November 9

12:40 If this was true my closed circuit relativist drive should work too.

While searching for the origin of the Lorentz factor equation, i discovered other things though. It derived from the hypothetical exitance of AEther which was supposed to be a incompressible frictionless probably immaterial fluid filling all space, and an amazing forgotten theory about atoms being vortices of AEther in which great names of most physicists in that time are linked to, which strikingly resembles today's strings theory which is applied to elementary paticles though. 

That beautiful theory was killed by the discovery of electron as separate entity from the atom, other things. Many more elementary particles were discovered after.

In which case my proposed theory is deriving from that one i didn't know about or vortices made atoms only applied one level down to elementary particles (strings) which are not unidimensional but made of vortices of  frictionless AEther, which AEther could be made of the smallest (muon) neutrinos.

The propagation of light is not waves in AEther similar to those in elastic media but unstable AEther vortices moving ot transferring from one place to another like in this animation and all fundamental forces are given by variations of pressure in AEther near and far caused by vortices.

One first step in proving this theory is the existence of spins of particles like electrons which are half made of photons of which speed (at periphery?) is the speed of light. Other calculations show 292 times the speed of light.

In the hypothesis all particles are vortices are vortices with a (linear) rotation speed comparable to the speed of light, the mass of particles withing the vortex may come with applying the Lorentz factor or in other words relativistic. The reason of matter is energy is because matter is made of vortices (whirls) at relativist velocities.

Minimal energy for an electron to be produced in pair production is half of 1.022 or 0.511. MeV. If one photon has more energy, after splitting the rest is converted in kinetic energy. That is the only energy at which an electron can exist. According to my model that is the energy in which an electron can exist in both toroidal and rotational hyperboloid.

Within a photon the unstable double vortex, the electron and positron do not have their closed toroidal shape until they split, but rather open ended rotation hyperboloids.

8:45 One of the most common models for electron within today's struggling string theory was actually produced by Lord Kelvin himself, according to this paper.

My proposed model for the photon is an unstable (oscillating), always transitional rotation hyperboloid vortex.

During pair production the photon with enough energy (1021 MeV) splits into an electron and positron of which only difference is charge. We can conclude the two cups (branches) of the rotation hyperboloid turn in two different direction, and after split into two tori. However it is unclear how the torus rotates, like in the diagram above or like those torus vortices seen in nature or both.

Though moving in the air witch cause friction and ultimately breaking down because of it, the torus vortices are stable and in a frictionless environment they could last indefinetely.

Shiva's drum. It is not a secret i created my photon model following the shape of Shiva's little drum. which could symbolize pair production. When a photon with enough energy hits an obstacle, the hyperboloid splits and turn to two tori.

A combination of rotating hyperboloid transitioning continuously into a torus (and then continuously dissipating) is seen in this video, though is created by gravity and fed continuously by chemical combustion turned into heat. For illustration only.

 

And yes if particles are vortices in AEther they of course are not punctiform and their position cannot be localized as such, until they produce an effect and eventually dissipate.

9:45 Just realized spell checking was turned off for everything i wrote in the last few days or maybe weeks.

A Theory About Light and Photon

Years ago i became intrigued with the Sanskrit syntagm pancha skanda that appears in Buddhist mantra hRdaya sUtra (Harvard Kyoto transliteration). Not knowing Sanskrit i attempted to replace each word with the corresponding English word from a dictionary and this is the result, that sounded more like a Physics Theory than a prayer. The title of the sUtra itself can be translated as Science Plan.

I have always been discontent with the current EM theory, fields theory, the existence of 5 fundamental forces, Special Relativity, etc..

One of the reasons is i don't see how the so called EM field can travel alongside the photon since electric field is radial with open lines and magnetic field is toroidal with closed lines and the intensity of both electric and magnetic components decrease with the square root of the distance while the photon keeps its energy constant.

To fix this they came with a patch to the theory, stating the EM field is separated into a near and a far zone, with the far zone being planar, with no more decreasing of intensity with square root which is not possible, not even as an approximation, because it breaks the laws of physics, with a bizarre shape of EM field in the near zone, a combination of the magnetic toroidal field and the electric radial.

