Hyundai Motor America

Last week i thought i finally fixed my car after i figured a way to measure oil viscosity with a straw. After figuring they put 5W30 and said it was 5W20 (manufacturer's recomandation) on May 2, i went again on May 4 and had another oil change.  The car quieted down until i came back from Lincoln City. I started to suspect somebody put oil additive in my engine but when i came back i checked viscosity again and it was not changed. But on my way i stopped at Grande Ronde and added 6 more gallon of fuel and the noise stopped again. So i figured it could be also something wrong with the fuel. So after watching some videos i tried to pull a gas sample from the car to check if it had extra aclohol which could cause problems with injectors. Could not succeed with a soft rubber tube because of a safety device the newer cars have which prevent from gas spilling during a rollover. However when i started the car the noise stopped. Then i finally figured it was the vacuum applied to the tank by the evaporative control system that was creating enough difference in fuel pressure for car to slighly missfire. Which meant the fuel pressure was marginal which could only happen if the fuel filter was clogged. So i thought it was worth it to try and change the fuel filter which probably was not changed in 55k miles or never on that car. So i watched a video on youtube on how to do that. However it is scary. No car has fuel filter inside the fuel tank. I could not possibly do it myself and i remembered Jiffy Lube declinded to do so also last year. Dealer was the only option.
I believe it was August 1st last year. I went and made an appointement for an oil change at Beaverton Hyundai. After the service person took the VIN number and made the appointement i left the dearleship. On my way out, Stan Miller, Manager of Service Department ran after me and asked me to roll the window down which i did and he told me i was banned for his dealership, for reason of "messing too much with the car". In those days i had a moisture and oil filter on the PCV line. Not the happiest choise, since then i tried many things and ended with a catch can but certainly the car was not in imediate danger of being damaged. He was in his office while the service guy made the appointement with the door open and didn't say anything in front of other people.

Previously he told me that i had my car overfilled with oil at his own service which may have resulted in oil getting in the intake. He also told me that the angle in which the nozzle is held when filling with oil matters as oil could get in the intake. He made me climb into a similar car and made me listen at the same clicking sound or worse then mine telling me "It's a Hyundai!".

I wrote here extensively about the reasons why the oil get in the intake.

Previously i asked him to replace engine head, where the noise came, he first accepted, then i changed my mind and when i asked him again he said he could to it but that would not help and he didn't want to take my money for nothing. The guy reminded me of the Australian country singer Ketih Urban.

At that dealership i had done a battery change right after buying the vehicle, at least one oil change, AC service and was banned at the attempt to do the second oil change after a long trip in southern US. The engine was still overfilled after i chaned oil at Murdoch Hyundai in Salt Lake City in the meantime. Ever since they keep sending me coupons. Today i spoke with several people, including Ale and i believe twice with Annie at their service. They kept asking me to spell my name and never calling me back. My question was if i could use the coupons and come back to do a fuel filter change. In the end i asked Annie to pull me from their mailing list and she said i have to hold for a confirmation and that kinda tipped me. I mean, why do i need a confirmation i was removed from a mail list? I'm sure they will do as they please.

Later i called the corporation where i spoke to Alexis. Never answering straight, never helping with a resolution, contradictory, bullying. I think there is a whole culture of bullying at Hyundai. She wanted to give me a case number but i remembered last time i talked to them they sent me an email after. So i'm waiting for the email.

What i wanted was either a written confirmation that i was banned or acceptance to fix my fuel filter and use the coupons they keep sending me.


Could not find the manual tonight, i found only this quick reference guide with the Maintenance schedule on the back.

How do you inspect a fuel filter? https://www.google.com/search?q=fuel+filter+inspect

How often you replace a fuel filter for a 2013 Elantra (Eternal)? Found this on a forum. Today i talked to three different people, one with an accent and one a Korean. They said you don't have to replace it.

" We changed the filter as my book says to change it at 60,000 km for warranty purposes. I don't have a lot of money and the mechanics here wanted $460.00 to replace the filter"

2014 Elantra sedan, 1.8 liter engine, similar to mine. https://www.hyundai-forums.com/md-2011-2016-elantra-sedan-coupe/637601-fuel-filter-change.html

[05-10-2019 11:00 AM]
Had it with Beaverton Hyundai. Just called Gladstone Hyundai (next as distance) and asked for a fuel tank air filter and a fuel filter. They don't have the fuel filter separately but only with pump and it costs over 400 dollars. For the other one i payed 26 and will be there 2-3 business days. Parts guy was new and i heard him talking with another guys trying to figure the parts out. Then he passed me to the cashier who asked the credit card twice and my address and phone number.

