Acting on Wrong Assumptions

"What a tangled web we weave"

Implying or creating time synchronized information that is not related to but makes it statistically reasonable for someone to believe something that is not real, isn't similar to tempting?

Knowingly creating situations that are statistically more likely to cause someone to fail in their actions, or damage to their health isn't similar to persecuting?

Creating or bringing in the spotlight events or information similar but unrelated with other events with the purpose of creating confusion,  hesitations, misinterpretations, lowering resolve or forgetting, isn't that misleading?

Creating a string of events that verify each other and storing all the information created with the purpose of justifying one of them, usually the most important, in case it succeeds, can't event think of a definition here.

Breaking daily and hourly numerous other laws in the process of committing all of the above.

How many times these misdoings are multiplied over the years and if they are many people involved and everything is coordinated so the above mentioned informations and situations are integrated into the larger picture of an entire fake reality with the purpose of verifying each other down to a certain level?

What kind of society is the one that allows all this happen within its structure of authorities?

Băsescu Look-Alike

Nicson, Ceauşescu

"President Nixon announced today he is going to be the first US chief executive to visit a Communist country - Romania."

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=6NcvAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Q1cDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4159,5961914&dq=nixon+romania+visit&hl=en

"Ceausescu agreed with Nixon that there were basic differences in the two governments and said these differences had caused problems in the past. But, he assured Nixon, there were still grounds for cooperation between the United States and Romania in scientific and cultural development. "

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=5FozAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iDIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=4207,2172498&dq=nixon+romania&hl=en

https://www.google.com/search?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&tbm=nws&gl=us&as_q=nixon%20rumania%20visit&as_occt=any&as_drrb=a&tbs=ar%3A1&authuser=0#hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sa=X&psj=1&ei=kiixT5ytN-uWiQfGjJX2CA&ved=0CDMQBSgA&q=nixon+romania+visit&spell=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=b63f0232fc7dce2f&biw=1028&bih=544

Freud

There must have been a reason Freud developed his theories in Vienna.

Where East meets West. In fact, a lot of things happened in there, including the studies of Eminescu and Tesla (no, the later studied in Graz).

"peoples originated from interstellar deities (termed Theozoa) who bred by electricity, while “lower” races were a result of interbreeding between humans and ape-men (or Anthropozoa). The effects of racial crossing caused the atrophy of paranormal powers inherited from the gods, but these could be restored by the selective breeding of pure Aryan lineages."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theozoology#Theozoology

Which reminds me of this:

"Scientology teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology

WT...

I was sitting at my computer with a cup of coffee the TV was open i didn't pay attention they were a bunch of people with some glasses sitting at a table and then i don't know why i took a closer look and then i realized what they were talking about, luckily enough i had time to grab my camera and let you all witness this. It just happened, today after 1:00 PM.

Mammatus

Mamatus?

Click on the picture for a better view. Click on the blue link for more images.

Români, vi s-a pregătit ceva...

Picture this. Your relative is calling you on the phone from thousands of miles, several phone companies, thousands of fiber optics repeaters, one cell phone tower away. One hand on the TV remote and the other on the phone. Which do you press first? Would you give up a few minutes of hot debate on TV about the latest models' scandals, pseudo news or sugary soaps, or let your relative hear them in the background, after all it's them who are calling, bothering us with their home sickness and strange ideas about normality, make them feel closer to what's like to be home.

Imaginaţi-vă. O rudă vă sună la telefon de la o distanţă de mii de km, câteva firme telefonice, mii de repetitoare de fibră optică şi un turn de celulare. Cu o mână pe telefon şi una pe telecomandă. Pe care să alegi? Ai renunţa la câteva minute de dezbatere aprinsă la TV despre ultimele scandaluri ale vreunei modele, pseudo-ştiri sau telenovele siropoase sau îl laşi şi pe ruda ta să le asculte în background, doar ei sunt cei care sună, deranjându-ne cu dorul lor de casă şi idei ciudate despre normalitate, să-i facem astfel să se simtă mai aproape de cum e să fii acasă.

http://designinstruct.com/digital-art/photo-manipulation/how-to-create-a-dark-and-mysterious-tv-head-scene/

Wettest March Ever

http://www.kgw.com/news/March-2012-headed-for-Portlands-5th-wettest-ever-145166775.html

