Twin Towers Fall

As all hell broke loose today in the media, a myriad of subtle allusions that seem to top many things i've said, the clearest idea just came to mind. First, a question and an answer from Google.

"One World Trade Center and Two World Trade Center, commonly the Twin Towers, the idea of which was brought up by Minoru Yamasaki, were designed as framed tube structures, which provided tenants with open floor plans, uninterrupted by columns or walls. They were the main buildings of the World Trade Center."

And a link to a Google search. Surprisingly, most of the images are misleading, suggesting the load on the outer columns was minimal. They were some interior columns mainly for elevators and air shafts, taking maybe last than a quart of the load.

In a way is similar to the design of unibody cars which have no chassis but a frame made of sheet metal. There are advantages and disadvantages of cars without a chassis. I've once been hit from behind waiting in my truck at an intersection by a small but heavy Nissan Z built similarly to Porsches that is with a heavy chassis. Chassis hitting another chassis both with massive, steel bumpers made my mandible and bones in my spine move a bit from their normal positions which hurt for weeks after. Luckily though i had my foot pressing pretty hard on the break pedal when it happened and i was not pushed in traffic at that intersection. Also, minimal, almost invisible damage to both cars.

If i was in a unibody car, the frame would have bent and suffered damage while the shock would have been minimal.

As i said yesterday as i vaguely remembered reading it a long time ago, the WTC twin towers where designed by the American architect of Japanese descent Minoru Yamasaki in an innovative fashion for skyscrapers at that time. He was given the task after winning a contest against more famous architects. Today i checked and my memory was right.

Towers, instead of having massive columns inside, they were built more like a unibody car or wide bodied plane or most expressively said, like a can. All the resistance was at the outer walls, leaving
more freedom for floor plans.

How innovative this type of design was?

"Tube structures cut down costs, at the same time allow buildings to reach greater heights. Tube-frame construction was first used in the DeWitt-Chestnut Apartment Building, designed by Khan and completed in Chicago in 1963.[4] It was used soon after for the John Hancock Center and in the construction of the World Trade Center."

Among the requirements the towers should have withstood 80 mph winds and an impact of the biggest plane at the time. Probably like all the others.

But there is one difference between the previous and even following tubular structure design of tall building making the WTC design even more innovative. The size of the outer beams. On the same cross section, the load was divided on thinner, more numerous beams, 1 meter apart each. That made them more prone to breaking when the plane crashed through them and more vulnerable to heating by fire.

On September 11 2001 two planes full of kerosene after just taking off hit each tower.

What freedom means for floor plans? Lack of walls allows installing vast areas with cubicles which allowed the fuel from the shredded planes to soak the carpet and furniture and air go get in all the way to the core to feed the fires where about 1/4 of the vertical load of the building lays upon.

Kerosene is a type of fuel that comes out of the distilling process of oil at a temperature between gasoline and diesel. Lighter than diesel fuel, it has more carbon or more energy packed per gallon than gasoline.


Here is a diagram out of the web of continuous oil distillation process.

Heated oil is pumped continuously inside the column and fuels separate by weight and come out continuously from those pipes. The temperature inside the distillation column is higher at the bottom and lower at top to keep the heavier fractions flowing. The fuel fractions separate by weight of the fraction, the more hydrogen and less carbon content of each hydrocarbon fuel fraction distilled, the higher in the distillation tower.

I brought this up because burning carbon gives you more energy per each individual molecules combined than hydrogen. The heavier the fuel, also the more energy per weight it packs. From this point of view kerosene is close to diesel, that is a more energy carrying fuel than gasoline.

I has been speculated a lot on the web about burning temperature of kerosene being lower than melting temperature of iron.

But does kerosene have a precise burning temperature?

Everybody who has ever seen somebody welding with a torch fed with acetylene knows that temperature or volume of flame can both be adjusted. The more oxygen you give to the flame, the higher the temperature.

Now that i think i started to realize there is not a precise burning temperature for anything. What is burning. Combining oxygen and hydrocarbons. Each hydrogen molecule that combines with carbon and hydrogen gives a precise amount of energy, not temperature. Temperature in a fire is dictated by the volume of the burning involved. The more oxygen you have or better said the closer to ideal the mix, the higher the temperature.

"It is unfortunately not too rare to find that fire investigators estimate flame temperatures by looking up a handbook value, which turns out to the adiabatic flame temperature. Statements are then made about whether some materials could have melted, softened, lost strength, etc., based on comparing such a flame temperature against the material's melting point, etc. The purpose of this short paper is to point out the fallacies of doing this, and to present some more appropriate information for a more realistic assessment."

https://www.doctorfire.com/flametmp.html

In a typical open fire you will have burning only at surface surrounding the fuel. That is because oxygen is all being consumed at the surface and cannot reach inside because of the dynamics of hot gas or plasma moving and preventing it from reaching inside and because of being spent there. That's why all the blacksmiths since the beginning of iron age invented and use the bellows.

