January 28

12:00 AM (Top) dog who barks doesn't bite.

3:50 AM One more version. v6. How about this one (v7)

11:30 Oh... My... God... Version 6 is getting really close to this. Or this.

10:00 PM Was searching for examples in desmos, particularly a 3 d spiral which i can't find and i ran into what i believe is closest to a close string made of a whirl. Just for visualization of an idea.

3:35 It looks easy with Rhino Grasshopper but i have to buy it.

January 27

10:00 AM Desmos, poor man's computer simulator.

Traveling photon (v2)model with opposite whirls oscillating in different directions transferring energy from one axis to another. Red and blue represents two turning directions The arrows represent the conic whirls however the other way around (could not find an easy way in desmos).

2:45 PM Jumping photon (v3) model with opposite whirls oscillating in different directions transferring energy from one axis to another. Red and blue represents two turning directions.

One more version (v4) to explain polarization. Another (v5) one. And another (v1) one.

In a way, is similar to a yo-yo or a Maxwell pendulum but the two ends of the yo-yo cylinder rotate in different directions.  Another analogy would be four cups, touching at the bottom, with each red cup pouring into a blue one next to it and the other way around.

Whirls grow by extracting energy from the ones on the previous axis until their outer axial pressure equates the AEther pressure and then bounce back, bump into each other and cede their energy to the next axis.

Pick one my friend, it's your Universe!

I personal would go with the jumping because there is no axial movement, and this explains why the speed of light is greatest. More than that, the whirls could be absolute stationary, this explaining, in a way why the speed of light is seen the same by any non relativistic observer.

It also explain why the light accelerates suddenly back at c when exiting a medium that slows it down to like 70% .

The transversal cross section of the whirls will have the shape of a double hyperbola (red lines) to match this description.

There is one more possibility. Tomorrow.

Why transferring in the direction of propagation? I think there could be a shockwave in the AEther that creates an area of preferential low pressure ahead (jumping photon). In the case of travelling, could be simply inertia. No, there is no transfer of energy both in bouncing and the shockwave.

AEther is frictionless.

10:00 I remember to this day how my whole world crumbled when the physics teacher in college made this enunciation.

According to that, accelerating protons at the LHC ("close to the speed of light") would not make sense. No matter how close to the speed of light a proton is moving, the speed of a proton would still be at c=300000 kms/s away from it.

In other words if an observer is moving alongside the proton with a relativistic speed v let's say half of c (half the speed of light) the difference between v and c would still be c.

That moment i knew i was screwed because i could never learn something without understanding it. And they were so many other crazy formulas coming, for a whole year!

Also according to this same formula, relativistic speeds start at 0 or every time that ratio starts to have any none zero value. Typically considered? That is not exactly rocket science!

12:30 AM I didn't know!


5:20 Black is the next white.

January 26

4:35 AM According to standard model the smallest known particle is the muon neutrino, with a mass of 0.17 eV. All the other masses are measured in either MeV (mega electron volts) or GeV (giga electron volts) which is million or billion times bigger. At this point i propose AEther is made of neutrinos. They have a tiny mass, millions of times smaller than next bigger particle, no charge and a 1/2 spin. Ideal candidate.

A stream of neutrino could stand for a magnetic field where their spins could be aligned.

When a high energy photon enters a stream of neutrinos, it will get knocked out in its components, an electron and a positron which are whirls rotating in opposite directions and will start circling in opposite directions when in vacuum and spiraling in the cloud chamber.

From what i saw, the positron is bigger than the electron resulted in pair production and that cold as well be caused by the spin of neutrinos.

Don't know yet if the photon is made of one or two hourglass shaped pair of particles in a cross pattern and if they oscillate, transferring AEther from one another but is the only way it could happen if they move on a direction perpendicular on the hourglasses axis because otherwise the photon will start spiraling. As for what makes them oscillate, could be fluid mechanics laws applied for frictionless AEther and it could appear as they are dynamically attracted by their own past selves.

9:47 Yeah should have avoided any exotic ideas like past selves, creating time, things like this. As i went to bed last night i finally got the idea, however was too tired to come back at the computer and write it down.

