Showing posts sorted by date for query pair. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query pair. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Infinitesimal Whirls of Prodigious Velocity



Now imagine the space is filled with a superfluid known in the past as AEther, currently as dark matter, made not of Helium atoms like in the video above but of much smaller neutrinos which do not interact with anything except their intrinsic gravity and have a small but non zero mass.

The vortices created in AEther as superfluid could be much smaller and rotate much faster, entering the area of relativity, when the mass increases exponentially with speed and we know in a ideal superfluid the vortices once started they rotate indefinitely.

Could those be what we know as elementary particles and the corresponding interacting forces the known fundamental forces except for gravity? All fundamental particles have quantized mass and spin.

From what we are seeing in sub lambda (superfluid) Helium, the whirls can travel, interact with each other, combine or destroy each other, attach to each other etc., just like particles but obeying the laws of fluid mechanics (applied to superfluids). By example two whirls rotating in the same direction repel each other etc.

Matter energy equivalence would be more obvious than within the known, given, non-intuitive abstract formula.

Also we can sea the reason for quantization. Stable whirls can form only in certain sizes (and speeds).

It is true. For more complicated atoms, it will look like an unmanageable and also possibly impossible to describe tangle. And there is a link with struggling string theory. The rotation of the string like whirls could count for the extra dimensions found necessary by its proponents.

The following image could represent what we currently know as electrons. Though Steven Rado was born and lived in Hungary, the name suggests Serbian or even Romanian origin, like for Nikola Tesla quoted in the title.
Historically the AEther had different conceptualizations. But there is still one type of AEther that at least partly coincides with my theory. The magnetic flux is the literal flow of AEther (but with no vortices).

Within my theory, vortices are the particles and the only field is the AEther pressure gradient corresponding to electric field in mainstream science. 

Magnetic field is nothing but the frictionless flow of AEther. Electric field is the gradient generated by the low pressure near the flow of AEther (Bernoulli). When surrounding an electron it creates a pole of low (static) pressure.


Within my theory light would be a succession of unstable pairs of whirls passing energy from one pair to another (current to next) according to this model in an incredible fast succession. But they will not move at the speed of light, they will only jump from one place to the next at the speed of light.

One of the consequences of particles being made of whirls is if you try to accelerate them there will be an opposition because they are of course rotating (at very high speed), opposition we may call inertia.

But you will never be able to accelerate them at the speed of light of course because they are rotating and parts of them will have to move faster than light. Unless they align with the rotation axe parallel to the direction of motion but you can't do that with solid, macro objects.

Only a small fraction of Helium superfluid turns to whirls in a bowl or rotating sub lambda Helium. On a BIG scale like the Universe, only a small fraction of AEther had turned to vortices.

Some noticed there is very little antimatter in the Universe and i assume because the Universe is turning slowly of course in one direction only. We can also find it in unstable form in every photon. Dark energy of course is the rotating energy of the whole carousel.

Talking about matter anti-matter (symmetry). From the electron donut model proposed above we cannot see any possibility of a symmetrical counterpart because it is completely balanced.

So we need to add an extra movement (we are now in the world of dynamic particles where everything is made of motion) like the one seen in the static image (before clicking) in the first video. In there the spiral around the theroid is not actually part of it.

But a few days ago, just after i found Steven Rado's book linked twice above, i ran into something very interesting. A post doctoral researcher in a Greek University made some animations about 4 years ago, after much reasoning using terms of current accepted theories combined with his own intuition and pseudo science.

All i know it is just a different attempt to theorize dynamic particles and it fits what i have in mind right now. Here it is. He calls it electron geometric magnetic flux dynamic model. In the meantime his email address at the university is gone and he is not answering emails on the other address at gmail.

The whirls show intuitively a... shall i call it a spiral in a circumferential reference frame. It can be left and right.

But i was  thinking. If the magnetic field (flux whatever) is a flow of AEther this means it creates(wraps) a... should i call it, electric current on the circumference of torus, (if we only could speak of electric currents inside an electron) which in turn creates the NS axial magnetic field so in fact we can see now why the magnetic field and electric currents are inseparable. Also defines the spin up and down of an electron.

