremlin and is at the very basis of subconsciously antagonizing the Russians against all (English speaking) world and the other way around.

It looks, my friends like your brains have been programmed.

Moss_cow. Rush_ya. Bella_Russia. Si bear_ya. War_saw. Prague. Book, arrest, Loon_done, Pare_is.

Gore_bashev. Krush_chev. GRUss.

UK_GB.

Ukraine (UK reign). Key_ev. , etc..

The Cyrillic alphabet.

Why antagonize the Russians in this centuries old world wide conspiracy? DIVIDE ET IMPERA. They needed an antagonist, like the clown for Batman, Lex Luther (law looter) for Superman, the liquid terminator for the mechanical one etc.. Otherwise it will be all boring and people will forget about and go about their business.

5:00 BTW do i detect a threat in this Hungarian super confident plain arrogant looking yelling singer's "hit" played endlessly at least on our local specialized station (Z100 Portland. Zenu. PDXenu).

9:09 PM Everybody who took college level physics knows about relativistic mass. According to Einstein, mass of a particle changes with its speed and changes dramatically when the speed goes "relativistic", which means is comparable to the speed of light. So we assume here Einstein was right.

At the speed of light the mass of any particle except for the photon which may not be a particle after all becomes infinite. You can see the formula in this article.

We all know electrons usually revolve around an atom. However, when there are more than one electron, their trajectories and speeds become so complicated, due to interactions and collisions between them it is impossible to describe them in mathematical terms. The so called n-body situation.

At this point it is easier to describe their behavior in terms like clouds, where we can no longer know the speed or position of a certain electron.

Some of the electrons around an atom move at relativistic speeds. We know that is happening for gold, probably other heavy elements.

Electrons do have (resting) mass and when they move at relativistic speeds they will add their relativistic mass to the mass of atom.

In the case of gold, some of the fastest moving electrons can have 1.2 times the resting mass.

Nobody has yet measured the number of neutrons in an atom. It is said, for heavier particles, the number of neutrons is higher than that of protons, needed to counteract the electrostatic repulsion with the strong force and that explains the difference in mass/proton (atomic number) ratio. We call isotopes the atoms with same number of protons and different number of neutrons.

So what will happen with the relativistic electrons when one atom decays into two others, assuming the atoms do not loose them (or capture others right away from the "environment"), when the temperature stabilizes? Will the sum of their relativistic mass be the same as of the initial atom?

I think not. Electric charges that mainly hold the electrons in orbit will be the same, but the orbitals will be lower.

So here could be the true cause of the so call mass defect, the basis for the (in)famous formula E=mc2.

There is no equivalence between energy and matter (whatever that is).

I believe it is from here we should start looking for the nature of mass. Unfortunately i cannot make the calculations to prove the mass defect is the difference between relativistic mass of all electrons before and after because of my very limited mathematical knowledge at this time. And it could be impossible because of how complicated would be the trajectories.

After gross estimates, this theory does not stand if the electrons of the 6 orbital (in gold) do not exceed 58% of the speed of light. But if that percentage comes from an average speed, and some could have 70% of the speed of light or more, due to collisions and accelerations in their complicated trajectory, even for limited amounts of times, things could change.

11:55 For the first time ever i did a google search (with a typo) and got an answer but i don't know where that answer came from. Clicked on the link next to it, nothing. When i corrected the typo, i did not get the same answer anymore and o believe this is due to AI, could not have happened before that. So yeah, google AI is (of) an amoeba too or worse.

12:15 Yeah but... The electrons, especially for heavier elements do not move around the atom in a circular orbit, or at a constant speed or even radius like in Bohr' model, they are like zig-zagging in a mess mainly due to electrostatic repulsion forces and yes collisions (like in no one's model)... Here is an idea how it would look with 5 electrons but try to imagine 79 like in gold.

February 11

Shiva and fire. The hope diamond.


Yes i would believe the trajectory of the ball could represent an electron falling. However there is a new discussion arising. If the electron is moving on orbit at relativistic speeds, the speed of one level should be different than the at the other thus there will be a slight mass problem. Both at the emission and during the photo-electro effect.

January 24

6:22 I have been working a few hours at this project. It is a representation of what it might be the real propagation of light. When an electron moves to a lower orbit, like in the case of hydrogen, where we have a single electron, its trajectory is similar to this one.

Its movement represent a tiny electric current initially created of a single falling electron that in turn may cause a magnetic field made of a single line, at 90 degrees. However the magnetic field cannot close cause it is following the movement of the only electron that ends in a different position.

This proves this magnetic field is nothing but a reaction of the void to the electric one in fact is just another electric current, made of only one virtual negatively charged particle, and the cycle repeats, propagating in space.

January 15

5:30 I think i was right to believe the motion of an electron around a proton would look weird, because of the existence of 3 quarks forming the proton which obviously have a non-zero distance between them, of which 2 are positively charged. In mechanics there is a situation known as three body problem.

If they were only two positive quarks, the orbit would not be anything like a circle. In fact people have thought of that and there is a blog post that quotes another one and is showing the orbit of the Star Wars planet Tatooine that gravitates around 2 Suns. And no, it won't have anything like years, crop seasons, thinks like that.

And this is the case of an atom with only one proton. Think about bigger ones. How complicated would be to describe the orbit of 16 electrons (oxygen) by example that also repel each other when moving around 16 protons of which all are made of three quarks. A 64 body problem (not counting the neutrons)?

Ok so Bohr and even Heisenberg didn't know about quarks but they knew about protons. However in Bohr's atomic model the electrons all turn nicely around the nucleus like planets around a Sun of which masses are negligible (except for Jupiter) when compared to that of the Sun by means of gravity which is not polar like protons in an atom (and even those gravities influence heavily each other).

And one more thing. In heavier atoms electrons on lowest levels (of energy?) turn at speeds close to c and that according to Einstein can cause their mass (and energy) to increase dramatically. Could that stand for the (in)famous mass "defect" problem?

Thing is we are stuck in physics at a level not far from that of fuzzy math Heisenberg and confusing Einstein, at nearly 100 years since their theories and waste the time of the children in colleges with stupid inconsistent naïve theories.