Just called Ron Tonkin Hyundai. Finally figured why they don't sell filters. They have a service called "flushing" of the fuel system which is supposed to clean the filter. They said car should also have sensors for fuel tank pressure and fuel pressure, so i should try and read those to see what's happening. Fact is if i take the fuel tank cap off and put it back on the noise (click, or tick) at the engine mostly disappears.

In the mean time i found the manual. It was sitting fallen behind the desk. There is no such thing as "flushing" of the fuel system or replacing the fuel filter. It's still a mistery to me as what's hapeening.

The laws of common sense say that if the gasoline has dirt in it (and all gasoline has some) the filter should catch it and in the process it will saturate with that dirt needing replacment.

There are some contradiction regarding fuel filter replacement in this page. It is not clear what the word "clean" means. Hope it is not a joke since this is the first time when i heard a filter can be cleaned. It is true i go on the patio from time to time and blow my hepa and carbon filters in the opposite direction to air flow to remove some dust and prolong their life. However i don't see how you can revert flow in that filter while in place and if you do so how you don't contaminate your hole fule tank. I will come back tomorrow with a clearer picture (need some day light, flash creates reflection) and Mannix starts right now at 2 AM on the west coast. As far as replacement goes, i cannot find any filter at the dealers without the pump.

[05-11-2019 4:17 PM]
Al modern cars built since January 1 1996 have an serial interface with the on-board computer called OBDII. (On board Diagnostic). Provided you have a tool you can interface with the computer, read sensor readings and set parameters. You could also change the whole software. The tools in the past cost thousands of dollars, now you can to it with a bluetooth device and a $2.99 App from Microsoft. Here is the screenshot with the readings of the fuel tank pressure sensor, done outside the purge phase of the evap system.  I had a similar software on the tablet, which i paid 10 dollars for (Torque) but since i reset the tablet last time cannot download it unless if i pay again. (Free version could also read sensors but it doesn't work.) So it's really hard to read that sensor during purge cycle to diagnose the system. Computer is supposed to throw a check engine light if the pressure does not go down enough within that cycle, which involves applying vacuum to the thank. However if you have a clogged fuel tank air filter (which i never knew existed) that is not going to show up. (Together with oh so many malfunctions the computer can't catch and won't turn a check engine light on.)

This car before me has been driven on a road that had pine needles on it and it had a layer of half inch of those on the mud flaps on the rear wheels. That filter is located under one of those flaps on left rear but is exposed to dirt from the road, which puzzles me. I just ordered one of those at ... Gladstone Hyundai and i think if i remove half of the mud flap i can do it here in the parking lot and also take a picture of the location. Is it possible that that filter let dirt contaminate the fuel tank which in turn contaminated the fuel filter that is downstream from the pump and for this car is located inside the tank, an unusual or even unique design so it's very hard to replace as shown in the video above and could not be order separately.

By interfacing with the computer i also figured there is no fuel pressure sensor, which is common for this class of vehicles. Because of that, a "flushing" of the system that is supposed to clean the fuel filter, offered both by dealer and Jiffy lube cannot be measured or quantified. Also the car does not a fuel line port to measure the fuel pressure with the engine on which is unusual for this class of cars and is impossible to evaluate or "inspect" the fuel filter as recommended in the manual seen in the picture above.

Russia and History of Linguistics

My frustration only grew when i tried to search for more aggressive instances of looking into history from the point of view of linguistics. As with many possibly interconnected scientific fields, there are not even established definitions or work protocols and methodologies. Nothing strong i can refer to in what follows.

There are many scientists (in Romania we use the French term "savant" in a rather sarcastic sense) in all areas of study. In fact so many in each area no one could drop one needle in there (another Romanian expression trying to describe extreme occupancy of a narrow space). There are also suspicions (from my part) that they actually cover each other in stagnation and all kinda time wasting heresies. (We saw so many useless studies and claims like about healing cancer and AIDS in the last decades while nothing really happens in reality).