However the planar far zone theory implies the photon caries it's own energy and EM fields which i believe it is true.

You can find the animated version of this representation in Wikipedia.

After seeing it though i became interested in the shape of an EM field caused by the decay of one single electron as in photon emission, thinking of it more like a disturbance than a field. Mostly because the electron does not travel through a conductor and cannot create a closed magnetic field because it starts and ends in different points in space.

During the past summer a group of Polish scientists published a few images claiming to be holograms of single photons. Obtain through interference of two photons, one consequence is the photons could not be other than waves.

More recently i ran into an animation showing whirls in a superfluid.

Than hypothesize at that temperature, Helium starts to exhibit the same properties as AEther, mainly due to lack of friction, though at a much higher density, creating inside whirls due to Coriolis force that show properties like repelling each other, breaking, re-combining and most importantly, creating quasi particles as strings, though several orders of magnitude bigger in size than the ones from the Standard Model.

I also hypothesize AEther could be a frictionlress or a super fluid made of neutrinos, which are much smaller than any particle and all particles are more or less stable disturbances within it all obeying the known laws of fluid mechanics.

I then proposed the 5 fields are all created by the movement of whirls that create areas of low pressure around them, streams of AEther inside, etc..

Two whirls rotating in the same direction are repelling each other, rotation of whirls create a stream of superfluid in interior that enters at one end and exits the other, producing magnetic field, and pressure of superfluid creating gravity. Strong force could be actual entanglement of whirls organized as strings.

Combining with ancient symbols, N.Tesla's ideas about whirls and AEther, Ezekiel's wheel, etc..

I created this animated model of a photon made of two rotating double hyperboloid shaped AEther whirls. The symbol above indicate the rotation direction which is the same for each wheel though opposite for two opposite ones. If you click on the image you can see the 3D simulation on desmos. Low pressure make them attract each other and rotation in the same direction repel, thus becoming stable at a certain distance.

Which representation fits more ancient symbols (Vajra, Buddhist Adamantine - Symbol of power).

Since the image of the vajras from this symbol seems very similar to my model, i don't see why they whirls should not have an internal structure. Made of rotating AEther, a superfluid, they could have all kind of stationary waves inside as they absorb AEther at the surfaces and expel it through the middle, it looks like in two stages.

In most representations i have seen so far it appears there is some sort of outer shell made of probably again stationary waves suggesting a closed circuit of AEther within a bubble. However (within the ancient symbol) there are tiny small swirls between the small whirls that form between the 4 main ones, other asymmetries.

Could it be each of the four whirls pump AEther in a closed circuit around them.

I believe it can all be all seen on a simulation on a supercomputer.

Then i looked again at those images created by the Polish scientists. It appears they also caught those structures inside the photon as seen in the Buddhist ritual tools. The indestructible vajra.

 

We are familiar with standing waves inside fast moving fluids from "diamond shock waves" inside the exhaust of supersonic engines. Vajra in Sanskrit means diamond, among other things.

The vajra is represented always outside the hyperboloid bell (to be visible) but i think it's all happening inside. We can see at the end of the bell and area called emptiness which suggests the flow of AEther is on an open circuit.

If these ancient symbols represent light, as it is always suggested by their names, it could mean this ancient knowledge could not have been transmitted to us over millennia except through religion. By a better version of ourselves.


Tripundra represents the stream of AEther entering and exiting every shwirl, that closes (sort of) outside the swhirl of every open ended particle (string).

This version of Trishula reminds me of something i've seen in Egypt. Four disks representing the four swirls (two double drums in India) of the photon.

Einstein knew. His tongue in the shape of a whirl. Question is. Is he taunting us or giving a message to the future?

January 28

12:00 AM (Top) dog who barks doesn't bite.

3:50 AM One more version. v6. How about this one (v7)

11:30 Oh... My... God... Version 6 is getting really close to this. Or this.