And no, it is not a Jewish conspiracy. Einstein was not a Jew, or maybe he was, by the looks, but he was also made by an actor, like Tesla and all others. The conspiracy is much deeper than that and goes all the way to Ancient Egypt and their today continuators, the elite of Japan and the Sun God and their alliance with Hungarians who provide the European looking actors.

6:25 Statul abrupt. Una e să protestezi și să faci grevă ca profesorii care nu voiau să încheie mediile sau chiar ca cei din 10 august și alta e să blochezi capitala unei țări cu utilaje grele, ca într-un asediu. Se atentează la funcționarea ordinii de drept într-un stat iar eu nu cred că șoferii aceia sunt români.

7:10 PM Aplicați legile existente și nu lăsați o categorie dotată cu utilaje grele să terorizeze toată populația României acționnând ca și complicii lor. Câte încălcări de exemplu ale codului rutier au fost comise de așa zișii protestatari, prin blocarea șoselelor cu vehiculele lor private?

January 13

12:37 I think i came up with the first law of Universal reaction. The force of the reaction is proportional with the square of the size of the disturbance.

4:24 Novak și fermierii.

7:00 How an antiquated election system in place since before media and super fast communications era favors big money and  pathological criminals or their designated opponents in their race towards US Presidency. Why not direct elections period like in most European countries?

According to the states' legislations (and this is a type of discrimination between citizens of  the same country), people vote early in a so called open or closed so called primary elections during which a single candidate is pushed to the top for the "final" elections when every citizen gets to choose between... two candidates only of which most don't want, even with Taylor Swift push for young voters. What (or who) to vote?

It is clear to anybody the Republican party is ceding early by pushing totally ineligible candidates, of which Trump is the most.

7:50 László Tőkés.

11:38 At this hour of the night i can't even begin to understand the formulas behind that trajectory, but i like to believe that if they would calculate that trajectory taking in the consideration only the electric asymmetry of the proton they would come with something similar. Also i don't know why the nucleus itself would not rotate a bit, thus the cloud. And it all seems symmetrical.

Needless to say. The movement of the electron creates an electric current following that trajectory and the electric current creates a weird shape magnetic field etc. of which the variable part caused by the curves would be compensated by self induction.

I would think that while the atom is not perturbed like by heat, it would stay like that forever. 

However if the whole thing starts to vibrate, like being heated, at some point the electron might first jump on a higher level and and then loose that orbit and i don't know what shape will have the lower orbit, but will still be symmetrical if stable and at least during the fall both stable shapes will be asymmetrical and the magnetic field created during the fall will be asymmetrical.

Or simply the orbit would be perturbed enough by vibration for that to happen, without the need of fall. Especially if the lower energy level is fully populated like they are, where would the poor electron go?

By law of conservation of energy, something has to compensate that asymmetry and that would be a virtual particle creating an orphan asymmetrical field away from its cause because the cause (the fall or vibration) ceases before of the accomplishing of self induction and that in turn would create another one and another one, figuring the wheel of Ezekiel and of course the motion of a virtual particle would create an unstable string each time.

So in the end it is an uncompensated asymmetrical jumping (with the speed of light) magnetic or electric field. Nothing travels at the speed of light, not even light.

January 12

11:08 Have no idea what is the etymology of the word свобода, the same in Russian and Ukrainian, however i know they are both Indo-European languages and this word reminds me of the last two words of Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra written in Sanskrit which i believe it the mother of most European and Indian languages.

11:37 Ca să nu regret mai târziu, așa cum regret că nu am scris chestia de mai sus acum câteva zile când mi-am dat seama prima dată, să mai spun o scurtă poveste. Pe care am mai spus-o dar în altă formă.

În anul I și II am avut o colegă cu looks de super star, de fapt semăna foarte bine cu Sandra, cântăreața lui Michael Crețu, dar avea o arsură pe gât care o desfigura puțin.

Însă abia zilele astea după ce am scris niște observații și am rememorat ce știam despre emisia spontană fotonică mi-am dat seama de niște chestii.

Pe colegă o chema Camelia Chelman și era din Bacău. Dacă scrii numele Chelman cu K, Kelman (da, știu la fel ca și Kelemen), toate consoanele formează KLMN adică numerotarea straturilor de energie ale electronilor care orbitează în jurul unui nucleu. În continuare, Camelia sugerează cocoașă deci o greutate sau o sarcină electrică poate?

Ea a picat examenul de mecanică teoretică din anul II bis, ceea ce însemna pentru ea terminarea facultății ceea ce sugerează că și căderea unui electron nu trebuie interpretată cuantic ci clasic? Și a căzut din tren înainte de a ajunge în Bacău (eu nu locuiam în Bacău în timpul acela, asta a fost după repartiție) după ce a picat examenul și a murit.

La începutul lui 81 cred m-am întâlnit cu ea la examenul de Studiul Metalelor în toamnă (eram în grupe diferite). L-am luat amândoi cu 5 (de pomană, eu am greșit chiar diagrama fier-carbon), știam că profesorul Alexandru nu pică în toamnă pe nimeni, ca de obicei când sunt foarte stresat, am luat-o pe jos la o plimbare foarte lungă și nu știu cum ne-am nimerit împreună, am mers pe jos din Tudor până în Copou (cât e, 5 km?) după care ne-am întors spre seară în centru și ea m-a dus să văd Carul cu Boi "care se uită la tine indiferent din ce direcție te uiți la tablou" (roțile lui Ezekiel?).

Mda, și traseul seamănă cu traiectoria unui electron care pică.

Căderea ei din tren a fost în 83? (locomotivă electrică, chiar, cât e forța gravitațională la distanțe foarte mici ca nucleu-orbită), an în care s-au scumpit băuturile iar România a început declinul economic ce a dus la căderea regimului 6 ani mai târziu în 89. Crețu, Kreuz, base, dance, oscillating perpendicular strings, de-light, M energy level, Sandra (particule, nisip, trecerea timpului)?