So in the end this asymmetry does not lead to an anti-electron but just to the spin up spin down electrons. But it could help us to make the next step. That is understanding what is electric charge.

Maybe i should try and finish Rado's book. But from what i've seen so far, he thinks all particles are sinks. Which means we need an extra dimension where the AEther goes (and comes back in positively charged particles).

By looking at the (mind bending) animation below i have the following intuition. Whatever electric current that creates the axial magnetic field inside the torus might radiate in the outside world creating an electric field or maybe a very slow moving widely spread electric current in the opposite direction from the one that creates the magnetic field.
  

But if we go back to fluid mechanics, we may think the electron is actually vacuuming AEther from surroundings an expels it through the axis and the pressure gradient created is the electric field.

When they attract each other, they also align like beads on a string on the high speed flow of AEther possibly relativistic in the center forming clusters, like seen in the first static image above or the second video.

Sunday, November 9, 2025

November 9

12:40 If this was true my closed circuit relativist drive should work too.

While searching for the origin of the Lorentz factor equation, i discovered other things though. It derived from the hypothetical exitance of AEther which was supposed to be a incompressible frictionless probably immaterial fluid filling all space, and an amazing forgotten theory about atoms being vortices of AEther in which great names of most physicists in that time are linked to, which strikingly resembles today's strings theory which is applied to elementary paticles though. 

That beautiful theory was killed by the discovery of electron as separate entity from the atom, other things. Many more elementary particles were discovered after.

In which case my proposed theory is deriving from that one i didn't know about or vortices made atoms only applied one level down to elementary particles (strings) which are not unidimensional but made of vortices of  frictionless AEther, which AEther could be made of the smallest (muon) neutrinos.

The propagation of light is not waves in AEther similar to those in elastic media but unstable AEther vortices moving ot transferring from one place to another like in this animation and all fundamental forces are given by variations of pressure in AEther near and far caused by vortices.

One first step in proving this theory is the existence of spins of particles like electrons which are half made of photons of which speed (at periphery?) is the speed of light. Other calculations show 292 times the speed of light.

In the hypothesis all particles are vortices are vortices with a (linear) rotation speed comparable to the speed of light, the mass of particles withing the vortex may come with applying the Lorentz factor or in other words relativistic. The reason of matter is energy is because matter is made of vortices (whirls) at relativist velocities.

Minimal energy for an electron to be produced in pair production is half of 1.022 or 0.511. MeV. If one photon has more energy, after splitting the rest is converted in kinetic energy. That is the only energy at which an electron can exist. According to my model that is the energy in which an electron can exist in both toroidal and rotational hyperboloid.

Within a photon the unstable double vortex, the electron and positron do not have their closed toroidal shape until they split, but rather open ended rotation hyperboloids.

8:45 One of the most common models for electron within today's struggling string theory was actually produced by Lord Kelvin himself, according to this paper.

My proposed model for the photon is an unstable (oscillating), always transitional rotation hyperboloid vortex.

During pair production the photon with enough energy (1021 MeV) splits into an electron and positron of which only difference is charge. We can conclude the two cups (branches) of the rotation hyperboloid turn in two different direction, and after split into two tori. However it is unclear how the torus rotates, like in the diagram above or like those torus vortices seen in nature or both.

Though moving in the air witch cause friction and ultimately breaking down because of it, the torus vortices are stable and in a frictionless environment they could last indefinetely.

Shiva's drum. It is not a secret i created my photon model following the shape of Shiva's little drum. which could symbolize pair production. When a photon with enough energy hits an obstacle, the hyperboloid splits and turn to two tori.

A combination of rotating hyperboloid transitioning continuously into a torus (and then continuously dissipating) is seen in this video, though is created by gravity and fed continuously by chemical combustion turned into heat. For illustration only.
 
And yes if particles are vortices in AEther they of course are not punctiform and their position cannot be localized as such, until they produce an effect and eventually dissipate.

9:45 Just realized spell checking was turned off for everything i wrote in the last few days or maybe weeks.