I don't believe anymore they oscillate or pulsate or anything. The Polish hologram seem to be accurate.

What is holding those four funnels together preventing them from growing to infinity is the pressure of the AEther, made of neutrinos. Which then could mean the AEther fills uniformly the whole known space. Photons cannot exist without it. This goes against the Big Bang theory.

So in a way the were right talking about luminiferous AEther. However i feel a bit nervous about countless neutrinos and muouns passing through my body all the time. But i believe other cosmic rays are doing more damage then those, giving me this terrible headache this morning.

Let's read one more time what the Bible says about Ezekiel's wheel.

Perpendicular Scalar Compression? Photons do not travel? This comes close to my first representation however those vectors are pulsating funnels and the "hologram" caught an image covering a whole period with all 4 funnels at their peak.

Two funnels in existence at any moment. The photon could be split into an electron and a positron when the funnels are equal enters the magnetic field. The positron gets bigger by accumulating more neutrinos that turn in opposite direction as whirl of opposite spin attract?

I don't see any negative spin in the standard model table though.

BTW the table is big and the number of particles we figured so far is small (Art is long and time is short).

3:10 I thought i saw that before! (Too late in Paris)

4:55 A boundary condition may occur when AEther pressure meets whilrs, like in the case of photons. Here is a more complex or maybe hypothetic particle.

January 24

7:50 AM I have a hunch this sculpture represents the electron in its excited state in the middle as a cylindrical whirl and the hourglass shaped chairs around are photons. The world for table in Romanian is masa, which is also used in physics for mass (like in French mass or English mass).

I am considering the hypothesis that inside the vortex an electron is made of there is a quantum singularity or void (no AEther) where AEther can fall into and the main energy of the whirl is not created but only its spin is oriented by a Coriolis force. The energy of the whirl is created by AEther falling into that void which means the Universe is trying to heal itself from that careless disturbance.

However the whirl can be shook by thermal agitation or knocked by other particles around and thus emits photons which are smaller whirls. So yeah, i believe the photon emission can be used as a source of energy.

The analogous whirls in superfluids can't create a singularity because they're moving to slow for that.

Theoretically an isolated electron cannot emit photons. Do we see here photons emitted by electrons in motion inside the tube or by electrons hitting the glass? What do you think? Which reminds me. Could the four discs represent the KLMN shells, the djed (pillar, base) a whirl, the ank a lobe and the serpent, a photon? 

Which photon is presented as a snake, suggesting a wave. Probably where all physicist took from at the beginning of past century. 

5:25 So far o have identified the magnetic field as a stream of AEther, coming out of whirls in similar way air is coming out of cyclones, possible residual from Aether entering a singularity in the middle of a particle (whirl) moving at relatively slow speeds.

If one photon is made of two whirls in the shape of an hourglass, one negative and one positive, possibly oscillating between the two (too small to have a singularity), when entering a stream of AEther, the two will separate and start circling in that stream of AEther following mechanic fluid laws like in pair production.

Because of air and alcohol particles in cloud chamber, the two will start loosing energy and their trajectory will turn into a spiral.

What i do not understand in classical pair production is how come the positron does not disappear when in contact with the cloud components. Could it be because it's too small and too fast rotating?

January 23

12:25 Stable vortices exist in superfluids which are frictionless. The core of a superfluid vortex is @ one Angstrom and the size of a He atom is about 0.3 Angstrom however they cannot get closer than a few Angstroms due to repelling electrostatic forces. I don't believe a volume of fluid of a few atoms can behave like a fluid and form vortexes. It must be atoms floating in AEther vortexes.

Superfluid vortexes are a only a few orders of magnitude bigger than hypothesized particle AEther vortexes, possible at a different quantum level (quasi particles quantum level), mirroring the particle level. Or it could simply be superfluid frictionless helium behave exactly like AEther at a different scale due to different densities or atom "inclusions".

Or maybe at near zero K AEther combined with Helium behaves like a denser frictionless AEther.

Superfluid vortices also connect and reconnect and can form quasi-particles. This is similar with electrons connecting to form strings thus bigger particles like photons.