Inversarea timpului. E posibil să fie și alte mesaje în acest video, poate chiar notele, poate și în celelalte ale Enigma. Unicorn, primordial disturbance and its reaction that created the Universe, Nirvana (stingerea), etc..

Mai vedeți și voi eu sunt saturat cu multitudinea de chestii la care mă gândesc zilele astea.

January 11

12:48 Could it be the 4 disks on the djed represent the four energy levels of orbiting electrons, the oval "head" of the Ankh the semi-closed eccentric magnetic or electric field line following the fall of an electron from highest orbit level, the Sun above representing the light (photon), etc..

2:15 I think i might have found something to work with in GeoGebra. Pharaoh's crook and flail? Earlier the image was available as google search result, it is now gone however in the meantime i downloaded the file it came from so i can do a screenshot (have to download it to see it). There are some interesting enunciations in the article too. "For the principle of conservation of energy to be hold true, it is necessary to add an extra term to the equation of motion as the radiation reaction force."

8:24 As for self induction of a single electron, it is very simple. Similar with self induction of a current made of many electrons eventually moving inside a conductor (self induction, the magnetic field created by a current generates back a current that opposes its cause).

However the problem gets more complicated and also more captivating when we consider a single accelerated electron moving in vacuum also on a curved trajectory which still fits the definition of an electric current. Then, we might have eccentric self induction and an electric momentum away from its cause which i call a virtual particle.

9:47 E=mc2 also means mass is energy. The photons which move at the speed of light only have mass in the sense they carry energy. However. Speed of light in glass is about 2/3 than in vacuum (BTW, way or infinitely outside of the scariest part of the Lorentz curve, or almost non-relativistic).

I understand the photons might be (instantly) slowed down when they enter glass. However. When light escapes glass it accelerates back to full c (c is always the same bla bla). Where do the slowed down photons get the extra energy to accelerate instantly back to c? (head scratching emoticon here).

January 10

11:25 "Eu centrez, eu dau cu capul" (I center, i score). Here it goes :

I think i found a way to visualize the falling of an electron on a lower orbit, after i figure the equations. Probably the most overlooked phenomenon in history of science. For the accelerated phase, it should be a parabolic spiral. No need for supercomputers or anything. Except maybe if there was some AI software which you could verbally ask it to do so and spare all the work.

Why is it important? Well, a falling electron is (the smallest) electric current, right, which generates a magnetic field, right, which accompanies the emitted photon (or is the emitted photon).

Nevermind that. They just sent in a team (made of little "Mexicans") who started hammering to finish the walls of the fallen stairwell (about a month ago, remember). There will be between 1000 and 10000 hammerings today. Like in the days when the emperor was here, and did the windows. Or a few years earlier when they did the roofing for the whole complex, with an average of one nail a second for 6 months.

11:30 Was thinking earlier. If the religious thugs of Japan force their own people to work to death to partly finance their covert ninja type operations abroad, what will they do to others. Like what they are doing nowadays with Americans and they don't even know it.

4:00 Thoughts from my walk. If we were to calculate the trajectory of a falling electron we need to know first position and speed of the electron, which according to German physicist Werner von Braun Heisenberg it is not possible. I bet this is  the main reason they never adventured to do it.

So we must to get rid of this theory first, also with the help of deeper quantum mechanics, and that is the quarks i bet Heisenberg didn't know about.

Ok, Heisenberg published his uncertainty theory in 1927 and quarks were discovered in 1964 and he died in 1976 and he never corrected his theory. Why would had he, since he already won a Nobel prize in 1932 and was already the father of quantum mechanics?

For the most simple atom, hydrogen, with one single proton which is made of quarks we can see the proton has a spatial asymmetric dipole charge. More than that, to form the nucleus, the proton is paired with a neutron which has no electric charge at all, only mass which adds to the off center asymmetry.

Since both nuclei and electrons have mass, there is a tiny gravitational force between them though the electric force is prevalent.

So the normal circular trajectory of an electron around a nucleus, better said around the center of its electric charge is perturbed by the electric asymmetry of the proton and the position relative to its mass center.

There is also the issue with the mass of the electron. The electron has enough mass to move the atom around a bit, like Moon vs Earth. At those speeds, this thing will also contribute to instability of many possible orbits or "energy levels" and in the end their are only a few permitted or "quantified".

Since we now know quarks are made of strings that vibrate, i bet this model is too complicated for any mathematician and they came up with this uncertainty theory instead.

Though they have so many "idle" (they do not apply to anything) theorems in math no one single person on Earth can review them all in a single lifetime.

But nowadays we have giant supercomputers, let's feed them this model. However i bet they already did and only a few know the results.

I remember i once applied for a grant to pay to use a supercomputer to come up with a method of predicting earthquakes. Based of course on a different theory than tectonics plates theory. But applying for a grant is a complicated job in itself which i screwed and i bet they have one guy in every grants hogging team that to do just that.

BTW do they ever give Nobel prizes to guys who dismantle old theories that have been given Nobel prizes for? I believe they do, Bohr made substantial changes to the previous two models, Thompson and Rutherford who also received Nobel Prizes.

However big money don't need Nobel prizes (which come with one million each), all they need is a good working theory that will allow them to peek into tomorrow's market. One thousand times per second.

BTW is head scratching stimulating blood circulation inside brain?

530 Like i remember during that time when i opened an Ameritrade account and put in 2000 dollars from a credit card. At first it was working but after a few days it was like some big entity with big money was intervening and screwing the prices of my picks so i gave up. But i was there long enough to see they were every day 2 o 3 startups dying there.

They all seemed the same. Gathering a hundred or two hundred million capital, real or not, around a chemical formula for a new Alzheimer drug that never made it past a couple years of studies. But guess what. How many grants where they sucking besides the initial investment?

Big money, big schemes nobody looks at. Nobody cares cause it's government's money.

Dharma Wheel of Nikola Tesla

I think Tesla might have had a good intuition interpreting the dharma wheel of Buddhism or star of Ishtar or contemporary Scientology cross (yes i believe our future lays in the mnemonics of the past religions) but it is not quite the way he did it.