10:00 PM Was searching for examples in desmos, particularly a 3 d spiral which i can't find and i ran into what i believe is closest to a close string made of a whirl. Just for visualization of an idea.

3:35 It looks easy with Rhino Grasshopper but i have to buy it.

January 23

12:25 Stable vortices exist in superfluids which are frictionless. The core of a superfluid vortex is @ one Angstrom and the size of a He atom is about 0.3 Angstrom however they cannot get closer than a few Angstroms due to repelling electrostatic forces. I don't believe a volume of fluid of a few atoms can behave like a fluid and form vortexes. It must be atoms floating in AEther vortexes.

Superfluid vortexes are a only a few orders of magnitude bigger than hypothesized particle AEther vortexes, possible at a different quantum level (quasi particles quantum level), mirroring the particle level. Or it could simply be superfluid frictionless helium behave exactly like AEther at a different scale due to different densities or atom "inclusions".

Or maybe at near zero K AEther combined with Helium behaves like a denser frictionless AEther.

Superfluid vortices also connect and reconnect and can form quasi-particles. This is similar with electrons connecting to form strings thus bigger particles like photons.

But there is something else interesting in this animation. Vortexes seem aligned in strings and all seem to move in one direction kinda perpendicular to the movement of the fluid, possibly by expelling superfluid pretty much like a jet engine does. It would not violate conservation of energy since they do that since the beginning of time their existence.

They are kept apart and quite uniformly distributed due to repelling forces between vortexes of the same direction of rotation. But i believe at longer distance they attract each other due to lower pressure (Bernoulli). They seem to attract and sometimes repel each other at the extremities because of streams of superfluid getting in at one end and out at the other. More study  needed here.

1:05 Maybe it was time i defined the five fields according to my theory of Eather Whirls.

First was created Eather, through a disturbance that may have come from one single conscience (will) that filled the whole Universe. Then a single point in the middle started to rotate and turn into a whirl that was created the rotating speed needed for all the others.

All particles are made of Eather whirls. The stable ones which can exist in certain sizes and rotation speeds (quantum) move by inertia in the frictionless AEther and can live indefinitely.

Electron is the smallest charged particle made of a single stable whirl. Due to its magnetic field it has a measurable spin. As a whirl its rotation speed is not constant though. It starts with 0 at periphery and it goes all the way to speed of light or beyond in the center where there is absolute vacuum, voided of EAther. A place where again space and time does not exist.

Its quantum size is dictated by the initial pressure of the AEther and the maximum speed reached before a quantum void is created in the middle.

Strong force could be explained by entangling of two whirls.

It is very similar to the eye of a hurricane. There is a cylindric wall where speed is highest and inside there is low pressure and low humidity and no winds with clear blue sky.

All around the cyclone type of hurricane there is an area of low pressure and all around an anticyclone there is an area of high pressure.

The most interesting part about cyclones-anticyclones is the anticyclones exhibit high pressure on the outside and absorb air in the middle and cyclones the other way around.

Since i suspect that inside a low pressure whirl the pressure inside can get so low it creates a void in the AEther, possibly tunneling it to a nearby high pressure which leaks AEther and increase pressure around it. But it could be they simply couple with each other due to the fact they cannot combine due to quantum size.

In weather, due to existence of a positive pressure atmosphere, the cyclones would be more frequent and anticyclone cannot exist without an anticyclone which feeds it.

I believe one can already guess through analogy, static electric fields, positive and negative, attraction between those and magnetic field as the flow of Aether through the whirls and attraction due to lower pressure inside those due to Bernoulli's law.

Gravity should come from low pressure inside the streams that flow in each string.

4:10 First where created galaxies, as single whirl. As the pressure of the AEther started to get lower, all the other objects started to be created.

Could it be most matter like hydrogen is created by the whirls in AEther created by Coriolis effect and not the Big Bang (what a choice of words)? Like cyclones on Earth and they are mostly low pressure spinning little things so that would be the reason there is more matter than antimatter around us?

The creation process will continue until enough AEther is converted to matter and then its density will be too low and the process stops.