Monday, February 10, 2025

February 10

2:25 AM Sounds like my theory, with different words. The large-scale coherent effects of the spin of the particles in the virtual sea versus whirls in the frictionless AEther (probably made of electron neutrinos).
As for the two halves of the fast rotating hyperboloids. Don't know yet how they're created but i know it's got to be more than the fall of an electron to a different energy level. One idea would be one electrons pairs with a positron that comes from nucleus after an excitation. Another could be one electron exists as bigger whirl and splits in half, leaving the rest ionized.

But i know how it moves (jumps) forward and it moves fast. There are only two narrow streams of AEther at the joint, one for each half (electron/positron) that transfer fast moving AEther to the next perpendicular unrolling/rolling like reels (2x2).

As soon as one pair of whirls disappears the static pressure of the AEther takes place creating a shock wave, pushing the new one forward in the joint area creating two other whirls on a perpendicular direction, which takes angular momentum from touching the first.

12:46 PM M-am gândit pentru o secundă două, m-am luat cu alte chestii și am uitat să postez. Se putea afla ieri cât de mulți clienți au fost la supermarket-uri printr-o simplă căutare google. Acum google afișează (în dreapta, mai jos) gradul de ocupare a unui loc comercial, folosind datele GPS din telefoane.

12:55 PM Oamenii ar trebui să nu se mai chinuie să inventeze roata de atâtea ori la rând. Există anumite simboluri, obiecte de cult care poartă informaÈ›ii despre È™tiinÈ›a È™i tehnologia unor vremuri apuse. Unul dintre acestea este caduceul, un simbol asociat cu zeul Mercur care a devenit simbolul farmaciÈ™tilor dar È™i al comercianÈ›ilor. ÃŽnsă dacă ne uităm atent, vedem două aripi È™i doi È™erpi.

Șarpele prin felul în care înaintează pare să sfideze legile fizicii. Mercurul este un fluid greu. Aripile simbolizează zborul.

Eu am propus de mult un motor cu circuit închis, l-am numit relativistic. Un fluid, care ar putea fi vapori de mercur Ã®ncărcaÈ›i electrostatic este accelerat într-o direcÈ›ie la viteze relativiste (bățul din mijloc), unde masa lor creÈ™te È™i returnat pe alt ciuruit la viteze axiale nerelativiste (È™erpii), generând un moment net.

Asta ar elimina nevoia de a căra rezervoare de combustibil pe care să-l arunci în spațiu.

Varianta electronică.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

January 30

1:25 AM Vectors v6 turned paraboloids. This version allowing two full whirls in existence at at time would better explain pair production. Should now try and build a version with hyperbolae instead of parables because hyperbola is asymptotic and would explain better transfer between whirls.

9:50 Am văzut o dare de seamă pe buget pe anul trecut. ÃŽn unele locuri pensionarii sunt numiÈ›i în continuare asistaÈ›i sociali.

Pensiile sunt acoperite aproape integral din contribuÈ›ii CAS de pe fluturaÈ™i.

InvestiÈ›ii, 120 +57 miliarde de lei, adică 35 miliarde de euro? cu 35 miliarde euro faci 1750 km autostradă la 20 milioane pe km. Un spital mare costă sub un miliard de euro.

Vrem  lista cheltuieli investiÈ›ii pe ministere È™i proiecte.

11:38 Rusia discută cu Trump, nu cu paraziții europeni.

11:55 After one hour in full swing, she left about 15 minutes ago. A monstrous bass started outside.

8:45 Four travelling hyperboloids.

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

January 29

7:02 All the math i could remember flashed in front of my eyes last night, but i've done it (the basis for my final model). In the meantime, i realized the model could be something else i haven't thought of it yet.

Got a question. How people could understand math in the past without desmos (or something similar like Geogebra, etc..)

7:50 It moves on slider l on z axis for now but it works. It's slow and jittery even on my octo core mini PC because there are a lot of calculations to be done. I believe it could be optimized by reusing some of the calculations but that is not my purpose today.

12:10 PM But again this version does not allow any asymmetry for polarization.

Also the real hologram on the left suggests there is a phase difference between the whirls. Could be advancement with rotation? (Coming (maybe not so) soon, have to move it in cylindrical coordinates).