Disregarding those formulas, and seeing this representation as a photon in transversal plane it could all be the pulsating cross quanta may create besides time and space, also gravity.

The words tryadha vyavasthita sarva buddha in the mantra translate literally "three expected for each light (color?)" corresponding to the three components in some ancient representations in the center of the wheel that could mean each proton is made of three quarks.

Interpretation:

1:12 1/5/2024 version

It is not quite like that. I assumed the magnetic field line starts in the middle of nowhere and probably would have if the electron would have an initial vertical speed.

However its descending speed starts from zero and in the initial moment the single magnetic field line starts from near the electron and extends on a parable like curve in a plane perpendicular to the trajectory of the electron that contains the electron, if there are no other electrons to interfere with the electron's falling speed or trajectory. Then it's gonna be a more complicated curve.

During the constant speed phase it moves on a circle on a the same plane and the trajectory is helicoidal with a constant radius.

It seems the electron during acceleration phase is ceding its energy to the virtual field line. The only way this can happen is if the field line is the trajectory of a positive virtual charge that furthers from the electron by increasing the radius of that helix. During deceleration the electron looses speed and energy and the virtual charge gets back close to it. 

The trajectory as a whole seems like the shape of a 3D horse shoe  that is part of a helix with variable and constant radius or the edges of a propeller arm.

The virtual positive charge moving in a circuit that seems closed in a view in the direction of the fall, would create a negative virtual charge moving on a trajectory similar to that of the falling electron. For the accelerating and decelerating part of the cause the virtual charge would move at different angle both looking like an pharaoh's crook and flail with both constantly changing angles and propagating with each step?

Year is 2024 and i am shocked by the fact nobody looked into this until now. That is the shape of a single magnetic field line generated by a falling electron. They instead look in the cloud chamber of the LHC, the most complicated machine built on Earth. Unless if it's all a big coverup and they knew this from the beginning of quantum mechanics era.

Another ancient source that is less obvious. There are spirals in this Ancient Egypt amulet near other details (square, wings) that seem to represent right angles, half right angles in the context of an eye that might represent light and a bird that might represent gravity.

The tilak. Never knew it is called like that. And a 3D U shaped version on Amazon.

I think after a major world conflict people's knowledge broke into pieces. Like Sanskrit broke into many European and Indian languages, each keeping different words, the same happened with the advanced knowledge. People tried to pass it down to further generations that reverted to stone edge.

They knew they had to somehow preserve the important parts and painted those on the forehead of their children, or  built pharaoh's masks waiting for a revival which never took place. The pieces and symbols and stories became different religions as we know them and humans never reverted to the highly advanced civilization (Heaven for all) that was once here on Earth and it is possible the intruders who are probably the ones who built the pyramids survived as well without knowledge of their past.

But nowadays they are obviously way ahead of us.

January 1st

2020 + 4 Temptation strong. Dualism. She's not the man...


The (always four) characters from the video above are undoubtedly taken from...

11:00 Is branching of the Universe the same as entropy?

As per action/reaction law, conscience was born with the first disturbance at the beginning of the Multiverse as a reaction to it and according to Leo Szilard, conscience opposes entropy. Heat pumps are the only known devices that do just that, but others could be imagined.

When an electron moves to a lower orbit it create an electric current or space/time disturbance that in turn creates a reaction in such a way it would not interfere with its cause, and the only way is at 90 degrees in space and time. That is probably the reason in many mythologies light is associated with conscience.

If that, the opposite could be imagined. False gods could nullify someone's conscience with bringing chaos, like noises or physical bullying which could take forms as unwanted sexual attraction from celebrities spread in society.

In Japanese mythology Amaterasu brother Susanoo brings chaos in the Universe and forces her to hide. In all religions there is a god of chaos. Egyptian mythology has Seth. In both mythologies the ruler is the sun god. It is not the first indications of Egyptian descendance of the Japanese which at this point should be obvious to any historian or even non historian.

The fact nobody acknowledges is due mainly to the fact they don't claim or even suppress this knowledge from main stream and this can tell a thing about their true intentions.

12:30 At this point i am tempted to say the perception of (tiny visible spectrum) of light built in our physical bodies as means of orientation through space is a mere coincidence with the true nature of it but i am not so sure, though they are separate things, it all could be some sort of closing or convergent loop.

3:40 Of course the 4 whatever the number great religions of the world starting with Judaism and ending with Scientology or masonry whatever all inherited some of the true knowledge however under the form of mnemonics and mysticism and rituals they continune to this day and will for a while.

Of them all Buddhism encoded best that lost knowledge but they themselves don't know what it is, most are interpreting the panca skanda as the five senses. Would it mad sense for the text to be embedded in the path of any Buddhist monk since the time the monks were just mourners of a lost world?

Laws and Observations on Time Travel

By consequences of a new theory regarding the emission of photons and propagation of light, issued after observations of the current theory that seems impossible and of the design and existence of the many pyramids built in areas currently including in modern Egypt and Nubia (Sudan), time travel seems more than ever a real possibility and more than that, it seems it may already happened in our civilization's past and we may have been contaminated with knowledge from/of the future.

Though predicted by the current quantum and string theories, that possibility was so remote, nobody bothered to try and examine its consequences in our lives.

...

In macro or continuous or analogous world we have the following situation. We cannot make measurements of an electric circuit without interfering and thus changing the parameters.

In one of the most simple electric circuit, that can be a battery, a resistor and two conductors, by touching the ends of the circuit with the probes of a meter we will induce a change of the resistance of the circuit, by adding its own resistance (for functioning, the meter needing to divert a small but not negligible amount of electrons from the circuit), thus altering the results.

As principle, it may be inherited from quantum world, of which the macro world is made of, where we have the so called "observer effect", since the everyday macro world is made by a myriad but finite number of quanta.

Or the other way around, we could extrapolate the first experiment (two paragraphs above) in the quantum world, by limiting the number of electrons flowing through the two circuits (one original and one added by the meter) to a quantum scale.

Another very important idea, besides all fundamental forces are in fact one, derived from reading the Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra (Core Plan), is reality is being created by our minds.  