Narrow specialization leads to some sort of monopoly of scientific branches over certain areas of study. The savants get so good in their field no one can even dare to say a word. They become supreme authorities and nothing can be done anymore without the approval of the leader of the clan towards whom all hosannas converge. But who knows what really happens under the curtain of specialized terms and works and barrage of biased media articles. That is how much work and progress is being made.

But how could we possibly have savants in two different areas in the same time if (artificial) competition and time needed to be each on top of his game in a certain area does not allow one to specialize in two areas which sometimes are not apparently related, like by example history and linguistics?

We have an "official science" called "History of linguistics" which as the title says, takes care of history of linguistics. Very few people would even thing about that. However much more useful would be one that would study History of Languages, not even dare to think of a branch of history named Linguistic History, or history studied from the point of view of evolution and transfer of words and languages.

Probably on the opposite side is the holistic approach. I say probably because i rarely see attempts to look at things from more than one narrow point of view so i can only imagine. With much less resources and bibliographies to read, sometimes simply putting together basic facts from two or more disciplines (which i have to admit, i've done a lot lately) reveal things that no one can even dream or maybe could have never been discovered.

We all at least in High School are though lots of basic facts from different disciplines. However there is a total lack of integration between them and forgetting all those, either after specialization in faculties or having a full life is the general idea).


So here comes the example. One simple etymology reveals and attempts to state tantalizing facts that are not (strongly) implemented in current history of countries. And confirm the whole story i wrote about so far. And reveal controversies arisen from contradictions between two sciences on the same subject. Or lack of harmonization. Or lack of integration.

"Etymology[edit]

Main article: Rus' (name)

Europe in the 9th century. Roslagen is located along the coast of the northern tip of the pink area marked "Swedes and Goths".

The etymology and semantic history of the word Rus' has been a highly contentious topic, on which debate is ongoing. This is partly because of a widespread assumption that by identifying the linguistic origin of the name Rus', scholars can identify the origins of the people whom it described. This assumption has, however, been criticized in twenty-first-century scholarship.^[2][3]

According to the prevalent theory, the name Rus', like the Finnish name for Sweden(Ruotsi), is derived from an Old Norse term for "the men who row" (rods-) as rowing was the main method of navigating the rivers of Eastern Europe, and that it could be linked to the Swedish coastal area of Roslagen (Rus-law) or Roden, as it was known in earlier times.^[4][5] The name Rus' would then have the same origin as the Finnish and Estonian names for Sweden: Ruotsi and Rootsi.^[6][7]

In absence of any other attempts Wikipedia has become the only scientific multidisciplinary integration tool we know of. Here because of the way it was designed, people of different backgrounds can write and edit articles. It is the only place where, in this case historians and linguists can come together and talk in the view of public. However there are others who are watching and interfering. Occasional politicians. Wannabe quick fixers of this upside down world.

The above section. Obviously lacking necessary level of English. This is a sign somebody with strong convictions but little refinement has written parts of it. Word scholarship is used nowadays in English mostly for financing of students and very little as describing the scientific establishment. Or maybe the statement is sarcastic.

The fact one theory has opponents however does not mean it is not true. Probably those who don't like very much the fact that Russians and Swedes have a partially common origin. And those would not be necessarily the swedes who probably don't care except if they are polarized by politicians and lunatics that can speak and write. Those who are part of the anti-Russia propaganda machine at work in western countries for at least one century. Enemies of both people or all European native people. As for Russians, they even didn't wake up yet from one century long imprisonment in their own country or space or whatever.

First. It is unclear to me what Finish are. There are claims they are related in the western hemisphere of our planet only to Hungarians. The so called ugric connection. However, since i've been studied lately extensively but on isolated issues (it's really hard to study as a whole something that doesn't seem even been put together, like histories of all countries) the history of Hungarians which by the way is again full of controversies arised by their own historian and others who looked into it, i fail to fully understand it. Could it be a pre-Magyar relationship from a simultaneous migration to the north, both coming from Mesopotamia. (Sumer).

One thing is clear so far. Finish in northern Europe are as aliens as Hungarian in central. Vaguely connected linguistically and culturally with each other, heavily influenced and influencing including genetically in the last thousand of years their reacting hosts, they lost, until recently, a strong connection with each other. (Finland influence in the whole world nowadays is enormous for such a small country, if it was to talk only about Helsinki Accords, Linus Torvalds or Nokia).