They also use porous carbon rich coal made of wood that allows air to flow inside their volume after eliminating hydrogen and water from it usually by partially burning it in a low oxygen environment like in sand at high temperature.



They blow air with the bellows like in this video for reaching high temperatures necessary to forge the iron, usually above 771 Celsius or 1420 Farenheit when the iron starts to soften by changing to a different allotropic state, from body-centered cubic (BCC), most resistant (same with diamond) to a face-centered cubic (FCC) which allows movement or slip of crystals on slip planes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slip_(materials_science)

https://www.google.com/search?q=iron+beta+allotropic+temperature

But way before that happens there is another phenomenon happening.

During fabrication of beams through cold roling the steel like any metal hardens (before breaking). This hardening through lamination done by stressing metal is an advantage of cold lamination. But this type of hardening is lost if metal is heated at re-crystallization temperature, which is lower than the temperature stated above.

Hot rolled beams are also hardened during the controlled cooling process.

Both type can loose strength if heated above 260 degrees Celsius through a process called re-growth (of crystals).

Because of the dynamics of the fire, the oxygen from the air in any burning building cannot reach inside if there's something to burn outside first, simply for being consumed. Any firefighter knows it is not a good idea to break windows or open doors if unnecessary, that only bringing more oxygen and intensifying the fire.

With all these being said i think it's easy now for everybody to figure that if the steel towers were designed in a more "classical" fashion, with vertical beams way inside, the air and fire could not have reached to create near the beams the temperatures necessary to weaken them being consumed by the fire in the windows area.

Once the breakage started at one floor, the rest of the building above will start falling reaching enough moving energy to break he floor under. Simply because the outer beams where thicker towards the bottom of the tower, breaking first in the weakest area which was always at the floor under the breakage front. In a way, it was like a controlled demolition, only by design.

Inside the floors they were enough materials like concrete that would put out vast amounts of harmful dust that would cover significant areas around for a long time.

A Trip at Tryon

Tesla and Bosnian Pyramids.

Since, at least for myself, i have established in my mind that the rulers of Egypt were Northern Europeans (here is Thor with an Ank like artifact, Thor, Horus), i came back to the subject of relatively recently discovered Pyramids of Bosnia. First, we should note the proximity with the place of birth of Nikola Tesla, the greatest inventor of our known recent civilization which accelerated the use and production of electricity. There are other inventions of his including several about transmitting power and information wirelessly around those being lots of confusion and other inventions, some hidden. Some even claimed he discovered forms of free energy and geo-weapons.

Here are a couple of screenshots from free Google Earth. The first shows a birds-eye view of the one of the so called pyramids.
By looking at the today's geometry of the formation we may note it is possible than underneath the vegetation and soil we may distinguish the northern and eastern faces of a pyramid while the other two may have been eroded or even quarried. We can notice the cardinal directions' (north, east, south, and west) orientation similar to the pyramids of Giza of the two distinguishable sides or faces, that of east and north.

Within the second screenshot there is a measurement again done on Google Earth of the distance between the so called pyramids and the birthplace of today's civilization's game changer Nikola Tesla.

Before trying to hypothesize in directions never heard before even by the fiercest conspiracy theorists and starting to build speculations let's bring all the informations we can find of course on the web to satisfy the stipulation to the known reality regarding the subject.

At that time both Croatia and Hungary were in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Thus it makes sense Tesla studied in Austria and worked in Budapest.

"In 1875, Tesla enrolled at Austrian Polytechnic in Graz, Austria, on a Military Frontier scholarship."

"In 1881, Tesla moved to Budapest, Hungary, to work under Tivadar Puskás at a telegraph company, the Budapest Telephone Exchange." There he might have perfected the first known electronic amplifier.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#Working_at_Budapest_Telephone_Exchange

Many of Tesla's inventions are based on the principle of resonance. Radio, which was first patented by Marconi (decades later the patent was reversed to Tesla) uses this principle. Two distant oscillating circuits, an emitter and a receiver can transmit wirelessly information carried by tiny amounts of energy from one to the other if they are at resonance or build with the exact same parameters. A modern transistor or IC (integrated circuit) radio, which was perfected starting with the 50s uses a series of transistor to amplify the very week signal of a coil resonating with the emitter so the signal can be heard in a small speaker or headphone.