In the case of this classic quantum experiment the presence of an electron detector is changing the results. Some argue that it is not our consciousness that interferes with the result, but merely the detector.

However the detector was made by conscious beings with that purpose only and the probability of one being created by a random variation of reality is zero, and without the consciousness of the experimenter, even if there could be a variation of reality that could create it in an infinite time, the experiment is meaningless, or does not exist as such without the observer, but as a simple (un)recorded variation of reality.

The extra reality of the act of observation by a conscious being affects future reality of the Universe and possibly its creation since the beginning. Based on the decision taken after that measurement, the conscious beings as us may take an action that would change the future.

If two people witness the same experiment and they agree on the results and the action needed to be taken, in the hypothetical Multiverse there will be no two but only one future. (From this we also can conclude both society and human consciousness (mind) obey quantum laws).

From here we can come to the conclusion that the more people agree on an observation and upon the decision made by it, the more stable or strong the next Universe will be, thus the idea of convergence (of the Multiverse back into one) which seems to be again following the only universal law, that of action/reaction that created it in the first place.

In the case of time travel from the future (in need of resources), the travelers do not want the Universe they come from to be changed, so they have to take measures. One of them would be convincing all the conscious beings in the time of intended target that they and their occult leadership do not come from the future and the best way is to convince them they are super beings from the present, aka decision making gods and we shall surrender to them so they can make all the decisions for us based on fake or inexistent observations.

A Sun God seems a logical choice since it will ever be present in this form or a predictable one all the way to their time.

However since there are people among us who have doubts and try alternating way of thinking and start making their own decisions based on objective (repeatable, reproducible) observations, they decided to capture and institutionalize the trend, by adding extra false gods.

Those extra gods which are actually people invested with decision making power by the agreement of many have to be false and forgettable, totally diverting the reality of the observations and decision making in a way that would not affect their reality in the future.

So in the end, they came up with the idea of actors playing the role of leaders (decisions makers), which actors having absolutely no power and there is no real casual chain of events that can lead from the act of leadership done by travelers to the fake leaders.

Quantum

We have come a long way since the first enunciation of quantum theory. Some got used to it so much is like a second nature. But today many people discuss about on forums and they have opinions and sometimes find inconsistencies if not contradictions.

But what it is. In the subatomic world, all quantities are discrete values. It is, in a way, what digital is vs analog.

The reason for that is simple. The state of the Universe was 0 before the big bang and that was one single event.

However, properties of quantum world translates to the every day world and the enormous number of quantum properties put together to form everyday objects make them look continuous and analog. Like composing bits from an wav or mp3 file into an analog wave form which is audible and recognizable.

At the time, all these of course came from observations and not postulates. They determined the properties of quantum world through experiments of which first and most important is the photon-electron effect. One photon is needed to displace one electron from a metallic surface.

They concluded the entire quantum world is made of such discrete particles of which every single one of the same class has the same properties.

One electron has always the same mass and electric charge. One photon travels always with the speed of light and it can never be found resting, one proton has always the same mass and its electric charge will be always the opposite of that of an electron.

More than that, they interact with each other to form what we call matter. Protons and neutrons together form the nucleus of atoms which is orbited by a number of electrons. For each element and isotope of  the Mendeleev table we have the same number of protons and neutrons.

Because electrons cannot be split in smaller particles, they are called fundamental, together with several others while protons and neutrons are formed by smaller fundamental ones.

This discretization of matter goes all the way to molecules. Atoms combine to form molecules by sharing orbiting electrons. Molecules with the same formulas or structure have always the same properties.

However. It has been found that light which is made of photons has properties similar to those of waves in elastic media, like sounds or a wave created by a rock or in a lake, of which one is diffraction.

After much head scratching of the scientists, they came with a solution. Light is not photons or waves but a combination of those they call dualism wave particles of light. That, to satisfy all observations and experiments.

One discrete photon is always accompanied by an analogous wave front and they came with the idea of electro magnetic radiation or wave. And that's where the first confusion occurred.

EM waves let's say emitted by a radio station seem continuous and analog and have all properties of those.

However EM radiation coming from a single electron descending to a lower orbit, which is a short lived electric current, generates a magnetic field and it is said that magnetic field pulse in turn generates and electric one and so forth, hence the EM radiation seems discrete because the speed, the start end end position of the electron can be defined only in quantum world.

And first inconsistency. Since the current generated by that falling electron is a finite line, it generates a magnetic field like a rectangular permanent magnet would, in the shape of a pumpkin that would be near zero at poles or in the direction of the pole. However we expect something more like a cloud, the same way electrons orbit the atom.

Anyways it is not a circular or spherical wave like field we are used to from elastic media. Same goes for a dipole antenna for radio emissions.

Another one. Falling of an electron can create only one front wave. After that, the EM field is not sustained by anything from behind.

Again the velocity of the fallen electron is a quantum affair. Electrons reside in discrete cloud like positions on different levels of energy around the atom. Thus it cannot be established a speed in classical or non quantum terms for that falling electron from one cloud to another. Thus we can't know for how long the magnetic field lives.

Another one. Let's say the front of EM wave created by the pulse of falling of an electron spreads, though not like a sphere but like a pumpkin, continuously, in all directions (with the exception of poles). The photon can only go in one direction out of an infinity (or a few following the uncertainty principle).

After a while the intensity of the EM field decreases by a law similar to the square of distance, and will become insignificantly small while the photon can travel theoretically 11 billion years if it does not encounter any obstacles, (and depending on where it was emitted, can exceed the limits of the Universe and there will be no more dualism).

Another one. A number of photons emitted by a compact source are each created by its own electron so we cannot talk of a coherent analogous EM field but of a cloud of overlapping out of phase short lived fields.

From all the above observations one can realize the precarity of the whole EM theory as we know it today.

Without going into postulate mode yet, or without any changes to current theories, i want to make a first observation. The wave nature of light which is a bunch of photons coming from a single compact source like those used in experiments can be explained much easier if we could consider some sort of resonance between traveling photons emitted by falling electrons or a statistic grouping of in phase photons.

That is there will be always a number of photons in phase with each other, creating a virtual front wave.