Electric fields of electron and positron whirls is given by the AEther pressure gradient caused by the enormous speed of the whirls and magnetic field would be a stream of AEther attracted at periphery and expelled through the middle. Being frictionless, there is no transfer of energy on a closed circuit AEther stream.

AEther pressure holds the 4 components of the photon together.

Gravity would stand for lower pressure inside every whirls that make up the Universe.

Whirls rotating in opposite directions attract each other and those rotating in the same direction repel however, when they rotate at 90 degrees, it's either way.

If i the photon enters a magnetic field (a stream of neutrinos or AEther) it will start to rotate until it breaks in the components with them merging from 4 into 2 swirls that start rotating in opposite directions creating the so called pair production. AEther itself is polarized which means it has a pressure. Due to this, electron whirls pump less AEther than positron ones hence an asymmetry for explaining polarization.

So yeah, instead of having one million crazy theories, formulas and interpretations (and approximations) each to explain anomalies in the pervious as it is in quantum physics right now, you would have one crazy interpretation and the rest is our classic (super)fluid mechanics...

12:20 Whirls in the news.

5:45 when i added this to that entry a very loud exhaust started to rumble outside. As the engine heated a little, the rpm went lower and the sound diminished. However it's still there and i think is the black GMW. It left after i wrote.

Though there is no left hand rule for magnetic field, in this image Tesla seems to point the thumb to himself and wrap his fingers, with hairdo figuring the asymmetrical pair production which is proof of the existence of positive pressure (polarized) AEther.

Saturday, January 25, 2025

January 26

4:35 AM According to standard model the smallest known particle is the muon neutrino, with a mass of 0.17 eV. All the other masses are measured in either MeV (mega electron volts) or GeV (giga electron volts) which is million or billion times bigger. At this point i propose AEther is made of neutrinos. They have a tiny mass, millions of times smaller than next bigger particle, no charge and a 1/2 spin. Ideal candidate.

A stream of neutrino could stand for a magnetic field where their spins could be aligned.

When a high energy photon enters a stream of neutrinos, it will get knocked out in its components, an electron and a positron which are whirls rotating in opposite directions and will start circling in opposite directions when in vacuum and spiraling in the cloud chamber.

From what i saw, the positron is bigger than the electron resulted in pair production and that cold as well be caused by the spin of neutrinos.

Don't know yet if the photon is made of one or two hourglass shaped pair of particles in a cross pattern and if they oscillate, transferring AEther from one another but is the only way it could happen if they move on a direction perpendicular on the hourglasses axis because otherwise the photon will start spiraling. As for what makes them oscillate, could be fluid mechanics laws applied for frictionless AEther and it could appear as they are dynamically attracted by their own past selves.

9:47 Yeah should have avoided any exotic ideas like past selves, creating time, things like this. As i went to bed last night i finally got the idea, however was too tired to come back at the computer and write it down.

I don't believe anymore they oscillate or pulsate or anything. The Polish hologram seem to be accurate.

What is holding those four funnels together preventing them from growing to infinity is the pressure of the AEther, made of neutrinos. Which then could mean the AEther fills uniformly the whole known space. Photons cannot exist without it. This goes against the Big Bang theory.

So in a way the were right talking about luminiferous AEther. However i feel a bit nervous about countless neutrinos and muouns passing through my body all the time. But i believe other cosmic rays are doing more damage then those, giving me this terrible headache this morning.

Let's read one more time what the Bible says about Ezekiel's wheel.

Perpendicular Scalar Compression? Photons do not travel? This comes close to my first representation however those vectors are pulsating funnels and the "hologram" caught an image covering a whole period with all 4 funnels at their peak.

Two funnels in existence at any moment. The photon could be split into an electron and a positron when the funnels are equal enters the magnetic field. The positron gets bigger by accumulating more neutrinos that turn in opposite direction as whirl of opposite spin attract?

I don't see any negative spin in the standard model table though.

BTW the table is big and the number of particles we figured so far is small (Art is long and time is short).

3:10 I thought i saw that before! (Too late in Paris)


4:55 A boundary condition may occur when AEther pressure meets whilrs, like in the case of photons. Here is a more complex or maybe hypothetic particle.