Above is the simplest possible radio, something i played with when i was a kid at children's club, that can work without a battery that is it completely relies on the small amount of energy transmitted by the emitter in every direction (BTW, today's radio station power is in the tens of thousands of kW at the antenna). A coil and capacitor put in parallel (connected at both ends) with each other and in series (connected at each end) with the ground and antenna provides the entire circuit. The totally passive resonating circuit is called an LC oscillator, that is made of a coil wich delays the current of a voltage applied to exchanges periodically energy with the capacitor, which anticipates the current applied to it. But for that periodic exchange or energy to happen it needs some energy from a source of power and that is radiant EM energy received by the antenna. A diode extracts the useful information which is modulated on top of the oscillating EM wave at the emitter. The variable electric field emitted by the huge FM and AM antennas on top of hills can do it. But the circuit would work or receive signal that or tiny amounts of power only at resonance, that is when its own oscillating frequency coincides with the frequency of the emitter and that can be done by tuning it either by adding or removing windings to the coil at time of building making it a fixed frequency tuned oscillator or by the use of a tuning variable capacitor instead of the fixed one in the schematics above which allows us to catch multiple stations each of a different frequency. It is more complicated than i can explain here, there are lots of sites who do just that but the point is it will draw energy from a distant emitter when tuned at the same frequency, energy that is modulated with a signal that carries useful information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit#Resonance_effect

Above is a working real life batteryless AM radio build exactly by the schematics shown above, with 4 electronic components, all passive and without any amplifier. Energy received by the antenna in the resonating circuit directly from the huge power emitters is enough to power a small headphone.

Only low levels of power can be transmitted wirelessly by radio stations. Here is an experiment done by an MIT team of students and teachers that actually duplicate some of Tesla's experiments since about a century before transmitting relatively high power levels enough to power a bulb. In the same fashion Tesla did a hundred or so years ago. These guys actually stand between the emitting and receiving coils which demonstrates even better what i'm talking about: The power is transmitted only between the two coils that resonate with each other.

What this has to do with the possible link between Tesla and Bosnian Pyramids?

Still have to bring in some more information for the purpose of this post before drawing any conclusion.

Bellow there is is an animation of an oscillating spring. If put in vacuum it could move forever if it wasn't for the intra-crystalline friction (between tiny grains or crystal of the metal). (I believe a single crystal pure quarts oscillating only mechanically in vacuum can oscillate forever, but never thought of this until now; let's put it aside for another time).

Like in any analogy, we are tempted to ask selves. Could this mechanical oscillator exchange energy with another one through the same resonance phenomenon used for transmitting electric wireless energy?

The answer is it could and it happens all the time. Tough as suggested in the animation the spring on top is linked to a stand of infinite mass and infinite rigidity that does not oscillate and does not steal any energy from the spring, that is not possible in reality. In reality the spring can be attached only to a stand which in itself has its own finite mass, elasticity and it contributes to the slowing down and ultimately stopping of the oscillation. But also to transmitting the oscillation at a distance.

What will happen though if we put another spring attached to the same stand? After a while the other spring will start to oscillate a little, depending on the size and stability of the stand, on a frequency that is a combination of its own and of the initial one. Or its own modulated with the one of the other one. As it draws more more energy through the stand from the first one it will start to oscillate more while the first start to slow down. In the end the energy will equalize in both until there is no energy to transmit from one to another, before they will stop altogether due to again internal friction and friction with the air if not in vacuum.

The closest example i can find on the web about transmitting energy between two oscillating springs at resonance

Now let's imagine a multitude of springs, not hanging but standing on a mat (of springs as well) with the weights on top and among them only two of the same parameters or own oscillating frequency.

Only the two with the same oscillating frequency will exchange energy in a similar fashion with the experiment in the video above.

Now for the conclusion all we have to do is replace again in our mind the mat with the surface of the Earth and the springs with mountains also made of rocks both the ground and the mountain being elastic and having weight with each mountain having its own oscillating frequency.

What happens with other mountains if through some means we can actually make a mountain jump up and down (of course, having only tiny but perceivable non-zero oscillations).

If there is within a relative let's say a few hundred km a mountain with the same parameters, the two will exchange oscillations.

But what happens if one of the mountains is actually a pyramid that has tunnels inside were some (people) can release balls, of different sizes and having slight eccentricity or even round balls in tunnels that have bumps? The energy of the ball that results from its height after being raised through some means or even manufactured on top of the pyramid will gradually transfer to the pyramid making it oscillate. All mountains within a certain radius having that particular frequency will start oscillate. (Misterious round spheres made of stone can be found all over the world)

It is very unlikely in real geography there will be in the distance in any direction two mountains of the same oscillating frequency. If well chosen, the ball and/or the tunnel, only one will oscillate.

That in itself will be nothing because the ball could not possibly have enough energy to create a distant earthquake, though maybe a tiny, though non-zero one. But if the distant targeted mountain sits on a seismic area which has built some energy since the last earthquake and the moment is chosen on a certain alignment Earth-Sun-Moon which can ad or maximize that energy what will happen?

There are both tunnels and balls found inside and nearby the Bosnian pyramids.


https://www.google.com/search?q=bosnia+stone+balls&source=lnms&tbm=isch

https://www.google.com/search?q=bosnian+pyramids+tunnels&source=lnms&tbm=isch

One more thing. The Bosnian pyramids are located within a few miles from Sarajevo, the place where WWI, of which end we just celebrated on 11/11, started in 1914.
and here is a picture with an alley with garages at Rolling Hills apartments. If you drive  up the alley too close from garages, you will oscillate a bit inside the car.