By this reasoning the (hypothetical) black hole at the center of the Galaxy could at lease initially be creating by thinning EAther, pulling the slower rotating matter in that void until it saturates?

Since this was my first draft on this idea and did not know where was going to take me while kept doing searches, i have to re-write for eliminating apparent contradictions, readability all after giving it so more thought.

11:13 However before i do that i have to add a few things here.

I looks like for all particle, big or small which have a charge which stand for negative pressure, that pressure is indeed a constant of several. We can have 1/3, -1, 1/2 or zero.

So yeah, if you stack a number of electrons to make a what, bigger particle, donut like closed string you will have the same charge, possibly making a muon. I don't know if the sum of masses is equal to its mass or there is a "defect" due to differences in relativistic speeds of AEther to which i stick for now cause i don't know if it's right or wrong because if divide the two masses, i get a fractional number.

11:51 I think i was wrong when i said this particle cannot have spin or charge. Though is made obviously of spinning electrons aligned with their spinning axis on a circle, there is a "captive" stream of AEther inside, which would actually have to spin in opposite direction. The spinning electrons that make the ring would also create a stream along the axis of the donut which may count for this.

January 20

12:35 AM According to my most recent theory (of everything), electrons (or positrons for that matter) could not exist in vacuum (or anywhere) by themselves because they have to continuously absorb AEther, grow in size, split into smaller and slower ones which will have to cluster having their spins (and tiny magnetic poles) aligned in a circle making something very close to a smoke ring that rotates against self. Could this closed structure be a standalone particle that also sifts EAther? So it will have a magnetic field and mass though no spin or charge. Oops!

I would think the size of the donut depends of individual electrons' energy. Big or small?

1:07 Right. Yet another name for AEther.

1:20 CERN built the biggest and most expensive machine on Earth to find Higg's boson. Their idea is very simple. Since protons are the biggest charged available particles, by smashing them by accelerating and colliding them coming from two opposite directions many smaller particles will emerge from that collision. But i believe many that are not in there will be created by destroying the original ones.

2:35 I think i've nailed it. There are two types of whirls in the whole Universe and those are funnel like ones. One of positive and one of negative pressure. You can put several of these together and build any particle. They can be closed like the one in the picture above or open ended with a positive swirl allowing the venting of AEther absorbed by the first one creating a stream that enters and exits the particle called a magnetic line.

Earthworms? Uroboros?

So yeah, i believe the guys who made all these interpretations possible deserve a Nobel prize. Look at that, the first ever picture (holograph whatever) of the smallest building blocks of the Universe!

3:17 Yeah i know the image obtained by those Polish guys resembles the German Iron Cross, first issued by the Prussian King Friedrich Wilhelm III. But the design is much older, since 1191, year of the beginning of the Teutonic Order, some 25 years earlier than the of  the Dominican Order. Too tired now, have to go to sleep.

Spirala energetică. Those four cars have lots of iron in them right?

11:41 Question. Do you think ninja can manipulate bio-photons through Kuji Kiri?

2:05 PM Patru

10:10 How about a closed string in the shape of infinity (the edges are only to visualize rotation). That one would not sift any outside EAther whatsoever. Would be a better candidate for Higg's Boson?

I believe best candidate would be a really tangled closed one which would not pump AEther in or from the outside world.

January 14

12:30 AM In 1907 Nikola Tesla wrote this: "The primary substance [AEther], thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter".

Electrons were first discovered in 1897 or ten years earlier and were thought to be particles thus matter but the charge to mass ratio than mass was first calculated in 1909.

According to AEther whirls theory, electrons are autonomous independent whirls (though they can merge in greater whirls) like lobes around centers. 

Protons were discovered ten years later, in 1917.

Tesla always claimed he was in contact with aliens. That, i believe.

I think this is the only way he could have known, years before the discovery of protons or Bohr's model or lobe model or string theory or AEther whirls theory.

Or maybe, since he mentions things like Ākāśa or Prana, he had access to more complete Sanskrit texts other than hRdaya sUtra.

