Nu ministerele hotărăsc salariile angajaților, ci doar Parlamentul, prin legile bugetelor care pentru anul 2025 au fost contrasemnate chiar de Bolojan, pe atunci Președinte al Senatului.
Iată aici un exemplu, mai multe puteți găsi în această foaie de calcul, care are link permanent pe blogul meu principal (acesta). În această secțiune din Anexa 3 la Legea Bugetului de Stat unde se stabilește bugetul Ministerului Educației de la începutul anului este precizată și suma pentru salarii (cheltuieli personal).
Aceste sume nu ajung însă la ministere, care de fapt nu au nici o contabilitate. Există la Ministerul Educației un document care seamănă cu o dare de seamă contabilă cumulativă la sfârșitul fiecărei luni (raport de execuție bugetară) se pare tipizat (COFOG3) dar sumele pe venituri și cheltuieli sunt aproximativ la mai puțin de jumătate (10,7 miliarde la sfârșit de octombrie, din 35 alocate la buget). Ca să nu mai vorbesc de suma totală de 65 miliarde alocată acestui minister. În rest nu am găsit nimic la nici un alt minister.
Valoarea deficitului se (ante)calculează din legile bugetelor, adică de la începutul anului, însă aceste sume nu ajung nici pe jumătate la ministere(le care au aceste dări de seamă). La celelalte, nu știm nimic.
1:35 PM Last night i saw the first and probably last episode of For all Mankind that started painfully with a hypothetical first Moon landing by the Soviets. No i don't believe they theoretically would have had the resources and the will to do that as i don't believe anybody has ever been there. What was interesting was the reaction of Americans when watching on TV the landing, first step, etc..
Have you ever wondered how come the Soviets which started as an overwhelming agricultural economy built so fast high quality buildings, generally multi story concrete made condos, to give free housing for all?
One of the reason is they saw German projects and probably had blue prints, like for most anything they have done after war, including fighter jets, rockets, machinery, etc.. Another reason was they were working all together, not worrying about keeping a workplace, or the thing called "job security" in the US. Also because they were all peasant which did not have any (industrial) workplace culture at all.
Another was the involvement of big American corporations like GE.
Did that lead to stagnation? Too many people to feed, too few willing or capable to improve.
Not to talk about the Chinese phenomenon that happens nowadays though it still raises (bitter) smiles for the naivety of many of their designed and sold products with which they will one day overwhelm the US industry and drive it to bankruptcy as i don't see any other reason they sell at those prices (yes on Amazon, another giant that probably has the same undeclared purpose).
In my opinion there is an enormous loss of resources due to false work place competition that in the US became a whole culture, with "job security" as a main focus, when one keeps everything he knows for himself, keeping communication laconic (or succinct) so it won't create more competition and possible replacement.
Some say workplace competition leads to innovation, i say rather not. Innovation rarely occurs in established, engineered manufacturing processed starting from employees. Quoting the fact they don't have the time and energy and motivation to do that. The managers won't encourage it as it would "make them look bad".
And yes i believe that some day people would be replaced by robots, making work optional will, instead of going to gym, would use optional work as a physical and mental exercise, challenging only selves, in a highly ethical and understanding society.
BTW his hand is not seen when he touches the ground with his forehead and jacket, the moment of the biggest necessary acceleration.
4:40 Alexandru Nazare