But what do you do when you have strong contradiction scientific statements made in view of public within the same field of science which is history?

https://www.google.com/search?q=finland+history

"A part of the Kingdom of Sweden from 13th century until 1809, it then became an autonomous duchy of the Russian Empire until 1917, when it declared independence." (New world order which started after WWI or earlier after Tunguska event).

First entry in this one phrase history of Finland from google is since 13th century when it is said it became part of kingdom of Sweden. Obviously, in the other page quoted above it is said that the name Rus, or Kievan Rus kingdom starting in 10th century was given possibly by the... Finish!

Not much better in Wikipedia. First written account, 12 century. Though, through linguistics, that is etymology of the word Rus, they existed and have been highly influential before 10th century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland

It came at no surprise to me when i read this.

http://www.mongolia-web.com/opinion/2084-are-the-finns-the-mongolians-of-europe/

"This would also imply that Finno-Ugric languages in Finland were preceded by a North-Western Indo-European language, at least to the extent the latter can be associated with the Cord Ceramic culture"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland#Chronology_of_languages_in_Finland

"From 3200 BC onwards, either immigrants or a strong cultural influence from south of the Gulf of Finland settled in southwestern Finland. This culture was a part of the European Battle Axe cultures, which have often been associated with the movement of the Indo-European speakers."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Finland#Merovingian_period:_575_AD_%E2%80%93_800_AD

Due to great stress from the controlled environment i live in i will cut this very short for now:

My hypothesis (ans is built mostly on linguistic but integrated with known historic, cultural and archaeologically confirmed facts and especially with modern history and events) is after the fall of Ur, first state city in the world and great Sumerian Civilization which began due to climate changes around year -2000, Sumerians started to migrate north and went all the way to Scandinavia, Mongolia and Japan but some remained as south as Turkey, Iran, Iraq. Etymologies like Ural Mountains, Ukraine - ugric, Sami people, Samurai, Sumo wrestling, Orkhon River, but also Europe, which is recent, countless others are there to prove it. In India they came from back south starting around Aral Sea and became known as Arians (Aryan Invasion Theory, around -1500). Culturally, linguistically and genetically opposed to Indo European as Scandinavia and obviously Europe and India originally were, they were/are persistent people, with much extraordinarily ancient knowledge, of which some was un-accessible even to them until they re-gained more tools to look into old Sumerian and possibly Egyptian or Indian writings they might had have access to which suddenly brought to us all the technologically advances of the last century that seem to converge all to a great deception. From a different moment or time or different world.

Are they about to restore their ancient possibly advanced civilization this time on planetary scale (and of course eliminate all non-Aryans).

For all these reason they don't need a branch of history called Lingustics (based) History. They don't need anything new in science cause they already got all they need.

I am not completely satisfied with this blog post but i think i touched the important points. Also have some surprised in searches which compensate for not being able to write it the way i wanted due to great interference from outside like synchronized noises (which may seem to an observer normal).

Random Facts About Jainism

Out of the top of my head, interesting fact about Jainism i cannot connect yet.

Word Jain and Jina seem to have a semantic connection with the word ninja. Jina means victor in Sanskrit.

Jainism as religion emphasizes non-violence. So ninjutsu.

"Paradoxically, there are no aggressive acts of violence in ninjutsu, as violence only begets more violence and can never lead to a happy ending."

https://medium.com/classical-martial-arts/ninjutsu-%E5%BF%8D%E8%A1%93-c042ab5191e8

Jainism is a non-theistic religion, if one can imagine anything like it. However they believe in immortality and perfection of souls. From this point of view, Scientology is similar. Thetans (souls) in Scientology are omniscient and benevolent though they have forgotten their true nature. Mahavira and Buddha where contemporary. However the name Ron L Hubbard can be almost annagrammed as L(iving) Buddha Reborn. Buddha is a god-like figure in ... Buddhism.

Could the palm symbol that pops on a google image search on term have anything to do with the practice of auditing in Scientology.

https://i.etsystatic.com/19800242/r/il/10b7be/1885205001/il_1588xN.1885205001_kvw5.jpg

Ninjutsu and some religions possibly including Jainism have a practice called Kuji-in.

Swastika symbol. Believe it or not, swastika in Sanskrit literary means "it is sweet".