Hanno toccato la Luna

În sfârşit a apărut traducerea în italiană a acestei melodii (data postării). Cred că vorbesc în numele tuturor românilor dacă vreau să le "mulţumesc" aici tuturor dj-eilor care au difuzat această melodie când am fost în România în 2004, fără să aibă cea mai mică idee despre versuri. Nu are rost să-i mulţumesc lui Nino, fiindcă el probabil ştie ce-a făcut. I-am scris atunci un email pe care îl mai am cred şi l-am întrebat de traducerea în italiană sau o limbă "de circulaţie" iar el mi-a răspuns cu o scrisoare generică, plina de patriotism local, în care printre altele spunea că nu înţelege de ce lumea vrea să cânte mai mult în italiană (eu l-am întrebat doar de traducerea versurilor). Acum poate va răspunde, dar bănuiesc că la fel ca mulţi alţii, indirect şi pe alte canale. În schimb prin acel email am devenit fan oficial al său, fără să vreau, şi am rămas aşa probabil până când dintr-un motiv tehnic nu am mai primit acel newsletter sau am signed out, nu-mi amintesc. Pe atunci am fost intrigat de cât de mult s-a dat la radio în România această melodie în vara lui 2004 în ciuda faptului că nimeni nu înţelegea versurile, în afară de câteva cuvinte.

Aceste fotografii au fost făcută de mine la biserica ortodoxă românească din Oregon City. Tipul se numește Tudor Toader, am fost coleg cu el la AVX. El seamănă mult cu Nino d'Angelo și îmi spunea fratello dar când încercam să vorbesc italiană cu el punea capul în jos și nu spunea nimic. După ce "fata lui Aurel Popescu" cu care a fost căsătorit a murit de cancer (Ana Blandiana cred) s-a căsătorit cu Cornelia (Elena Udrea, Ibolya Olah, Angela Gheorghiu, etc.). El împreună cu Cornelia erau un fel de gospodari ai bisericii și organizau picnicuri.

Aceasta este una din camerele de producție suedeză Hasselblad care a fost pe lună. Ea se vinde acum cu vreun milion de dolari. Se poate vedea că îi lipsește ornamentele din piele care au fost lipite cu un adeziv pe părțile exterioare. Se știe că pe lună ziua temperatura poate atinge 200 de grade, suficient să prăjească acea piele și filmul dinăuntru. Dar poate că le-au ținut la umbră când au făcut pozele și au scos filmele repede și le-au băgat în buzunar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasselblad

Roma

"Mon esprit est pareil à la tour qui succombe

Sous les coups du bélier infatigable et lourd."

http://fleursdumal.org/poem/208

You're So Vain

Pretty Woman

Niko Niko Rice And Zoi Yogurt

Different DNA

"Most eukaryotic chromosomes include packaging proteins which, aided by chaperone proteins, bind to and condense the DNA molecule to prevent it from becoming an unmanageable tangle."

However there is a phase in cellular mitosis (division) when, before replication, chromosomes need to be unpackaged.

How do they manage to remain a "manageable tangle" during that period?

BTW there is another thing i don't understand in this video that shows a strand already unpackaged being processed by the enzymes helicase/polymerase to create two strands. Where it comes from the "material" added by the polymerase to create the second strand?

Can a packed chromosome perform the same function like transmitting information to ribosomes on how to build protein as an unpacked one? How fragment copies of DNA pass that "scaffolding" (image below)?

According to current theories, human chromosomes' "double stranded helicoidal DNA" range in length from 51 million to 245 million base pairs of atoms. At actual size, an average human cell chromosome totals up to 3 meters long and a few angstroms (10 to minus 10 meters) wide, made of two very long strings (strands) of atoms linked together as pairs. The longest known molecule.

To replicate, each double helix has to unwind and separate in two strands and and each strand of course has to stay in one piece. Each strand then acts as a template for a new strand or its new pair that needs to be packed back together. But at least at a certain moment when it is unpacked, it should be indeed an "unimaginable tangle".

And who or what is doing the job of unpacking/packing, scaffolding, etc..?

If you take a look at the picture below you'll see the 5 levels of winding or packaging of the DNA. At least at three different levels the DNA is packed with different types of "fiber".

http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/pix/eukchromosome.jpg

Chromosomes are visible under microscope. Here is a video showing the very moment of the separation of the chromosomes during the mitosis (dividing) of one cell.

However no unpacking, unwinding/rewinding etc. of the double helix strands is apparent. They appear to separate like they were in the final stage from the picture above. According to the current theory the video basically shows each chromosome as a clew separating into two without any unwinding.

This video (animation) catches and earlier phase, "condensation" but still no replication. Condensation appears to be the last level of packaging as in the image above.