But the front wave can only be electric, magnetic or both, and we'd have to accept the photons are carrying each its own pulsating field while the energy of the photon will always depend on its... (pulsating) frequency, field that of course is not spherical or pumpkin like and does not loose intensity and travels with the photon for 11 billion years.

Ok so here comes the postulate. In the same line of reasoning, we have to admit that the falling electron does not produce a quasi spherical magnetic field but transfer its energy to only one pulsating photon that is made of both magnetic and electric fields. Or better said, only electrical.

And that pulsating field can only be an infinite series of successive reactions of the void to the initial disturbance created by the falling electron, following the only universal law and that is action/reaction.

First reaction to the disturbance will occur in such a way it will not interfere with its source, and that is at 90 degrees in space and time to its cause. In turn, that first reaction will create the second, etc.. in an infinite cycle creating a cross traveling quantum we call photon.

However there is not a B wave but only E disturbances which pulses once transversal like in the animation below and then jumps 90 degrees ahead longitudinal and pulses again at 90 degrees transversal.

Though each transversal pulse is made at peak of two quarks that have mass, the total transversal (electric of course) momentum is zero while it's still photon, the pulse balances self after one cycle of four pulses as if those four pulses were emitted at once which makes us thinking if longitudinal time has any significance in its own reference frame.

I think the mass of the two quarks may come from the electron also falling into the gravitational field of the nucleus which is very weak when compared to the electric but it exists. (we cannot not dismiss any amount in quantum).

Even in this animation one starts to ask self if the fields are balanced. But we are talking here electric and magnetic line fields, not mechanical yoyos with inertia and stuff. Why should they be anchored at one end? And here another question for the EM theory. If one field causes the other, then why are they always in phase?

The representation does not apply to EM fields emitted by falling electrons because those can only exist for the time of the electron falling, that is one half period, and hence the first confusion. We don't have such things in nature (dipoles fed by oscillators).

The deducted appearance of the moving quanta would be a succession of lines at 90 degrees each in a succession of parallel planes that seen on the direction of propagation will look like a cross. The apparent rotation of the quantum is its spin.

Depending on the frequency, or the difference in levels of energy of the origin electron (or possible other sources) we will have light, microwaves, radio waves etc. or all the EM spectrum as we know it.

According to this theory, light can be bend when an electric field is applied in the direction of the quanta where is moving away with the help of a very high frequency high voltage stimulation (maybe not at every cycle) that may be created with the help of so called Helmholtz resonators or other type of very advanced "stone age" device inside pyramid or simply with the help of a very strong electrostatic field applied from very close when light generated at the top of they pyramidion moves down the gold faces.

Also light quanta could be accelerated or rushed from behind down the pyramidion by other in phase quanta.

Again using the hypothesis the pyramid is a indeed a photonic device capable of splitting light quanta created at the top in its four components. By doing this in a fast energetic successions it may bring anything contained inside or in a focused area to its frame reference and the time inside may slow, space dilate (According to Einstein time stops for anything that travels at the speed of light).

By bending light around pyramid light could be slowed down by the angle effect or accelerated by other quanta pushing from behind thus time can be reverted. But you need to revert time all the way to before that region of space was inside the expanding Universe to create a wormhole.

Or maybe they didn't want to. BTW, i was thinking yesterday, i don't see any restrictions to traveling into the future if you are about do die inside that pyramid anyway and never to come out. Or maybe if you abide a few simple rules. Or if you don't care about creating parallel universes and stuff.

We know this is possible in the microwave or even terahertz range with today's electronics. Did i mention vacuum creating mechanism for the Helmholtz resonator inside the pyramid?

All these and probably more were known of course to Ancient Egyptians, who build the pyramids to manipulate quanta, possibly others. By forcing the cross quanta down the slopes of a pyramid they split it into a square (in a way similar to opening a 4 blade iris) (final stabbing of Christ on the cross) using high voltage electricity and the shape of the gold pyramidion they could basically bend light, induce speeds much greater than light, stretch space, revert time, etc..

I know where they got their ideas for the string theory. But do they know what the strings are made of?

Ok i think i got it. When an electrons falls to a lower orbit and creates a photon (void reaction) that is too energetic, it can break down in two other particles, which are open strings too small to create their own void reactions and in turn start vibrating. Because the reaction to void is dynamic, the split creates two charged particles.

Here are (named only) a few ancient and modern symbols reminding of this model of Universe and demonstrating knowledge of it. I won't add the graphic symbols because in some countries are banned.

Square and compass.

In Ancient Chinese mythology there is a story of two half snake half human brother and sister, Fuxi and Nüwa, who supposedly rebuilt the Universe with a square and a compass. In this representation they look surrounded by strings made of rings. Their modern continuation seem to be the freemasons.

Swastika

Toyota logo

Audi logo

Subaru logo

Also. The striking similarities of these fundamental scientific findings with major themes of the four main religions of the world, possible other religions, suggest these themes were popular in the past, possibly carrying symbolic informations about lost knowledge belonging to advanced ancient civilizations that ended in a global conflict conflict, possibly the one described in the oral epic story (that has been later written) Mahabharata.

Wild turkeys, split pyramid, pyramidion and a solar symbol (left) part of a museum across Indian Head Casino, last night, inside Warm Springs reservation, Oregon.

DeCember 12 (12)

2:02 AM "My purpose for the day was to see if it's possible to design a practical device that could do what the warp engines were doing in Star Trek but the day has passed drowned in unnecessary noise a and stomps and s...t."

Let's see if i have anything to say about the link above. I don't believe in negative energy and mass an s...t.

I believe in traveling within a void bubble. What is a void bubble. It is a place... no place at all. It is what this Universe was before big-gang (or first true random void disturbance).

In that no place at all distances do not mater. So if you open one of those and then another one in a different place corner of the Universe whatever was in the first one would migrate in the second when first one fades away. No other opening (of bubbles) can intervene in those moments or loss of material and lives could occur. Or parallel Universes be created whatever.

That's why i was telling, it is a limited resource in this Universe.