Gothic cathedral spires share a similar form with structures on Jain temples.

There seem to be a connection between the Rastafarian flag and Jain flag. Also name of God in Rastafarianism is Jah. There is a lion on the Rastafarian flag, while Mahavira (mostly unknown name of founder) in Jainism is associated with lion. Country name Japan.

Iron like Lion in Zion (assoctiation with Xenu?)

Both Scientology and Jainism are non-theistic. Because they hope they will raise to goodhood. That is level 8 in Scientology and whatever fusion with Brahma in Jainism (inherited from Hinduism). That means every one of them will become god in this or a future life. That's why they must perfect selves and the world.

"a person who is able to create his own universe"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Thetan#OT_VIII:_Truth_Revealed

There is one question i have to all who have reached or promised this. Will you create your own universe (which can be hard to imagine much different than as a branch of the current we all live in) with or without your friends or family. Cause if you chose to keep your friends and family, they will all become whatever you wish and thus not having their personalities anymore.

Of course most punished would be Xenu. If billions of thetans chose to branch out each on their own that means Xenu would be multiplied by as many times and would have to suffer as slave billions of times for eternities.

There is of course a betters solution to all problems. Al thetans could agree for a convergent universe where they all could share their godhood status. I mean they could all be like a team of gods in an universe they choose to be their own. This way at least they won't be alone each in their own (universe).
But i think this has been done already. Hollywood. Music industry. The team of gods. 20th century history.

There is at least one conclusion i can draw already not only related to the facts above but with other from my daily experience. Scientologists, Jainists, others are doing their work to perfect society so they can live better next lives so they can perfect selves throughout all reincarnation cycles until they reach nirvana.

Openly through influential movies and organizations. Politics. Covert through allegoric live shows on dark web. (But a live show won't be nothing, wouldn't draw any audience without strong typed characters, including negative).

There is no telling what these guys would do, besides not harming others. Today i saw yet another woman at an intersection biting her lip because she missed her opportunity because yet again i stopped in time.

They don't care about their lives because they know they will be reincarnated and won't do harm to others because of their believes (Still have some lingering emotions because they live in material bodies). But they can arrange rendez-vouss with destiny karma like they one described above. Who knows if in a just born parallel universe their wishes don't come true. But only of true believers. Those who are still here (only the good die) have to keep on trying.

Also there's no telling in what they will do "to expose evil in society" just to em-better them, so their next lives will be better. Sometimes they need to bring out the evil so it will become apparent and that is probably what they did through manipulation in Europe causing the two world wars and thus purifying the world.

About financing. Besides income from big Hollywood production and donations (Scientology).

https://www.google.com/search?q=jainism+diamond+business

Întrebările referendumului.

Citesc știrile. Majoritatea pe un ton copilăresc, așa cum le place românilor, integrează câte o mică strâmbă. Lucruri nu foarte foarte grave dar mereu nelalocul lor. Toate împreună, după luni, ani și decenii sucesc mintea celor care le citesc.

A venit și Putin și a spus o jumătate de adevăr. Cu ce sunt rușii diferiți de europeni. Cu ce sunt românii diferiți de europeni.

Au sosit acum o mie de la poalele Himalaei, în mijlocul Europei, o misiune cât o țărișoară, cu scopul de a pune mai întâi mâna pe cele mai bogate rezerve de aur ale Eurasiei și apoi a se infiltra, diviza și pregăti cucerirea Europei, ceea ce s-a și materializat, după două războaie fratricide, prin influență separată, în UE. Rușii, românii, ce a fost la est de ei s-au despărțit încet încet cultural de vest iar misionarii iluziei infiltrați printre ei au influențat mereu trendurile locale mereu ciudate, mereu cu ceva lipsă la inventar.

Nu știu cum să mai spun altfel. Citiți cu mai multă atenție fiecare "știre" în parte și veți descoperi ce este nelalocul lui. Un exemplu:

"Întrebarea unu este la fel de mălăiață ca și autorul. Iar cea de –a doua, la fel de încruntată și de contorsionată ca și el. De ce este necinstită întrebarea a doua? Pentru că nu este o întrebare. Este o o frază cu patru picioare. Sau o capră cu patru picioare." [autorul articolului are aici un punct, întrebarea a doua este într-adevăr multiplă deși la fel de aiurea ca și prima].

https://www.cotidianul.ro/intrebarea-cel-putin-patrupeda-a-presedintelui/

Întrebările referendumului. La fel ca și știrile, naive, inutile și fără altă consecință decât angajarea românilor pe probleme false și pierderea timpului. O lună începând de astăzi, toți românii se vor gândi folosind timpul lor cel mai bun, ce să răspundă. Există însă un șir lung de întrebări care așteaptă răspuns în mintea cetățeanului democrat de ani de zile. Iohannis tocmai a adăugat câteva la ele.