Friday, January 24, 2025

January 24

7:50 AM I have a hunch this sculpture represents the electron in its excited state in the middle as a cylindrical whirl and the hourglass shaped chairs around are photons. The world for table in Romanian is masa, which is also used in physics for mass (like in French mass or English mass).

I am considering the hypothesis that inside the vortex an electron is made of there is a quantum singularity or void (no AEther) where AEther can fall into and the main energy of the whirl is not created but only its spin is oriented by a Coriolis force. The energy of the whirl is created by AEther falling into that void which means the Universe is trying to heal itself from that careless disturbance.

However the whirl can be shook by thermal agitation or knocked by other particles around and thus emits photons which are smaller whirls. So yeah, i believe the photon emission can be used as a source of energy.

The analogous whirls in superfluids can't create a singularity because they're moving to slow for that.

Theoretically an isolated electron cannot emit photons. Do we see here photons emitted by electrons in motion inside the tube or by electrons hitting the glass? What do you think? Which reminds me. Could the four discs represent the KLMN shells, the djed (pillar, base) a whirl, the ank a lobe and the serpent, a photon? 

Which photon is presented as a snake, suggesting a wave. Probably where all physicist took from at the beginning of past century. 

5:25 So far o have identified the magnetic field as a stream of AEther, coming out of whirls in similar way air is coming out of cyclones, possible residual from Aether entering a singularity in the middle of a particle (whirl) moving at relatively slow speeds.

If one photon is made of two whirls in the shape of an hourglass, one negative and one positive, possibly oscillating between the two (too small to have a singularity), when entering a stream of AEther, the two will separate and start circling in that stream of AEther following mechanic fluid laws like in pair production.

Because of air and alcohol particles in cloud chamber, the two will start loosing energy and their trajectory will turn into a spiral.

What i do not understand in classical pair production is how come the positron does not disappear when in contact with the cloud components. Could it be because it's too small and too fast rotating?

Thursday, January 16, 2025

January 16

1:25 Dulce Bucovină... La fel ca în cazul desenelor din nisip ale călugărilor tibetani, în cazul ouălor din Bucovina după milenii a intervenit fantezia pictorilor... Dar unele motive sunt constante și de asemenea sugestive.

1:40 James David Vance

2:00 AM Just unpublished and will re-write entirely my Theory of Everything based on this statement.

A photon is made of 4 conic AEther whirls rotating in opposite directions next to each other on two axis perpendicular on each other and transversal to direction of movement, moving through space frictionless, in a way similar to a smoke ring.

The speed of a photon against the stationary AEther is limited to a fraction of the the peripheral rotation speed of the whirls which is limited by the centrifuge force.

2:25 În urma elucidării adevăratelor circumstanțe ale semnării de către Ciolacu a falsului tratat de la Budapesta (Ciolacu nu are calitatea constituțională de a semna tratate externe, asta este un atribut al Președintelui României, semnare urmată de ratificarea Parlamentului), ei au rescris din volei alegerile și au făcut loc acestui personaj, Georgescu (care printre altele imită numele meu).

El va lătra până la vară, comentând la miÈ™to sau apărând în alegorii, menite să creeze confuzie asupra tot ce scriu eu sau în general tot ce se întâmplă, când se va sătura toată lumea È™i va fi retras probabil printr-o gafă irecuperabilă È™i pe veci memorabilă, ca multele din istoria post 89, pentru a face loc clovnilor (des)prăfuiÈ›i ai sistemului.

2:40 One question to which google did not know the answer. Could shock waves add energy to matter, creating excitation and a peak in spontaneous decay.

9:40 In this version of my theory mass could be created by the speed of aether. When only rotating, not moving linearly or at relativistic speeds, mass would appear stationary and constant. When moving, would follow the special relativity equation, suggesting there is some resistance of aether to movement of the whirls.

Or it could be aether has mass or only relativistic mass and the whirls create areas of depression, concentrating aether. The faster they move linearly, the more aether they absorb and their size and mass grows.

Again inertia could be explained by growth of mass at non-relativistic speed.

Photons would exist at a point of equilibrium between attraction of the four components due to low pressure, rotation speed and linear speed.