This was done on Earth with a pyramid shaped device during Ancient Egypt and then nowadays using tokamaks (in a different purpose then declared). Synchronization is the key for the transfer.

Was thinking of a dynamic process. A traveling device could wrap itself in a bubble while opening a bubble ahead at some distance. While advancing from one bubble to the other, the ship does not exit in the normal space so i don't know if it could open a bubble in a continuous mode but who knows for sure if there is not some trick for it...

Though i'm pretty sure it can be done because we need it and this Universe, or the first disturbance, arose to fulfill any rational need or anything mind can think of.

But will a ship traveling using successive or continuous jumps, obviously slower than bubble to bubble disrupt the busy schedule of site to site traveling?

Only salvation would come with size. If a bubble will resonate only with one of the same size, or only with one created at a certain precise time after the first one, then yes, simultaneous multiple site to site pairs of bubbles could exist, including ships.

2:50 Yeah i know, it sounds a bit like Scientology. But then let us not forget that...

2:52 And now that we have all the philosophical premises in place, let's think of a practical device. However, it may require brainstorming, or who knows, all the thetans have again to agree...

But i think all a ship has to do is to create ahead a tunnel of void long enough for the end of it to be in phase with the beginning... But that would require a lot of energy and probably should think first of how to extract the energy from the void. Or maybe the bubble can travel as a wave or something, conserving the bubble... As a worm maybe?

3:12 Visionary Jules Verne writes in his book about Paris in 1960 (or after 100 years he wrote it), reality that seems to be postponed to our days (his mind was a bit fast), among others, that journalism would not exist anymore, as they were no news and i think he was right about that one too.

Superweapons used in the first decades of twentieth century (Tunguska event) and reactions that followed (WWI, WWII, totalitarism) wiped the need for war thus the one for news. However they keep waging wars as a mean to control population that was getting smarter in the west and writing something that replaces the news, i call it the continuous show, which is a very sophisticated and complex live show, using the addiction for news of the population as a mean to keep them dumb.

1:00 This suggests a couple of large superconductive coils similar to those of tokamaks that could wrap the ship in a void bubble. However, the coils themselves that are attached to the ship are out of that bubble.

3:43 Spin and orbit the nucleus? Ok let' say for the purpose of this discussion they spin in a circle. Thus the magnetic field is nothing but again a reaction of the void, creating again closed loops perpendicular to its motion in a way similar to electron rotates in a closed loop. 

No further reaction to the reaction cause this one is closed and not moving. Since the electron rotates it probably rotates with it and there is a continuous "field" of rotating magnetic lines around the rotation axis.

This type of reaction is again an electric field but since it has no polarity (no beginning or end) as it is closed it does not interact with other electric nearby fields. But if we were to consider the fact the electron is rotating like in a cloud of uncertainty around the nucleus, the multitude of lines of field at some time parallel to the axis of rotation in a plane containing the electron rotation radius is generated by the uncertainty (cloud like) position of the electron around the rotating axis.

So in the end there is only one "force" and that is electric and when dynamic (single, open or moving) it causes two different types of reaction to the void. Light quanta, for single open linear disturbances like in case of an electron falling to a lower orbit which propagates in squares, the so called magnetic field described above, gravity being just an attraction between orienting dipoles from two different objects.

In case of the "magnetic" field above,  things are clear. The reaction to the disturbance created  by the rotation of electron has a direction following the direction of the rotation of the electron and the poles attract each other in order to sum the reaction.

Why is an electron charged and why it repels other electrons. This is not an easy one. Electrons spin and they probably have asymmetric charges made of smaller particles like polar molecules and thus they create a "magnetic" field. But electron is spinning and changing direction of the spin too fast fast to allow its void reaction to close through it, hence the field lines appear open. Uncertainty of the direction of the spin and spin speed of electron create unipolar fields. Probably same with protons.

And from here on i think i got a direction into explaining what particles are. I think they are light quanta with such a high frequency or small wave length or side length of their square they can't move the way light quanta does and small ones combine into large ones to satisfy the weird properties of very small ones. Or they probably move into a different time frame and/or space than light does, whatever you may like. Anyways  they are trapped into combinations within larger "molecular" particles.

Ok i got the whole of it. It's all in my mind. Shall i put it here for free?

December 5

1:52 Is this torii gates tunnel reminiscing of a pyramid shaft?

11:17

1:40 I had no idea when i developed the autonomous light quanta theory what immediate purpose would serve and be confirmed by.

I think i wrote before why i can't believe the current EM theory. They say when an electron move to a lower orbit it creates a sudden discharge, basically an electric current that in turn generates a magnetic field that in turn... hence the EM traveling field.

It should be a one front only field since the source ceases to exist, being a magnetic field at inception it has the shape of a pumpkin etc. though it is not thin but has volume and will be next to zero on the direction of the discharge or the electric current that created it or at poles.

The original magnetic field is stationary for the time the electron falls but (they say) it creates an electric one that is ahead with half period of that wave length frequency of which shape is hard to imagine short of the animation in Wikipedia and which creates another magnetic one, basically moving in jumps.

These fields vectors are said to be perpendicular on each other and on the direction of propagation which seems impossible in polar regions of the pumpkin.

It also seems obvious that the intensity of those fields decreases, maybe not with the square of distance (because it is not a sphere) but following other similar equation and after a while it will be so weak it will be undistinguishable from the background noise.

According to the dualism of light theory accompanied by these jumping fields there is a photon that of course flies into one direction only (out of many possible by riding the quasi spherical field). Average life expectation for a photon is 11 billion years or something like that.

Which means that if the photon does not encounter any obstacle it will travel with the speed of light for 11 billion years, possibly escaping the edges of our Universe. And it is obvious that after a while, rather early in photon's life it will not be accompanied anymore by the original EM field.

This theory has so many flaws we need not to continue to discuss it.

What i proposed is there is no electric, magnetic or gravity field, but only electric which appears as pulses, basically arrows of energy. Those pulses (or disturbances) create reactions that have to be in a such direction and positions in space they will not interfere with its cause, basically re-creating self at a 90 degrees angle in space and one quart of the period in time.