„1 - Sunteți de acord cu interzicerea amnistiei și grațierii pentru infracțiuni de corupție?"

Infracțiunile de corupție sunt orice fel de infracțiuni (din Codul Penal căci acolo sunt infracțiunile) cu daune mai mari de 20.000 sau 200.000 de euro? Există o asemenea infracțiune în Codul Penal? Corupție? (în afară de corupere de minori).

https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direc%C8%9Bia_Na%C8%9Bional%C4%83_Anticorup%C8%9Bie

"2 - Sunteți de acord cu interzicerea adoptării de către Guvern a ordonanțelor de urgență în domeniul infracțiunilor, pedepselor și al organizării judiciare și cu extinderea dreptului de a ataca ordonanțele direct la Curtea Constituțională?”

Să aducem în față Articolul 115 (6) din Constituție: Ordonanţele de urgenţă nu pot fi adoptate în domeniul legilor constituţionale, nu pot afecta regimul instituţiilor fundamentale ale statului, drepturile, libertăţile şi îndatoririle prevăzute de Constituţie, drepturile electorale şi nu pot viza măsuri de trecere silită a unor bunuri în proprietate publică.

Este organizarea judiciară ca parte din justiție, o instituție fundamentală a statului?

Acest paragraf din Constituție este de exemplu (sunt multe altele) încălcat flagrant (în văzul tuturor dar neștiința multora) și de atâția ani prin înființarea DNA prin OUG.

"Instituțiile sunt un set de reguli formale sau reguli informale generatoare de ordine în raporturile sociale".

https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institu%C8%9Bie

Este Codul Penal o instituție fundamentală a statului? (PSD a trecut însă la modificarea lui prin lege după ce a amenințat îndelung România că o va face prin OUG. Va trece nu va trece această lege de sesizarea PNL, de semnătura Președintelui. Vom vedea).

Ultima parte a întrebării. Extinderea dreptului de a ataca ordonanțele direct la Curtea Constituțională. Dreptul cui? Implică asta modificarea Constituției? Care articol și paragraf? Va fi lăsată această modificare a Constituției la decizia CCR după referendum?

Articolul 146 litera i) [CCR] veghează la respectarea procedurii pentru organizarea şi desfășurarea referendumului şi confirmă rezultatele acestuia.

Orodnanțele nu pot intra în vigoare decât după depunerea lor în Parlament. În acel moment ele devin proiecte de legi și pot fi atacate ca atare de Președinte, un număr de deputați, Avocatul Poporului, etc.. Nu-mi amintesc de nici o ordonanță de urgență să fi fost atacată vreodată pe această cale de vreun președinte.

Articolul 115 (5) Ordonanţa de urgenţă intră în vigoare numai după depunerea sa spre dezbatere în procedură de urgenţă la Camera competentă să fie sesizată şi după publicarea ei în Monitorul Oficial al României. Camerele, dacă nu se află în sesiune, se convoacă în mod obligatoriu în 5 zile de la depunere sau, după caz, de la trimitere. Dacă în termen de cel mult 30 de zile de la depunere, Camera sesizată nu se pronunţă asupra ordonanţei, aceasta este considerată adoptată şi se trimite celeilalte Camere care decide de asemenea în procedură de urgenţă. Ordonanţa de urgenţă cuprinzând norme de natura legii organice se aprobă cu majoritatea prevăzută la articolul 76 alineatul (1) .