But there is something else interesting in this animation. Vortexes seem aligned in strings and all seem to move in one direction kinda perpendicular to the movement of the fluid, possibly by expelling superfluid pretty much like a jet engine does. It would not violate conservation of energy since they do that since the beginning of time their existence.

They are kept apart and quite uniformly distributed due to repelling forces between vortexes of the same direction of rotation. But i believe at longer distance they attract each other due to lower pressure (Bernoulli). They seem to attract and sometimes repel each other at the extremities because of streams of superfluid getting in at one end and out at the other. More study  needed here.

1:05 Maybe it was time i defined the five fields according to my theory of Eather Whirls.

First was created Eather, through a disturbance that may have come from one single conscience (will) that filled the whole Universe. Then a single point in the middle started to rotate and turn into a whirl that was created the rotating speed needed for all the others.

All particles are made of Eather whirls. The stable ones which can exist in certain sizes and rotation speeds (quantum) move by inertia in the frictionless AEther and can live indefinitely.

Electron is the smallest charged particle made of a single stable whirl. Due to its magnetic field it has a measurable spin. As a whirl its rotation speed is not constant though. It starts with 0 at periphery and it goes all the way to speed of light or beyond in the center where there is absolute vacuum, voided of EAther. A place where again space and time does not exist.

Its quantum size is dictated by the initial pressure of the AEther and the maximum speed reached before a quantum void is created in the middle.

Strong force could be explained by entangling of two whirls.

It is very similar to the eye of a hurricane. There is a cylindric wall where speed is highest and inside there is low pressure and low humidity and no winds with clear blue sky.

All around the cyclone type of hurricane there is an area of low pressure and all around an anticyclone there is an area of high pressure.

The most interesting part about cyclones-anticyclones is the anticyclones exhibit high pressure on the outside and absorb air in the middle and cyclones the other way around.

Since i suspect that inside a low pressure whirl the pressure inside can get so low it creates a void in the AEther, possibly tunneling it to a nearby high pressure which leaks AEther and increase pressure around it. But it could be they simply couple with each other due to the fact they cannot combine due to quantum size.

In weather, due to existence of a positive pressure atmosphere, the cyclones would be more frequent and anticyclone cannot exist without an anticyclone which feeds it.

I believe one can already guess through analogy, static electric fields, positive and negative, attraction between those and magnetic field as the flow of Aether through the whirls and attraction due to lower pressure inside those due to Bernoulli's law.

Gravity should come from low pressure inside the streams that flow in each string.

4:10 First where created galaxies, as single whirl. As the pressure of the AEther started to get lower, all the other objects started to be created.

Could it be most matter like hydrogen is created by the whirls in AEther created by Coriolis effect and not the Big Bang (what a choice of words)? Like cyclones on Earth and they are mostly low pressure spinning little things so that would be the reason there is more matter than antimatter around us?

The creation process will continue until enough AEther is converted to matter and then its density will be too low and the process stops.

By this reasoning the (hypothetical) black hole at the center of the Galaxy could at lease initially be creating by thinning EAther, pulling the slower rotating matter in that void until it saturates?

Since this was my first draft on this idea and did not know where was going to take me while kept doing searches, i have to re-write for eliminating apparent contradictions, readability all after giving it so more thought.

11:13 However before i do that i have to add a few things here.

I looks like for all particle, big or small which have a charge which stand for negative pressure, that pressure is indeed a constant of several. We can have 1/3, -1, 1/2 or zero.

So yeah, if you stack a number of electrons to make a what, bigger particle, donut like closed string you will have the same charge, possibly making a muon. I don't know if the sum of masses is equal to its mass or there is a "defect" due to differences in relativistic speeds of AEther to which i stick for now cause i don't know if it's right or wrong because if divide the two masses, i get a fractional number.

11:51 I think i was wrong when i said this particle cannot have spin or charge. Though is made obviously of spinning electrons aligned with their spinning axis on a circle, there is a "captive" stream of AEther inside, which would actually have to spin in opposite direction. The spinning electrons that make the ring would also create a stream along the axis of the donut which may count for this.