They way those travel suggest a succession of squares which have one arrow on one side only. As soon as an arrow finish one side it is transfered on next square, not seen here.


The optical effects of light are easy to explain in this theory. Quanta (or pulses) whe nowadays call photons are never singular coming from a source but in large numbers flying in all direction. Some of them since inception are in phase (though not going in the same direction as in a laser), by resonance. So they will create the equivalent of wave fronts that may explain the classic optical experiments.

Now try to imagine four of those emitted simultaneously right on the tip of the pyramidion perpendicular on each side that in turn would create perpendicular ones moving on each side in squares pushed down (repelled) by new ones from the tip where a conductor is hooked fed by some induction coil fed by a batter or condenser inside the pyramid or a resonant circuit similar to a Tesla coil whatever.

Like in a combination of this video (turquoise pyramids only) and the one above.

There will be four disturbances chasing each other in squares above the surface while the squares are getting bigger and bigger and pushed down given the shape of the pyramidion that will create sort of an electric prying effect on space, and possibly opening the original void.

By calculation or trial and error one could focus this electric vacuum somewhere in an empty space below inside the pyramid where the air has also been removed, thus creating a bubble of the original void, where distances have no meanings and which will be instantly connected to a similar or more bubbles across the perceived Universe.

Yes it is possible the Ancient Egyptians, others, could have figured this by themselves if they knew about electricity and geometry and nature of the Universe.

In a time when people lived by themselves and not drowned in symbolism and all kind of fake competitions generated of course by the need of a few to own this very limited resource that could open the possibility to travel across the Universe maybe to better worlds that we may call Heaven.

Extracellular Matrix and Cancer

All cells, bacteria and viruses have a wrapping membrane formed by lipid bilayers. I don't know exactly how it grows back after a cellular division, but i believe it is the fundamental "brick" of life. Everything that lives in the animal kingdom have to have one. It is very fragile, like a soap bubble. Can read for further details.

The thickness of this universal bio material is known, it is two molecules thick or about 4 nm (nano meter or 1/1000 microns or 10 to the power -9 meters). For comparison, the size of a diamond cubic crystal made of 8 atoms is about 0.35 nm.

One of the methods of visualizing a virus within a tissue is by freezing and cutting that piece containing viruses with a micro-tome equipped with a knife made of diamond. However you cannot sharpen diamond to obtain an edge one atom thick, and even if you could it would break before cutting anything. One of the smallest commercially available diamond knife is about 12 atoms or 2 nm radius or 4 nm thick.

Because of that a cross section through a cell's or virus's membrane would be more of a tear than a cut.

Most viruses have around 100 nm diameter. To see a cross section of a virus you have to cut slices of the tissue suspected to have viruses in it and then you look under electron microscope to see if you caught/cut a virus in two.

Eukariotic cells are those which made up multicellular organisms. Their two molecule thick lipid bylayer membrane is very fragile but they are encapsulated in collagen extracellular tissue (or cellulose in case of plants) that also holds an organ together and has some mechanical resistance.

Here are images of collagen extracellular matrices in cut cross sections in various stages of degradation because of induced illnesses in mice, last one being most porous, after they have been stripped of cells with some chemicals.

Usually represented through graphs, there are also images of cross sections of whole cells taken under electron microscope, though is hard to catch in a single image all types of organelles within one single cell in a cut sample. But i would assume if you have enough time and patience you would find a cell that has been cut in such a way it has all of those visible.

Coincidentally this cell is seen with two open vesicles in the lower right side which means the cell is dying because some of its organelles are already used to produce viruses. It can also be a cultured cell, that is not wrapped yet in a connective tissue matrix.

To me it is hard to believe a cell would produce something that would infect and kill other cell, that is viruses.

But how most viruses that are enveloped only in a fragile bylayer membrane can escape the hard collagen connective tissue enclosure of the cell. I believe the answer probably is viruses can only propagate within already damaged tissue or weakened or porous matrix which is not intact and can be an evolutionary mechanism through which cells that are not completely encapsulated are killed. (2 micrometers mean 2000 nanometers).

There is a type of cells that specialize in maintaining and regenerating the connective tissue. They are called fibroblasts. However sometimes tissues cannot be repaired and they are replaced with scar tissues which is mostly made of collagen like in the case of cirrhosis of the liver. But there are no fiberblasts in the extracellular matrix surrounding cells. That one is secreted by the cells themselves.

But it could happen some people are so depleted of collagen from previous repairs like in case in chronic ulcerations, or simply a poor diet, that their cellular matrix is so thin is permeable to things as fragile as viruses. One way to know is examining old scars that used to be firm and then turned into very soft tissue.

Once the matrix become permeable, not only viruses and bacteria but the cells themselves start to penetrate and divide outside, right the border of the matrix, especially in weakened or damaged areas and if they are too many close to each other they start building a different kind of matrix we all know as cancer. Unlike viruses and bacteria they are not recognized as harmful but your organism's immune system.

However it is unclear to me from all i could find how cells divide inside the extracellular matrix where every cell seems to have its own place made of collagen fiber. 

It is obvious there is not enough room for two daughter cells inside a single "room", one of them has to die. I would assume that after division there is a competition between the two daughters and only the most viable survives. But if cells start dividing outside the matrix, they will all probably live for ever inculcating the mutant ones and the ones closest to the old matrix will start building their own aberrant matrix.

Could it be peaks during chemo kill the cells that are dividing freely just outside the matrix more than the ones inside.

...

It is known that collagen fibers are too big to penetrate human intestine. All it can go in your blood stream within a healthy intestine is broken down through digestion small molecules of monosaccharides, amino-acids, fatty acids and minerals.

However, if you take collagen supplements or eat collagen rich foods like bone broth or hot dogs, those are broken down in your intestine during digestion to the exact type of amino-acids and minerals needed by the fibroblasts or cells to produce collagen.

I believe a healthy cellular matrix in all organs is key in cancer prevention and it can be maintained through a proper diet and also by treating all chronic inflammations and ulcerations in your body that are usually caused by an unavoidable toxic environment with dust, mold and bacteria.