Most likely coming from a previous human civilization that existed and was wiped by the last ice age (with the surviving part, Egypt). More scientific then technological, which used pyramids as stargates and sources of power. Maybe that was their own doom and could have been the reason they suppressed Tesla's ideas. Our planet goes through ice age cycles.

Tesla wanted to harness the unlimited energy of the AEther using oscillating circuits. But i think he might have confused the source of energy with Earth's electric field gradient. Tapping into that on planetary scale would have meant depletion of ionosphere.

8:10 After all that happened during the weekend, this morning i had this question on my mind. How many cars were sold by the Japanese in the US throughout history. Started with some searches but soon became frustrated because you can't find the numbers ready.

Toyota in the 50s was making 300 cars in one year. Then suddenly the started to overpass the cars sold in the US. To give you a general idea, in 2023 half of the cars sold in the US were imported from Japan. If we were to add to this the Japanese cars produced in the 24 US factories, those who come from Korea and Mexico, where do we get at?

The good news, is the trend is going big times downwards. Don't know if it's growing consumer conscience, enhanced durability of the cars or lowering of the US credit rating. COVID, name it.

In 2023, they were only around 3 million cars sold in the US of which half were imported directly from Japan, and from the other half, some made under Japanese brands in Mexico and then the Korean ones.

But those numbers, if added to Tesla, GM and other US manufacturers don't add up in the chart below.Some say those 24 Japanese factories in the US brought jobs. That maybe true but if you look closely in the group pictures with employees will see Asians or hikikomori barely disguised into Mexicans.

How many do you think they gross to throughout history? I would estimate, way beyond 100 millions in all these 60 years that have completely reshaped America. Trouble is they started to make the law in the US.

Everywhere i go all i see is their hikikomori trained in ninjutus and for whites beautiful and AI fed supersmart Hungarian actors and actresses. In Oregon trying to emulated an inexistant German and Mexican population.

So yeah, instead of looking into securing Greenland, Americans should look at the racoons in their own backyard.

Before it's too late as one beautiful Eagles song says.

January 9

12:57 AM I believe this is where we should look for particles. It is said all particles "have a spin", right?

It's not "they have a spin", they are swirls or they exist because they rotate. Right.

In a fluid, swirls rotating in the same direction repel each other and electrons of the same spin repel each other more strongly. In my theory the repelling electrostatic force is due to random disturbances of the same positive pressure rotating against neutral pressure of the AEther that repel each other.

String theory was born from the need to explain the "strong force".

8:00 What did i say about pink being the new white? What can it be a pink poney on a Japanese navy flag background?


11:28 Could she be the one upstairs? BTW she's shaking the building, "as we speak". (Didn't "go to work" today of course after i just posted).

11:50 Apropo credeam că simbolurile naziste sunt interzise în România... Sau în SUA...

3:20 Just figured a new valence for the song. Chrystal Nacht.

January 6

12:45 AM According to the diagram and formula of relativistic speed, there is not a clear point of when a speed becomes relativistic or when a virtual particle comes into existence.

The relativistic mass of an electron "falling" to a lower energy level basically begins when the electron starts to be accelerated.

Thing is, due to rotation of an electron around a central charge, the initial and final fall speed are different than zero, on the direction of the fall and they continue to rotate around the charge before and after the fall, thus creating some infinitesimal initial or residual void reactions and those follow the photon in its path and could count for the losses as they may interfere with others, effectively tangling the void, creating the AEther.

Because of this, the process of transfer of energy from one virtual particle to another within the photon is not 100% efficient. This may count for loss of energy during this transfer and the red shifting of distant sources of light. Where does that energy go? possibly in the void?

In fact if i think i realize that even if a photon is not emitted, the orbiting electrons may create signatures in the void which may slow their rotation, possibly falling to a lower energy level from where some other electron is kicked back after acquiring some energy that in the end could come from thermal agitation.

This could be the reason of decaying of some particles or assembles of particles depending on configurations.