[I postponed the research in this direction for a few days needed to catch my breath, however i am forced to do it because some threat and punish me for this, can't really talk about (one revolution a day, wouldn't that be enough for them?)

So i did not have enough time to come with any proof of the above, other than "it must be that way" which is equivalent to the reasoning behind Special Relativity which is only an enunciation, a datum or a dogma with no explanations behind period.]

So the low pressure whirls would act like an aether vacuum, and then transferring its surplus to the high pressure one, in the case of light. In case of "ordinary matter" we only have low pressure whirls, cause antimatter or high pressure whirls is rare in this Universe.

Being made of matter and antimatter in the same time (the pair production is the proof) make light not absorb aether and thus moving faster than anything.

Electrostatic force would be repelling of two whirls with opposite rotation direction and gravity attraction of all negative pressure whirls towards AEther.

11:54 Nu știu dacă Călin Georgescu Călin a observat, dar avem deja unul.

12:00 Așa cum am scris de mai multe ori, când scriu și eu ceva mai de Doamne-ajută, avioanele se ridică de la sol.

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

January 15

12:15 AM Was meditating after seeing a cover of a Romanian online humoristic magazine.

Yes turning mass into energy on a massive scale could spell trouble. By destroying and harnessing the infinitesimal whirls moving at prodigious velocities you could create ripples in space time continumm with unpredictable results.

But this is already happening in the current reactors, though harnessing only the so called mass deffect, with lesser efficiency and greater risks to environment. As for why the lobes in Schrodinger's theory do not look exactly like swirls, well, their equations are not those of swirls and nobody took their holograms yet. Until now, they thought they were something else.

12:45 PM Today markets are rejoicing at 1.83 percent on "inflation data". My guess is more about oil and the fact ever time i mention aliens in one of my posts on a serious note the market is up more than 1% the next day. Or my mentions about the selling of new vehicles in the US.

I tried to explain in the past and i see it in the market movements. People are driven by emotions that soon turn into beliefs. How else could we explain the long grief of a good looking president that others think it was the worst?

Here is another attempt to plot a correlation between inflation and stock market. It's hard cause i cannot find easily inflation charts. I believe one can see easily the market is leading or is a bit ahead.

From that hole or near zero in early 2020 inflation rose to a max on this chart of maybe 3.8% while the stock market doubled to about 100% on the same period which means the rate of correlation is 3.8/100.

So if the market went up 1.8% today it means inflation went up 1.8*3.8/100=0.068% while the average per day CPI increase for the month of December was 0.3/22 = 0.014
1:30 I was staring at the charts above wondering what have possibly brought inflation up from that "hole" in the middle of the chart when it was near 0 when i saw the words "Fed's target goal 2%". Why Fed's goal would be 2% and not 0%?

Then on a hunch i went to search for a Fed's rate chart and guess what. With Fed Interest left to 0 the inflation first dropped to 0 went way up above the "target rate" of 2% and started to go down only after massive Fed interest ("Fund rate") increases.

It looks to me like (implying they are benevolent) that they are guessing and don't understand how this works as well.

6:35 Trouble is the correlation ended by the time those charts end. Which could mean one thing. They changed the way the calculate CPI or they put it temporarily on hold by using artificial means since they control everything. Especially since that time period i wrote about that.

Also. Do you believe stock market follows the inflation or is the other way around? CPI is calculated by the end of each month and there is no way the traders know it daily as the charts above suggest. I believe is (was) a purely automated link not controlled  by anybody and the market was driving it not the other way around.

7:10 It looks like thought the recent months i started to focus on structures of tiny things like photons, electrons, outer shells, i missed something really important i ran into last night. The Dacian shields. Most likely back then people were displaying these things to inspire fear to their enemies cause they all knew what they meant.

So yeah, could they have had knowledge that was slowly diluting over millennia, following some civilization extinction event, like the great flood, etc..

According to the shield, the lobes are empty shells which makes sense because it would be basically a closed whirl, unlike the light whirls that are open, like an ice cream cones ore the helmets below.

Lobes are closed because they were attracted by the central charge. There are numerous other symbols on the shield, of which some could represent pair production. The "umbilical chord" in the middle of the lobes could represent some structure inside the fast rotating lobe?