Articolul 146
Curtea Constituţională are următoarele atribuţii:
a) se pronunţă asupra constituţionalităţii legilor, înainte de promulgarea acestora, la sesizarea Preşedintelui României, a unuia dintre preşedinţii celor două Camere, a Guvernului, a Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie, a Avocatului Poporului, a unui număr de cel puţin 50 de deputaţi sau de cel puţin 25 de senatori, precum şi, din oficiu, asupra iniţiativelor de revizuire a Constituţiei;

Și rămâne problema cea mai importantă. Binecunoscuta lege 341/2013. Acesta este al doilea referendum organizat după intrarea în vigoare a acestei legi. O lungă serie de legi neconstituționale, pe care nu le mai amintesc aici pentru a nu mări confuzia, culminând cu această lege a adus pas cu pas la această practică juridică greu de imaginat. Un referendum inclusiv unul pentru modificarea Constituției se poate organiza acum în România cu prezența a numai 30% din înscriși în listele electorale permanente, 25% voturi valide și atenție:12,5% aprobare!

Articolul 2 [din Constituție]
(1) Suveranitatea naţională aparţine poporului român, care o exercită prin organele sale reprezentative, constituite prin alegeri libere, periodice şi corecte, precum şi prin referendum.
(2) Nici un grup şi nici o persoană nu pot exercita suveranitatea în nume propriu.

30% din electorat este un grup, nu? Poporul român cu drept de vot nu poate fi 30%, nu?

(După ce am scris postarea prima dată PSD venit cu un truc și a spus că în registrul electoral sunt mai mulți cetățeni înscriși decât pe listele electorale permanente. De ce când ar trebuie să fie aceiași. Ei știu mai bine fiindcă guvernează țara de 3 ani. Sau poate s-au pregătit pentru situația când cineva va spune asta în public). Așa că voi corecta. Pe o listă mai lungă sau mai scurtă e vorba tot de 30%).

De asemenea, legile referendumului, la fel ca toate care afectează "regimul instituțiilor fundamentale din România" nu pot fi modificate prin OUG. Legea 341/2013 care modifică acest cvorum la 30% este neconstituțională.

Legea 341/2013 trebuie abrogată de CCR ca fiind neconstituțională. În acest moment o pot face (ca lege promulgată), în baza Articolului 146 d) Avocatul Poporului dar și orice cetățean român, care poate da în judecată Statul și ridica o excepție de neconstituționalitate (în mod similar cum au făcut-o cei doi cu căsătoria lor falsă din Belgia).

Articolul 146 d) [CCR] hotărăşte asupra excepţiilor de neconstituţionalitate privind legile şi ordonanţele, ridicate în faţa instanţelor judecătoreşti sau de arbitraj comercial; excepţia de neconstituţionalitate poate fi ridicată şi direct de Avocatul Poporului;

Vanilla Ice Cream

Vanillin vs Methamphetamine


Yo, VIP, let's kick it!
Ice ice baby
Ice ice baby
All right stop
Collaborate and listen
Ice is back with my brand new invention
Something grabs a hold of me tightly
Then I flow that a harpoon daily and nightly
Will it ever stop?
Yo, I don't know
Turn off the lights and I'll glow
To the extreme, I rock a mic like a vandal
Light up a stage and wax a chump like a candle
Dance
Bum rush the speaker that booms
I'm killin' your brain like a poisonous mushroom
Deadly, when I play a dope melody
Anything less that the best is a felony
Love it or leave it
You better gain way
You better hit bull's eye
The kid don't play
If there was a problem
Yo, I'll solve it
Check out the hook while my DJ revolves it
Ice ice baby Vanilla
Ice ice baby Vanilla
Ice ice baby Vanilla
Ice ice…


Ephedrine aka adrenaline.

"Ephedra is a type of shrub whose extract has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for over 5,000 years. In 1885, Nagai Nagayoshi—a Japanese chemist studying in Germany—identified the active chemical in ephedra, a stimulant called ephedrine.

Methamphetamine was difficult to make until 1919, when another Japanese chemist—Akira Ogata—streamlined the process. He used phosphorus and iodine to reduce the ephedrine into a crystallized form, creating the world’s first crystal meth."

"Methamphetamine triggers a response in the body that’s similar to adrenaline, heightening alertness and a willingness to take risks."

"During World War II, the Allies and Axis powers both used the drug to keep troops awake."

https://www.history.com/topics/crime/history-of-meth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulf_Ekberg

The only non-theistic religion i've heard of so far was Scientology

https://www.google.com/search?q=Jain+Dharma%2C+is+an+ancient%2C+non-theistic%2C+Indian+religion

Gassing is non-violent, right?