9:08 De ce instituțiile de sondaj nu i-au dat lui Georgescu nici o șansă în turul I? Cum a fost posibil ca un candidat de care nu a auzit nimeni, nici măcar eu care urmăresc politica din România mai tot timpul, fiind clasat de sondaje pe locul 6 să iasă pe primul loc?

9:35 According to my theory (Dynamic Strings), AEther is not a medium of propagation for light but a tangle of infinitesimal electrical and gravitational disturbances, filling the void, opposing the motion of anything, possibly causing the limitation to speed of light, red shift of distance sources and "spontaneous" "probabilistic" decaying of particles and elements. Could this be the hypothetical dark matter.

Yes according to this, the "ordinary matter" (or energy whatever) is constantly leaking into dark matter, which in turn it is leaking into something else, but at a much slower rate.

Also the void creates the AEther as a sort of memory for everything that has ever moved in this Universe.

But don't worry, everything, matter, dark matter is cleaned by the black holes, the vacuum cleaners of the Universe. However it will be a long time until all black holes will  merge into a single one, and all the disturbances will melt back into the void.

9:40 Within the post with my theory of everything there is a statement saying that strings may swell with motion, especially at relativistic speeds, by accumulating energy. Now imagine an electron, which we now know is a circular closed string made of a negative virtual particle and a graviton chasing each other being accelerated while "falling" to a lower energy level.

Its virtual particle trajectory (and that of the accompanying graviton0 will look pretty much like this, right? So the virtual particle of positive sign generated by the void that continues to replicate self into a negative one etc..

Which may finally explain the 4 laurel leaves of Grinell College Seal most likely symbolically representing a photon. So it's just a bit more complicated that my minimalist representation linked on the right but it may account for the pair production.

11:12 Which may also count for one of the symbols seen on masonic aprons called the behive (here, 42).

It stand for industry and it may also represent a silk cocoon or a lotus petal. However there are many symbols on this apron that may symbolically represent light, like the 4 pillars, the main masonic sign, square and compass, sprig leaves etc.. Too bad we cannot see in the image all the explanations.

2:40 A charged virtual particle on a circular (or helicoidal) trajectory will create a copy of itself, moving in a plane at 90 degrees, of an opposite charge. Pretty much like in this image. Question. How the illustrator knew?

December 26

9:48 Talking about electron-positron pair production, just remembered something. Something i always was intrigued with in Lake Oswego. The logo of the Mountain Park area, in two different versions and i thought it could represent the volcano which is actually the Mountain of the Mountain Park, where yes, PCC Sylvania is located. Re-creation center?

3:55 PM Ok was in a hurry and made a mistake by misreading this statement.

Bur i am still following this idea. What happens when a particle gets very close to the speed of light and according to Einstein, threatens to fill the whole Universe with its mass? Do they have experiments to prove it?

BTW At what speed an electron and a positron come out of pair production? Very close to the speed of light they say. But if we apply trigonometry to this image, we get electrons moving much slower.

What happens to the conservation of mass and momentum, since both electrons and positrons are much heavier then photons (it is said photons do not have mass but have momentum)? All of the photon's energy will turn to mass, but that mass is speeding (near the speed of light), a momentum will appear, out of nothing.

Can we count to a near punctiform electric field to instantly? accelerate those two masses, one charged positively and one negatively at near the speed of light? What happens to their trajectory when moving in that charge's electric field? We see the whole process occur in the cloud chamber. Where is that completely stripped of electrons ionized charge come from to conserve momentum?

Also. The electron trajectory in an electric field is circular only if the angle it comes at is perpendicular to the field. They probably got lucky taking the image above.

BTW Lorentz force breaks the action-reaction principle Centrifugal force is not represented in any of the representations.

Let's say we build an electrostatic sling shot with two objects, one much heavier, both charged electrically. Upon release, the lighter particle will accelerate but the large one will have a recoil, proportional to the weight ratio. (Nothing is negligible in quantum).