The scale could they represent individual whirls like (1/4 parts of) photons?

Other structures like pair production but maybe protons, also like whirls, inside the circle under the lobes. A whole factory made of strings made of whirls that reminds of... cells inside our bodies.

In other words, a wealth of information. Something we could not have been able to pull together for another 1000 years or most likely, never.

Compare with Tibetan sand madalas

7:52 What else we have from Dacians? I heard froms school but never saw the thing or an HD image of it. This is way above Egyptian technology, Roman technology at the time or any other technology until modern days.

10:56 Anything but the truth.

Got tired of searching the original Greek text where Herodotus said Dacians where the most righteous and brave of the Thracians, but i believe the original text said dextrous not righteous which is also their name. In Sanskrit so they must have spoken Sanskrit.

Monday, January 6, 2025

January 6

12:45 AM According to the diagram and formula of relativistic speed, there is not a clear point of when a speed becomes relativistic or when a virtual particle comes into existence.

The relativistic mass of an electron "falling" to a lower energy level basically begins when the electron starts to be accelerated.

Thing is, due to rotation of an electron around a central charge, the initial and final fall speed are different than zero, on the direction of the fall and they continue to rotate around the charge before and after the fall, thus creating some infinitesimal initial or residual void reactions and those follow the photon in its path and could count for the losses as they may interfere with others, effectively tangling the void, creating the AEther.

Because of this, the process of transfer of energy from one virtual particle to another within the photon is not 100% efficient. This may count for loss of energy during this transfer and the red shifting of distant sources of light. Where does that energy go? possibly in the void?

In fact if i think i realize that even if a photon is not emitted, the orbiting electrons may create signatures in the void which may slow their rotation, possibly falling to a lower energy level from where some other electron is kicked back after acquiring some energy that in the end could come from thermal agitation.

This could be the reason of decaying of some particles or assembles of particles depending on configurations.

9:08 De ce instituÈ›iile de sondaj nu i-au dat lui Georgescu nici o È™ansă în turul I? Cum a fost posibil ca un candidat de care nu a auzit nimeni, nici măcar eu care urmăresc politica din România mai tot timpul, fiind clasat de sondaje pe locul 6 să iasă pe primul loc?

9:35 According to my theory (Dynamic Strings), AEther is not a medium of propagation for light but a tangle of infinitesimal electrical and gravitational disturbances, filling the void, opposing the motion of anything, possibly causing the limitation to speed of light, red shift of distance sources and "spontaneous" "probabilistic" decaying of particles and elements. Could this be the hypothetical dark matter.

Yes according to this, the "ordinary matter" (or energy whatever) is constantly leaking into dark matter, which in turn it is leaking into something else, but at a much slower rate.

Also the void creates the AEther as a sort of memory for everything that has ever moved in this Universe.

But don't worry, everything, matter, dark matter is cleaned by the black holes, the vacuum cleaners of the Universe. However it will be a long time until all black holes will  merge into a single one, and all the disturbances will melt back into the void.

9:40 Within the post with my theory of everything there is a statement saying that strings may swell with motion, especially at relativistic speeds, by accumulating energy. Now imagine an electron, which we now know is a circular closed string made of a negative virtual particle and a graviton chasing each other being accelerated while "falling" to a lower energy level.

Its virtual particle trajectory (and that of the accompanying graviton0 will look pretty much like this, right? So the virtual particle of positive sign generated by the void that continues to replicate self into a negative one etc..

Which may finally explain the 4 laurel leaves of Grinell College Seal most likely symbolically representing a photon. So it's just a bit more complicated that my minimalist representation linked on the right but it may account for the pair production.

11:12 Which may also count for one of the symbols seen on masonic aprons called the behive (here, 42).

It stand for industry and it may also represent a silk cocoon or a lotus petal. However there are many symbols on this apron that may symbolically represent light, like the 4 pillars, the main masonic sign, square and compass, sprig leaves etc.. Too bad we cannot see in the image all the explanations.

2:40 A charged virtual particle on a circular (or helicoidal) trajectory will create a copy of itself, moving in a plane at 90 degrees, of an opposite charge. Pretty much like in this image. Question. How the illustrator knew?