8:20 So it can. If everybody gets lucky enough to pass among orbiting electrons, the electric field gradient of of the central mass could separate the two virtual particles from the photon, change direction from transversal to longitudinal and the prodigious rotation with asymmetries at the surface can accelerate them to near the speed of light while the magnetic field in the cloud chamber does the rest.

Looks too complicated and the rotation speed of billions of billions rotations per second could know the photon away.

Maybe the magnetic field does it all and there is no need for nucleus as the two virtual particles already have a longitudinal component (not well represented here) close to the speed of light.
 

11:30 This image confirms what i just stated about the two components of light, a virtual electron and a virtual photon being flattened out which means two particle both move now longitudinal and with an added energy becoming stable electrons.

And my thought goes again to dharmachakra that has 8 spokes, of which four charged, with relativistic mass, moving in a cross pattern of which only two exist at a time and probably gravitons moving on the other cross pattern of the chakra not at 45 degrees but on the same direction, in opposition with the virtual charged particles, to balance them.

Maybe they are represented at 45 degrees because there was no other way to represent them in a symbol that was supposed to transcend millennia or until people will regain enough knowledge to understand them.

With three colors swirling in the middle, pretty much like in the icon of google chrome, with a color for each component, a virtual electron, positron and a graviton. However in string theories it is also stated that a graviton does not exist alone but is massless chargeless entity that exist within all closed loops strings of which the electron is one.

According to hRdaya sUtra, gravitons could be temporary holes in the space time left behind by the moving virtual particles at relativistic speeds.

Could it be both virtual particles in existence within the photon moving at relativistic speed are closed by the magnetic field in a circle pattern with the gravitons chasing the particles, this being the energy to matter transfer phase phase before they become independent of each other, moving ahead at near the speed of light, borrowing energy from the rotation of that nucleus (so they are seen in the cloud chamber, otherwise would just float around at non relativistic speed.

I believe in nature there are enough places with a magnetic field strong enough to separate the virtual particles of a photon into a pair of one electron and one positron.

At the scale of the size of an electron there are no fog or air particle to interfere with their speed or turning their trajectory into a decaying spiral.

The two particles created by the splitting of a photon are electrons if the light is polarized in the direction of the magnetic field. If not, other weirder particles may be created with shapes like spirals, fish like spirals, etc..

Quarks cannot exist individually and have fractional charges and the reason is they have virtual electrons and positrons in common as are said to be bound by the strong force to create protons similar to how in molecules electrons are used in common.

December 23

6:05 AM Patru actori.

6:19 नविद्य

2:00 PM Eu am criticat CCR de multe ori ca fiind una din cele mai corupte instituții din România, pentru numeroasele decizii de neconstituționalitate pe care le-a dat în favoarea infractorilor. Adică au adus sute de modificări legilor ca să scape pe unii și pe alții. Cât de multe, se poate vedea pe site-ul lor.

Din aceste statistici ale Curții  Constituționale. A modificat sau neavizat sau trimis înapoi Parlament 269 de legi înainte de promulgare (a priori), atunci când a fost sesizată și 584 după, la solicitările instanțelor ca urmare a cererii avocaților infractorilor. Odată o lege modificată, toți inculpații beneficiază de acea modificare, după, dar mulți și retroactiv.

După cum vedeți, numărul deciziilor posteriori este dublu față de cel a priori, ceea ce nu s-ar întâmpla dacă CCR ar citi și aviza toate legile înainte de promulgare, chiar dacă nu a fost sesizată, fiindcă o lege, procesul legislativ sunt de notorietate publică.

Nu știu de Georgescu și nu mi se pare ok după ce am citit zilele astea. Dar CCR i-a făcut o mare nedreptate lui Lasconi și tuturor celor care au mers la vot și României în general anulând complet alegerile, ceea ce nu era de competența CCR. Conform articolului 82 din Constituție CCR are doar atribuția de a valida alegerile.

Puteau să rezolve panica creată de apariția neverosimilă (ceea ce mie îmi ridică semne de întrebare asupra numărătorii voturilor, și aici CCR avea competență să intervină) a lui Georgescu ca și câștigător în turul II la fel ca în cazul lui Șoșoaca și în turul II intra următorul pe lista cu procentaje să candideze cu Lasconi.