Thursday, December 26, 2024

December 26


9:48 Talking about electron-positron pair production, just remembered something. Something i always was intrigued with in Lake Oswego. The logo of the Mountain Park area, in two different versions and i thought it could represent the volcano which is actually the Mountain of the Mountain Park, where yes, PCC Sylvania is located. Re-creation center?

3:55 PM Ok was in a hurry and made a mistake by misreading this statement.

Bur i am still following this idea. What happens when a particle gets very close to the speed of light and according to Einstein, threatens to fill the whole Universe with its mass? Do they have experiments to prove it?

BTW At what speed an electron and a positron come out of pair production? Very close to the speed of light they say. But if we apply trigonometry to this image, we get electrons moving much slower.
What happens to the conservation of mass and momentum, since both electrons and positrons are much heavier then photons (it is said photons do not have mass but have momentum)? All of the photon's energy will turn to mass, but that mass is speeding (near the speed of light), a momentum will appear, out of nothing.

Can we count to a near punctiform electric field to instantly? accelerate those two masses, one charged positively and one negatively at near the speed of light? What happens to their trajectory when moving in that charge's electric field? We see the whole process occur in the cloud chamber. Where is that completely stripped of electrons ionized charge come from to conserve momentum?

Also. The electron trajectory in an electric field is circular only if the angle it comes at is perpendicular to the field. They probably got lucky taking the image above.

BTW Lorentz force breaks the action-reaction principle Centrifugal force is not represented in any of the representations.

Let's say we build an electrostatic sling shot with two objects, one much heavier, both charged electrically. Upon release, the lighter particle will accelerate but the large one will have a recoil, proportional to the weight ratio. (Nothing is negligible in quantum).

8:20 So it can. If everybody gets lucky enough to pass among orbiting electrons, the electric field gradient of of the central mass could separate the two virtual particles from the photon, change direction from transversal to longitudinal and the prodigious rotation with asymmetries at the surface can accelerate them to near the speed of light while the magnetic field in the cloud chamber does the rest.

Looks too complicated and the rotation speed of billions of billions rotations per second could know the photon away.

Maybe the magnetic field does it all and there is no need for nucleus as the two virtual particles already have a longitudinal component (not well represented here) close to the speed of light.
 

11:30 This image confirms what i just stated about the two components of light, a virtual electron and a virtual photon being flattened out which means two particle both move now longitudinal and with an added energy becoming stable electrons.
And my thought goes again to dharmachakra that has 8 spokes, of which four charged, with relativistic mass, moving in a cross pattern of which only two exist at a time and probably gravitons moving on the other cross pattern of the chakra not at 45 degrees but on the same direction, in opposition with the virtual charged particles, to balance them.

Maybe they are represented at 45 degrees because there was no other way to represent them in a symbol that was supposed to transcend millennia or until people will regain enough knowledge to understand them.

With three colors swirling in the middle, pretty much like in the icon of google chrome, with a color for each component, a virtual electron, positron and a graviton. However in string theories it is also stated that a graviton does not exist alone but is massless chargeless entity that exist within all closed loops strings of which the electron is one.

According to hRdaya sUtra, gravitons could be temporary holes in the space time left behind by the moving virtual particles at relativistic speeds.

Could it be both virtual particles in existence within the photon moving at relativistic speed are closed by the magnetic field in a circle pattern with the gravitons chasing the particles, this being the energy to matter transfer phase phase before they become independent of each other, moving ahead at near the speed of light, borrowing energy from the rotation of that nucleus (so they are seen in the cloud chamber, otherwise would just float around at non relativistic speed.

I believe in nature there are enough places with a magnetic field strong enough to separate the virtual particles of a photon into a pair of one electron and one positron.

At the scale of the size of an electron there are no fog or air particle to interfere with their speed or turning their trajectory into a decaying spiral.

The two particles created by the splitting of a photon are electrons if the light is polarized in the direction of the magnetic field. If not, other weirder particles may be created with shapes like spirals, fish like spirals, etc..

Quarks cannot exist individually and have fractional charges and the reason is they have virtual electrons and positrons in common as are said to be bound by the strong force to create protons similar to how in molecules electrons are used in common.