Astfel ne-am ales cu cel de-al 11-lea guvern Iohannis și al II-lea Ciolacu, practic menținându-se continuitatea politicii previzibil catastrofală de timp de 34 de ani în România.

Acest act de nedreptate va plana ca un precedent și ca un ton de mare nelegalitate deasupra României.

3:07 My theory "of everything" is not complete because i left outside the open strings.

According to the idea of generating strings by electric charges moving at relativistic speeds, i would assume an open string would be generated by the motion of a charged particle within an electric field like that of an electron between the electrodes in a vacuum tube.

Einstein theory do apply however the trajectory will not be bent due to the maintaining the particle within the electric field thus creating... antigravity? (Maybe opening unsatisfied vortexes?)

At none relativistic speed a moving charged virtual particle would be an electric field line.


3:25 Also doing some searches was intrigued by this shape that looks like a lotus petal or cross section of some corridors within world pyramids however i am not prepared mentally to deal with it right now (i have brought into my main memory everything related strings).

The same for this one.

4:50 What?

4:51 Apropo. Citisem undeva zilele astea despre semne ale insuficienței cardiace. Un semn mai științific ar fi urcarea la altitudine. La 2000 de metri de exemplu, aerul este rarefiat cam la 80% față de nivelul mării. Dacă urcând spre Brașov de exemplu începeți să vă simțiți inconfortabil, întoarceți-vă înapoi și mergeți la medic.

Este nevoie de o circulație mai mare, deci inima să pompeze mai mult pentru a scoate oxigen din plămânii ne-obișnuiți cu aerul rarefiat (capacitate pulmonară mică de șes). Un organism sănătos poate să compenseze imediat prin accelerarea bătăilor inimii (mărirea pulsului) dar în caz de insuficiență cardiacă apare decompensarea cu simptome specifice lipsei de oxigen.

6:40 I think Buddhists interpreted the great text at macro level.

11:30 I am trying to make some sense of of this equation taking into account this enunciation. I don't want to go to forums. Lately (talking about some years now) they give some useful answers only after i find it on my own, but they mix in there all sort of sarcasm and keep comming with solutions even after i said i found it myself. Anyways, it's a free world (in the Western Hemisphere).

So yes, where is the electron's own magnetism fitting in the formula for magnetic field above since i only see the current (linear component of electron's motion in a conductor) in the equation and some constants.

11:34 Hodgson. Everyone on this planet knows the lyrics of this song. "Everyone's a millionaire" and that is about Texas of course. To prove it you can do a search on that phrase and will see google comes up with his song.

You went in there i don't know, at the beginning of the century, in about the same time people like Tesla and Einstein were trying to build a future for us all, bought a piece of land, drilled a few holes and "voila", you were suddenly rich. And that is of course due to Otto.

So yes, when they heard what Tesla said about giving free energy to anyone it would look normal to me if they sabotaged him. Do you remember JR Ewing? People like him had no morality, all they cared about was themselves.

And i know some of the tools they use involve hiring voodoo witches and things like that. Bending the other way around. Things you might not even notice. Until he got mad and could not finish this work.

Einstein was smarter, he stopped before they got to him but who knows exactly. (now wondering what is the pulsation on my neck and how it got there).

In a way is like playing slot machines. You have to know when to stop.

Then Schrodinger and Heisenberg put a seal to it all. But when it becomes an insult to everyone? When trying to understand things like i wrote at 11:30 above.

12:02 AM (24) I think i might have an idea where those bubbles in the insulin reservoir come from.

Every time i use the pen i feel a smell similar to formaldehyde. Then i feel it coming out of my lungs. I believe they use it as a preservative, since you have 28 day to use the pen after you take it out of the fridge. And that preservative is responsible for the bubbles as well.

Nevermind that. It's phenol and m-cresol.

Could it be the one in vials which are like 5 doses each could contain less preservatives?